{"id":198599,"date":"2018-07-17T09:39:00","date_gmt":"2018-07-17T04:09:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=198599"},"modified":"2018-07-21T17:24:36","modified_gmt":"2018-07-21T11:54:36","slug":"sc-modified-bombay-high-courts-order-as-an-interim-measure-during-the-pendency-of-appeal-in-a-divorce-petition","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/17\/sc-modified-bombay-high-courts-order-as-an-interim-measure-during-the-pendency-of-appeal-in-a-divorce-petition\/","title":{"rendered":"SC modifies Bombay High Court’s order as an interim measure during the pendency of appeal in a divorce petition"},"content":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court: <\/strong>A bench of N.V. Ramana and S. Abdul Nazeer JJ., modified the order of the High Court of Bombay in a divorce petition filed seeking for the modification of the maintenance and alimony amount.<\/p>\n

The facts of the case state that the appellant (wife) had filed a petition under Section 27(1)(d) of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 before the Family Court in Mumbai seeking permanent alimony of Rs 30,00,00,000\/- and interim maintenance of Rs 3,50,000\/- for herself along with Rs 2,50,000\/- for her minor daughter. Though, the Family Court had partly allowed the appellant\u2019s application for interim maintenance. On obtaining the final order of divorce from the family Court and being dissatisfied with the same, the parties preferred an appeal to the High Court. Further, the appellant being aggrieved of the order of the High Court approached the Supreme Court seeking relief.<\/p>\n

Therefore, the Supreme Court on considering the facts and orders passed by the High Court and Family court observed that considering the merits of the order of the High Court it did not require interference. In order to balance the interests of the parties, the Supreme Court modified the High Court\u2019s order by allowing the withdrawal of Rs 2 Crores by the wife during intra-appeal as an interim measure. [Udita Nabha v. Ranjeet Nabha,2018 SCC OnLine SC 695<\/a>, dated 16-07-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court: A bench of N.V. Ramana and S. Abdul Nazeer JJ., modified the order of the High Court of Bombay in <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":154914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[16391,30163,31014,31015],"class_list":["post-198599","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-alimony","tag-divorce-petition","tag-interim-meausre","tag-section-271d-of-the-special-marriage-act"],"yoast_head":"\nSC modifies Bombay High Court's order as an interim measure during the pendency of appeal in a divorce petition | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/17\/sc-modified-bombay-high-courts-order-as-an-interim-measure-during-the-pendency-of-appeal-in-a-divorce-petition\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"SC modifies Bombay High Court's order as an interim measure during the pendency of appeal in a divorce petition\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: A bench of N.V. Ramana and S. Abdul Nazeer JJ., modified the order of the High Court of Bombay in\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/17\/sc-modified-bombay-high-courts-order-as-an-interim-measure-during-the-pendency-of-appeal-in-a-divorce-petition\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-07-17T04:09:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-07-21T11:54:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/17\/sc-modified-bombay-high-courts-order-as-an-interim-measure-during-the-pendency-of-appeal-in-a-divorce-petition\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/17\/sc-modified-bombay-high-courts-order-as-an-interim-measure-during-the-pendency-of-appeal-in-a-divorce-petition\/\",\"name\":\"SC modifies Bombay High Court's order as an interim measure during the pendency of appeal in a divorce petition | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/17\/sc-modified-bombay-high-courts-order-as-an-interim-measure-during-the-pendency-of-appeal-in-a-divorce-petition\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/17\/sc-modified-bombay-high-courts-order-as-an-interim-measure-during-the-pendency-of-appeal-in-a-divorce-petition\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-07-17T04:09:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-21T11:54:36+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/17\/sc-modified-bombay-high-courts-order-as-an-interim-measure-during-the-pendency-of-appeal-in-a-divorce-petition\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/17\/sc-modified-bombay-high-courts-order-as-an-interim-measure-during-the-pendency-of-appeal-in-a-divorce-petition\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/17\/sc-modified-bombay-high-courts-order-as-an-interim-measure-during-the-pendency-of-appeal-in-a-divorce-petition\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/17\/sc-modified-bombay-high-courts-order-as-an-interim-measure-during-the-pendency-of-appeal-in-a-divorce-petition\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"SC modifies Bombay High Court’s order as an interim measure during the pendency of appeal in a divorce petition\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SC modifies Bombay High Court's order as an interim measure during the pendency of appeal in a divorce petition | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/17\/sc-modified-bombay-high-courts-order-as-an-interim-measure-during-the-pendency-of-appeal-in-a-divorce-petition\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"SC modifies Bombay High Court's order as an interim measure during the pendency of appeal in a divorce petition","og_description":"Supreme Court: A bench of N.V. Ramana and S. Abdul Nazeer JJ., modified the order of the High Court of Bombay in","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/17\/sc-modified-bombay-high-courts-order-as-an-interim-measure-during-the-pendency-of-appeal-in-a-divorce-petition\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-07-17T04:09:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-07-21T11:54:36+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/17\/sc-modified-bombay-high-courts-order-as-an-interim-measure-during-the-pendency-of-appeal-in-a-divorce-petition\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/17\/sc-modified-bombay-high-courts-order-as-an-interim-measure-during-the-pendency-of-appeal-in-a-divorce-petition\/","name":"SC modifies Bombay High Court's order as an interim measure during the pendency of appeal in a divorce petition | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/17\/sc-modified-bombay-high-courts-order-as-an-interim-measure-during-the-pendency-of-appeal-in-a-divorce-petition\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/17\/sc-modified-bombay-high-courts-order-as-an-interim-measure-during-the-pendency-of-appeal-in-a-divorce-petition\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","datePublished":"2018-07-17T04:09:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-21T11:54:36+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/17\/sc-modified-bombay-high-courts-order-as-an-interim-measure-during-the-pendency-of-appeal-in-a-divorce-petition\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/17\/sc-modified-bombay-high-courts-order-as-an-interim-measure-during-the-pendency-of-appeal-in-a-divorce-petition\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/17\/sc-modified-bombay-high-courts-order-as-an-interim-measure-during-the-pendency-of-appeal-in-a-divorce-petition\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/17\/sc-modified-bombay-high-courts-order-as-an-interim-measure-during-the-pendency-of-appeal-in-a-divorce-petition\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"SC modifies Bombay High Court’s order as an interim measure during the pendency of appeal in a divorce petition"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":240638,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/14\/bom-hc-if-the-wife-is-earning-something-for-livelihood-can-the-same-be-a-ground-to-refuse-alimony-under-s-24-of-hindu-marriage-act-read-courts-ruling-taking-reiterating-scs-decision\/","url_meta":{"origin":198599,"position":0},"title":"Bom HC | If the wife is earning something for livelihood, can the same be a ground to refuse alimony under S. 24 of Hindu Marriage Act? Read Court’s ruling reiterating SC’s decision","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 14, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0Mangesh S. Patil, J., in the present application directed the husband to pay an amount of Rs 10,000 towards alimony pendente lite under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act. Petitioner-wife has impugned the order passed by the Family Court, Judge wherein her application was rejected in which\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":211802,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/12\/gau-hc-wife-granted-alimony-under-s-25-hma-in-spite-of-no-claim-agreement-with-husband\/","url_meta":{"origin":198599,"position":1},"title":"Gau HC | Wife granted alimony under S. 25 HMA in spite of ‘no claim agreement’ with husband","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 12, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Gauhati High Court:\u00a0A Bench of A.S. Bopanna, CJ and Sanjay Kumar Medhi, J. dismissed an appeal filed by the appellant-husband against family court's order granting alimony of Rs 2.5 lakhs to the respondent-wife. Undisputed facts of the case are that the parties were formerly married to each other. Some marital\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":236867,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/07\/madras-hc-once-permanent-maintenance-is-received-under-s-20-of-dv-act-yet-due-to-change-in-circumstances-if-alteration-in-maintenance-is-required-what-approach-should-be-resorted-hc-elucidates\/","url_meta":{"origin":198599,"position":2},"title":"Madras HC | Once permanent maintenance is received under S. 20 DV Act, yet due to change in circumstances if alteration in maintenance is required, what approach should be resorted? HC elucidates","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 7, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of M. Sathyanarayanan and P. Rajamanickam, JJ., addressed an appeal with regard to seeking interim maintenance when permanent maintenance was already granted. Petitioners have filed the present appeal challenging the Family Court's Order. Husband sought divorce against the first appellant(wife) on the ground of cruelty.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":264939,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/02\/alimony-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":198599,"position":3},"title":"Whether husband is entitled to claim alimony under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955? Bom HC decides","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 2, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: Bharati Dangre, J., held that provision of maintenance\/permanent alimony being a beneficial provision for the indigent spouse, Section 25 can be invoked by either of the spouse, where a decree of any kind governed by Sections 9 to 13 has been passed and marriage tie is broken,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":292691,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/20\/supreme-court-grants-divorce-under-article-142-of-the-constitution-irretrievable-breakdown-of-marriage\/","url_meta":{"origin":198599,"position":4},"title":"Irretrievable breakdown of marriage | Supreme Court invokes Article 142 of the Constitution to grant mutual consent divorce","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"May 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"This ruling is significant in the light of the judgment dated 01-05-2023, wherein the Constitution Bench had held that the Supreme Court has the power to dissolve a marriage on the ground of irretrievable breakdown under Article 142(1) of the Constitution of India.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"article 142 of the constitution","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/article-142-of-the-constitution.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/article-142-of-the-constitution.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/article-142-of-the-constitution.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/article-142-of-the-constitution.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":369272,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/09\/family-court-judge-divorce-case-sc-enhances-alimony-rs-50-lakh\/","url_meta":{"origin":198599,"position":5},"title":"Supreme Court enhances Alimony from Rs. 30 Lakh to Rs. 50 Lakh in Former AAG and Family Court Judge Divorce Case","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"December 9, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court observed that the husband, being a judicial officer holding a responsible public position, owed a heightened duty of fair, adequate, and dignified financial security for his wife and daughter.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Family Court Judge Divorce Case","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Family-Court-Judge-Divorce-Case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Family-Court-Judge-Divorce-Case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Family-Court-Judge-Divorce-Case.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Family-Court-Judge-Divorce-Case.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198599","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=198599"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198599\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/154914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=198599"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=198599"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=198599"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}