{"id":198403,"date":"2018-07-11T15:26:51","date_gmt":"2018-07-11T09:56:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=198403"},"modified":"2018-07-17T18:27:31","modified_gmt":"2018-07-17T12:57:31","slug":"penalty-under-section-2711c-of-income-tax-act-is-not-automatic-intentional-wrongdoing-by-the-assessee-has-to-be-established","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/11\/penalty-under-section-2711c-of-income-tax-act-is-not-automatic-intentional-wrongdoing-by-the-assessee-has-to-be-established\/","title":{"rendered":"Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act is not automatic, intentional wrongdoing by the assessee has to be established"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: <\/strong>A Division Bench comprising of Ravindra Bhat and A.K. Chawla, JJ. dismissed Revenue\u2019s appeal holding that Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) was right in holding that the assessee was not liable to penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act, 1961.<\/p>\n

The assessee, manufacturers of TV parts, purchased some machinery for Rs 3.34 crores, which they were not able to remove from the port due to inability to mobilize funds. The assessee decided to write off the machinery into account books, which was disclosed in Annual Accounts. Subsequently, while filing the IT return, the above-mentioned amount was claimed as revenue loss. The revenue Authorities held that the writing off of the said amount was not justified. The penalty was levied on the assessee under Section 271(1)(c) for making the wrong claim in the return. On appeal, ITAT held that no penalty could be levied on assessee in the present case. Revenue appealed against the order of ITAT.<\/p>\n

The High Court perused the section and observed that a plain reading of the provision shows that penalty is levied only on an assessee who either \u2018conceals\u2019 or \u2018furnishes inaccurate particulars of his income\u2019, these are the two essentials. Supreme Court decision in T. Ashok Pai v. CIT, (2007) 7 SCC 162<\/a><\/strong>, was relied upon wherein it was held that penalty under the section is not automatic in nature; the conditions under the section must exist before the penalty is imposed; Revenue had the responsibility of showing intentional wrongdoing. It was observed that though the petitioner made a wrong claim, the Parliament had no intention to penalise everyone who makes a wrong claim of deduction. The Court held that the essentials of Section 271(1)(c) were not satisfied. Hence, the decision of ITAT was upheld and the appeal was dismissed. [PR CIT-8 v. Samtel India Ltd.,2018 SCC OnLine Del 9750<\/b><\/a>, dated 09-07-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Ravindra Bhat and A.K. Chawla, JJ. dismissed Revenue\u2019s appeal holding that Income Tax Appellate <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[30953,30955,30952,30954,30956],"class_list":["post-198403","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-itat","tag-machinery","tag-section-2711c-of-income-tax-act","tag-write-off","tag-wrong-claim"],"yoast_head":"\nPenalty under Section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act is not automatic, intentional wrongdoing by the assessee has to be established | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/11\/penalty-under-section-2711c-of-income-tax-act-is-not-automatic-intentional-wrongdoing-by-the-assessee-has-to-be-established\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act is not automatic, intentional wrongdoing by the assessee has to be established\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Ravindra Bhat and A.K. Chawla, JJ. dismissed Revenue\u2019s appeal holding that Income Tax Appellate\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/11\/penalty-under-section-2711c-of-income-tax-act-is-not-automatic-intentional-wrongdoing-by-the-assessee-has-to-be-established\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-07-11T09:56:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-07-17T12:57:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/11\/penalty-under-section-2711c-of-income-tax-act-is-not-automatic-intentional-wrongdoing-by-the-assessee-has-to-be-established\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/11\/penalty-under-section-2711c-of-income-tax-act-is-not-automatic-intentional-wrongdoing-by-the-assessee-has-to-be-established\/\",\"name\":\"Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act is not automatic, intentional wrongdoing by the assessee has to be established | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-07-11T09:56:51+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-17T12:57:31+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/11\/penalty-under-section-2711c-of-income-tax-act-is-not-automatic-intentional-wrongdoing-by-the-assessee-has-to-be-established\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/11\/penalty-under-section-2711c-of-income-tax-act-is-not-automatic-intentional-wrongdoing-by-the-assessee-has-to-be-established\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/11\/penalty-under-section-2711c-of-income-tax-act-is-not-automatic-intentional-wrongdoing-by-the-assessee-has-to-be-established\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act is not automatic, intentional wrongdoing by the assessee has to be established\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act is not automatic, intentional wrongdoing by the assessee has to be established | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/11\/penalty-under-section-2711c-of-income-tax-act-is-not-automatic-intentional-wrongdoing-by-the-assessee-has-to-be-established\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act is not automatic, intentional wrongdoing by the assessee has to be established","og_description":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Ravindra Bhat and A.K. Chawla, JJ. dismissed Revenue\u2019s appeal holding that Income Tax Appellate","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/11\/penalty-under-section-2711c-of-income-tax-act-is-not-automatic-intentional-wrongdoing-by-the-assessee-has-to-be-established\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-07-11T09:56:51+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-07-17T12:57:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/11\/penalty-under-section-2711c-of-income-tax-act-is-not-automatic-intentional-wrongdoing-by-the-assessee-has-to-be-established\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/11\/penalty-under-section-2711c-of-income-tax-act-is-not-automatic-intentional-wrongdoing-by-the-assessee-has-to-be-established\/","name":"Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act is not automatic, intentional wrongdoing by the assessee has to be established | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-07-11T09:56:51+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-17T12:57:31+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/11\/penalty-under-section-2711c-of-income-tax-act-is-not-automatic-intentional-wrongdoing-by-the-assessee-has-to-be-established\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/11\/penalty-under-section-2711c-of-income-tax-act-is-not-automatic-intentional-wrongdoing-by-the-assessee-has-to-be-established\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/11\/penalty-under-section-2711c-of-income-tax-act-is-not-automatic-intentional-wrongdoing-by-the-assessee-has-to-be-established\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act is not automatic, intentional wrongdoing by the assessee has to be established"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":320414,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/20\/s-269ss-income-tax-act-not-applicable-receipt-sale-consideration-in-cash-itat-delhi\/","url_meta":{"origin":198403,"position":0},"title":"S. 269-SS of Income Tax Act not applicable to receipt of sale consideration of immovable property in cash but only on loan or deposit: ITAT, Delhi","author":"Editor","date":"April 20, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cSection 269-SS of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has a specific bar on receiving a sum more than 20,000\/- from any other persons by way of loan or deposit.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":348387,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/21\/bona-fide-belief-plus-genuineness-of-transaction-constitutes-reasonable-cause-s-273-no-penalty-s-271e-income-tax-act-chhattisgarh-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":198403,"position":1},"title":"Bona fide belief plus genuineness of transaction constitutes reasonable cause under S. 273B, Penalty can\u2019t be imposed under S. 271E of Income Tax Act: Chhattisgarh HC","author":"Editor","date":"May 21, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cSince the assessee has shown the reasonable cause within the meaning of Section 273B of the Act, the assessee is not liable to pay penalty under Section 271E of the Act for non-compliance of Section 269T of the Act.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Chhattisgarh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":366479,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/12\/itat-upholds-deletion-of-disallowance-against-aishwarya-rai\/","url_meta":{"origin":198403,"position":2},"title":"Read why ITAT Mumbai dismissed Revenue’s appeal against CIT(A)’s deletion of disallowance made against Aishwarya Rai Bachchan","author":"Ekta","date":"November 12, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Tribunal stated that the AO must record satisfaction explaining why the assessee\u2019s own disallowance is unacceptable, but it was not done in the present case.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"deletion of disallowance against Aishwarya Rai","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/blog-13-12.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/blog-13-12.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/blog-13-12.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/blog-13-12.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":358002,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/27\/bhc-on-treating-income-from-same-source-differently\/","url_meta":{"origin":198403,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Defeats the ends of justice\u2019; Bombay HC sets aside ITAT\u2019s order treating income from same source differently for different assessment years","author":"Editor","date":"August 27, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"For the purposes of Income Tax Act, 1961, the business which is involved in letting out premises on hire, would be said to have commenced right from the stage of repairing and furnishing of property for being rented out and cannot be treated as commenced only when the premises are\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"treating income from same source differently","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/treating-income-from-same-source-differently.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/treating-income-from-same-source-differently.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/treating-income-from-same-source-differently.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/treating-income-from-same-source-differently.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":320130,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/16\/assessing-officer-to-record-dissatisfaction-cogent-reasons-for-correctness-claim-assessee-bombay-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":198403,"position":4},"title":"Assessing Officer to record dissatisfaction with correctness of claim of Assessee in respect of expenditure with cogent reasons: Bombay HC","author":"Editor","date":"April 16, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court dismissed an appeal of Income Tax Commissioner to disallow expenditure amounting to 94 Crore u\/s 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":357207,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/21\/bom-hc-vintage-car-sale-taxable-as-capital-gains\/","url_meta":{"origin":198403,"position":5},"title":"Capital gains tax applies to vintage car sale when no evidence of personal use is adduced: Bombay High Court","author":"Editor","date":"August 21, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cCapability of a car for personal use would not ipso facto lead to automatic presumption that every car would be personal effects for being excluded from capital assets of the Assessee.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"vintage car sale taxable","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/vintage-car-sale-taxable.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/vintage-car-sale-taxable.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/vintage-car-sale-taxable.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/vintage-car-sale-taxable.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/vintage-car-sale-taxable.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/vintage-car-sale-taxable.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198403","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=198403"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198403\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=198403"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=198403"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=198403"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}