{"id":198007,"date":"2018-07-04T18:15:32","date_gmt":"2018-07-04T12:45:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=198007"},"modified":"2018-07-04T18:15:32","modified_gmt":"2018-07-04T12:45:32","slug":"wife-convicted-for-murder-given-benefit-of-exception-1-to-section-300-ipc-in-light-of-grave-and-sudden-provocation-by-the-husband","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/04\/wife-convicted-for-murder-given-benefit-of-exception-1-to-section-300-ipc-in-light-of-grave-and-sudden-provocation-by-the-husband\/","title":{"rendered":"Wife convicted for murder given benefit of Exception 1 to Section 300 IPC in light of grave and sudden provocation by the husband"},"content":{"rendered":"

Gauhati High Court: <\/strong>A Division Bench comprising of Suman Shyam and Achintya Malla Bujor Barua, JJ., decided a criminal appeal wherein the conviction of the appellant-wife under Section 302 IPC for the murder of her husband was altered to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304(II).<\/p>\n

The appellant was alleged to have committed murder by attacking her husband with an axe. Before the trial court, the appellant took a defence that her husband mistakenly fell on the axe which resulted in his death. However, considering all the evidence available, the trial court held her guilty. Further, under Section 106 Evidence Act it was the duty of the accused to prove any fact which was exclusively within her knowledge. The appellant herein did not discharge the onus, and accordingly, she was convicted under Section 302. The appellant challenged the order in appeal.<\/p>\n

The High Court perused the record and found that the fact-finding by the trial court did not suffer from any infirmity. The appellant, who was alone with the deceased at the time of the incident, was not able to discharge the burden of proving the fact exclusively within her knowledge. Moreover, nature of injuries suffered by the deceased, as shown in the post-mortem report, made the theory of the deceased falling on the axe, improbable. However, as per appellant\u2019s statement and also statements of prosecution witnesses, the deceased was a drunkard who took up fights with the appellant. On the day of the incident also there was a fight between the appellant wife and her husband. The Court held that the incident was an outcome of the fight which gave grave and sudden provocation to the appellant that resulted in commision of the act. Considering the facts, the Court held that the appellant was a victim of circumstances and deserved the benefit of Exception 1 to Section 300. Accordingly, her conviction was altered from that under Section 302 to Section 304(II) IPC. Appeal was disposed of accordingly. [Suljina Dhan v. State of Assam, 2018 SCC OnLine Gau 645<\/a>, dated 25-6-2018]<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Gauhati High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Suman Shyam and Achintya Malla Bujor Barua, JJ., decided a criminal appeal wherein the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[30436,30843,2641,2642],"class_list":["post-198007","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-convict","tag-discharge-the-onus","tag-husband","tag-wife"],"yoast_head":"\nWife convicted for murder given benefit of Exception 1 to Section 300 IPC in light of grave and sudden provocation by the husband | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/04\/wife-convicted-for-murder-given-benefit-of-exception-1-to-section-300-ipc-in-light-of-grave-and-sudden-provocation-by-the-husband\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Wife convicted for murder given benefit of Exception 1 to Section 300 IPC in light of grave and sudden provocation by the husband\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Gauhati High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Suman Shyam and Achintya Malla Bujor Barua, JJ., decided a criminal appeal wherein the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/04\/wife-convicted-for-murder-given-benefit-of-exception-1-to-section-300-ipc-in-light-of-grave-and-sudden-provocation-by-the-husband\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-07-04T12:45:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Gauhati-HC.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/04\/wife-convicted-for-murder-given-benefit-of-exception-1-to-section-300-ipc-in-light-of-grave-and-sudden-provocation-by-the-husband\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/04\/wife-convicted-for-murder-given-benefit-of-exception-1-to-section-300-ipc-in-light-of-grave-and-sudden-provocation-by-the-husband\/\",\"name\":\"Wife convicted for murder given benefit of Exception 1 to Section 300 IPC in light of grave and sudden provocation by the husband | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-07-04T12:45:32+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/04\/wife-convicted-for-murder-given-benefit-of-exception-1-to-section-300-ipc-in-light-of-grave-and-sudden-provocation-by-the-husband\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/04\/wife-convicted-for-murder-given-benefit-of-exception-1-to-section-300-ipc-in-light-of-grave-and-sudden-provocation-by-the-husband\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/04\/wife-convicted-for-murder-given-benefit-of-exception-1-to-section-300-ipc-in-light-of-grave-and-sudden-provocation-by-the-husband\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Wife convicted for murder given benefit of Exception 1 to Section 300 IPC in light of grave and sudden provocation by the husband\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Wife convicted for murder given benefit of Exception 1 to Section 300 IPC in light of grave and sudden provocation by the husband | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/04\/wife-convicted-for-murder-given-benefit-of-exception-1-to-section-300-ipc-in-light-of-grave-and-sudden-provocation-by-the-husband\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Wife convicted for murder given benefit of Exception 1 to Section 300 IPC in light of grave and sudden provocation by the husband","og_description":"Gauhati High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Suman Shyam and Achintya Malla Bujor Barua, JJ., decided a criminal appeal wherein the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/04\/wife-convicted-for-murder-given-benefit-of-exception-1-to-section-300-ipc-in-light-of-grave-and-sudden-provocation-by-the-husband\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-07-04T12:45:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Gauhati-HC.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/04\/wife-convicted-for-murder-given-benefit-of-exception-1-to-section-300-ipc-in-light-of-grave-and-sudden-provocation-by-the-husband\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/04\/wife-convicted-for-murder-given-benefit-of-exception-1-to-section-300-ipc-in-light-of-grave-and-sudden-provocation-by-the-husband\/","name":"Wife convicted for murder given benefit of Exception 1 to Section 300 IPC in light of grave and sudden provocation by the husband | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-07-04T12:45:32+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/04\/wife-convicted-for-murder-given-benefit-of-exception-1-to-section-300-ipc-in-light-of-grave-and-sudden-provocation-by-the-husband\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/04\/wife-convicted-for-murder-given-benefit-of-exception-1-to-section-300-ipc-in-light-of-grave-and-sudden-provocation-by-the-husband\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/04\/wife-convicted-for-murder-given-benefit-of-exception-1-to-section-300-ipc-in-light-of-grave-and-sudden-provocation-by-the-husband\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Wife convicted for murder given benefit of Exception 1 to Section 300 IPC in light of grave and sudden provocation by the husband"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":201890,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/18\/part-of-hostile-witness-testimony-found-trustworthy-can-be-taken-into-consideration-man-convicted-for-sons-murder-on-wifes-hostile-testimony\/","url_meta":{"origin":198007,"position":0},"title":"Part of hostile witness\u2019 testimony found trustworthy can be taken into consideration; man convicted for son\u2019s murder on wife’s hostile testimony","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 18, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Division Bench comprising of B.R. Gavai and Sarang V. Kotwal, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed against the judgment of the trial court whereby the appellant was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC. The appellant was convicted for the murder of his son. On\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":323551,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/04\/meghalaya-hc-modifies-husband-conviction-302-killing-wife-ex-husband\/","url_meta":{"origin":198007,"position":1},"title":"\u2018Every possibility for prudent man to lose temper on seeing wife with another man\u2019: Meghalaya HC modifies husband\u2019s conviction u\/s 302 for killing wife\u2019s ex-husband","author":"Editor","date":"June 4, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cOn noticing the presence of the ex-husband (deceased) in his house, the husband caused the death of the deceased in order to safeguard his right over person (wife) without any premeditation or intention. The case fell within the ambit of Exception 2 to Section 300 of the IPC on the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Meghalaya High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":231570,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/06\/30\/cal-hc-harassment-by-in-laws-for-womans-black-complexion-is-cruelty-under-s-498-a-ipc-husband-convicted-for-murdering-wife-over-her-black-complexion\/","url_meta":{"origin":198007,"position":2},"title":"Cal HC | Harassment by in-laws for woman’s black complexion is cruelty under S. 498-A IPC; Husband convicted for murdering wife over her black complexion","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 30, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of Sahidulla Munshi and Subhasis Dasgupta, JJ.,\u00a0upheld the conviction of accused-husband under Section 498-A IPC for the offence of cruelty to woman and under Section 302 for the murder of his wife. At the same time, the Court acquitted the accused-mother-in-law of the charge under\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":261954,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/18\/husband-killed-wife-brutally-in-a-heat-of-passion-leaving-husband-with-a-wounded-pride\/","url_meta":{"origin":198007,"position":3},"title":"Husband killed wife brutally in a heat of passion leaving husband with a wounded pride: Bom HC decides whether the said offence will come under “Murder” or “Culpable Homicide not amounting to Murder”","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 18, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: Stating that, in the moment of anger spouses almost forgot about the two children who were hardly three years old at the time of incident, the Division Bench of Sadhana S. Jadhav and Prithiviraj K. Chavan, JJ., found that the case of a husband killing wife with\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":300720,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/04\/day-to-day-bickering-between-husband-wife-not-cruelty-under-section-498a-of-the-ipc-calcutta-high-court-scc-blog-legal-research\/","url_meta":{"origin":198007,"position":4},"title":"Day to day bickering between husband-wife does not amount to cruelty under Section 498A of the IPC: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"September 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court held that there were latches on the part of the Trial Court in appreciation of evidence with regards to the alleged offence under Section 498A of the IPC.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":283521,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/09\/delhi-high-court-modifies-conviction-from-section-302-to-section-304i-ipc-penal-code-legalnews-legalawareness-legalresearch\/","url_meta":{"origin":198007,"position":5},"title":"Absence of premeditation leads to Delhi High Court modifying murder conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder; Convict to be released","author":"Editor","date":"February 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Based on the weapon used for inflicting injuries to the deceased was a very heavy danda with nodes therein, the Trial Court has convicted the appellant for offence punishable under Section 302 IPC. However, it failed to appreciate the fact that the alleged offence was not committed by pre-meditation.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198007","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=198007"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198007\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=198007"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=198007"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=198007"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}