{"id":197950,"date":"2018-07-03T17:01:06","date_gmt":"2018-07-03T11:31:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=197950"},"modified":"2018-07-03T17:01:06","modified_gmt":"2018-07-03T11:31:06","slug":"a-consumer-farmer-shall-not-suffer-for-failure-of-seed-inspector-or-district-level-enquiry-committee-to-follow-the-procedure-if-complainant-is-otherwise-able-to-prove-his-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/03\/a-consumer-farmer-shall-not-suffer-for-failure-of-seed-inspector-or-district-level-enquiry-committee-to-follow-the-procedure-if-complainant-is-otherwise-able-to-prove-his-case\/","title":{"rendered":"A consumer farmer shall not suffer for failure of Seed Inspector or District Level Enquiry Committee to follow the procedure, if complainant is otherwise able to prove his case"},"content":{"rendered":"

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC):<\/strong> A Single Member Bench of NCDRC presided by V.K. Jain, J. upheld the order of State Commission of Haryana granting relief of about Rs two lakh from the Indian Farmers Fertilizers Cooperative Limited (IFFCO, the petitioner) for selling \u201cadulterated\u201d seeds to two farmers who suffered financial losses due to poor yield.<\/p>\n

According to the complainant farmers, they were assured by the petitioner that the seeds would give proper yield of 8 to10 quintals per acre. On poor yield, they made complainants to the Agriculture Department which carried out an inspection and found the plants to be of different variety and about 60-70% of the plants with high growth without any fruits. The complainants approached the\u00a0 District Forum concerned. Their claims were denied by the District Forum but were upheld by the State Commission on appeal. Aggrieved petitioner approached NCRDC.<\/p>\n

The emphasis of the petitioner\u2019s arguments was that that despite circular dated 03.01.2002, the Agriculture Department did not associate representative of the Seed Agency and the Scientists of KGK\/KVK, HAU in the inspection and the report was prepared at the back of the petitioner without any notice to it.<\/p>\n

Commission relied on its own decision in Reliance Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd. <\/em>v. Umesh Singh Chandan Singh Saddiwal,<\/em><\/strong> 2016 SCC OnLine NCDRC 78<\/a> and Apex\u2019s Court judgment in Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Co. Ltd. <\/em>v. Alavalapati Chandra Reddy,<\/em><\/strong> (1998) 6 SCC 738<\/a>. The Commission held that the failure of the Seed Inspector or for that matter District Level Enquiry Committee to follow the procedure under Seed Act or Rules thereunder cannot be fatal to a complaint, filed under the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act. Hence, such failure cannot lead to dismissal of a Consumer Complaint, if the complainant is otherwise able to prove his case. Commission also noted that there is no way by which a farmer can compel the seed inspector or the committee to follow the said procedure. [IFFCO v. Vijay Kumar, Revision Petition No. 912 of 2018, order dated 14-06-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): A Single Member Bench of NCDRC presided by V.K. Jain, J. upheld the order of State <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":199533,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[18321,30824,30825,30826],"class_list":["post-197950","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-consumer-protection-act","tag-farmers","tag-poor-yield","tag-seed-agency"],"yoast_head":"\nA consumer farmer shall not suffer for failure of Seed Inspector or District Level Enquiry Committee to follow the procedure, if complainant is otherwise able to prove his case | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/03\/a-consumer-farmer-shall-not-suffer-for-failure-of-seed-inspector-or-district-level-enquiry-committee-to-follow-the-procedure-if-complainant-is-otherwise-able-to-prove-his-case\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"A consumer farmer shall not suffer for failure of Seed Inspector or District Level Enquiry Committee to follow the procedure, if complainant is otherwise able to prove his case\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): A Single Member Bench of NCDRC presided by V.K. Jain, J. upheld the order of State\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/03\/a-consumer-farmer-shall-not-suffer-for-failure-of-seed-inspector-or-district-level-enquiry-committee-to-follow-the-procedure-if-complainant-is-otherwise-able-to-prove-his-case\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-07-03T11:31:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/03\/a-consumer-farmer-shall-not-suffer-for-failure-of-seed-inspector-or-district-level-enquiry-committee-to-follow-the-procedure-if-complainant-is-otherwise-able-to-prove-his-case\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/03\/a-consumer-farmer-shall-not-suffer-for-failure-of-seed-inspector-or-district-level-enquiry-committee-to-follow-the-procedure-if-complainant-is-otherwise-able-to-prove-his-case\/\",\"name\":\"A consumer farmer shall not suffer for failure of Seed Inspector or District Level Enquiry Committee to follow the procedure, if complainant is otherwise able to prove his case | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/03\/a-consumer-farmer-shall-not-suffer-for-failure-of-seed-inspector-or-district-level-enquiry-committee-to-follow-the-procedure-if-complainant-is-otherwise-able-to-prove-his-case\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/03\/a-consumer-farmer-shall-not-suffer-for-failure-of-seed-inspector-or-district-level-enquiry-committee-to-follow-the-procedure-if-complainant-is-otherwise-able-to-prove-his-case\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-07-03T11:31:06+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/03\/a-consumer-farmer-shall-not-suffer-for-failure-of-seed-inspector-or-district-level-enquiry-committee-to-follow-the-procedure-if-complainant-is-otherwise-able-to-prove-his-case\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/03\/a-consumer-farmer-shall-not-suffer-for-failure-of-seed-inspector-or-district-level-enquiry-committee-to-follow-the-procedure-if-complainant-is-otherwise-able-to-prove-his-case\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/03\/a-consumer-farmer-shall-not-suffer-for-failure-of-seed-inspector-or-district-level-enquiry-committee-to-follow-the-procedure-if-complainant-is-otherwise-able-to-prove-his-case\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887,\"caption\":\"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/03\/a-consumer-farmer-shall-not-suffer-for-failure-of-seed-inspector-or-district-level-enquiry-committee-to-follow-the-procedure-if-complainant-is-otherwise-able-to-prove-his-case\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"A consumer farmer shall not suffer for failure of Seed Inspector or District Level Enquiry Committee to follow the procedure, if complainant is otherwise able to prove his case\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"A consumer farmer shall not suffer for failure of Seed Inspector or District Level Enquiry Committee to follow the procedure, if complainant is otherwise able to prove his case | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/03\/a-consumer-farmer-shall-not-suffer-for-failure-of-seed-inspector-or-district-level-enquiry-committee-to-follow-the-procedure-if-complainant-is-otherwise-able-to-prove-his-case\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"A consumer farmer shall not suffer for failure of Seed Inspector or District Level Enquiry Committee to follow the procedure, if complainant is otherwise able to prove his case","og_description":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): A Single Member Bench of NCDRC presided by V.K. Jain, J. upheld the order of State","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/03\/a-consumer-farmer-shall-not-suffer-for-failure-of-seed-inspector-or-district-level-enquiry-committee-to-follow-the-procedure-if-complainant-is-otherwise-able-to-prove-his-case\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-07-03T11:31:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/03\/a-consumer-farmer-shall-not-suffer-for-failure-of-seed-inspector-or-district-level-enquiry-committee-to-follow-the-procedure-if-complainant-is-otherwise-able-to-prove-his-case\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/03\/a-consumer-farmer-shall-not-suffer-for-failure-of-seed-inspector-or-district-level-enquiry-committee-to-follow-the-procedure-if-complainant-is-otherwise-able-to-prove-his-case\/","name":"A consumer farmer shall not suffer for failure of Seed Inspector or District Level Enquiry Committee to follow the procedure, if complainant is otherwise able to prove his case | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/03\/a-consumer-farmer-shall-not-suffer-for-failure-of-seed-inspector-or-district-level-enquiry-committee-to-follow-the-procedure-if-complainant-is-otherwise-able-to-prove-his-case\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/03\/a-consumer-farmer-shall-not-suffer-for-failure-of-seed-inspector-or-district-level-enquiry-committee-to-follow-the-procedure-if-complainant-is-otherwise-able-to-prove-his-case\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","datePublished":"2018-07-03T11:31:06+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/03\/a-consumer-farmer-shall-not-suffer-for-failure-of-seed-inspector-or-district-level-enquiry-committee-to-follow-the-procedure-if-complainant-is-otherwise-able-to-prove-his-case\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/03\/a-consumer-farmer-shall-not-suffer-for-failure-of-seed-inspector-or-district-level-enquiry-committee-to-follow-the-procedure-if-complainant-is-otherwise-able-to-prove-his-case\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/03\/a-consumer-farmer-shall-not-suffer-for-failure-of-seed-inspector-or-district-level-enquiry-committee-to-follow-the-procedure-if-complainant-is-otherwise-able-to-prove-his-case\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","width":1330,"height":887,"caption":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/03\/a-consumer-farmer-shall-not-suffer-for-failure-of-seed-inspector-or-district-level-enquiry-committee-to-follow-the-procedure-if-complainant-is-otherwise-able-to-prove-his-case\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"A consumer farmer shall not suffer for failure of Seed Inspector or District Level Enquiry Committee to follow the procedure, if complainant is otherwise able to prove his case"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":216224,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/28\/ncdrc-iffco-directed-to-pay-enhanced-compensation-to-farmers-who-suffered-loss-of-crop-due-to-defective-seeds-bought-from-it\/","url_meta":{"origin":197950,"position":0},"title":"NCDRC | IFFCO directed to pay enhanced compensation to farmers who suffered loss of crop due to defective seeds bought from it","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 28, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): V.K Jain (Presiding Member), J. allowed a revision petition filed by a farmer seeking enhancement of compensation provided for loss of his crops. Petitioners herein were farmers who had bought seeds from the respondent society. The resultant crops were not up to the mark\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":203215,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/06\/manufacturers-and-not-farmers-have-the-onus-to-prove-the-quality-of-seeds-under-consumer-protection-act-1986\/","url_meta":{"origin":197950,"position":1},"title":"Manufacturers, and not farmers, have the onus to prove the quality of seeds under Consumer Protection Act, 1986","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 6, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): A Division Bench comprising of R.K. Agrawal, J. and M. Shreesha, Member dismissed the revision petition filed against the order of Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission confirming payment of compensation to the respondent\/complainant \u2013 farmers for supply of inferior quality of seeds by\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":243887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/15\/consumer\/","url_meta":{"origin":197950,"position":2},"title":"NCDRC | If a farmer suffers crop loss due to the usage of herbicides bought from a dealer or manufacturer of agri-inputs, can he claim a loss for crop damage? Read Commission\u2019s reasoning","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 15, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): Anup K. Thakur (Presiding Member) dismissed the revision petition while upholding the State Commission\u2019s order. Respondent\/Complainant had sown sugarcane. He purchased herbicides from petitioner 1\/OP 1. It was submitted that after the usage of the said herbicide the crop started to suffer severe damage.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":336894,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/09\/ncdrc-remands-consumer-case-theft-scdrc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":197950,"position":3},"title":"NCDRC remands consumer case regarding theft to Madhya Pradesh SCDRC to be decided on merits","author":"Sucheta","date":"December 9, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The NCDRC noted that Reliance General Insurance did not take the issue of territorial jurisdiction before SCDRC; therefore, SCDRC basing its decision on the same, was bad in law.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/National-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/National-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/National-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/National-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":100001,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/01\/18\/indian-overseas-bank-directed-to-pay-rs-50000-for-delay-in-processing-cheque\/","url_meta":{"origin":197950,"position":4},"title":"Indian Overseas Bank directed to pay Rs 50,000 for delay in processing cheque","author":"Saba","date":"January 18, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC):\u00a0While directing Indian Overseas Bank to pay Rs 50,000 to a person for delay in processing cheque, NCDRC upheld the order of District Forum asking the bank to pay the money to the man while holding deficiency in service on part of the bank. Said\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":214336,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/06\/ncdrc-inordinate-delay-by-builder-in-delivery-of-flats-possession-amounts-to-deficiency-of-service-allottee-granted-complete-refund-along-with-compensation\/","url_meta":{"origin":197950,"position":5},"title":"NCDRC | Inordinate delay by builder in delivery of flats\u2019 possession amounts to deficiency of service \u2013 allottee granted complete refund along with compensation\u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 6, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission: Justice V.K. Jain (Presiding Member), allowed a consumer complaint seeking a refund of money paid to book a residential flat in a construction project being carried out by the developer.\u00a0 Complainant herein had booked a residential flat in a project started by the opposite party\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197950","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=197950"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197950\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/199533"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=197950"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=197950"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=197950"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}