{"id":197777,"date":"2018-06-29T16:55:29","date_gmt":"2018-06-29T11:25:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=197777"},"modified":"2018-07-02T12:06:28","modified_gmt":"2018-07-02T06:36:28","slug":"writ-petition-not-maintainable-if-there-is-a-remedy-for-redressal-by-a-competent-statutory-authority","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/29\/writ-petition-not-maintainable-if-there-is-a-remedy-for-redressal-by-a-competent-statutory-authority\/","title":{"rendered":"Writ petition not maintainable if there is a remedy for redressal by a competent statutory Authority"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Calcutta High Court: <\/strong>A Division Bench comprising of Biswanath Somadder and Arindam Mukherjee, JJ., dismissed an appeal in light of the availability of an efficacious alternative remedy before a competent statutory Authority.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The appeal was filed against the decision of the learned Single Judge who had dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant challenging the election process for the post of Gram Panchayat member. The learned Single Judge, while dismissing the petition, held that the same was not maintainable before the writ court and relegated the appellant to an appropriate statutory remedy which is available for a period of thirty days from the date of declaration of the election results. The appellant, instead of applying before the statutory Authority, was before the High Court in appeal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The High Court considered the matter and observed that the writ petition had challenged the election process, and the statutory mechanism for raising such dispute was clearly stated under Section 79 of West Bengal Panchayat Elections Act 2003. The Section prescribes the statutory Authority as well as the time frame for redressal of the dispute. The Court held that the appellant could take recourse to the available alternative remedy before a competent statutory Authority as provided under the Act. Therefore, the Court did not find any infirmity with the decision of the learned Single Judge, and accordingly, the appeal was dismissed. The appellant was directed to approach the Authority within ten days. [Mina Perween v. State of W.B.,<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/8Kxgu370\">2018 SCC OnLine Cal 3962<\/a>, decided on 25-06-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Calcutta High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Biswanath Somadder and Arindam Mukherjee, JJ., dismissed an appeal in light of the availability <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":48761,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[30750,30747,30749],"class_list":["post-197777","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-appropriate-statutory-remedy","tag-election-process","tag-maintainable"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Writ petition not maintainable if there is a remedy for redressal by a competent statutory Authority | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/29\/writ-petition-not-maintainable-if-there-is-a-remedy-for-redressal-by-a-competent-statutory-authority\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Writ petition not maintainable if there is a remedy for redressal by a competent statutory Authority\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Biswanath Somadder and Arindam Mukherjee, JJ., dismissed an appeal in light of the availability\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/29\/writ-petition-not-maintainable-if-there-is-a-remedy-for-redressal-by-a-competent-statutory-authority\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-06-29T11:25:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-07-02T06:36:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/29\/writ-petition-not-maintainable-if-there-is-a-remedy-for-redressal-by-a-competent-statutory-authority\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/29\/writ-petition-not-maintainable-if-there-is-a-remedy-for-redressal-by-a-competent-statutory-authority\/\",\"name\":\"Writ petition not maintainable if there is a remedy for redressal by a competent statutory Authority | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/29\/writ-petition-not-maintainable-if-there-is-a-remedy-for-redressal-by-a-competent-statutory-authority\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/29\/writ-petition-not-maintainable-if-there-is-a-remedy-for-redressal-by-a-competent-statutory-authority\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-06-29T11:25:29+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-02T06:36:28+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/29\/writ-petition-not-maintainable-if-there-is-a-remedy-for-redressal-by-a-competent-statutory-authority\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/29\/writ-petition-not-maintainable-if-there-is-a-remedy-for-redressal-by-a-competent-statutory-authority\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/29\/writ-petition-not-maintainable-if-there-is-a-remedy-for-redressal-by-a-competent-statutory-authority\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/29\/writ-petition-not-maintainable-if-there-is-a-remedy-for-redressal-by-a-competent-statutory-authority\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Writ petition not maintainable if there is a remedy for redressal by a competent statutory Authority\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Writ petition not maintainable if there is a remedy for redressal by a competent statutory Authority | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/29\/writ-petition-not-maintainable-if-there-is-a-remedy-for-redressal-by-a-competent-statutory-authority\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Writ petition not maintainable if there is a remedy for redressal by a competent statutory Authority","og_description":"Calcutta High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Biswanath Somadder and Arindam Mukherjee, JJ., dismissed an appeal in light of the availability","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/29\/writ-petition-not-maintainable-if-there-is-a-remedy-for-redressal-by-a-competent-statutory-authority\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-06-29T11:25:29+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-07-02T06:36:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/29\/writ-petition-not-maintainable-if-there-is-a-remedy-for-redressal-by-a-competent-statutory-authority\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/29\/writ-petition-not-maintainable-if-there-is-a-remedy-for-redressal-by-a-competent-statutory-authority\/","name":"Writ petition not maintainable if there is a remedy for redressal by a competent statutory Authority | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/29\/writ-petition-not-maintainable-if-there-is-a-remedy-for-redressal-by-a-competent-statutory-authority\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/29\/writ-petition-not-maintainable-if-there-is-a-remedy-for-redressal-by-a-competent-statutory-authority\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg","datePublished":"2018-06-29T11:25:29+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-02T06:36:28+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/29\/writ-petition-not-maintainable-if-there-is-a-remedy-for-redressal-by-a-competent-statutory-authority\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/29\/writ-petition-not-maintainable-if-there-is-a-remedy-for-redressal-by-a-competent-statutory-authority\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/29\/writ-petition-not-maintainable-if-there-is-a-remedy-for-redressal-by-a-competent-statutory-authority\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/29\/writ-petition-not-maintainable-if-there-is-a-remedy-for-redressal-by-a-competent-statutory-authority\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Writ petition not maintainable if there is a remedy for redressal by a competent statutory Authority"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":214499,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/09\/pat-hc-employers-petition-challenging-labour-courts-compensation-awarded-to-employee-not-maintainable-where-alternative-statutory-remedy-not-exhausted\/","url_meta":{"origin":197777,"position":0},"title":"Pat HC | Employer\u2019s petition challenging Labour Court\u2019s compensation awarded to employee not maintainable, where alternative statutory remedy not exhausted","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 9, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: The Bench of Shivaji Pandey, J. dismissed a writ petition filed by an employer, challenging the amount of compensation directed to be paid to its employee by the Labour Court, on the ground that the petitioner had not exhausted the alternative statutory remedy. The instant petition was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":337096,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/11\/mere-existence-of-alternative-remedy-not-ground-for-dismissal-writ-petition-kerala-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":197777,"position":1},"title":"Writ petition against administrative authority cannot be dismissed as &#8216;non-maintainable&#8217; merely on ground of existence of alternative remedy: Kerala HC","author":"Editor","date":"December 11, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"There is a difference between entertainability and maintainability of a writ petition. Powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India can be exercised in restricted circumstances and within well-defined parameters, even if there exists an alternate remedy.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":204918,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/07\/property-disputes-between-private-parties-not-a-fit-case-for-high-courts-to-interfere-under-article-226-of-the-constitution\/","url_meta":{"origin":197777,"position":2},"title":"Property disputes between private parties: Not a fit case for High Courts to interfere under Article 226 of the Constitution","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 7, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Dhiraj Singh Thakur, J., dismissed a writ petition filed against the actions of private respondents 6 to 13, whereby respondents were interfering with the property owned by the petitioner. The main issue that arose before the Court was whether the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":204135,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/24\/challenge-to-arbitrators-award-in-a-writ-court-not-maintainable-if-statutory-remedy-under-section-34-of-arbitration-act-not-exhausted\/","url_meta":{"origin":197777,"position":3},"title":"Challenge to Arbitrator\u2019s award in a writ court not maintainable if statutory remedy under Section 34 of A&#038;C Act not exhausted","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 24, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: A Single judge bench comprising of Birendra Kumar, J. while hearing a civil writ petition against an Arbitrator\u2019s order held that since the statutory remedy provided under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 had not been exhausted, the High Court could not exercise its writ jurisdiction. The respondent\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":189154,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/02\/15\/court-exercise-writ-jurisdiction-not-ignore-condition-imposed-law-entertaining-appeal\/","url_meta":{"origin":197777,"position":4},"title":"The Court, in exercise of writ jurisdiction, should not ignore a condition imposed by law for entertaining an appeal","author":"Saba","date":"February 15, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: A civil writ petition was dismissed by a Single Judge Bench comprising of Ram Surat Ram Maurya, J., on the ground that the petitioner had an alternate remedy of appeal under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest (SARFAESI) Act, 2002. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":267159,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/20\/writ-petition-not-maintainable-due-to-having-an-alternative-and-efficacious-remedy-under-s-17-of-the-sarfaesi-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":197777,"position":5},"title":"Raj HC | Writ Petition not maintainable due to having an alternative and efficacious remedy under S. 17 of the SARFAESI Act","author":"Editor","date":"May 20, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Mahendar Kumar Goyal, J. dismissed the writ petition in view of availability of alternative remedy to the petitioners under the provisions of the SARFAESI Act.\u00a0 The instant writ petition was filed by the borrowers for quashing the order dated 15-03-2022 passed by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Jaipur\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197777","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=197777"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197777\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/48761"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=197777"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=197777"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=197777"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}