{"id":197636,"date":"2018-06-28T18:24:03","date_gmt":"2018-06-28T12:54:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=197636"},"modified":"2018-07-02T12:18:30","modified_gmt":"2018-07-02T06:48:30","slug":"call-for-report-is-not-mandatory-under-section-4-of-the-probation-of-offenders-act-1958-bombay-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/28\/call-for-report-is-not-mandatory-under-section-4-of-the-probation-of-offenders-act-1958-bombay-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Call for Report\u2019 is not mandatory under Section 4 of the Probation of Offender\u2019s Act,1958: Bombay HC"},"content":{"rendered":"

Bombay High Court: <\/strong>A Single Judge Bench comprising of \u00a0Prakash D. Naik, J., addressed a Criminal Revision Application challenging the order passed by learned Special Judge for rejecting the application to \u2018call for the report\u2019 of probation officer under Section 4(1)(2) of Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, by giving a clear vision in reference to the said provision of the Act and its essentiality in reference to a case to case dependency.<\/p>\n

In the present case, the facts state that the applicant was a field officer at \u2018Apnalaya Sanstha\u2019 and was accused of molestation and outraging the modesty of a child\/victim who used to attend the classes conducted under Sanstha. For the said act, the applicant accused was punishable under Section 354 A of Indian Penal Code and Section 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act. The Trial Court rejected the application stating that it is for the Court to consider the circumstances of the case and the nature of offence as to when the benefit of the said provisions can be given to the accused.<\/p>\n

Therefore, the Hon\u2019ble High Court found no infirmity in the order of rejection stated above and dismissed the Criminal Revision Application, by placing its view that the court is always required to apply its mind to the requirements for exercising powers as contemplated under Section 4 of the Probation of Offender\u2019s Act.<\/p>\n

On analysing the stated facts and observing that the accused being a 40 year old\u00a0 man had deliberately committed the said act, Court stated that if PW2 was the victim today, someone else would be tomorrow, which lead the Court to the contention of \u2018calling for reports\u2019 not mandatory in every case as been claimed by the applicant, otherwise every other accused would demand so. In accordance to the stated\u00a0 facts, Court declared that \u2018Judicial attitude ought to have been against allowing the benefit of probation to him, who was otherwise an educated and experienced person in life.\u2019 <\/em>Further, Court declared that there is no merit in the application and therefore, it stands dismissed. [Nishant Harishchandra Salvi v. State of Maharashtra,2018 SCC OnLine Bom 1305<\/b><\/a>, decided on 18-06-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Bombay High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of \u00a0Prakash D. Naik, J., addressed a Criminal Revision Application challenging the order passed <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":74381,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[30716,30717,30715],"class_list":["post-197636","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-call-for-report","tag-nature-of-offence","tag-outraging-the-modesty"],"yoast_head":"\n\u2018Call for Report\u2019 is not mandatory under Section 4 of the Probation of Offender\u2019s Act,1958: Bombay HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/28\/call-for-report-is-not-mandatory-under-section-4-of-the-probation-of-offenders-act-1958-bombay-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Call for Report\u2019 is not mandatory under Section 4 of the Probation of Offender\u2019s Act,1958: Bombay HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of \u00a0Prakash D. Naik, J., addressed a Criminal Revision Application challenging the order passed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/28\/call-for-report-is-not-mandatory-under-section-4-of-the-probation-of-offenders-act-1958-bombay-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-06-28T12:54:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-07-02T06:48:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/28\/call-for-report-is-not-mandatory-under-section-4-of-the-probation-of-offenders-act-1958-bombay-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/28\/call-for-report-is-not-mandatory-under-section-4-of-the-probation-of-offenders-act-1958-bombay-hc\/\",\"name\":\"\u2018Call for Report\u2019 is not mandatory under Section 4 of the Probation of Offender\u2019s Act,1958: Bombay HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/28\/call-for-report-is-not-mandatory-under-section-4-of-the-probation-of-offenders-act-1958-bombay-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/28\/call-for-report-is-not-mandatory-under-section-4-of-the-probation-of-offenders-act-1958-bombay-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-06-28T12:54:03+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-02T06:48:30+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/28\/call-for-report-is-not-mandatory-under-section-4-of-the-probation-of-offenders-act-1958-bombay-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/28\/call-for-report-is-not-mandatory-under-section-4-of-the-probation-of-offenders-act-1958-bombay-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/28\/call-for-report-is-not-mandatory-under-section-4-of-the-probation-of-offenders-act-1958-bombay-hc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/28\/call-for-report-is-not-mandatory-under-section-4-of-the-probation-of-offenders-act-1958-bombay-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Call for Report\u2019 is not mandatory under Section 4 of the Probation of Offender\u2019s Act,1958: Bombay HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u2018Call for Report\u2019 is not mandatory under Section 4 of the Probation of Offender\u2019s Act,1958: Bombay HC | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/28\/call-for-report-is-not-mandatory-under-section-4-of-the-probation-of-offenders-act-1958-bombay-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Call for Report\u2019 is not mandatory under Section 4 of the Probation of Offender\u2019s Act,1958: Bombay HC","og_description":"Bombay High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of \u00a0Prakash D. Naik, J., addressed a Criminal Revision Application challenging the order passed","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/28\/call-for-report-is-not-mandatory-under-section-4-of-the-probation-of-offenders-act-1958-bombay-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-06-28T12:54:03+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-07-02T06:48:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/28\/call-for-report-is-not-mandatory-under-section-4-of-the-probation-of-offenders-act-1958-bombay-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/28\/call-for-report-is-not-mandatory-under-section-4-of-the-probation-of-offenders-act-1958-bombay-hc\/","name":"\u2018Call for Report\u2019 is not mandatory under Section 4 of the Probation of Offender\u2019s Act,1958: Bombay HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/28\/call-for-report-is-not-mandatory-under-section-4-of-the-probation-of-offenders-act-1958-bombay-hc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/28\/call-for-report-is-not-mandatory-under-section-4-of-the-probation-of-offenders-act-1958-bombay-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","datePublished":"2018-06-28T12:54:03+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-02T06:48:30+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/28\/call-for-report-is-not-mandatory-under-section-4-of-the-probation-of-offenders-act-1958-bombay-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/28\/call-for-report-is-not-mandatory-under-section-4-of-the-probation-of-offenders-act-1958-bombay-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/28\/call-for-report-is-not-mandatory-under-section-4-of-the-probation-of-offenders-act-1958-bombay-hc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","width":1331,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/28\/call-for-report-is-not-mandatory-under-section-4-of-the-probation-of-offenders-act-1958-bombay-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Call for Report\u2019 is not mandatory under Section 4 of the Probation of Offender\u2019s Act,1958: Bombay HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":259114,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/27\/modesty-of-a-woman\/","url_meta":{"origin":197636,"position":0},"title":"Touching feet of a woman without her consent: Is it outraging the modesty of a woman? Bom HC answers","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 27, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: While addressing a matter with regard to \u201coutraging modesty of a woman\u201d, M.G. Sewlikar, J., expressed that, \u201c\u2026touching any part of the body of a woman without her consent that too in the dead hour of the night by a stranger amounts to a violation of modesty\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":226549,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/05\/sikk-hc-unwelcome-sexual-advances-by-a-teacher-person-using-criminal-force-upon-a-woman-with-intention-or-knowledge-that-her-modesty-would-be-outraged-should-be-punished\/","url_meta":{"origin":197636,"position":1},"title":"Sikk HC | Unwelcome “sexual advances” by a Teacher; Person using criminal force upon a woman with intention or knowledge that her modesty would be outraged should be punished","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 5, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Sikkim High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of Meenakshi Madan Rai and Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, JJ., while addressing a case of offence\u00a0under Section 354 A of Penal Code, 1860 for sexual harassment of a student by the teacher, held that, If any person uses criminal force upon any woman with the intention\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":223447,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/21\/hp-hc-s-361-crpc-mandates-court-to-record-special-reasons-for-not-dealing-with-the-accused-under-provisions-of-probation-of-offenders-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":197636,"position":2},"title":"HP HC | S. 361 CrPC mandates court to record special reasons for not dealing with the accused under provisions of Probation of Offenders Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 21, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Anoop Chitkara, J. upheld the decision of the first appellate court in the present case where the court on its own motion took cognizance of the complaint concerning the release of the respondent under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 after his conviction\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":252529,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/11\/outraging-modesty-of-a-woman\/","url_meta":{"origin":197636,"position":3},"title":"Bom HC on \u2018Outraging Modesty of Woman\u2019 | Would throwing love chit on person of a married woman amount to outraging her modesty? Read on","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 11, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: Rohit B. Deo, J., expressed that, The modesty of a woman is her most precious jewel and there cannot be a straitjacket formula to ascertain whether modesty is outraged. Applicant was convicted for offence punishable under Sections 354, 509 and 506 of the Penal Code, 1860. Mrs\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":278832,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/30\/a-woman-can-be-held-guilty-for-committing-offence-under-section-354-ipc-bombay-court-convicts-a-woman-for-outraging-modesty-of-another-woman\/","url_meta":{"origin":197636,"position":4},"title":"A woman can be held guilty for committing offence under Section 354 IPC; Bombay Court convicts a woman for outraging modesty of another woman","author":"Editor","date":"November 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Metropolitan Magistrate, 70th Court, Mazgaon, Mumbai: In a case filed against the accused for offences punishable under Section 324, 354, 504, 509 of the Penal Code, 1860, M.V. Chavhan, J., acquitted the accused of the offences punishable under section 324, 504 and 509 of IPC and convicted of the offences\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Metropolitan Magistrate","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image41.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":46231,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/12\/report-of-probation-officer-to-be-called-before-granting-probation-under-section-42-of-probation-of-offenders-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":197636,"position":5},"title":"Report of Probation officer to be called before granting probation under Section 4(2) of Probation of Offenders Act","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 12, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: Deciding an appeal against the sentence awarded by the trial court on ground of its inadequacy, a single judge bench of A.I.S. Cheema, J., has observed that while granting benefit of probation, courts shall ensure compliance of provisions of Probation of Offenders Act, and when probation is\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197636","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=197636"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197636\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/74381"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=197636"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=197636"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=197636"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}