{"id":197621,"date":"2018-06-28T13:01:46","date_gmt":"2018-06-28T07:31:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=197621"},"modified":"2018-07-02T12:19:29","modified_gmt":"2018-07-02T06:49:29","slug":"conviction-modified-from-section-302-to-304-ii-ipc-holding-that-the-assault-was-committed-in-a-fit-of-rage","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/28\/conviction-modified-from-section-302-to-304-ii-ipc-holding-that-the-assault-was-committed-in-a-fit-of-rage\/","title":{"rendered":"Conviction modified from Section 302 to 304 (II) IPC holding that the assault was committed in a fit of rage"},"content":{"rendered":"

Gauhati High Court: <\/strong>A Division Bench comprising of Suman Shyam and A.M. Buzor Baruah, JJ., altered the conviction and sentence of the appellant from that under Section 302 to Section 304 Part II of Penal Code, 1860.<\/p>\n

The appellant was convicted for the homicidal death of his father-in-law. It was alleged that the appellant hacked the deceased to death with an axe. On receiving information, an FIR was registered under Section 302 against the petitioner. The appellant was tried and convicted by the trial court and sentenced to life imprisonment. The appellant filed the instant appeal against the said order. It is worth mentioning that conviction of the appellant was based on testimonies of eye-witnesses as well as the wife of the deceased (mother-in-law of the petitioner).<\/p>\n

The High Court considered the record as well as submissions made by the parties. The Court noted that the testimonies of the prosecution witnesses indeed proved that the death of the deceased was homicidal. The Court perused the testimonies of the witnesses and was of the opinion that the wife (CW 1) of the deceased was a material witness. Her testimony, according to the Court, was most important. It was noted that in her testimony, CW 1 had stated that there was a dispute between the appellant and the deceased over a sum of Rs. 1000. Also, there was an ongoing fight between both of them that started the previous day. The Court also noted that the eye-witnesses also stated that at the time of the incident, there was a fight between the appellant and the deceased who was also holding a bamboo stick. Further, although the appellant was equipped with an axe, he did not use the sharp edge of it while assaulting the deceased. In such circumstances, the High Court was of the opinion that it was a case where the act was committed in a fit of anger; the existence of a grave and sudden provocation could not be ruled out. Accordingly, the Court while upholding the finding of guilt against the accused, modified his conviction as stated above. Also, the sentence was modified from that of life to seven years imprisonment. [Joyram Kerkata v. State of Assam,2018 SCC OnLine Gau 643<\/b><\/a>, dated 25-6-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Gauhati High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Suman Shyam and A.M. Buzor Baruah, JJ., altered the conviction and sentence of the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[30423,30710,30709,9291],"class_list":["post-197621","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-convicted","tag-fit-of-anger","tag-homicidal-death","tag-life-imprisonment"],"yoast_head":"\nConviction modified from Section 302 to 304 (II) IPC holding that the assault was committed in a fit of rage | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/28\/conviction-modified-from-section-302-to-304-ii-ipc-holding-that-the-assault-was-committed-in-a-fit-of-rage\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Conviction modified from Section 302 to 304 (II) IPC holding that the assault was committed in a fit of rage\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Gauhati High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Suman Shyam and A.M. Buzor Baruah, JJ., altered the conviction and sentence of the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/28\/conviction-modified-from-section-302-to-304-ii-ipc-holding-that-the-assault-was-committed-in-a-fit-of-rage\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-06-28T07:31:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-07-02T06:49:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Gauhati-HC.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/28\/conviction-modified-from-section-302-to-304-ii-ipc-holding-that-the-assault-was-committed-in-a-fit-of-rage\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/28\/conviction-modified-from-section-302-to-304-ii-ipc-holding-that-the-assault-was-committed-in-a-fit-of-rage\/\",\"name\":\"Conviction modified from Section 302 to 304 (II) IPC holding that the assault was committed in a fit of rage | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-06-28T07:31:46+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-02T06:49:29+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/28\/conviction-modified-from-section-302-to-304-ii-ipc-holding-that-the-assault-was-committed-in-a-fit-of-rage\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/28\/conviction-modified-from-section-302-to-304-ii-ipc-holding-that-the-assault-was-committed-in-a-fit-of-rage\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/28\/conviction-modified-from-section-302-to-304-ii-ipc-holding-that-the-assault-was-committed-in-a-fit-of-rage\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Conviction modified from Section 302 to 304 (II) IPC holding that the assault was committed in a fit of rage\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Conviction modified from Section 302 to 304 (II) IPC holding that the assault was committed in a fit of rage | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/28\/conviction-modified-from-section-302-to-304-ii-ipc-holding-that-the-assault-was-committed-in-a-fit-of-rage\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Conviction modified from Section 302 to 304 (II) IPC holding that the assault was committed in a fit of rage","og_description":"Gauhati High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Suman Shyam and A.M. Buzor Baruah, JJ., altered the conviction and sentence of the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/28\/conviction-modified-from-section-302-to-304-ii-ipc-holding-that-the-assault-was-committed-in-a-fit-of-rage\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-06-28T07:31:46+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-07-02T06:49:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Gauhati-HC.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/28\/conviction-modified-from-section-302-to-304-ii-ipc-holding-that-the-assault-was-committed-in-a-fit-of-rage\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/28\/conviction-modified-from-section-302-to-304-ii-ipc-holding-that-the-assault-was-committed-in-a-fit-of-rage\/","name":"Conviction modified from Section 302 to 304 (II) IPC holding that the assault was committed in a fit of rage | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-06-28T07:31:46+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-02T06:49:29+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/28\/conviction-modified-from-section-302-to-304-ii-ipc-holding-that-the-assault-was-committed-in-a-fit-of-rage\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/28\/conviction-modified-from-section-302-to-304-ii-ipc-holding-that-the-assault-was-committed-in-a-fit-of-rage\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/28\/conviction-modified-from-section-302-to-304-ii-ipc-holding-that-the-assault-was-committed-in-a-fit-of-rage\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Conviction modified from Section 302 to 304 (II) IPC holding that the assault was committed in a fit of rage"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":245261,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/09\/culpable-homicide\/","url_meta":{"origin":197621,"position":0},"title":"Gau HC | \u201cNature of injury does not suggest that the appellant acted in cruelty\u201d; HC converts conviction for murder into culpable homicide","author":"Editor","date":"March 9, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Gauhati High Court: The Division Bench of Suman Shyam and Mir Alfaz Ali, JJ., heard the instant petition against the judgment and order dated 24-03-2011 rendered by Additional Sessions Judge, whereby, the appellant was convicted under Section 302 Penal Code, 1860 and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for life. The case\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":200361,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/20\/accused-convicted-under-section-302-ipc-in-light-of-no-alternative-theory\/","url_meta":{"origin":197621,"position":1},"title":"Accused convicted under Section 302 IPC in light of \u2018no alternative theory\u2019","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 20, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of S. Muralidhar and Vinod Goel, JJ. dismissed a criminal appeal filed against the order of the trial court whereby the appellant was convicted under Section 302 IPC. The appellant was alleged to have murdered his wife. It was proved that the deceased\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":48751,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/23\/conviction-modified-from-section-302-ipc-to-section-304-ii-ipc-for-the-accused-who-raped-an-8-year-old-girldeceased\/","url_meta":{"origin":197621,"position":2},"title":"Conviction modified from Section 302 IPC to Section 304 (II) IPC for the accused who raped an 8 year old girl(deceased)","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 23, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court: While dealing with a death reference the Court cancelled the death sentence","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":199019,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/25\/conviction-altered-from-section-302-to-304ii-in-absence-of-mens-rea\/","url_meta":{"origin":197621,"position":3},"title":"Conviction altered from Section 302 to 304 (II) IPC in absence of mens rea","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 25, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Division Bench comprising of P.N. Deshmukh and M.G. Giratkar, J., partly allowed a criminal appeal which was filed against the judgment of conviction under Section 302 IPC passed by the trial court. The convict was accused of throwing chilli powder at the deceased and other persons\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":283521,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/09\/delhi-high-court-modifies-conviction-from-section-302-to-section-304i-ipc-penal-code-legalnews-legalawareness-legalresearch\/","url_meta":{"origin":197621,"position":4},"title":"Absence of premeditation leads to Delhi High Court modifying murder conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder; Convict to be released","author":"Editor","date":"February 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Based on the weapon used for inflicting injuries to the deceased was a very heavy danda with nodes therein, the Trial Court has convicted the appellant for offence punishable under Section 302 IPC. However, it failed to appreciate the fact that the alleged offence was not committed by pre-meditation.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":378679,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/18\/bombay-hc-converts-murder-conviction-to-culpable-homicide-on-provocation\/","url_meta":{"origin":197621,"position":5},"title":"Bombay HC converts conviction from murder to culpable homicide, recognises \u201ccontinuous provocation\u201d from tobacco-addicted brother","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"March 18, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe deceased used to beat them even though they tried to persuade him to give up his addictions and improve.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"culpable homicide on provocation","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/culpable-homicide-on-provocation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/culpable-homicide-on-provocation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/culpable-homicide-on-provocation.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/culpable-homicide-on-provocation.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197621","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=197621"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197621\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=197621"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=197621"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=197621"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}