{"id":197587,"date":"2018-06-27T15:01:57","date_gmt":"2018-06-27T09:31:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=197587"},"modified":"2018-06-27T15:21:04","modified_gmt":"2018-06-27T09:51:04","slug":"section-17-of-sarfaesi-act-provides-remedy-before-drt-against-the-order-of-district-magistrate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/27\/section-17-of-sarfaesi-act-provides-remedy-before-drt-against-the-order-of-district-magistrate\/","title":{"rendered":"Section 17 of SARFAESI Act provides remedy before DRT against the order of District Magistrate"},"content":{"rendered":"

Madhya Pradesh High Court: <\/strong>In a matter arising under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest (SARFAESI) Act, 2002, a Division Bench comprising of Hemant Gupta, CJ and Atul Sreedharan, J. allowed a writ appeal and set aside the Orders of the learned Single Judge as well as the Debts Recovery Tribunal.<\/p>\n

The appellant, a secured creditor, invoked the jurisdiction of the District Magistrate under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act. Against the order passed by the District Magistrate, the respondents preferred a challenge before the Debts Recovery Tribunal who declined to exercise jurisdiction, holding that an application under Section 17 of the Act is not maintainable before the Tribunal. Respondents filed an appeal before the learned Single Judge who by his impugned judgment, allowed the challenge and set aside the Order of the District Magistrate. Aggrieved by the Order of the Single Judge, the appellants were in appeal before the High Court.<\/p>\n

The High Court, after considering the record, held that the learned Single Judge was not right in setting aside the Order of the DM. The Court, relying on its previous judgments, held that an appeal under Section 17 of the Act against an order passed by the DM, is maintainable before the Debts Recovery Tribunal. Thus, the Court set aside the orders of the learned Single Judge as well as the Debts Recovery Tribunal. The matter was accordingly sent back to the Tribunal for adjudication under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act. [Authorized Officer v.\u00a0 Prafulla Kumar Maheshwari; 2018 SCC OnLine MP 325<\/a>; dated 01-05-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Madhya Pradesh High Court: In a matter arising under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest (SARFAESI) Act, <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[8991,28984,11801,2554],"class_list":["post-197587","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-appeal","tag-drt","tag-high-court","tag-Jurisdiction"],"yoast_head":"\nSection 17 of SARFAESI Act provides remedy before DRT against the order of District Magistrate | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/27\/section-17-of-sarfaesi-act-provides-remedy-before-drt-against-the-order-of-district-magistrate\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Section 17 of SARFAESI Act provides remedy before DRT against the order of District Magistrate\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh High Court: In a matter arising under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest (SARFAESI) Act,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/27\/section-17-of-sarfaesi-act-provides-remedy-before-drt-against-the-order-of-district-magistrate\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-06-27T09:31:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-06-27T09:51:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MP-high-court1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/06\\\/27\\\/section-17-of-sarfaesi-act-provides-remedy-before-drt-against-the-order-of-district-magistrate\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/06\\\/27\\\/section-17-of-sarfaesi-act-provides-remedy-before-drt-against-the-order-of-district-magistrate\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"headline\":\"Section 17 of SARFAESI Act provides remedy before DRT against the order of District Magistrate\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-06-27T09:31:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-27T09:51:04+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/06\\\/27\\\/section-17-of-sarfaesi-act-provides-remedy-before-drt-against-the-order-of-district-magistrate\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":270,\"commentCount\":0,\"keywords\":[\"Appeal\",\"DRT\",\"high court\",\"Jurisdiction\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/06\\\/27\\\/section-17-of-sarfaesi-act-provides-remedy-before-drt-against-the-order-of-district-magistrate\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/06\\\/27\\\/section-17-of-sarfaesi-act-provides-remedy-before-drt-against-the-order-of-district-magistrate\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/06\\\/27\\\/section-17-of-sarfaesi-act-provides-remedy-before-drt-against-the-order-of-district-magistrate\\\/\",\"name\":\"Section 17 of SARFAESI Act provides remedy before DRT against the order of District Magistrate | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-06-27T09:31:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-27T09:51:04+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/06\\\/27\\\/section-17-of-sarfaesi-act-provides-remedy-before-drt-against-the-order-of-district-magistrate\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/06\\\/27\\\/section-17-of-sarfaesi-act-provides-remedy-before-drt-against-the-order-of-district-magistrate\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/06\\\/27\\\/section-17-of-sarfaesi-act-provides-remedy-before-drt-against-the-order-of-district-magistrate\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Section 17 of SARFAESI Act provides remedy before DRT against the order of District Magistrate\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_1\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Section 17 of SARFAESI Act provides remedy before DRT against the order of District Magistrate | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/27\/section-17-of-sarfaesi-act-provides-remedy-before-drt-against-the-order-of-district-magistrate\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Section 17 of SARFAESI Act provides remedy before DRT against the order of District Magistrate","og_description":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: In a matter arising under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest (SARFAESI) Act,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/27\/section-17-of-sarfaesi-act-provides-remedy-before-drt-against-the-order-of-district-magistrate\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-06-27T09:31:57+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-06-27T09:51:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MP-high-court1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/27\/section-17-of-sarfaesi-act-provides-remedy-before-drt-against-the-order-of-district-magistrate\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/27\/section-17-of-sarfaesi-act-provides-remedy-before-drt-against-the-order-of-district-magistrate\/"},"author":{"name":"Bhumika Indulia","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"headline":"Section 17 of SARFAESI Act provides remedy before DRT against the order of District Magistrate","datePublished":"2018-06-27T09:31:57+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-27T09:51:04+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/27\/section-17-of-sarfaesi-act-provides-remedy-before-drt-against-the-order-of-district-magistrate\/"},"wordCount":270,"commentCount":0,"keywords":["Appeal","DRT","high court","Jurisdiction"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/27\/section-17-of-sarfaesi-act-provides-remedy-before-drt-against-the-order-of-district-magistrate\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/27\/section-17-of-sarfaesi-act-provides-remedy-before-drt-against-the-order-of-district-magistrate\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/27\/section-17-of-sarfaesi-act-provides-remedy-before-drt-against-the-order-of-district-magistrate\/","name":"Section 17 of SARFAESI Act provides remedy before DRT against the order of District Magistrate | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-06-27T09:31:57+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-27T09:51:04+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/27\/section-17-of-sarfaesi-act-provides-remedy-before-drt-against-the-order-of-district-magistrate\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/27\/section-17-of-sarfaesi-act-provides-remedy-before-drt-against-the-order-of-district-magistrate\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/27\/section-17-of-sarfaesi-act-provides-remedy-before-drt-against-the-order-of-district-magistrate\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Section 17 of SARFAESI Act provides remedy before DRT against the order of District Magistrate"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":344645,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/29\/magistrates-jurisdiction-section-14-sarfaesi-act-kerala-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":197587,"position":0},"title":"Magistrate\u2019s jurisdiction under S. 14 of SARFAESI Act doesn\u2019t involve adjudication; passing orders in printed format with just filled-in details is unjustifiable: Kerala HC","author":"Apoorva","date":"March 29, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe power under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act has significant consequences, which is why it is entrusted to high-ranking officials like the District Magistrate or Chief Judicial Magistrate.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":306330,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/03\/delhi-high-court-remedy-section-1310-sarfaesi-act-cannot-considered-remedy-independent-rdb-act-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":197587,"position":1},"title":"Delhi High Court| Remedy under Section 13(10) of SARFAESI Act cannot be considered as a remedy independent of the RDB Act","author":"Arunima","date":"November 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court is unable to accept that the legislative intent is to provide parallel regimes for the recovery of debts. The provisions of Section 13(10) of the SARFAESI Act, thus, cannot be interpreted in the manner as contended on behalf of the petitioner.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":41211,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/02\/high-courts-cannot-entertain-any-writ-petition-challenging-the-order-of-the-debts-recovery-tribunal-unless-any-exceptional-circumstances-arise\/","url_meta":{"origin":197587,"position":2},"title":"High Courts cannot entertain any writ petition challenging the order of the Debts Recovery Tribunal unless any exceptional circumstances arise","author":"Sucheta","date":"April 2, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: While deciding the present petition wherein the issue was that whether a writ petition challenging an order passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) while disposing an appeal filed under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, is maintainable, especially when Section 18 of the 2002 Act\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":196227,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/22\/withdrawal-of-notice-under-s-13-4-of-sarfaesi-act-does-not-discharge-the-debt\/","url_meta":{"origin":197587,"position":3},"title":"Withdrawal of notice under Section 13 (4) of SARFAESI Act does not discharge the debt","author":"Saba","date":"May 22, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: A petition filed against the possession notice issued under Rule 8 of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules 2002 was dismissed by a Division Bench comprising of Hemant Gupta, CJ and Vijay Kumar Shukla, J. Argument of the petitioner was that earlier, the concerned Bank initiated proceedings\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":361237,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/23\/remedy-for-secured-creditors-aggrieved-by-actions-under-section-134-of-the-sarfaesi-act-where-does-it-lie\/","url_meta":{"origin":197587,"position":4},"title":"Remedy for Secured Creditors Aggrieved by Actions under Section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act: Where does it Lie?","author":"Editor","date":"September 23, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"by Prashant Tripathi*","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Secured Creditors Remedy under SARFAESI Act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Secured-Creditors-Remedy-under-SARFAESI-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Secured-Creditors-Remedy-under-SARFAESI-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Secured-Creditors-Remedy-under-SARFAESI-Act.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Secured-Creditors-Remedy-under-SARFAESI-Act.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":200299,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/20\/civil-court-cannot-have-jurisdiction-in-matters-covered-under-sarfaesi-act-2002-just-because-fraud-is-alleged\/","url_meta":{"origin":197587,"position":5},"title":"Civil Court cannot have jurisdiction in matters covered under SARFAESI Act, 2002 just because fraud is alleged","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 20, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: In this case, two revision petitions were disposed of together by a Single Judge Bench comprising of Anil Kshetarpal, J., where issues were identical. This revision petition was filed against an order where application for rejection of plaint was dismissed. The Plaintiffs were alleged with\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197587","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=197587"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197587\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=197587"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=197587"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=197587"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}