{"id":197558,"date":"2018-06-27T08:34:34","date_gmt":"2018-06-27T03:04:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=197558"},"modified":"2018-08-29T15:47:16","modified_gmt":"2018-08-29T10:17:16","slug":"us-supreme-court-upholds-trumps-entry-ban-on-nationals-of-five-muslim-majority-states","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/27\/us-supreme-court-upholds-trumps-entry-ban-on-nationals-of-five-muslim-majority-states\/","title":{"rendered":"US Supreme Court upholds Trump\u2019s \u2018travel ban\u2019 on nationals of five Muslim-majority States"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Supreme Court of The United States: <\/strong>A nine-Judge Bench, by a majority of 5:4, upheld the travel ban on people from five Muslim-majority countries imposed by President Donald J. Trump (vide Proclamation No. 9645). John Roberts, CJ., while delivering the opinion of the Court, held that the Government has set forth a sufficient national security justification to survive rational basis review.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In September 2017, the President imposed entry restrictions on nationals from eight foreign states whose system for managing and sharing information about their nationals were inadequate according to the President. A review system was undertaken by the Department of Homeland Security which identified those foreign states having deficient information sharing practices and posing national security concerns. Pursuant to the review, the Acting Secretary of Homeland Security recommended entry restrictions on certain nationals from eight foreign states (Muslim majority countries). After consultations with multiple Cabinet Members, the President issued the Proclamation exercising authority under Sections 1182(f) and 1185(a) of Act No. 8 of United States Code (USC). Plaintiffs (respondents herein), the State of Hawaii and Muslim Association of Hawaii, challenged the Proclamation as violating Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) and Establishment Clause. The District Court of Hawaii (and also of Maryland) granted a nationwide preliminary injunction barring the enforcement of the restrictions, which was affirmed by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">However, the Hon\u2019ble Supreme Court reversed the order of the lower courts and held that the President has lawfully exercised the broad discretion granted to him under the above-mentioned Section 1182(f) to suspend the entry of aliens into US; the provision vests the President with ample power to impose such entry restrictions; the sole requirement being that the President \u2018finds\u2019 that entry of such aliens \u2018would be detrimental to the interests of the United States\u2019; the President had undoubtedly fulfilled that requirement. The Hon\u2019ble Court dismissed all the challenges put forth by the respondents including the allegation that primary purpose of the Proclamation was religious animus. It was observed, <em>admission and exclusion of foreign nationals is a \u2018fundamental sovereign attribute exercised by the Government\u2019s political departments largely immune from judicial control\u2019. <\/em>Further, the Proclamation was premised on national security concerns and said nothing about religion; entry restrictions on nationals of Muslim-majority countries were limited to those nations that were previously designated by the Congress as posing national security risks. The Court noted three features, <em>firstly<\/em>, since the imposition of the ban, three countries have been removed from the list; <em>secondly<\/em>, the Proclamation contains various exceptions to the restrictions; <em>thirdly<\/em>, it contains a waiver program for all foreign nationals seeking entry as immigrants and non-immigrants. Finally, observing that it cannot substitute its own assessment for the Executive\u2019s predictive judgments on such matters, the Hon\u2019ble Supreme Court upheld the entry ban which is now applicable on five out of original eight Muslim-majority countries. [Trump v.\u00a0 Hawaii, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/abqy0ymk\"><b>2018 SCC OnLine US SC 28 : 585 US ____ (2018)<\/b><\/a>, decided on 26-06-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court of The United States: A nine-Judge Bench, by a majority of 5:4, upheld the travel ban on people from five <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":32691,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,12],"tags":[30683,30684,2693,30682],"class_list":["post-197558","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-foreigncourts","tag-aliens","tag-immigration-and-nationality-act","tag-Muslim","tag-us"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>US Supreme Court upholds Trump\u2019s \u2018travel ban\u2019 on nationals of five Muslim-majority States | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/27\/us-supreme-court-upholds-trumps-entry-ban-on-nationals-of-five-muslim-majority-states\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"US Supreme Court upholds Trump\u2019s \u2018travel ban\u2019 on nationals of five Muslim-majority States\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court of The United States: A nine-Judge Bench, by a majority of 5:4, upheld the travel ban on people from five\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/27\/us-supreme-court-upholds-trumps-entry-ban-on-nationals-of-five-muslim-majority-states\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-06-27T03:04:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-08-29T10:17:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/27\/us-supreme-court-upholds-trumps-entry-ban-on-nationals-of-five-muslim-majority-states\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/27\/us-supreme-court-upholds-trumps-entry-ban-on-nationals-of-five-muslim-majority-states\/\",\"name\":\"US Supreme Court upholds Trump\u2019s \u2018travel ban\u2019 on nationals of five Muslim-majority States | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/27\/us-supreme-court-upholds-trumps-entry-ban-on-nationals-of-five-muslim-majority-states\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/27\/us-supreme-court-upholds-trumps-entry-ban-on-nationals-of-five-muslim-majority-states\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-06-27T03:04:34+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-29T10:17:16+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/27\/us-supreme-court-upholds-trumps-entry-ban-on-nationals-of-five-muslim-majority-states\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/27\/us-supreme-court-upholds-trumps-entry-ban-on-nationals-of-five-muslim-majority-states\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/27\/us-supreme-court-upholds-trumps-entry-ban-on-nationals-of-five-muslim-majority-states\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887,\"caption\":\"Supreme Court of The United States\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/27\/us-supreme-court-upholds-trumps-entry-ban-on-nationals-of-five-muslim-majority-states\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"US Supreme Court upholds Trump\u2019s \u2018travel ban\u2019 on nationals of five Muslim-majority States\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"US Supreme Court upholds Trump\u2019s \u2018travel ban\u2019 on nationals of five Muslim-majority States | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/27\/us-supreme-court-upholds-trumps-entry-ban-on-nationals-of-five-muslim-majority-states\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"US Supreme Court upholds Trump\u2019s \u2018travel ban\u2019 on nationals of five Muslim-majority States","og_description":"Supreme Court of The United States: A nine-Judge Bench, by a majority of 5:4, upheld the travel ban on people from five","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/27\/us-supreme-court-upholds-trumps-entry-ban-on-nationals-of-five-muslim-majority-states\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-06-27T03:04:34+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-08-29T10:17:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/27\/us-supreme-court-upholds-trumps-entry-ban-on-nationals-of-five-muslim-majority-states\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/27\/us-supreme-court-upholds-trumps-entry-ban-on-nationals-of-five-muslim-majority-states\/","name":"US Supreme Court upholds Trump\u2019s \u2018travel ban\u2019 on nationals of five Muslim-majority States | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/27\/us-supreme-court-upholds-trumps-entry-ban-on-nationals-of-five-muslim-majority-states\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/27\/us-supreme-court-upholds-trumps-entry-ban-on-nationals-of-five-muslim-majority-states\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg","datePublished":"2018-06-27T03:04:34+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-29T10:17:16+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/27\/us-supreme-court-upholds-trumps-entry-ban-on-nationals-of-five-muslim-majority-states\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/27\/us-supreme-court-upholds-trumps-entry-ban-on-nationals-of-five-muslim-majority-states\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/27\/us-supreme-court-upholds-trumps-entry-ban-on-nationals-of-five-muslim-majority-states\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg","width":1330,"height":887,"caption":"Supreme Court of The United States"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/27\/us-supreme-court-upholds-trumps-entry-ban-on-nationals-of-five-muslim-majority-states\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"US Supreme Court upholds Trump\u2019s \u2018travel ban\u2019 on nationals of five Muslim-majority States"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":138701,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/28\/us-supreme-court-partially-lifts-the-block-on-travel-ban-order\/","url_meta":{"origin":197558,"position":0},"title":"US Supreme Court partially lifts the block on travel ban Order","author":"Saba","date":"June 28, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of United States: The US Supreme Court by a 2-1 majority granted a partial victory to the Executive as it lifted important elements of lower court orders blocking the Trump\u2019s controversial travel ban targeting visa applicants from six Muslim-majority countries. These cases involve challenges to Executive Order No.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Supreme Court of The United States","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":235088,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/31\/bom-hc-quashing-of-firs-against-tablighi-jamaat-foreign-nationals-justice-sewlikar-gives-reasoning-for-the-judgment-differs-on-observations-of-malice-in-state-action\/","url_meta":{"origin":197558,"position":1},"title":"Bom HC | Quashing of FIRs against Tablighi Jamaat foreign nationals: Justice Sewlikar gives reasoning for the judgment; Differs on observations of malice in State action","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 31, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0M.G. Sewlikar, J., in reference to the judgment pronounced by this Court on 21-08-2020, with regard to the quashing of FIRs again foreign nationals who indulged in Tablighi Jamaat, stated that it agreed with the operative part of the Judgment but does not agree with some reasoning and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":173534,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/05\/travel-ban-allowed-enforced-completely\/","url_meta":{"origin":197558,"position":2},"title":"Travel ban allowed to be enforced completely","author":"Saba","date":"December 5, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"As reported by The Guardian, the Supreme Court of the United States has, by a 7:2 majority, allowed the Trump administration's travel ban to take into full effect. The Court ruled on Monday that a ban ordered on travellers from six Muslim-majority countries and two other countries could be immediately\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":105561,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/13\/court-of-appeals-at-san-francisco-denies-trumps-emergency-motion-against-temporary-nationwide-stay-on-travel-ban\/","url_meta":{"origin":197558,"position":3},"title":"Court of Appeals at San Francisco denies Trump\u2019s emergency motion against temporary nationwide stay on Travel Ban","author":"Saba","date":"February 13, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit:\u00a0After imposition of a nation-wide TRO against the travel ban executive order by President Trump, the Ninth US Circuit Court of Appeals also ruled that the TRO must stay in place and refused to reinstate the order banning travellers from seven countries.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/TRAVEL-BAN.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":44351,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/19\/english-court-has-jurisdiction-to-determine-proceedings-concerning-the-future-welfare-of-two-young-girls-who-are-hungarian-nationals\/","url_meta":{"origin":197558,"position":4},"title":"English Court has jurisdiction to determine proceedings concerning the future welfare of two young girls who are Hungarian Nationals","author":"Sucheta","date":"April 19, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of the United Kingdom:\u00a0Deciding on an appeal as to whether courts of England or Hungary should have jurisdiction to determine proceedings concerning the future welfare of two young girls, the Court by a majority set aside the request for a transfer of the proceedings to Hungary and returned\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":228246,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/04\/13\/grant-of-consular-services-to-foreign-nationals-presently-residing-in-india-due-to-travel-restrictions-in-the-context-of-covid19-outbreak-till-30th-april-2020\/","url_meta":{"origin":197558,"position":5},"title":"Grant of Consular Services to Foreign Nationals, presently residing in India due to travel restrictions in the context of COVID19 outbreak, till 30th April, 2020","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 13, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"In order to remove confusion in the public, it is informed that Union Ministry for Home Affairs (MHA), on 28.03.2020, had granted consular services on gratis basis to foreign nationals, presently residing in India due to travel restrictions in the context of COVID-19 outbreak, till 30th\u00a0April, 2020. (https:\/\/pib.gov.in\/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=1613895) Regular visa,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197558","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=197558"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197558\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/32691"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=197558"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=197558"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=197558"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}