{"id":197071,"date":"2018-06-15T14:29:31","date_gmt":"2018-06-15T08:59:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=197071"},"modified":"2018-06-19T10:59:09","modified_gmt":"2018-06-19T05:29:09","slug":"no-interference-is-warranted-in-an-intra-court-mandamus-appeal-unless-there-is-palpable-infirmity-in-the-impugned-judgment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/15\/no-interference-is-warranted-in-an-intra-court-mandamus-appeal-unless-there-is-palpable-infirmity-in-the-impugned-judgment\/","title":{"rendered":"No interference is warranted in an intra-court mandamus appeal unless there is palpable infirmity in the impugned judgment"},"content":{"rendered":"

Calcutta High Court: <\/strong>Biswanath Somadder, J. speaking for the Court comprising of himself and Arindam Mukherjee, J. dismissed an appeal challenging the judgment of the learned Single Judge who had dismissed the writ petition filed before him by the appellant.<\/p>\n

The appellant had filed a writ petition before the learned Single Judge, who dismissed the petition on grounds of suppression of facts on the part of the writ petitioner (appellant). Admittedly, the petitioner had earlier obtained an interim order for age relaxation in the selection process, based on same pleas. The learned Single Judge was pleased to note the fact that a candidate was entitled to age relaxation only once. And such opportunity had been already availed of by the petitioner in 2015. Aggrieved by the dismissal of his petition, the appellant approached the High Court.<\/p>\n

The High Court perused the record and observed that the Single Judge rightly found the appellant guilty of suppression of facts as relevant facts were not pleaded by the appellant. The Court categorically observed, in an intra-court appeal, no interference is usually warranted unless the impugned judgment suffers from palpable infirmities or perversities. <\/em>The Court held that on a plain reading of the judgment, no such perversity was deductible, rather it was rendered with cogent and justifiable reasons. In such circumstances, the appeal was dismissed. [Panchanan Bera v. State of W.B.,2018 SCC OnLine Cal 3468<\/a>, dated 13-06-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Calcutta High Court: Biswanath Somadder, J. speaking for the Court comprising of himself and Arindam Mukherjee, J. dismissed an appeal challenging the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":52131,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[8991,30335,9331,30535],"class_list":["post-197071","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-appeal","tag-infirmity","tag-interference","tag-intra-court"],"yoast_head":"\nNo interference is warranted in an intra-court mandamus appeal unless there is palpable infirmity in the impugned judgment | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/15\/no-interference-is-warranted-in-an-intra-court-mandamus-appeal-unless-there-is-palpable-infirmity-in-the-impugned-judgment\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"No interference is warranted in an intra-court mandamus appeal unless there is palpable infirmity in the impugned judgment\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court: Biswanath Somadder, J. speaking for the Court comprising of himself and Arindam Mukherjee, J. dismissed an appeal challenging the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/15\/no-interference-is-warranted-in-an-intra-court-mandamus-appeal-unless-there-is-palpable-infirmity-in-the-impugned-judgment\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-06-15T08:59:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-06-19T05:29:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/15\/no-interference-is-warranted-in-an-intra-court-mandamus-appeal-unless-there-is-palpable-infirmity-in-the-impugned-judgment\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/15\/no-interference-is-warranted-in-an-intra-court-mandamus-appeal-unless-there-is-palpable-infirmity-in-the-impugned-judgment\/\",\"name\":\"No interference is warranted in an intra-court mandamus appeal unless there is palpable infirmity in the impugned judgment | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/15\/no-interference-is-warranted-in-an-intra-court-mandamus-appeal-unless-there-is-palpable-infirmity-in-the-impugned-judgment\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/15\/no-interference-is-warranted-in-an-intra-court-mandamus-appeal-unless-there-is-palpable-infirmity-in-the-impugned-judgment\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-06-15T08:59:31+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-19T05:29:09+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/15\/no-interference-is-warranted-in-an-intra-court-mandamus-appeal-unless-there-is-palpable-infirmity-in-the-impugned-judgment\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/15\/no-interference-is-warranted-in-an-intra-court-mandamus-appeal-unless-there-is-palpable-infirmity-in-the-impugned-judgment\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/15\/no-interference-is-warranted-in-an-intra-court-mandamus-appeal-unless-there-is-palpable-infirmity-in-the-impugned-judgment\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/15\/no-interference-is-warranted-in-an-intra-court-mandamus-appeal-unless-there-is-palpable-infirmity-in-the-impugned-judgment\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"No interference is warranted in an intra-court mandamus appeal unless there is palpable infirmity in the impugned judgment\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"No interference is warranted in an intra-court mandamus appeal unless there is palpable infirmity in the impugned judgment | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/15\/no-interference-is-warranted-in-an-intra-court-mandamus-appeal-unless-there-is-palpable-infirmity-in-the-impugned-judgment\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"No interference is warranted in an intra-court mandamus appeal unless there is palpable infirmity in the impugned judgment","og_description":"Calcutta High Court: Biswanath Somadder, J. speaking for the Court comprising of himself and Arindam Mukherjee, J. dismissed an appeal challenging the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/15\/no-interference-is-warranted-in-an-intra-court-mandamus-appeal-unless-there-is-palpable-infirmity-in-the-impugned-judgment\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-06-15T08:59:31+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-06-19T05:29:09+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/15\/no-interference-is-warranted-in-an-intra-court-mandamus-appeal-unless-there-is-palpable-infirmity-in-the-impugned-judgment\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/15\/no-interference-is-warranted-in-an-intra-court-mandamus-appeal-unless-there-is-palpable-infirmity-in-the-impugned-judgment\/","name":"No interference is warranted in an intra-court mandamus appeal unless there is palpable infirmity in the impugned judgment | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/15\/no-interference-is-warranted-in-an-intra-court-mandamus-appeal-unless-there-is-palpable-infirmity-in-the-impugned-judgment\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/15\/no-interference-is-warranted-in-an-intra-court-mandamus-appeal-unless-there-is-palpable-infirmity-in-the-impugned-judgment\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","datePublished":"2018-06-15T08:59:31+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-19T05:29:09+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/15\/no-interference-is-warranted-in-an-intra-court-mandamus-appeal-unless-there-is-palpable-infirmity-in-the-impugned-judgment\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/15\/no-interference-is-warranted-in-an-intra-court-mandamus-appeal-unless-there-is-palpable-infirmity-in-the-impugned-judgment\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/15\/no-interference-is-warranted-in-an-intra-court-mandamus-appeal-unless-there-is-palpable-infirmity-in-the-impugned-judgment\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/15\/no-interference-is-warranted-in-an-intra-court-mandamus-appeal-unless-there-is-palpable-infirmity-in-the-impugned-judgment\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"No interference is warranted in an intra-court mandamus appeal unless there is palpable infirmity in the impugned judgment"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":197777,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/29\/writ-petition-not-maintainable-if-there-is-a-remedy-for-redressal-by-a-competent-statutory-authority\/","url_meta":{"origin":197071,"position":0},"title":"Writ petition not maintainable if there is a remedy for redressal by a competent statutory Authority","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 29, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Biswanath Somadder and Arindam Mukherjee, JJ., dismissed an appeal in light of the availability of an efficacious alternative remedy before a competent statutory Authority. The appeal was filed against the decision of the learned Single Judge who had dismissed the writ petition\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":194004,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/15\/a-party-cannot-be-condemned-unheard\/","url_meta":{"origin":197071,"position":1},"title":"A party cannot be condemned unheard","author":"Saba","date":"March 15, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Sanjay Karol, acting CJ. and Ajay Mohan Goel, J., decided a letters patent appeal, wherein the Court quashed the order passed against the appellant by the learned Single Judge, on grounds of violation of principles of natural justice. Earlier, a writ\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":197555,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/26\/mere-filing-of-an-appeal-does-not-stay-the-order-appealed-against\/","url_meta":{"origin":197071,"position":2},"title":"Mere filing of an appeal does not stay the order appealed against","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 26, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Tripura High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Ajay Rastogi, CJ and Arindam Lodh, JJ. dismissed an intra court appeal filed against the order of learned Single Judge directing the appellant-Corporation to consider the appointment of Respondent 1 in accordance with the \u2018die-in-harness\u2019 scheme. Husband of Respondent 1 was in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":357510,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/23\/advocate-bound-by-clients-instructions-delhi-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":197071,"position":3},"title":"\u2018An advocate is bound by the client’s instructions and is not obligated to verify their truthfulness\u2019: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"August 23, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"In this case, the appellant had challenged the judgment of the High Court\u2019s Single Judge Bench, wherein it was held that advocates representing the opposing party had no fiduciary or professional relationship vis-a-vis the appellant.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Advocate bound by client's instructions","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Advocate-bound-by-clients-instructions.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Advocate-bound-by-clients-instructions.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Advocate-bound-by-clients-instructions.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Advocate-bound-by-clients-instructions.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":368379,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/02\/family-court-power-to-execute-warrant-not-helpless-powerlesscorrect-address-calcutta-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":197071,"position":4},"title":"Family Court not helpless or powerless to ensure execution of its warrant, provided correct address is supplied: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"December 2, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Division Bench refused to interfere with the single judge\u2019s order.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Family Court power to execute warrants","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Family-Court-power-to-execute-warrants.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Family-Court-power-to-execute-warrants.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Family-Court-power-to-execute-warrants.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Family-Court-power-to-execute-warrants.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":189154,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/02\/15\/court-exercise-writ-jurisdiction-not-ignore-condition-imposed-law-entertaining-appeal\/","url_meta":{"origin":197071,"position":5},"title":"The Court, in exercise of writ jurisdiction, should not ignore a condition imposed by law for entertaining an appeal","author":"Saba","date":"February 15, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: A civil writ petition was dismissed by a Single Judge Bench comprising of Ram Surat Ram Maurya, J., on the ground that the petitioner had an alternate remedy of appeal under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest (SARFAESI) Act, 2002. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197071","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=197071"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197071\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/52131"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=197071"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=197071"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=197071"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}