{"id":197026,"date":"2018-06-15T11:46:22","date_gmt":"2018-06-15T06:16:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=197026"},"modified":"2018-06-22T17:03:31","modified_gmt":"2018-06-22T11:33:31","slug":"antrix-devas-dispute-hc-allows-bangalore-city-civil-court-to-decide-upon-jurisdiction-in-the-matter","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/15\/antrix-devas-dispute-hc-allows-bangalore-city-civil-court-to-decide-upon-jurisdiction-in-the-matter\/","title":{"rendered":"Antrix-Devas Dispute: HC allows Bangalore City Civil Court to decide upon jurisdiction in the matter"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court<\/strong>: The Division Bench comprising S. Ravindra Bhat and Yogesh Khanna, JJ. set aside the decision of the Single Bench wherein it was that the Bangalore City Civil Court had no jurisdiction to hear the dispute related to arbitration between ISRO\u2019s Antrix Corporation and Devas Multimedia.<\/p>\n

An agreement was entered between Antrix Corporation and Devas Multimedia and further terminated unilaterally by Antrix due to \u2018national security reasons.\u2019 The agreement provided settlement of the dispute by arbitration and Devas accordingly pulled Antrix to International Court of Arbitration i.e. \u2018ICC\u2019. Antrix approached Bangalore Court to restrain Devas from proceeding with the arbitration and stop the International Court from going ahead with the matter. In 2015, the International Court ruling asked Antrix to pay USD 672 million to Devas for unlawful termination of the agreement. Subsequently, in September 2015, Devas moved to Delhi High Court for implementation of the arbitral award by seeking attachment of bank accounts of Antrix but the latter challenged its jurisdiction. Thereafter, it was held Antrix’s pleas in the court in Bangalore were not maintainable.<\/p>\n

Antrix contended that under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation once an application was made to a \u201ccourt\u201d, only that \u201ccourt\u201d would have jurisdiction over all subsequent applications made by either party under the Act, by virtue of Section 42. On the other hand, it was contended by Devas that Antrix had claimed substantially similar reliefs in its Section 11 petition before the Supreme Court which was dismissed, thereby leading to an issue estoppel. Allowing Antrix to re-agitate similar claims in a Section 9 petition before the City Civil Court would amount to forum shopping and an abuse of process of the courts.<\/p>\n

However, contentions of Antrix were upheld against those of Devas. Section 42 precluded the jurisdiction and the Bangalore Court being first seized of Antrix’s petition would first decide Antrix’s initial plea against the arbitration proceedings. If it is found to be maintainable and bonafide, then Section 42 would be applicable, however, if not then that application would be treated as non-est and application in Delhi High Court would not be hit by Section 42. [Antrix Corpn. Ltd. v. Devas Multimedia Pvt. Ltd., 2018 SCC OnLine Del 9338<\/a>, decided on 30-05-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: The Division Bench comprising S. Ravindra Bhat and Yogesh Khanna, JJ. set aside the decision of the Single Bench <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[30527,30526,2554],"class_list":["post-197026","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-antrix-devas","tag-arbitration-proceedings","tag-Jurisdiction"],"yoast_head":"\nAntrix-Devas Dispute: HC allows Bangalore City Civil Court to decide upon jurisdiction in the matter | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/15\/antrix-devas-dispute-hc-allows-bangalore-city-civil-court-to-decide-upon-jurisdiction-in-the-matter\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Antrix-Devas Dispute: HC allows Bangalore City Civil Court to decide upon jurisdiction in the matter\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: The Division Bench comprising S. Ravindra Bhat and Yogesh Khanna, JJ. set aside the decision of the Single Bench\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/15\/antrix-devas-dispute-hc-allows-bangalore-city-civil-court-to-decide-upon-jurisdiction-in-the-matter\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-06-15T06:16:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-06-22T11:33:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/15\/antrix-devas-dispute-hc-allows-bangalore-city-civil-court-to-decide-upon-jurisdiction-in-the-matter\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/15\/antrix-devas-dispute-hc-allows-bangalore-city-civil-court-to-decide-upon-jurisdiction-in-the-matter\/\",\"name\":\"Antrix-Devas Dispute: HC allows Bangalore City Civil Court to decide upon jurisdiction in the matter | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-06-15T06:16:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-22T11:33:31+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/15\/antrix-devas-dispute-hc-allows-bangalore-city-civil-court-to-decide-upon-jurisdiction-in-the-matter\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/15\/antrix-devas-dispute-hc-allows-bangalore-city-civil-court-to-decide-upon-jurisdiction-in-the-matter\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/15\/antrix-devas-dispute-hc-allows-bangalore-city-civil-court-to-decide-upon-jurisdiction-in-the-matter\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Antrix-Devas Dispute: HC allows Bangalore City Civil Court to decide upon jurisdiction in the matter\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Antrix-Devas Dispute: HC allows Bangalore City Civil Court to decide upon jurisdiction in the matter | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/15\/antrix-devas-dispute-hc-allows-bangalore-city-civil-court-to-decide-upon-jurisdiction-in-the-matter\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Antrix-Devas Dispute: HC allows Bangalore City Civil Court to decide upon jurisdiction in the matter","og_description":"Delhi High Court: The Division Bench comprising S. Ravindra Bhat and Yogesh Khanna, JJ. set aside the decision of the Single Bench","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/15\/antrix-devas-dispute-hc-allows-bangalore-city-civil-court-to-decide-upon-jurisdiction-in-the-matter\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-06-15T06:16:22+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-06-22T11:33:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/15\/antrix-devas-dispute-hc-allows-bangalore-city-civil-court-to-decide-upon-jurisdiction-in-the-matter\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/15\/antrix-devas-dispute-hc-allows-bangalore-city-civil-court-to-decide-upon-jurisdiction-in-the-matter\/","name":"Antrix-Devas Dispute: HC allows Bangalore City Civil Court to decide upon jurisdiction in the matter | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-06-15T06:16:22+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-22T11:33:31+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/15\/antrix-devas-dispute-hc-allows-bangalore-city-civil-court-to-decide-upon-jurisdiction-in-the-matter\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/15\/antrix-devas-dispute-hc-allows-bangalore-city-civil-court-to-decide-upon-jurisdiction-in-the-matter\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/15\/antrix-devas-dispute-hc-allows-bangalore-city-civil-court-to-decide-upon-jurisdiction-in-the-matter\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Antrix-Devas Dispute: HC allows Bangalore City Civil Court to decide upon jurisdiction in the matter"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":287420,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/21\/antrix-devas-deal-delhi-high-court-upholds-decision-setting-aside-icc-award-of-562-5-million-on-the-ground-of-fraud-legal-research-updaes-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":197026,"position":0},"title":"[Antrix-Devas Deal] Delhi High Court upholds decision of setting aside ICC Award of $562.5 million on the ground of fraud","author":"Simranjeet","date":"March 21, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court upheld Single judge's decision to set aside ICC Award of $562.5 million in favour of Devas Multimedia (P) Ltd. for a failed satellite agreement with Antrix Corporation Ltd., on the grounds of fraud and being in conflict with the public policy of India.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":260248,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/18\/cant-allow-devas-and-its-shareholders-to-reap-the-benefits-of-their-fraudulent-action-sc-upholds-nclats-order-to-wind-up-devas\/","url_meta":{"origin":197026,"position":1},"title":"“Can’t allow Devas and its shareholders to reap the benefits of their fraudulent action”; SC upholds NCLAT’s order to wind up Devas\u00a0\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"January 18, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\"If the seeds of the commercial relationship between Antrix and Devas were a product of fraud perpetrated by Devas, every part of the plant that grew out of those seeds, such as the Agreement, the disputes, arbitral awards etc., are all infected with the poison of fraud.\"","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Is-dismissal-from-service-per-se-an-unfair-labour-practice-for-being-disproportionate-to-the-misconduct-proved-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Is-dismissal-from-service-per-se-an-unfair-labour-practice-for-being-disproportionate-to-the-misconduct-proved-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Is-dismissal-from-service-per-se-an-unfair-labour-practice-for-being-disproportionate-to-the-misconduct-proved-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Is-dismissal-from-service-per-se-an-unfair-labour-practice-for-being-disproportionate-to-the-misconduct-proved-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Is-dismissal-from-service-per-se-an-unfair-labour-practice-for-being-disproportionate-to-the-misconduct-proved-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":260276,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/18\/explained-does-failure-to-publish-an-advertisement-lead-to-the-automatic-dismissal-winding-up-petition\/","url_meta":{"origin":197026,"position":2},"title":"Explained| Does failure to publish an advertisement lead to the automatic dismissal winding up petition?\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"January 18, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In the case where the bench of Hemant Gupta and V. Ramasubramanian*, JJ upheld NCLAT\u2019s order of winding up of Devas Multimedia Private Limited, the requirement of advertising the winding up petition was looked into and the Court observed that the failure to publish an advertisement would not\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Does-failure-to-publish-an-advertisement-lead-to-the-automatic-dismissal-winding-up-petition.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Does-failure-to-publish-an-advertisement-lead-to-the-automatic-dismissal-winding-up-petition.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Does-failure-to-publish-an-advertisement-lead-to-the-automatic-dismissal-winding-up-petition.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Does-failure-to-publish-an-advertisement-lead-to-the-automatic-dismissal-winding-up-petition.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Does-failure-to-publish-an-advertisement-lead-to-the-automatic-dismissal-winding-up-petition.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":249830,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/15\/arbitrator\/","url_meta":{"origin":197026,"position":3},"title":"Removal of Arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 A Welcome Step | Oyo Hotels & Homes (P) Ltd. v. Rajan Tewari : A case comment","author":"Editor","date":"June 15, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by Saurabh Seth*","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-2.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-2.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-2.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-2.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-2.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":260809,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/29\/scc-online-weekly-rewind-episode-46-ft-nilufer-bhateja\/","url_meta":{"origin":197026,"position":4},"title":"SCC Online Weekly Rewind Episode 46 ft. Nilufer Bhateja","author":"Nilufer Bhateja","date":"January 29, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"SCC Online Weekly Rewind Episode 46 ft. Nilufer Bhateja, Associate Editor is out now. The written episode along with the video episode can be watched and read below. \u00a0 Top News of the Week \u00a0Bishop Franco Mulakkal; A victim of faction feud in the Church and group fights of nuns?\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Legal RoundUp"","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-37-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-37-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-37-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-37-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-37-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":274691,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/29\/delhi-high-court-section34-of-the-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996-fraud-public-policy-arbitral-tribunal-international-bar-association-rules-international-arbitration-governmenta-authority-nation\/","url_meta":{"origin":197026,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court set aside arbitral award as it suffers from patent illegalities, and fraud and conflicts with the Public Policy of India","author":"Editor","date":"September 29, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (\u2018the Act\u2019) for setting aside of the arbitral award dated 14.09.2015 allowing the claim of the respondent, Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. has held that the impugned award dated 14.09.2015 suffers from patent\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197026","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=197026"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197026\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=197026"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=197026"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=197026"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}