{"id":196928,"date":"2018-06-13T14:20:30","date_gmt":"2018-06-13T08:50:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=196928"},"modified":"2018-06-21T17:40:48","modified_gmt":"2018-06-21T12:10:48","slug":"transfer-is-an-incident-of-service-not-to-be-interfered-with-unless-effected-in-violation-of-mandatory-statutory-rules","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/13\/transfer-is-an-incident-of-service-not-to-be-interfered-with-unless-effected-in-violation-of-mandatory-statutory-rules\/","title":{"rendered":"Transfer is an incident of service, not to be interfered with unless effected in violation of mandatory statutory rules"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Rajasthan High Court: <\/strong>A Single Judge Bench comprising of Veerender Singh Siradhana, J. dismissed a civil writ petition filed by the petitioner against his transfer from Rajasthan State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, Jaipur to District Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum, Jaisalmer.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The petitioner was employed as a class IV employee in the Commission at Jaipur for last 24 years. By the impugned order, as many as six employees including the petitioner were transferred. Feeling aggrieved, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal who directed the Commission to consider the representation of the petitioner. However, the Commission declined his representation. Aggrieved, the petitioner approached the High Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The High Court, while perusing the record, noted that the only grievance put forth by the appellant was that he had a son and four daughters, who were of marriageable age, and therefore, he ought to have been retained at Jaipur. Placing reliance on the Supreme Court decision in <strong><em>Gobardhan Lal <\/em>v.<em> State of U.P., <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/u48l0Ol7\">(2004) 11 SCC 402<\/a><\/strong>, which dealt with the scope and extent of judicial review in matters of transfer of an employee, the High Court observed, <em>by a catena of judgments it is now well settled that transfer is an incident of service. Unless transfer is effected in violation of any mandatory statutory rule or having adverse consequences on conditions of service, the same is not to be interfered with by the Courts as an Appellate Authority. <\/em>In light of the discussion as mentioned herein, the Court declined to interfere with the impugned transfer order as passed by the Competent Authority. The petition was thereby dismissed. [Vinod Kumar Bairwa v.\u00a0 Rajasthan State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/7r490Gcf\">2018 SCC OnLine Raj 1358<\/a>, dated 29-5-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Rajasthan High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Veerender Singh Siradhana, J. dismissed a civil writ petition filed by the petitioner <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[30480,30479,30481,30308,2787,30482,2765],"class_list":["post-196928","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-impugned","tag-incident","tag-mandatory","tag-rules","tag-service","tag-statutory","tag-Transfer"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Transfer is an incident of service, not to be interfered with unless effected in violation of mandatory statutory rules | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/13\/transfer-is-an-incident-of-service-not-to-be-interfered-with-unless-effected-in-violation-of-mandatory-statutory-rules\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Transfer is an incident of service, not to be interfered with unless effected in violation of mandatory statutory rules\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Veerender Singh Siradhana, J. dismissed a civil writ petition filed by the petitioner\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/13\/transfer-is-an-incident-of-service-not-to-be-interfered-with-unless-effected-in-violation-of-mandatory-statutory-rules\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-06-13T08:50:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-06-21T12:10:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/13\/transfer-is-an-incident-of-service-not-to-be-interfered-with-unless-effected-in-violation-of-mandatory-statutory-rules\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/13\/transfer-is-an-incident-of-service-not-to-be-interfered-with-unless-effected-in-violation-of-mandatory-statutory-rules\/\",\"name\":\"Transfer is an incident of service, not to be interfered with unless effected in violation of mandatory statutory rules | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-06-13T08:50:30+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-21T12:10:48+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/13\/transfer-is-an-incident-of-service-not-to-be-interfered-with-unless-effected-in-violation-of-mandatory-statutory-rules\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/13\/transfer-is-an-incident-of-service-not-to-be-interfered-with-unless-effected-in-violation-of-mandatory-statutory-rules\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/13\/transfer-is-an-incident-of-service-not-to-be-interfered-with-unless-effected-in-violation-of-mandatory-statutory-rules\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Transfer is an incident of service, not to be interfered with unless effected in violation of mandatory statutory rules\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Transfer is an incident of service, not to be interfered with unless effected in violation of mandatory statutory rules | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/13\/transfer-is-an-incident-of-service-not-to-be-interfered-with-unless-effected-in-violation-of-mandatory-statutory-rules\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Transfer is an incident of service, not to be interfered with unless effected in violation of mandatory statutory rules","og_description":"Rajasthan High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Veerender Singh Siradhana, J. dismissed a civil writ petition filed by the petitioner","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/13\/transfer-is-an-incident-of-service-not-to-be-interfered-with-unless-effected-in-violation-of-mandatory-statutory-rules\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-06-13T08:50:30+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-06-21T12:10:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/13\/transfer-is-an-incident-of-service-not-to-be-interfered-with-unless-effected-in-violation-of-mandatory-statutory-rules\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/13\/transfer-is-an-incident-of-service-not-to-be-interfered-with-unless-effected-in-violation-of-mandatory-statutory-rules\/","name":"Transfer is an incident of service, not to be interfered with unless effected in violation of mandatory statutory rules | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-06-13T08:50:30+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-21T12:10:48+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/13\/transfer-is-an-incident-of-service-not-to-be-interfered-with-unless-effected-in-violation-of-mandatory-statutory-rules\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/13\/transfer-is-an-incident-of-service-not-to-be-interfered-with-unless-effected-in-violation-of-mandatory-statutory-rules\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/13\/transfer-is-an-incident-of-service-not-to-be-interfered-with-unless-effected-in-violation-of-mandatory-statutory-rules\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Transfer is an incident of service, not to be interfered with unless effected in violation of mandatory statutory rules"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":334594,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/07\/raj-hc-dis-execution-proceeding-arrest-warrant-against-nokia-solutions-networks-india-ltd-an-uninvolved-party-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":196928,"position":0},"title":"Rajasthan High Court dismisses Execution Proceeding &amp; arrest warrant against Nokia Solutions &amp; Networks India (P) Ltd, an uninvolved party","author":"Ritu","date":"November 7, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Section 72 of the Consumer Protection Act penalties are intended for parties responsible for complying with a Commission\u2019s order and as the petitioner was not involved in the transaction or compliance, the proceedings against them were without basis.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":216853,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/15\/raj-hc-an-employee-cannot-be-transferred-in-the-last-year-of-his-service-if-the-department-does-not-have-an-obvious-cause-for-the-same\/","url_meta":{"origin":196928,"position":1},"title":"Raj HC | An employee cannot be transferred in the last year of his service, if the department does not have an obvious cause for the same","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 15, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Alok Sharma, J. allowed a civil writ petition filed by a person against his transfer order. As a result of which, another order was passed regarding its transfer, quashing the previous transfer order. \u00a0In the instant case, the petitioner was transferred to the post of RTO Alwar\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":315019,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/consumer-disputes-redressal-forums-overlooked-statutory-provisions-under-multi-state-co-operative-societies-act-cal-hc-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":196928,"position":2},"title":"Special laws override general laws| Consumer Forums must adhere to Arbitration mandate under Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"February 22, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court noted that specific provision under Section 84 of the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 mandates arbitration for disputes involving members and the society.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":305164,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/18\/rajasthan-hc-quashes-order-transferring-the-investigation-without-reason-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":196928,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Right to fair investigation and trial is fundamental right of victim as well\u2019: Rajasthan High Court quashes order transferring the investigation without reason","author":"Editor","date":"October 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cFirst progress report of the investigation has been called for in seven years. Moreover, the administrative instruction has not been followed inasmuch as more than thrice transfer of investigation of the case was not permissible.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"rajasthan high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":364810,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/27\/andhra-pradesh-insurer-not-necessary-party-in-medical-negligence-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":196928,"position":4},"title":"Andhra Pradesh High Court| Insurer not a necessary or proper party in medical negligence consumer complaints; impleadment rejected","author":"Arunima","date":"October 27, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The petitioner, along with other doctors from Yashoda Hospitals, was arrayed as an opposite party before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Guntur. The complainant alleged medical negligence and deficiency in service during treatment at the hospital.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"insurer not necessary party in medical negligence","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/insurer-not-necessary-party-in-medical-negligence.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/insurer-not-necessary-party-in-medical-negligence.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/insurer-not-necessary-party-in-medical-negligence.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/insurer-not-necessary-party-in-medical-negligence.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":315431,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/27\/calcutta-high-court-dismisses-writ-petition-on-termination-of-employment-by-private-school-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":196928,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Can\u2019t approach Writ Court to enforce Contract of personal service\u2019; Calcutta High Court dismisses Writ Petition on Termination of Employment by Private School","author":"Ritu","date":"February 27, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court held that a party can resort to the writ jurisdiction only if there involves public law element and not to enforce a contract of personal service, including all matters relating to the service of the employee-confirmation, suspension, transfer, termination, etc.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196928","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=196928"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196928\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=196928"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=196928"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=196928"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}