{"id":196922,"date":"2018-06-14T10:30:27","date_gmt":"2018-06-14T05:00:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=196922"},"modified":"2018-06-14T10:30:27","modified_gmt":"2018-06-14T05:00:27","slug":"ecj-a-member-state-cannot-deny-residency-rights-to-a-same-sex-spouse-just-because-it-does-not-recognise-same-sex-marriages","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/14\/ecj-a-member-state-cannot-deny-residency-rights-to-a-same-sex-spouse-just-because-it-does-not-recognise-same-sex-marriages\/","title":{"rendered":"ECJ: A Member State cannot deny residency rights to a same-sex spouse just because it does not recognise same-sex marriages"},"content":{"rendered":"

European Court of Justice:<\/strong> In a ground-breaking ruling, the European Court of Justice has directed all member States to recognize the residency rights of same-sex spouses, even if the State does not allow same-sex marriages.<\/p>\n

The case before the ECJ was involved Mr. Relu Adrian Coman, a Romanian national and Mr. Robert Clabourn Hamilton, an American national, who lived together in the United States for four years before getting married in Brussels in 2010. Mr. Hamilton was, however, denied the right of residence in Romania beyond three months, on the ground that he could not be considered in Romania as a \u2018spouse\u2019 of an EU citizen as Romanian law does not recognize marriage between persons of the same sex. The couple then approached the Constitutional Court, Romania, which in turn requested the ECJ whether Mr. Hamilton may be considered as the \u2018spouse\u2019 of an EU citizen who has exercised his right to freedom of movement and must, therefore, be granted a permanent right of residence in Romania.<\/p>\n

Court observed that in a situation in which a Union citizen has made use of his freedom of movement by moving to and taking up genuine residence, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 7(1) of Directive 2004\/38 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States other than that of which he is a national, and, whilst there, has created and strengthened a family life with a third-country national of the same sex to whom he is joined by a marriage lawfully concluded in the host Member State, Article 21(1) TFEU must be interpreted as precluding the competent authorities of the Member State of which the Union citizen is a national from refusing to grant that third-country national a right of residence in the territory of that Member State on the ground that the law of that Member State does not recognise marriage between persons of the same sex. Such person has right to reside in the territory of the Member State of which the Union citizen is a national for more than three months. This derived right of residence cannot be made subject to stricter conditions than those laid down in Article 7 of Directive 2004\/38. Further, it noted that recital 31 of Directive 2004\/38 inter alia prohibited discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation by the Member States. Court also held that the word \u2018spouse\u2019 used in Article 2(2)(a) in definitions in gender neutral. [Relu Adrian Coman v. Inspectoratul General pentru Imigrari and Ministerul Afacerilor Interne,\u00a0Case C-673\/16,<\/span> dated 12-06-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

European Court of Justice: In a ground-breaking ruling, the European Court of Justice has directed all member States to recognize the residency <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":71611,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,4631],"tags":[4991,30497,30496,3373,30498],"class_list":["post-196922","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-international-courts","tag-discrimination","tag-gender-neutral","tag-same-sex","tag-spouse","tag-third-country"],"yoast_head":"\nECJ: A Member State cannot deny residency rights to a same-sex spouse just because it does not recognise same-sex marriages | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/14\/ecj-a-member-state-cannot-deny-residency-rights-to-a-same-sex-spouse-just-because-it-does-not-recognise-same-sex-marriages\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"ECJ: A Member State cannot deny residency rights to a same-sex spouse just because it does not recognise same-sex marriages\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"European Court of Justice: In a ground-breaking ruling, the European Court of Justice has directed all member States to recognize the residency\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/14\/ecj-a-member-state-cannot-deny-residency-rights-to-a-same-sex-spouse-just-because-it-does-not-recognise-same-sex-marriages\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-06-14T05:00:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/14\/ecj-a-member-state-cannot-deny-residency-rights-to-a-same-sex-spouse-just-because-it-does-not-recognise-same-sex-marriages\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/14\/ecj-a-member-state-cannot-deny-residency-rights-to-a-same-sex-spouse-just-because-it-does-not-recognise-same-sex-marriages\/\",\"name\":\"ECJ: A Member State cannot deny residency rights to a same-sex spouse just because it does not recognise same-sex marriages | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/14\/ecj-a-member-state-cannot-deny-residency-rights-to-a-same-sex-spouse-just-because-it-does-not-recognise-same-sex-marriages\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/14\/ecj-a-member-state-cannot-deny-residency-rights-to-a-same-sex-spouse-just-because-it-does-not-recognise-same-sex-marriages\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-06-14T05:00:27+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/14\/ecj-a-member-state-cannot-deny-residency-rights-to-a-same-sex-spouse-just-because-it-does-not-recognise-same-sex-marriages\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/14\/ecj-a-member-state-cannot-deny-residency-rights-to-a-same-sex-spouse-just-because-it-does-not-recognise-same-sex-marriages\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/14\/ecj-a-member-state-cannot-deny-residency-rights-to-a-same-sex-spouse-just-because-it-does-not-recognise-same-sex-marriages\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":886},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/14\/ecj-a-member-state-cannot-deny-residency-rights-to-a-same-sex-spouse-just-because-it-does-not-recognise-same-sex-marriages\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"ECJ: A Member State cannot deny residency rights to a same-sex spouse just because it does not recognise same-sex marriages\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"ECJ: A Member State cannot deny residency rights to a same-sex spouse just because it does not recognise same-sex marriages | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/14\/ecj-a-member-state-cannot-deny-residency-rights-to-a-same-sex-spouse-just-because-it-does-not-recognise-same-sex-marriages\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"ECJ: A Member State cannot deny residency rights to a same-sex spouse just because it does not recognise same-sex marriages","og_description":"European Court of Justice: In a ground-breaking ruling, the European Court of Justice has directed all member States to recognize the residency","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/14\/ecj-a-member-state-cannot-deny-residency-rights-to-a-same-sex-spouse-just-because-it-does-not-recognise-same-sex-marriages\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-06-14T05:00:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":886,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/14\/ecj-a-member-state-cannot-deny-residency-rights-to-a-same-sex-spouse-just-because-it-does-not-recognise-same-sex-marriages\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/14\/ecj-a-member-state-cannot-deny-residency-rights-to-a-same-sex-spouse-just-because-it-does-not-recognise-same-sex-marriages\/","name":"ECJ: A Member State cannot deny residency rights to a same-sex spouse just because it does not recognise same-sex marriages | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/14\/ecj-a-member-state-cannot-deny-residency-rights-to-a-same-sex-spouse-just-because-it-does-not-recognise-same-sex-marriages\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/14\/ecj-a-member-state-cannot-deny-residency-rights-to-a-same-sex-spouse-just-because-it-does-not-recognise-same-sex-marriages\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg","datePublished":"2018-06-14T05:00:27+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/14\/ecj-a-member-state-cannot-deny-residency-rights-to-a-same-sex-spouse-just-because-it-does-not-recognise-same-sex-marriages\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/14\/ecj-a-member-state-cannot-deny-residency-rights-to-a-same-sex-spouse-just-because-it-does-not-recognise-same-sex-marriages\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/14\/ecj-a-member-state-cannot-deny-residency-rights-to-a-same-sex-spouse-just-because-it-does-not-recognise-same-sex-marriages\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg","width":1330,"height":886},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/14\/ecj-a-member-state-cannot-deny-residency-rights-to-a-same-sex-spouse-just-because-it-does-not-recognise-same-sex-marriages\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"ECJ: A Member State cannot deny residency rights to a same-sex spouse just because it does not recognise same-sex marriages"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":259597,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/06\/ecj-holds-bulgaria-obligated-to-recognize-same-sex-couple-as-parents-of-a-child\/","url_meta":{"origin":196922,"position":0},"title":"ECJ holds Bulgaria obligated to recognize same sex couple as parents of a child even when its national law does not recognize the concept of marriage between homosexuals","author":"Editor","date":"January 6, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"European Court of Justice: The Bench composed of K. Lenaerts, President, L. Bay Larsen, Vice-President, A. Arabadjiev, K. J\u00fcrim\u00e4e, C. Lycourgos, E. Regan, N. J\u00e4\u00e4skinen, I. Ziemele and J. Passer, Presidents of Chambers, M. Ile\u0161i\u010d (Rapporteur), J.-C. Bonichot, T. von Danwitz and N. Wahl, JJ., directed Bulgaria to recognize same\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":322359,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/17\/cjeu-rules-eu-law-does-not-prevent-national-law-from-excluding-associations-of-judges-from-challenging-appointment-of-prosecutors\/","url_meta":{"origin":196922,"position":1},"title":"EU Law does not prevent national legislation from excluding associations of judges from challenging decisions vis-a-vis appointment of prosecutors: CJEU","author":"Editor","date":"May 17, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court held that Art 2 and Art.19(1) TEU, read with Arts 12 and 47 of the Charter must be interpreted as not precluding any national legislation which excludes professional associations of judges from challenging the appointment of prosecutors competent to conduct criminal prosecutions against judges.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national legislation contravention EU law","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/national-legislation-contravention-EU-law.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/national-legislation-contravention-EU-law.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/national-legislation-contravention-EU-law.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/national-legislation-contravention-EU-law.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6138,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/27\/same-sex-marriages-legalized-in-all-states\/","url_meta":{"origin":196922,"position":2},"title":"Same Sex marriages legalized in all States","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 27, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of United States: While bringing a long debated issue to a conclusion, the Supreme Court legalized the marriages of same sex couples and thereby Baker v. Nelson stands overruled. In the present case, the petitioners, 14 same-sex couples and two men whose same-sex partners are deceased, filed suits\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Foreign Courts"","block_context":{"text":"Foreign Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/foreigncourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":291221,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/03\/nepal-supreme-court-orders-government-to-recognise-same-sex-spouse-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":196922,"position":3},"title":"[Recognition of Same-sex Marriage] | Supreme Court of Nepal orders Government to recognize same-sex foreign spouse of a Nepalese citizen","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Government was directed to consider the Report made by an expert panel in 2015 which had recommended recognition of same-sex relationships.","rel":"","context":"In "Hot Off The Press"","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"nepal supreme court on same-sex","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/nepal-supreme-court-on-same-sex.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/nepal-supreme-court-on-same-sex.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/nepal-supreme-court-on-same-sex.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/nepal-supreme-court-on-same-sex.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":192324,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/02\/23\/ecj-pregnant-breastfeeding-workers-can-dismissed-grounds-collective-redundancy\/","url_meta":{"origin":196922,"position":4},"title":"ECJ: Pregnant and breastfeeding workers can be dismissed on grounds of collective redundancy","author":"Saba","date":"February 23, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"European Court of Justice: While dealing with the issue regarding the interpretation of Article 10(1) and (2) of Council Directive 92\/85\/EEC of 19 October 1992 (also known as Pregnant Workers Directive, 1992) on the measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health at work of pregnant workers and workers\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":233848,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/13\/court-of-appeal-ireland-upholds-rejection-of-family-reunification-appeal-by-an-afghan-refugees-third-wife-holds-polygamous-marriages-contrary-to-irish-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":196922,"position":5},"title":"Court of Appeal, Ireland\u00a0upholds rejection of family reunification appeal by an Afghan refugee\u2019s third wife, holds polygamous marriages contrary to Irish law","author":"Editor","date":"August 13, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Court of Appeal, Ireland: Donnelly, N\u00ed Raifeartaigh and Binchy JJ rejected an application for family reunification sought by an Afghan couple who got married when the husband was already in a valid, subsisting marriage, holding that the recognition of polygamous marriages is contradictory to Irish law and public policy. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Ireland.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Ireland.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Ireland.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Ireland.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Ireland.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196922","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=196922"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196922\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/71611"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=196922"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=196922"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=196922"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}