{"id":196885,"date":"2018-06-12T16:26:42","date_gmt":"2018-06-12T10:56:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=196885"},"modified":"2018-06-20T14:37:14","modified_gmt":"2018-06-20T09:07:14","slug":"judgment-reviewed-and-set-aside-holding-it-to-be-based-on-misconception-of-facts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/12\/judgment-reviewed-and-set-aside-holding-it-to-be-based-on-misconception-of-facts\/","title":{"rendered":"Judgment reviewed and set aside holding it to be based on misconception of facts"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Bombay High Court: <\/strong>A review petition filed by the Union of India and the Chief Postmaster General was allowed by a Division Bench comprising of R.M. Borde and A.M. Dhavale, J.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The review was sought of the judgment passed earlier by the same Court, wherein the candidates whose selection to the posts of Postman or Multi-tasking staff was cancelled on grounds of irregularities in the selection process, were ordered to be given posting. The instant petitioners (original respondents) had alleged large-scale irregularities in the selection process and therefore the selection of the respondents (original petitioners) was cancelled. The respondents (original petitioners) filed a writ petition in the Court against cancellation of their selection. The Court allowed the petition and order as mentioned above. The instant petitioners (original respondents) preferred the review of the said judgment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The High Court considered the submissions made on behalf of the parties and held that the original respondents were inadvertent in bringing out proper facts to the light of the Court. The alleged incidents of mass scale irregularities were not clearly placed before the Court. The High Court placed reliance on the Supreme Court decision in <strong><em>BCCI v.\u00a0 Netaji Cricket Club, <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/pC35pUfV\">2005 (4) SCC 741<\/a><\/strong>, wherein it was held, \u201c<em>An application for review would also be maintainable if there exists sufficient reason therefore. What would constitute \u2018sufficient reason\u2019 would depend on facts and circumstances of the case. The words sufficient reason in Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code is wide enough to include a misconception of fact or law by a Court or even an Advocate.<\/em>\u201d The Court held that in this case too, the earlier judgment was passed on a misconception of facts as proper facts were not brought to light.\u00a0 The Court held that it was a fit case where its review jurisdiction required to be exercised. Accordingly, the judgment under review was set aside. The original writ petitions were restored to the file for further consideration. [Union of India v. Prakash, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Q9uucW0E\">2018 SCC OnLine Bom 927<\/a>, dated 04-05-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bombay High Court: A review petition filed by the Union of India and the Chief Postmaster General was allowed by a Division <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":74381,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[30455,30454,2897,30453],"class_list":["post-196885","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-facts","tag-misconception","tag-Review","tag-sufficient-reason"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Judgment reviewed and set aside holding it to be based on misconception of facts | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/12\/judgment-reviewed-and-set-aside-holding-it-to-be-based-on-misconception-of-facts\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Judgment reviewed and set aside holding it to be based on misconception of facts\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court: A review petition filed by the Union of India and the Chief Postmaster General was allowed by a Division\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/12\/judgment-reviewed-and-set-aside-holding-it-to-be-based-on-misconception-of-facts\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-06-12T10:56:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-06-20T09:07:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/12\/judgment-reviewed-and-set-aside-holding-it-to-be-based-on-misconception-of-facts\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/12\/judgment-reviewed-and-set-aside-holding-it-to-be-based-on-misconception-of-facts\/\",\"name\":\"Judgment reviewed and set aside holding it to be based on misconception of facts | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/12\/judgment-reviewed-and-set-aside-holding-it-to-be-based-on-misconception-of-facts\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/12\/judgment-reviewed-and-set-aside-holding-it-to-be-based-on-misconception-of-facts\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-06-12T10:56:42+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-20T09:07:14+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/12\/judgment-reviewed-and-set-aside-holding-it-to-be-based-on-misconception-of-facts\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/12\/judgment-reviewed-and-set-aside-holding-it-to-be-based-on-misconception-of-facts\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/12\/judgment-reviewed-and-set-aside-holding-it-to-be-based-on-misconception-of-facts\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/12\/judgment-reviewed-and-set-aside-holding-it-to-be-based-on-misconception-of-facts\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Judgment reviewed and set aside holding it to be based on misconception of facts\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Judgment reviewed and set aside holding it to be based on misconception of facts | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/12\/judgment-reviewed-and-set-aside-holding-it-to-be-based-on-misconception-of-facts\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Judgment reviewed and set aside holding it to be based on misconception of facts","og_description":"Bombay High Court: A review petition filed by the Union of India and the Chief Postmaster General was allowed by a Division","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/12\/judgment-reviewed-and-set-aside-holding-it-to-be-based-on-misconception-of-facts\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-06-12T10:56:42+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-06-20T09:07:14+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/12\/judgment-reviewed-and-set-aside-holding-it-to-be-based-on-misconception-of-facts\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/12\/judgment-reviewed-and-set-aside-holding-it-to-be-based-on-misconception-of-facts\/","name":"Judgment reviewed and set aside holding it to be based on misconception of facts | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/12\/judgment-reviewed-and-set-aside-holding-it-to-be-based-on-misconception-of-facts\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/12\/judgment-reviewed-and-set-aside-holding-it-to-be-based-on-misconception-of-facts\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","datePublished":"2018-06-12T10:56:42+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-20T09:07:14+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/12\/judgment-reviewed-and-set-aside-holding-it-to-be-based-on-misconception-of-facts\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/12\/judgment-reviewed-and-set-aside-holding-it-to-be-based-on-misconception-of-facts\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/12\/judgment-reviewed-and-set-aside-holding-it-to-be-based-on-misconception-of-facts\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","width":1331,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/12\/judgment-reviewed-and-set-aside-holding-it-to-be-based-on-misconception-of-facts\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Judgment reviewed and set aside holding it to be based on misconception of facts"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":305807,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/26\/delhi-hc-dismisses-plea-challenging-cancellation-of-exam-due-to-malpractices-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":196885,"position":0},"title":"Extremely difficult for examination agencies to identify exact number of students engaged in malpractices; Delhi HC dismisses plea challenging cancellation of exam","author":"Editor","date":"October 26, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe very integrity of the entire selection process was compromised and DSEU could not determine its extent and hence, had to resort to cancelling the entire examination process, to protect the sanctity of the recruitment process.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298455,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/03\/orissa-hc-rejects-review-petition-on-aso-recruitment-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":196885,"position":1},"title":"ASO Recruitment| Orissa HC rejects review petition of Order quashing merit list of short-listed candidates","author":"Editor","date":"August 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Mere inclusion of the name in the select list does not confer any right to claim for appointment.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"orissa high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":238161,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/29\/mp-hc-in-the-garb-of-review-rehearing-cannot-be-permitted-court-dismisses-review-petition-finding-no-error-apparent\/","url_meta":{"origin":196885,"position":2},"title":"MP HC | In the garb of review, rehearing cannot be permitted; Court dismisses review petition finding no error apparent","author":"Editor","date":"October 29, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: In a case seeking review of an order of this particular Court by the petitioner, Rajeev Kumar Shrivastava, J., dismissed the same finding no ground to interfere in the original order. The instant review petition has been filed under Order 47 Rule 1 of the Civil\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":238115,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/28\/del-hc-cancellation-of-upsc-interviews-is-not-to-be-viewed-solitarily-as-a-one-off-incident-represents-a-deeper-malaise-in-selection-read-verdict-on-cancellation-of-upsc-interviews\/","url_meta":{"origin":196885,"position":3},"title":"Del HC | Cancellation of UPSC interviews is not to be viewed solitarily as a one-off incident, represents a deeper malaise in selection: Read Verdict on cancellation of UPSC interviews","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 28, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Prathiba M. Singh, J., while addressing the grievance of UPSC aspirants in regard to cancellation of interviews to be held by the Selection Committee observed that, Selection to the civil services, especially the IAS \u2013 a coveted service, cannot be a whimsical process. It has to follow certain\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":216647,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/09\/raj-hc-court-directs-state-to-consider-representations-of-petitioners-for-providing-equal-pay-to-similar-positioned-teachers\/","url_meta":{"origin":196885,"position":4},"title":"Raj HC | Court directs State to consider representations of petitioners for providing equal pay to similar positioned teachers","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 9, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Arun Bhansali J., disposed of a writ petition filed by the petitioner requesting to make pay fixation of the petitioner equal to similarly situated teachers, and the High Court reiterated a decision of the Jaipur Bench. In the instant case, the petitioner has filed the writ petition\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":245149,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/06\/judicial-power\/","url_meta":{"origin":196885,"position":5},"title":"Ori HC | Power of judicial review will not be permitted to be invoked to protect private interest at the cost of public interest or to decide contractual disputes","author":"Editor","date":"March 6, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: B.P. Routray J. dismissed the petition on the ground that cancellation of the tender cannot be said to have attracted the doctrine of lis pendens. The facts of the case are such that the petitioners are registered small scale industrial units who participated in the tender process\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196885","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=196885"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196885\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/74381"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=196885"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=196885"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=196885"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}