{"id":196763,"date":"2018-06-08T10:14:18","date_gmt":"2018-06-08T04:44:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=196763"},"modified":"2018-06-29T12:47:47","modified_gmt":"2018-06-29T07:17:47","slug":"any-person-male-or-female-is-entitled-to-invoke-the-provisions-of-domestic-violence-act-2005","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/08\/any-person-male-or-female-is-entitled-to-invoke-the-provisions-of-domestic-violence-act-2005\/","title":{"rendered":"Order permitting any person, male or female, to invoke Domestic Violence Act, 2005 &#8211; Withdrawn"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Karnataka High Court: <\/strong>A Single Judge Bench comprising of Anand Byrareddy, J. allowed a criminal petition filed by a Muslim male holding that he was entitled to invoke the provisions of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005 (DV Act).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The petition was filed under Section 482 CrPC by the petitioner, a male. Being aggrieved by certain acts of his wife and her family, the petitioner invoked the provisions of DV Act. Learned City Civil and Sessions Judge was not impressed by the action brought on behalf of the petitioner as in his opinion, the Act was heavily loaded in favor of women and it does not contemplate any male member being aggrieved by domestic violence. Feeling aggrieved, the petitioner approached the High Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In order to settle the issue, the High Court relied on the Supreme Court decision in <strong><em>Hiralal P. Harsora v.\u00a0 Kusum Narottamdas Harsora, <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/lL0M2ORj\">(2016) 10 SCC 165<\/a><\/strong>, wherein the Hon\u2019ble Court had struck down a part of Section 2(a) of DV Act holding it to be violative of Article 14 of the Constitution, and the phrase \u2018adult male\u2019 as appearing in Section 2(q) stood deleted. The High Court observed that if the said sub-section is read after deletion of the expression \u2018adult male\u2019, it would appear that <em>any aggrieved person, in terms of DV Act, whether male or female, is entitled to invoke provisions of the Act<\/em>. Having stated thus, the High Court held that petitioner\u2019s complaint could not have been trashed merely on the ground that the Act does not contemplate provisions for men. The petition was accordingly allowed. [Mohd. Zakir v. Shabana, Crl. Petition No. 2351 of 2017, dated 18.04.2018]<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Update:<\/span>\u00a0By an order dated 28.04.2018, Byrareddy J. withdrew the above-mentioned order and restored the petition to the file.<\/p>\n<p>The order reads as &#8211; &#8220;Notwithstanding Section 362 of Cr.P.C., the order rendered by this Court earlier on 18.04.2018 is found to be patently erroneous and therefore the order is withdrawn. The petition is restored to file and the registry is directed not to web host the order passed earlier and to take note of the fact that the order is withdrawn.&#8221;\u00a0[Mohd. Zakir v. Shabana, Crl. Petition No. 2351 of 2017, dated 28-04-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Anand Byrareddy, J. allowed a criminal petition filed by a Muslim male holding <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[10232,30380,30317,2693],"class_list":["post-196763","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-adult-male","tag-aggrieved","tag-dv-act","tag-Muslim"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Order permitting any person, male or female, to invoke Domestic Violence Act, 2005 - Withdrawn | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/08\/any-person-male-or-female-is-entitled-to-invoke-the-provisions-of-domestic-violence-act-2005\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Order permitting any person, male or female, to invoke Domestic Violence Act, 2005 - Withdrawn\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Karnataka High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Anand Byrareddy, J. allowed a criminal petition filed by a Muslim male holding\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/08\/any-person-male-or-female-is-entitled-to-invoke-the-provisions-of-domestic-violence-act-2005\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-06-08T04:44:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-06-29T07:17:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/08\/any-person-male-or-female-is-entitled-to-invoke-the-provisions-of-domestic-violence-act-2005\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/08\/any-person-male-or-female-is-entitled-to-invoke-the-provisions-of-domestic-violence-act-2005\/\",\"name\":\"Order permitting any person, male or female, to invoke Domestic Violence Act, 2005 - Withdrawn | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-06-08T04:44:18+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-29T07:17:47+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/08\/any-person-male-or-female-is-entitled-to-invoke-the-provisions-of-domestic-violence-act-2005\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/08\/any-person-male-or-female-is-entitled-to-invoke-the-provisions-of-domestic-violence-act-2005\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/08\/any-person-male-or-female-is-entitled-to-invoke-the-provisions-of-domestic-violence-act-2005\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Order permitting any person, male or female, to invoke Domestic Violence Act, 2005 &#8211; Withdrawn\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Order permitting any person, male or female, to invoke Domestic Violence Act, 2005 - Withdrawn | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/08\/any-person-male-or-female-is-entitled-to-invoke-the-provisions-of-domestic-violence-act-2005\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Order permitting any person, male or female, to invoke Domestic Violence Act, 2005 - Withdrawn","og_description":"Karnataka High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Anand Byrareddy, J. allowed a criminal petition filed by a Muslim male holding","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/08\/any-person-male-or-female-is-entitled-to-invoke-the-provisions-of-domestic-violence-act-2005\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-06-08T04:44:18+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-06-29T07:17:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/08\/any-person-male-or-female-is-entitled-to-invoke-the-provisions-of-domestic-violence-act-2005\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/08\/any-person-male-or-female-is-entitled-to-invoke-the-provisions-of-domestic-violence-act-2005\/","name":"Order permitting any person, male or female, to invoke Domestic Violence Act, 2005 - Withdrawn | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-06-08T04:44:18+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-29T07:17:47+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/08\/any-person-male-or-female-is-entitled-to-invoke-the-provisions-of-domestic-violence-act-2005\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/08\/any-person-male-or-female-is-entitled-to-invoke-the-provisions-of-domestic-violence-act-2005\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/08\/any-person-male-or-female-is-entitled-to-invoke-the-provisions-of-domestic-violence-act-2005\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Order permitting any person, male or female, to invoke Domestic Violence Act, 2005 &#8211; Withdrawn"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":222898,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/06\/cal-hc-a-mother-is-entitled-to-claim-relief-under-domestic-violence-act-against-his-son-law-on-aggrieved-person-under-dv-act-restated\/","url_meta":{"origin":196763,"position":0},"title":"Cal HC | A mother is entitled to claim relief under Domestic Violence Act against his son; law on &#8220;aggrieved person&#8221; under DV Act restated","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 6, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court:\u00a0Madhumati Mitra, J., dismissed an application filed against the order of the Sessions Judge whereby he upheld the order passed by the Magistrate who had directed the petitioner to pay monthly monetary relief to his mother and also her medical expenses. The respondent, the mother of the petitioner,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":196050,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/16\/women-governed-under-muslim-personal-law-have-right-to-recourse-under-the-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005\/","url_meta":{"origin":196763,"position":1},"title":"Women governed under Muslim Personal Law have right to recourse under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005","author":"Saba","date":"May 16, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Bharati H. Dangre, J., has held that the Muslim Personal Law can in no way curtail the protection granted under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005, from being available to a Muslim woman. Brief facts of the case\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":287599,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/23\/magistrates-decide-applications-domestic-violence-act-within-60-day-time-frame-written-reasons-recorded-karnataka-high-court-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":196763,"position":2},"title":"\u201cS. 12 is heart and soul of Domestic Violence Act\u201d; Karnataka High Court directs Magistrates to decide applications within the mandated period of 60 days","author":"Sucheta","date":"March 23, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In a clinical dissection of the Domestic Violence Act, 2005, the Karnataka High Court stated that the victims\u2019 grievances such as maintenance or shelter etc., must be addressed with immediacy, which is why the legislation has mandated a specific time frame.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Karnataka High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-586.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-586.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-586.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-586.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":232900,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/27\/law-on-domestic-violence-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005\/","url_meta":{"origin":196763,"position":3},"title":"Law on Domestic Violence [Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005]","author":"Editor","date":"July 27, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Shubhodip Chakraborty, Editorial Assistant has put this story together","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Law made Easy&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Law made Easy","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/law-made-easy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/DV.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/DV.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/DV.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/DV.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/DV.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":239278,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/17\/kar-hc-is-petition-under-s-125-crpc-maintainable-when-an-order-of-compensation-has-been-granted-under-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005-petition-allowed\/","url_meta":{"origin":196763,"position":4},"title":"Kar HC | Is petition under S. 125 CrPC maintainable when an order of compensation has been granted under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005; Petition allowed","author":"Editor","date":"November 17, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: Jyoti Mulmani J., allowed the revision petition on grounds of failure to ascertain and understand the material propositions involved in the case. The facts of the case are that the petitioner is a legally wedded wife of respondent and their marriage was solemnized on 28-02-2007 at Gayathri\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":216337,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/02\/cal-hc-divorced-wife-who-hasnt-remarried-held-entitled-to-execute-order-granted-under-s-12-of-dv-act-existence-of-domestic-relationship-dispensed-with\/","url_meta":{"origin":196763,"position":5},"title":"Cal HC | &#8216;Divorced wife&#8217; who hasn&#8217;t remarried held entitled to execute order granted under S.12 of DV Act; existence of &#8216;domestic relationship&#8217; dispensed with","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 2, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court:\u00a0Madhumati Mitra, J. dismissed an application filed by the petitioner to quash the order of the Additional Sessions Judge whereby he refused to stay the petition filed by his former wife for the execution of the maintenance order granted in her favour by the Magistrate. By the order\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196763","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=196763"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196763\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=196763"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=196763"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=196763"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}