{"id":196666,"date":"2018-06-04T16:08:50","date_gmt":"2018-06-04T10:38:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=196666"},"modified":"2018-06-25T11:04:36","modified_gmt":"2018-06-25T05:34:36","slug":"order-of-punishment-cannot-be-passed-with-a-retrospective-effect","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/04\/order-of-punishment-cannot-be-passed-with-a-retrospective-effect\/","title":{"rendered":"Order of punishment cannot be passed with a retrospective effect"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Patna High Court:<\/strong> The petition challenging the order of reduction in pay scale and stopping of increment was allowed by a Single Judge Bench comprising of Mohit Kumar Shah, J.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The petitioner who worked as a Junior Engineer in the Rural Construction Department was subjected to an enquiry for delinquency in inspection of a construction project. In furtherance of the enquiry so conducted, the pay of the petitioner was reduced to the lowest stage and his increments were also stopped. The said order which was passed on 14.10.2006 was set aside by the High Court in an appeal preferred by the petitioner. Thereafter, another order was passed by the respondents dated 31.3.2016 which was in same terms as the earlier order. This order was challenged by the petitioner in the instant petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The High Court considered the record and found that the impugned order was in violation of the terms of Bihar Service Rules as the order did not provide any time frame for the reduction of pay scale. Further, the order proposed to inflict punishment on the petitioner with a retrospective effect, and that could not be allowed. The Court held it to be a settled law that an order of punishment can never be retrospective and it always has to be prospective. Therefore, the Court held that the impugned order was liable to be set aside which was ordered accordingly. [Raj Kishore Sinha v. State of Bihar,<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/bC2W4Mm3\"> 2018 SCC OnLine Pat 825,<\/a> 18-05-2018]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Patna High Court: The petition challenging the order of reduction in pay scale and stopping of increment was allowed by a Single <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[29708,2775,3702,4581],"class_list":["post-196666","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-increment","tag-Punishment","tag-reduction","tag-retrospective-effect"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Order of punishment cannot be passed with a retrospective effect | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/04\/order-of-punishment-cannot-be-passed-with-a-retrospective-effect\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Order of punishment cannot be passed with a retrospective effect\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Patna High Court: The petition challenging the order of reduction in pay scale and stopping of increment was allowed by a Single\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/04\/order-of-punishment-cannot-be-passed-with-a-retrospective-effect\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-06-04T10:38:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-06-25T05:34:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/06\\\/04\\\/order-of-punishment-cannot-be-passed-with-a-retrospective-effect\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/06\\\/04\\\/order-of-punishment-cannot-be-passed-with-a-retrospective-effect\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Saba\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"headline\":\"Order of punishment cannot be passed with a retrospective effect\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-06-04T10:38:50+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-25T05:34:36+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/06\\\/04\\\/order-of-punishment-cannot-be-passed-with-a-retrospective-effect\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":252,\"commentCount\":2,\"keywords\":[\"increment\",\"Punishment\",\"reduction\",\"retrospective effect\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/06\\\/04\\\/order-of-punishment-cannot-be-passed-with-a-retrospective-effect\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/06\\\/04\\\/order-of-punishment-cannot-be-passed-with-a-retrospective-effect\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/06\\\/04\\\/order-of-punishment-cannot-be-passed-with-a-retrospective-effect\\\/\",\"name\":\"Order of punishment cannot be passed with a retrospective effect | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-06-04T10:38:50+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-25T05:34:36+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/06\\\/04\\\/order-of-punishment-cannot-be-passed-with-a-retrospective-effect\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/06\\\/04\\\/order-of-punishment-cannot-be-passed-with-a-retrospective-effect\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/06\\\/04\\\/order-of-punishment-cannot-be-passed-with-a-retrospective-effect\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Order of punishment cannot be passed with a retrospective effect\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_2\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Order of punishment cannot be passed with a retrospective effect | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/04\/order-of-punishment-cannot-be-passed-with-a-retrospective-effect\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Order of punishment cannot be passed with a retrospective effect","og_description":"Patna High Court: The petition challenging the order of reduction in pay scale and stopping of increment was allowed by a Single","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/04\/order-of-punishment-cannot-be-passed-with-a-retrospective-effect\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-06-04T10:38:50+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-06-25T05:34:36+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/04\/order-of-punishment-cannot-be-passed-with-a-retrospective-effect\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/04\/order-of-punishment-cannot-be-passed-with-a-retrospective-effect\/"},"author":{"name":"Saba","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"headline":"Order of punishment cannot be passed with a retrospective effect","datePublished":"2018-06-04T10:38:50+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-25T05:34:36+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/04\/order-of-punishment-cannot-be-passed-with-a-retrospective-effect\/"},"wordCount":252,"commentCount":2,"keywords":["increment","Punishment","reduction","retrospective effect"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/04\/order-of-punishment-cannot-be-passed-with-a-retrospective-effect\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/04\/order-of-punishment-cannot-be-passed-with-a-retrospective-effect\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/04\/order-of-punishment-cannot-be-passed-with-a-retrospective-effect\/","name":"Order of punishment cannot be passed with a retrospective effect | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-06-04T10:38:50+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-25T05:34:36+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/04\/order-of-punishment-cannot-be-passed-with-a-retrospective-effect\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/04\/order-of-punishment-cannot-be-passed-with-a-retrospective-effect\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/04\/order-of-punishment-cannot-be-passed-with-a-retrospective-effect\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Order of punishment cannot be passed with a retrospective effect"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":216249,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/29\/jhar-hc-non-furnishing-of-enquiry-report-not-detrimental-to-departmental-proceeding-if-no-prejudice-caused-to-employee\/","url_meta":{"origin":196666,"position":0},"title":"Jhar HC | Non-furnishing of enquiry report not detrimental to departmental proceeding, if no prejudice caused to employee","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 29, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J. heard a writ petition that sought to quash the order passed by the respondent whereby the petitioner had been inflicted with the punishment of stoppage of annual increment for six months in Departmental Proceeding. The petitioner was a constable and was accused of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":218114,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/16\/jhar-hc-hearing-delinquent-employee-necessary-where-disciplinary-authority-defers-from-finding-of-enquiry-officer\/","url_meta":{"origin":196666,"position":1},"title":"Jhar HC | Hearing delinquent employee necessary where disciplinary authority defers from finding of enquiry officer","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 16, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J. quashed the order which inflicted the punishment of non-payment of the salary of petitioner for a period of time during which a criminal case was lodged against the petitioner.\u00a0 The petitioner filed this writ petition for quashing order whereby the petitioner has been\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":205544,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/20\/stopping-increment-for-chewing-tobacco-in-office-held-to-be-a-major-punishment-order-set-aside-all-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":196666,"position":2},"title":"Stopping increment for \u2018chewing tobacco in office\u2019 held to be a major punishment; Order set aside: All HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 20, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Mithlesh Kumar Tiwari, J. while allowing a petition quashed the impugned order whereby the petitioner was awarded a punishment of stoppage of two annual increments on a permanent basis. The present petition was filed pertaining to challenging an order, according to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":227266,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/19\/jhar-hc-interference-with-orders-passed-pursuant-to-departmental-enquiry-can-only-be-in-case-of-no-evidence\/","url_meta":{"origin":196666,"position":3},"title":"Jhar HC | Interference with orders passed pursuant to departmental enquiry can only be in case of \u2018no evidence\u2019","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 19, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: Dr S.N. Pathak, J. dismissed the instant writ petition being devoid of merit. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was appointed as an Assistant Teacher by the State Government in 1994 on qualifying BPSC exam for the same post. After a long service,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":238922,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/09\/hp-hc-whether-an-employee-who-retired-on-31st-of-a-month-is-entitled-to-increment-which-would-have-fallen-due-on-1st-of-the-next-month-hc-elucidates\/","url_meta":{"origin":196666,"position":4},"title":"HP HC | Whether an employee who retired on 31st of a month is entitled to increment which would have fallen due on 1st of the next month; HC elucidates","author":"Editor","date":"November 9, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: A Division Bench of Tarlok Singh Chauhan and Jyotsna Rewal Dua, JJ., dismissing the present claim against the increment accrued post-retirement, reiterated the effect of relevant Pension Rules and settled precedents. Brief Facts Petitioner was appointed as Technical Assistant in the Department of Industries (Geological wing)\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":224565,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/27\/ori-hc-writ-court-is-not-competent-to-appreciate-the-evidence-and-findings-by-the-disciplinary-enquiry-authority\/","url_meta":{"origin":196666,"position":5},"title":"Ori HC | Writ Court is not competent to appreciate the evidence and findings by the Disciplinary\/ Enquiry Authority","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 27, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: Biswanath Rath, J. dismissed the writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking the quashing of the order whereby the petitioner herein was punished for discharging his duty dishonestly and also sought reinstatement of the petitioner in his service with all the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196666","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=196666"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196666\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=196666"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=196666"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=196666"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}