{"id":196431,"date":"2018-05-26T11:55:01","date_gmt":"2018-05-26T06:25:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=196431"},"modified":"2018-05-26T11:57:28","modified_gmt":"2018-05-26T06:27:28","slug":"no-information-about-the-progress-of-case-accepted-as-a-reasonable-cause-for-appellants-non-appearance-before-the-tribunal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/26\/no-information-about-the-progress-of-case-accepted-as-a-reasonable-cause-for-appellants-non-appearance-before-the-tribunal\/","title":{"rendered":"No information about the progress of case accepted as a reasonable cause for appellant\u2019s non-appearance before the Tribunal\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"

Rajasthan High Court:<\/strong> The Judgment passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal rejecting the claim petition of the appellant, was set aside by a Single Judge Bench comprising of Vineet Kumar Mathur, J.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The complainant sustained injuries in an accident with respondent\u2019s jeep being driven in a rash and negligent manner by the driver. He filed a claim petition before the Tribunal which was rejected for the appellant\u2019s non-appearance and non-production of evidence before the Tribunal. The appellant challenged the order of rejection of his claim petition by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The High Court perused the record and found that the claim of the appellant was rejected by the Tribunal on the ground that he failed to produce evidence despite being given multiple opportunities. However, the Court found\u00a0favour\u00a0with the cause shown by the appellant that he lived in a far off place and the information regarding progress of the case was not communicated to him by his counsel. The Court held that the cause shown by the appellant appeared to be reasonable. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the High Court remanded the matter back to the Tribunal from the stage of production of evidence by the claimant (appellant). The appeal was disposed of accordingly. [Mohd. Akbar Ali Khan v.\u00a0Ramsingh,\u00a02018 SCC\u00a0OnLine\u00a0Raj 1279<\/a>, dated 18-5-2018]\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Rajasthan High Court: The Judgment passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal rejecting the claim petition of the appellant, was set aside <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-196431","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts"],"yoast_head":"\nNo information about the progress of case accepted as a reasonable cause for appellant\u2019s non-appearance before the Tribunal\u00a0 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/26\/no-information-about-the-progress-of-case-accepted-as-a-reasonable-cause-for-appellants-non-appearance-before-the-tribunal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"No information about the progress of case accepted as a reasonable cause for appellant\u2019s non-appearance before the Tribunal\u00a0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court: The Judgment passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal rejecting the claim petition of the appellant, was set aside\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/26\/no-information-about-the-progress-of-case-accepted-as-a-reasonable-cause-for-appellants-non-appearance-before-the-tribunal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-05-26T06:25:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-05-26T06:27:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/26\/no-information-about-the-progress-of-case-accepted-as-a-reasonable-cause-for-appellants-non-appearance-before-the-tribunal\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/26\/no-information-about-the-progress-of-case-accepted-as-a-reasonable-cause-for-appellants-non-appearance-before-the-tribunal\/\",\"name\":\"No information about the progress of case accepted as a reasonable cause for appellant\u2019s non-appearance before the Tribunal\u00a0 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-05-26T06:25:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-05-26T06:27:28+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/26\/no-information-about-the-progress-of-case-accepted-as-a-reasonable-cause-for-appellants-non-appearance-before-the-tribunal\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/26\/no-information-about-the-progress-of-case-accepted-as-a-reasonable-cause-for-appellants-non-appearance-before-the-tribunal\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/26\/no-information-about-the-progress-of-case-accepted-as-a-reasonable-cause-for-appellants-non-appearance-before-the-tribunal\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"No information about the progress of case accepted as a reasonable cause for appellant\u2019s non-appearance before the Tribunal\u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"No information about the progress of case accepted as a reasonable cause for appellant\u2019s non-appearance before the Tribunal\u00a0 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/26\/no-information-about-the-progress-of-case-accepted-as-a-reasonable-cause-for-appellants-non-appearance-before-the-tribunal\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"No information about the progress of case accepted as a reasonable cause for appellant\u2019s non-appearance before the Tribunal\u00a0","og_description":"Rajasthan High Court: The Judgment passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal rejecting the claim petition of the appellant, was set aside","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/26\/no-information-about-the-progress-of-case-accepted-as-a-reasonable-cause-for-appellants-non-appearance-before-the-tribunal\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-05-26T06:25:01+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-05-26T06:27:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/26\/no-information-about-the-progress-of-case-accepted-as-a-reasonable-cause-for-appellants-non-appearance-before-the-tribunal\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/26\/no-information-about-the-progress-of-case-accepted-as-a-reasonable-cause-for-appellants-non-appearance-before-the-tribunal\/","name":"No information about the progress of case accepted as a reasonable cause for appellant\u2019s non-appearance before the Tribunal\u00a0 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-05-26T06:25:01+00:00","dateModified":"2018-05-26T06:27:28+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/26\/no-information-about-the-progress-of-case-accepted-as-a-reasonable-cause-for-appellants-non-appearance-before-the-tribunal\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/26\/no-information-about-the-progress-of-case-accepted-as-a-reasonable-cause-for-appellants-non-appearance-before-the-tribunal\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/26\/no-information-about-the-progress-of-case-accepted-as-a-reasonable-cause-for-appellants-non-appearance-before-the-tribunal\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"No information about the progress of case accepted as a reasonable cause for appellant\u2019s non-appearance before the Tribunal\u00a0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":235511,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/08\/madras-hc-can-mact-deal-with-claims-policies-other-than-accident-claims-provisions-of-mv-act-contractual-statutory-liability-cannot-be-equated-hc-elaborates\/","url_meta":{"origin":196431,"position":0},"title":"Madras HC | Can MACT deal with claims & policies other than Accident Claims provisions of MV Act? Contractual & Statutory liability cannot be equated: HC elaborates","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 8, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court:\u00a0S.M. Subramaniam, J., while addressing a motor accident claim, observed that, Once, the policy is contractual in nature and the parties have signed the agreement, then such a contract cannot be construed or brought within the ambit of statutory liability. The Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Limited is\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":218133,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/16\/utt-hc-comprehensive-policy-covers-liability-of-insurer-for-payment-of-compensation-in-cases-of-car-accidents-such-claims-are-not-barred-by-s-167-of-mv-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":196431,"position":1},"title":"Utt HC | \u2018Comprehensive policy\u2019 covers liability of insurer for payment of compensation in cases of car accidents; such claims are not barred by S. 167 of MV Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 16, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. remanded a matter pertaining to the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and directed them to decide on the matter expeditiously.\u00a0 The appeal was filed as the appellant as she was aggrieved by the order passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. The appellant\u2019s husband, Bhupesh\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":260223,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/17\/taking-rs-15000-as-notional-income-of-a-family-member-who-is-non-earning-in-a-motor-accident-claim\/","url_meta":{"origin":196431,"position":2},"title":"Taking Rs 15,000 as notional income of a family member who is non-earning, in a motor accident claim: Is it reasonable? All HC decides","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 17, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: The Division Bench of Dr Kaushal Jayendra Thaker and Ajai Tyagi, JJ., enhances quantum of award of a non-earning member in a motor accident claim, while referring to the Supreme Court decision in Kurvan Ansari v. Shyam Kishore Murmu, 2021 SCC OnLine SC 1060. Present appeal had\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":243724,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/11\/mv-act-does-claims-tribunal-possess-any-authority-to-award-costs-supreme-court-to-decide\/","url_meta":{"origin":196431,"position":3},"title":"[MV Act] Does Claims Tribunal possess any authority to award costs? Supreme Court to decide","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"February 11, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Taking note of an important legal question raised by the High Court of Kerala while hearing a Motor Vehicle Accident claim case, the 3-judge bench of NV Ramana, Surya Kant and Aniruddha Bose, JJ has agreed to decide the following question: \"Whether in the matter of awarding costs,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":338268,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/02\/andhra-pradesh-high-court-motor-accident-compensation-appeal-judgment-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":196431,"position":4},"title":"Andhra Pradesh High Court upholds compensation in Motor Accident Case; Dismisses allegations of foul play","author":"Arunima","date":"January 2, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"For the purpose of awarding compensation, there should be the causal relationship between the use of the motor vehicle and the accident resulting in death or permanent disablement, but the same is not required to be direct and proximate.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Andhra Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":328340,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/08\/attempt-overtake-vehicle-motor-accident-compensation-negligence-supreme-court-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":196431,"position":5},"title":"Mere attempt to overtake vehicle not Negligence; Supreme Court enhances MACT compensation from Rs.1,01,250 to Rs.11,25,000","author":"Sucheta","date":"August 8, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Regarding appellant\u2019s attempt to overtake a vehicle, the Court stated that he was doing an act which is an everyday occurrence on the road, but resultantly suffered extensive injuries himself. Furthermore, it was proved that the offending vehicle was being driven rashly and negligently.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"overtake vehicle not negligence supreme court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/overtake-vehicle-not-negligence-supreme-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/overtake-vehicle-not-negligence-supreme-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/overtake-vehicle-not-negligence-supreme-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/overtake-vehicle-not-negligence-supreme-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196431","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=196431"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196431\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=196431"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=196431"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=196431"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}