{"id":196303,"date":"2018-05-23T13:43:25","date_gmt":"2018-05-23T08:13:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=196303"},"modified":"2018-06-15T14:10:25","modified_gmt":"2018-06-15T08:40:25","slug":"mere-possession-of-counterfeit-notes-not-enough-to-establish-guilt","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/23\/mere-possession-of-counterfeit-notes-not-enough-to-establish-guilt\/","title":{"rendered":"Mere possession of counterfeit notes not enough to establish guilt"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Delhi High Court:<\/strong> A Single Judge Bench of the Delhi High Court comprising of S.P. Garg, J., allowed a criminal appeal, setting aside the conviction of the appellant under Section 489B and 489C of the IPC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The appellant had been arrested on account of possessing and trying to use as genuine, some fake currency notes while buying from a shop. The appellant had pleaded innocence. The Court analyzed the circumstances surrounding the arrest and noted that the accused possessed 7 more Rs. 500\/- denomination notes at the time of arrest out of which one more was counterfeit while the rest were genuine. The fake notes were such that they had to be tested with an instrument to establish that they were fake. The appellant had offered to switch the note he had given to the shopkeeper with any other note in his possession. Also, the appellant had not tried to run away. There were also discrepancies during the investigation and during the examination of witnesses.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court, while noted the settled position that mere possession of a counterfeit currency note is not enough to establish the guilt. Further, nothing had come on record to show that the appellant had reasons to believe that the note used by him was counterfeit. Presumption of knowledge from mere possession can only be drawn if the notes were apparently counterfeit. Further, the Court relied on the judgment in <em>M.Mammutti v. State of Karnataka<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/2B9K8Jtb\">(1979) 4SCC 723 : AIR 1979 SC 1705<\/a> to state that only if counterfeit notes are of such nature that mere look at that them would not convince a person that it is counterfeit then no presumption of knowledge can be attributed to the person merely possessing them. In the light of the above reasons, the appeal was allowed, sentence set aside. [Sunder Lal v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/f6lG14If\">2018 SCC OnLine Del 9079<\/a>, decided on 16-05-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench of the Delhi High Court comprising of S.P. Garg, J., allowed a criminal appeal, setting <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[30263,24934,2634,6701],"class_list":["post-196303","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-counterfeit-notes","tag-knowledge","tag-possession","tag-presumption"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Mere possession of counterfeit notes not enough to establish guilt | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/23\/mere-possession-of-counterfeit-notes-not-enough-to-establish-guilt\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mere possession of counterfeit notes not enough to establish guilt\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench of the Delhi High Court comprising of S.P. Garg, J., allowed a criminal appeal, setting\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/23\/mere-possession-of-counterfeit-notes-not-enough-to-establish-guilt\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-05-23T08:13:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-06-15T08:40:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/23\/mere-possession-of-counterfeit-notes-not-enough-to-establish-guilt\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/23\/mere-possession-of-counterfeit-notes-not-enough-to-establish-guilt\/\",\"name\":\"Mere possession of counterfeit notes not enough to establish guilt | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-05-23T08:13:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-15T08:40:25+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/23\/mere-possession-of-counterfeit-notes-not-enough-to-establish-guilt\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/23\/mere-possession-of-counterfeit-notes-not-enough-to-establish-guilt\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/23\/mere-possession-of-counterfeit-notes-not-enough-to-establish-guilt\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mere possession of counterfeit notes not enough to establish guilt\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mere possession of counterfeit notes not enough to establish guilt | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/23\/mere-possession-of-counterfeit-notes-not-enough-to-establish-guilt\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mere possession of counterfeit notes not enough to establish guilt","og_description":"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench of the Delhi High Court comprising of S.P. Garg, J., allowed a criminal appeal, setting","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/23\/mere-possession-of-counterfeit-notes-not-enough-to-establish-guilt\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-05-23T08:13:25+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-06-15T08:40:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/23\/mere-possession-of-counterfeit-notes-not-enough-to-establish-guilt\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/23\/mere-possession-of-counterfeit-notes-not-enough-to-establish-guilt\/","name":"Mere possession of counterfeit notes not enough to establish guilt | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-05-23T08:13:25+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-15T08:40:25+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/23\/mere-possession-of-counterfeit-notes-not-enough-to-establish-guilt\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/23\/mere-possession-of-counterfeit-notes-not-enough-to-establish-guilt\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/23\/mere-possession-of-counterfeit-notes-not-enough-to-establish-guilt\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mere possession of counterfeit notes not enough to establish guilt"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":215596,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/12\/tri-hc-mere-possession-of-counterfeit-currency-not-sufficient-to-prove-commission-of-offence-punishable-under-s-489-c-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":196303,"position":0},"title":"Tri HC | Mere possession of counterfeit currency not sufficient to prove commission of offence punishable under S. 489-C IPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 12, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Tripura High Court:\u00a0S. Talapatra, J. allowed an appeal against the decision of the Sessions Judge whereby the appellant was convicted under Section 489-C (possession of forged or counterfeit currency-notes or banknotes)\u00a0IPC. The appellant was found in possession of 27 fake counterfeit Indian currency-notes. He was charged and convicted as stated\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":319643,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/07\/fake-currency-serious-threat-to-economy-national-security-individual-cases-must-be-dealt-sternly-dhc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":196303,"position":1},"title":"Fake currency is serious threat to economy, national security, individual well-being; Delhi High Court dismisses bail application","author":"Simranjeet","date":"April 7, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The illicit activities surrounding supply and circulation of counterfeit currency notes pose multifaceted risks to both economy and individuals within society. There is no gainsaying that proliferation of counterfeit currency facilitates various forms of illicit activities.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":272386,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/26\/delhi-high-court-interim-injunction-restrains-website-myshoeshop-counterfeit-fake-shoes-first-copy-trademark-infringement-legalnews-legalupdates-legalresearch\/","url_meta":{"origin":196303,"position":2},"title":"Delhi High Court injuncts myshoeshop from violating trademark rights by selling first copy shoes of NB Device mark as well as Adidas, Nike, Louis Vuitton etc","author":"Editor","date":"August 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: Navin Chawla, J. restrained a website myshoeshop (\u2018defendant 1') from selling shoes having NB Device mark (\u2018plaintiff'). The website also sold counterfeit\/fake shoes of high-end popular brands violating their trademark rights as well. The plaintiff is a company incorporated under the laws of the State\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":205782,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/27\/sentencing-though-discretionary-power-of-courts-should-be-proportionate-to-gravity-of-the-offence\/","url_meta":{"origin":196303,"position":3},"title":"Sentencing, though discretionary power of Courts, should be proportionate to gravity of the offence","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 27, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: The appellant had filed this jail appeal before a Division Judge Bench comprising of Sudhir Agarwal and Om Prakash-VII, JJ., against his conviction and sentence order passed by Additional District Judge under Sections 489-B and 489-C IPC where he had to undergo imprisonment for life with fine,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":272652,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/30\/madras-high-court-granted-bail-non-bailable-offence-national-investigation-agency-unlawful-activities-prevention-act-1967-indian-penal-code-1860-prisoner-on-transit-warrant-non-bailable-warrant\/","url_meta":{"origin":196303,"position":4},"title":"Madras High Court| PT warrant can never be converted into regular warrant in a case where the accused person is already on bail; opportunity should be given to the accused to explain his non-appearance","author":"Editor","date":"August 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: In a case related to an appeal filed for the cancellation of an order of dismissing the bail application by the Special Court under the National Investigation Agency Act (Sessions Court for Exclusive Trial of Bomb Blast Cases) (Special Court), S.Vaidyanathan and A.D. Jagadish Chandira, JJ. released\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":343607,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/13\/delhi-high-court-334cr-damages-medserve-counterfeit-johnson-johnson-trademark-infringement-permanent-injunction-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":196303,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court awards \u20b93.34 cr damages against Medserve for selling counterfeit Johnson &amp; Johnson surgical products","author":"Arunima","date":"March 13, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cBy selling counterfeit medical products, the defendants have not only inflicted substantial financial loss upon the plaintiff but have also misled the consumers who purchased these products under the false belief that they were genuine. Given the gravity of the infringement and the extent of harm caused, compensatory damages alone\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196303","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=196303"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196303\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=196303"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=196303"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=196303"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}