{"id":196227,"date":"2018-05-22T13:24:09","date_gmt":"2018-05-22T07:54:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=196227"},"modified":"2018-05-30T12:26:34","modified_gmt":"2018-05-30T06:56:34","slug":"withdrawal-of-notice-under-s-13-4-of-sarfaesi-act-does-not-discharge-the-debt","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/22\/withdrawal-of-notice-under-s-13-4-of-sarfaesi-act-does-not-discharge-the-debt\/","title":{"rendered":"Withdrawal of notice under Section 13 (4) of SARFAESI Act does not discharge the debt"},"content":{"rendered":"

Madhya Pradesh High Court:<\/strong> A petition filed against the possession notice issued under Rule 8 of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules 2002 was dismissed by a Division Bench comprising of Hemant Gupta, CJ and Vijay Kumar Shukla, J.<\/p>\n

Argument of the petitioner was that earlier, the concerned Bank initiated proceedings against the petitioner under Section 13 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002. The petitioner invoked the jurisdiction of Debts Recovery Tribunal under Section 17 of the Act. However, such notice was withdrawn. Therefore, the petitioner contended that the Bank was estopped to issue fresh notice to the petitioner.<\/p>\n

The High Court did not find any merit in the contention of the petitioner and held that the withdrawal of notice under Section 13(4) did not discharge the petitioner\u2019s debt. The Bank was a secured creditor and a mortgagee and therefore, by withdrawal of earlier notice, the debt did not stand discharged. The Bank continued to be a creditor and petitioner a debtor. Thus, the possession notice could have been issued under the provisions of the Act. Further, the petitioner had an alternate efficacious remedy under Section 17 before the DRT. Accordingly, the petition was dismissed while the petitioner was given a liberty to approach DRT. [Devarshi Kirana Store v. Authorised Officer, 2018 SCC OnLine MP 354<\/a>, dated 18-5-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Madhya Pradesh High Court: A petition filed against the possession notice issued under Rule 8 of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules 2002 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":172684,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3659,11421,30242],"class_list":["post-196227","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-notice","tag-sarfaesi-act","tag-withdrawal"],"yoast_head":"\nWithdrawal of notice under Section 13 (4) of SARFAESI Act does not discharge the debt | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/22\/withdrawal-of-notice-under-s-13-4-of-sarfaesi-act-does-not-discharge-the-debt\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Withdrawal of notice under Section 13 (4) of SARFAESI Act does not discharge the debt\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh High Court: A petition filed against the possession notice issued under Rule 8 of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules 2002\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/22\/withdrawal-of-notice-under-s-13-4-of-sarfaesi-act-does-not-discharge-the-debt\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-05-22T07:54:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-05-30T06:56:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/22\/withdrawal-of-notice-under-s-13-4-of-sarfaesi-act-does-not-discharge-the-debt\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/22\/withdrawal-of-notice-under-s-13-4-of-sarfaesi-act-does-not-discharge-the-debt\/\",\"name\":\"Withdrawal of notice under Section 13 (4) of SARFAESI Act does not discharge the debt | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/22\/withdrawal-of-notice-under-s-13-4-of-sarfaesi-act-does-not-discharge-the-debt\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/22\/withdrawal-of-notice-under-s-13-4-of-sarfaesi-act-does-not-discharge-the-debt\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-05-22T07:54:09+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-05-30T06:56:34+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/22\/withdrawal-of-notice-under-s-13-4-of-sarfaesi-act-does-not-discharge-the-debt\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/22\/withdrawal-of-notice-under-s-13-4-of-sarfaesi-act-does-not-discharge-the-debt\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/22\/withdrawal-of-notice-under-s-13-4-of-sarfaesi-act-does-not-discharge-the-debt\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/22\/withdrawal-of-notice-under-s-13-4-of-sarfaesi-act-does-not-discharge-the-debt\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Withdrawal of notice under Section 13 (4) of SARFAESI Act does not discharge the debt\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Withdrawal of notice under Section 13 (4) of SARFAESI Act does not discharge the debt | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/22\/withdrawal-of-notice-under-s-13-4-of-sarfaesi-act-does-not-discharge-the-debt\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Withdrawal of notice under Section 13 (4) of SARFAESI Act does not discharge the debt","og_description":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: A petition filed against the possession notice issued under Rule 8 of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules 2002","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/22\/withdrawal-of-notice-under-s-13-4-of-sarfaesi-act-does-not-discharge-the-debt\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-05-22T07:54:09+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-05-30T06:56:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/22\/withdrawal-of-notice-under-s-13-4-of-sarfaesi-act-does-not-discharge-the-debt\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/22\/withdrawal-of-notice-under-s-13-4-of-sarfaesi-act-does-not-discharge-the-debt\/","name":"Withdrawal of notice under Section 13 (4) of SARFAESI Act does not discharge the debt | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/22\/withdrawal-of-notice-under-s-13-4-of-sarfaesi-act-does-not-discharge-the-debt\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/22\/withdrawal-of-notice-under-s-13-4-of-sarfaesi-act-does-not-discharge-the-debt\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg","datePublished":"2018-05-22T07:54:09+00:00","dateModified":"2018-05-30T06:56:34+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/22\/withdrawal-of-notice-under-s-13-4-of-sarfaesi-act-does-not-discharge-the-debt\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/22\/withdrawal-of-notice-under-s-13-4-of-sarfaesi-act-does-not-discharge-the-debt\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/22\/withdrawal-of-notice-under-s-13-4-of-sarfaesi-act-does-not-discharge-the-debt\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/22\/withdrawal-of-notice-under-s-13-4-of-sarfaesi-act-does-not-discharge-the-debt\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Withdrawal of notice under Section 13 (4) of SARFAESI Act does not discharge the debt"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":219128,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/jhar-hc-a-writ-petition-after-issuance-of-notice-under-s-134-of-sarfaesi-is-not-to-be-entertained-petitioner-to-approach-debt-recovery-tribunal\/","url_meta":{"origin":196227,"position":0},"title":"Jhar HC | A writ petition after issuance of notice under S. 13(4) of SARFAESI is not to be entertained; petitioner to approach Debt Recovery Tribunal","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 4, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: Sujit Narayan Prasad, J., dismissed the writ petition as a writ petition after issuance of notice under Section 13 (4) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 is not to be entertained. The brief facts of the case of the petitioner is that the petitioner has extended with the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":238380,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/02\/del-hc-is-the-liability-of-principal-borrower-and-guarantor-co-extensive-court-reiterates-scs-position-on-continuation-of-sarfaesi-proceedings-against-guarantor-by-banks\/","url_meta":{"origin":196227,"position":1},"title":"Del HC | Is the liability of Principal Borrower and Guarantor co-extensive? Court reiterates SC’s position on continuation of SARFAESI proceedings against Guarantor by banks","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 2, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of Hima Kohli and Subramonium Prasad, JJ., considered the following question: Whether a bank\/financial institution can institute or continue with proceedings against a guarantor under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act), when proceedings under the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":106861,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/15\/inform-debtor-before-commencing-with-auction-sale-of-his-security-allahabad-hc-quashes-drat-order\/","url_meta":{"origin":196227,"position":2},"title":"Inform debtor before commencing with auction sale of his security, Allahabad HC quashes DRAT order","author":"Saba","date":"February 15, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court:\u00a0The petitioner before the Court appealed against the order of Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal. The petitioner was serving in Punjab National Bank, Branch Mahmoorganj, Varanasi. During his service period, he availed a housing loan of Rs. 10 lacs in the year 2007 for construction of house and deposited\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":297732,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/26\/delhi-high-court-section-35-section-37-proceedings-under-sarfaesi-remain-unaffected-sebi\/","url_meta":{"origin":196227,"position":3},"title":"Whether SEBI in exercise of powers under SEBI Act can prevent a bank from proceeding under SARFAESI Act, 2002? Delhi High Court analyses","author":"Arunima","date":"July 26, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"SEBI is possessed with powers under the SEBI Act, 1992 to direct the petitioner bank in specific, and banks in general, regardless of them being registered with SEBI.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":236755,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/05\/jhar-hc%e2%94%82-loan-by-financial-institutions-is-in-the-nature-of-public-money-writ-petition-not-maintainable-as-alternative-remedy-available-under-s-17-of-sarfaesi-act-if-aggrie\/","url_meta":{"origin":196227,"position":4},"title":"Jhar HC | Loan by financial institutions is in the nature of \u2018public money\u2019; Writ Petition not maintainable as alternative remedy available under S. 17 of SARFAESI Act if aggrieved due to action taken by \u2018State\u2019 under S. 13\/14 of the Act","author":"Editor","date":"October 5, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: Rajesh Shankar, J. dismissed the petition on grounds of non-maintainability. The facts of the case are such that the petitioner took a loan to the tune of Rs 4, 25,000 from the respondent bank namely Allahabad Bank. Due to default in payment of money, a notice was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":204778,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/03\/considering-representation-under-s-133a-sarfaesi-act-mandatory-time-provided-to-communicate-response-thereon-is-not-del-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":196227,"position":5},"title":"Considering representation under S. 13(3A) SARFAESI Act mandatory, time provided to communicate response thereon is not: Del HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 3, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Single Judge Bench comprising of Vibhu Bakhru, J. dismissed a petition seeking a writ to be issued to set aside the reply under Section 13 (3A) of\u00a0 Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act) given by the respondent Bank\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196227","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=196227"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196227\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/172684"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=196227"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=196227"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=196227"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}