{"id":196037,"date":"2018-05-16T10:48:35","date_gmt":"2018-05-16T05:18:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=196037"},"modified":"2018-06-19T12:37:32","modified_gmt":"2018-06-19T07:07:32","slug":"only-requisite-for-payment-of-gratuity-even-upon-death-is-completion-of-10-years-of-service-not-attainment-of-60-years-of-age","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/16\/only-requisite-for-payment-of-gratuity-even-upon-death-is-completion-of-10-years-of-service-not-attainment-of-60-years-of-age\/","title":{"rendered":"Only requisite for payment of gratuity, even upon death, is completion of 10 years of service, not attainment of 60 years of age"},"content":{"rendered":"

Allahabad High Court:<\/strong> The Single Judge Bench comprising of Ashwani Kumar Mishra, J. decided a writ petition for the sanction of gratuity before completion of the age of 60 years.<\/p>\n

The petitioner sought the gratuity of his wife who was a headmaster in the institution and died in the year 2013. The petitioner was refused for gratuity on the ground that such amount was payable only on the completion of service at the age of 60 years and not prior to it.<\/p>\n

Observing the circumstances of the case, a similar Writ Petition No. 40568 of 2016 was considered by this Court, in which it was decided that the Government Order does not restrict payment of gratuity to an employee, who is otherwise covered under the scheme just because he has not attained the age of 60 years. Clause 5 of the Government Order, which provides that gratuity would be payable at the age of 60 years or upon death. Therefore, the petition from which reference has been taken upon, rejection of petitioner\u2019s claim for payment of gratuity was held to be not justified.<\/p>\n

In the present case, the Court concluded by quashing the impugned order and directed the authority concerned to re-consider the matter and take a decision with regard to payment of interest in terms of the applicable government order. [Chandra Prakash Saxena v. State of U.P., 2018 SCC OnLine ALL 532<\/a>,\u00a0 order dated 07-05-2018]<\/p>\n

\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Allahabad High Court: The Single Judge Bench comprising of Ashwani Kumar Mishra, J. decided a writ petition for the sanction of gratuity <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":75931,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[6862,9081,2787],"class_list":["post-196037","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-age","tag-gratuity","tag-service"],"yoast_head":"\nOnly requisite for payment of gratuity, even upon death, is completion of 10 years of service, not attainment of 60 years of age | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/16\/only-requisite-for-payment-of-gratuity-even-upon-death-is-completion-of-10-years-of-service-not-attainment-of-60-years-of-age\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Only requisite for payment of gratuity, even upon death, is completion of 10 years of service, not attainment of 60 years of age\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Allahabad High Court: The Single Judge Bench comprising of Ashwani Kumar Mishra, J. decided a writ petition for the sanction of gratuity\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/16\/only-requisite-for-payment-of-gratuity-even-upon-death-is-completion-of-10-years-of-service-not-attainment-of-60-years-of-age\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-05-16T05:18:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-06-19T07:07:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/All-HC-Lko-Bench_3.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"872\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/16\/only-requisite-for-payment-of-gratuity-even-upon-death-is-completion-of-10-years-of-service-not-attainment-of-60-years-of-age\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/16\/only-requisite-for-payment-of-gratuity-even-upon-death-is-completion-of-10-years-of-service-not-attainment-of-60-years-of-age\/\",\"name\":\"Only requisite for payment of gratuity, even upon death, is completion of 10 years of service, not attainment of 60 years of age | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/16\/only-requisite-for-payment-of-gratuity-even-upon-death-is-completion-of-10-years-of-service-not-attainment-of-60-years-of-age\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/16\/only-requisite-for-payment-of-gratuity-even-upon-death-is-completion-of-10-years-of-service-not-attainment-of-60-years-of-age\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/All-HC-Lko-Bench_3.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-05-16T05:18:35+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-19T07:07:32+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/16\/only-requisite-for-payment-of-gratuity-even-upon-death-is-completion-of-10-years-of-service-not-attainment-of-60-years-of-age\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/16\/only-requisite-for-payment-of-gratuity-even-upon-death-is-completion-of-10-years-of-service-not-attainment-of-60-years-of-age\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/16\/only-requisite-for-payment-of-gratuity-even-upon-death-is-completion-of-10-years-of-service-not-attainment-of-60-years-of-age\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/All-HC-Lko-Bench_3.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/All-HC-Lko-Bench_3.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":872},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/16\/only-requisite-for-payment-of-gratuity-even-upon-death-is-completion-of-10-years-of-service-not-attainment-of-60-years-of-age\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Only requisite for payment of gratuity, even upon death, is completion of 10 years of service, not attainment of 60 years of age\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Only requisite for payment of gratuity, even upon death, is completion of 10 years of service, not attainment of 60 years of age | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/16\/only-requisite-for-payment-of-gratuity-even-upon-death-is-completion-of-10-years-of-service-not-attainment-of-60-years-of-age\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Only requisite for payment of gratuity, even upon death, is completion of 10 years of service, not attainment of 60 years of age","og_description":"Allahabad High Court: The Single Judge Bench comprising of Ashwani Kumar Mishra, J. decided a writ petition for the sanction of gratuity","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/16\/only-requisite-for-payment-of-gratuity-even-upon-death-is-completion-of-10-years-of-service-not-attainment-of-60-years-of-age\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-05-16T05:18:35+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-06-19T07:07:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":872,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/All-HC-Lko-Bench_3.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/16\/only-requisite-for-payment-of-gratuity-even-upon-death-is-completion-of-10-years-of-service-not-attainment-of-60-years-of-age\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/16\/only-requisite-for-payment-of-gratuity-even-upon-death-is-completion-of-10-years-of-service-not-attainment-of-60-years-of-age\/","name":"Only requisite for payment of gratuity, even upon death, is completion of 10 years of service, not attainment of 60 years of age | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/16\/only-requisite-for-payment-of-gratuity-even-upon-death-is-completion-of-10-years-of-service-not-attainment-of-60-years-of-age\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/16\/only-requisite-for-payment-of-gratuity-even-upon-death-is-completion-of-10-years-of-service-not-attainment-of-60-years-of-age\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/All-HC-Lko-Bench_3.jpg","datePublished":"2018-05-16T05:18:35+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-19T07:07:32+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/16\/only-requisite-for-payment-of-gratuity-even-upon-death-is-completion-of-10-years-of-service-not-attainment-of-60-years-of-age\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/16\/only-requisite-for-payment-of-gratuity-even-upon-death-is-completion-of-10-years-of-service-not-attainment-of-60-years-of-age\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/16\/only-requisite-for-payment-of-gratuity-even-upon-death-is-completion-of-10-years-of-service-not-attainment-of-60-years-of-age\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/All-HC-Lko-Bench_3.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/All-HC-Lko-Bench_3.jpg","width":1330,"height":872},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/16\/only-requisite-for-payment-of-gratuity-even-upon-death-is-completion-of-10-years-of-service-not-attainment-of-60-years-of-age\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Only requisite for payment of gratuity, even upon death, is completion of 10 years of service, not attainment of 60 years of age"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/All-HC-Lko-Bench_3.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":197483,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/25\/section-46-of-payment-of-gratuity-act-does-not-contemplate-conviction-as-a-condition-precedent-for-forfeiting-gratuity\/","url_meta":{"origin":196037,"position":0},"title":"Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act does not contemplate conviction as a condition precedent for forfeiting gratuity","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 25, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of S.C. Gupte, J. dismissed a writ petition which was filed challenging the forfeiture of payment of gratuity due to the petitioner. The petitioner worked as a Branch Manager with the respondent Bank. He was charge-sheeted for misconduct alleging misappropriation of funds.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":267775,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/02\/on-failure-of-states-duty-to-disburse-the-gratuity-and-pension-amount-on-the-due-date-interest-is-obligatory\/","url_meta":{"origin":196037,"position":1},"title":"Cal HC | On failure of State’s duty to disburse the gratuity and pension amount on the due date, interest is obligatory","author":"Editor","date":"June 2, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court: Amrita Sinha, J. disposed of a petition which was filed by an Assistant Teacher who retired from service on 31-10-2020 regarding delayed payment of the gratuity and arrear pension amount. The grievance of the petitioner was that the Pension Payment Order was issued on 28-02-2022 and the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":302541,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/27\/agreement-cannot-override-statutory-gratuity-payment-obligations-under-payment-of-gratuity-act-1972-cal-hc-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":196037,"position":2},"title":"Agreement\/Settlement cannot override statutory Gratuity payment obligations under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"September 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court held that the contradiction between agreement and provisions of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, rendered the agreement unenforceable in terms of payment of gratuity.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":294279,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/determination-of-gratuity-from-date-termination-of-employment-kerala-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":196037,"position":3},"title":"Gratuity determined as per date of termination of employment, not the date of sanction or actual disbursement: Kerala High Court","author":"Ridhi","date":"June 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court suggested the petitioner to choose between Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 and Kerala State Housing Board Employees' (Pension and other Retirement Benefits) Regulations, 1990 for claim of gratuity or DCRG, since he cannot have gratuity under one with the ceiling limit payable under another Act.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"kerala high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282956,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/02\/under-the-payment-of-gratuity-act-a-delay-cannot-be-condoned-by-taking-the-aid-of-the-provisions-of-the-limitation-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":196037,"position":4},"title":"Delay cannot be condoned under Payment of Gratuity Act by taking the aid of the provisions of Limitation Act: Kerala High Court","author":"Editor","date":"February 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court perused Section 29(2) of the Limitation Act, 1963 and Section 7(7) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 and held that the authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act cannot condone the delay in filing an appeal by entertaining an application under Limitation Act.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-310.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":148351,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/08\/financial-burden-is-not-a-reason-sufficient-to-invalidate-the-retrospective-operation-of-payment-of-gratuity-amendment-act-2009\/","url_meta":{"origin":196037,"position":5},"title":"Financial burden is not a reason sufficient to invalidate the retrospective operation of Payment of Gratuity (Amendment) Act, 2009","author":"Saba","date":"August 8, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: While passing the order in a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging the retrospective operation of the Payment of Gratuity (Amendment) Act, 2009, a Single Judge Bench comprising of Ashok B. Hinchigeri, J. held that the newly substituted Section \u00a02(e) and the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196037","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=196037"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196037\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/75931"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=196037"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=196037"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=196037"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}