{"id":196021,"date":"2018-05-15T15:47:13","date_gmt":"2018-05-15T10:17:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=196021"},"modified":"2018-06-29T13:10:04","modified_gmt":"2018-06-29T07:40:04","slug":"injunction-against-the-use-of-trademark-vacated-in-light-of-bona-fide-use-of-surname","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/15\/injunction-against-the-use-of-trademark-vacated-in-light-of-bona-fide-use-of-surname\/","title":{"rendered":"Injunction against the use of trademark vacated in light of bona fide use of surname"},"content":{"rendered":"

Karnataka High Court:<\/strong> A Single Judge Bench comprising of L. Narayana Swamy, J. dismissed a miscellaneous first appeal while vacating the injunction passed against the respondent prohibiting him from using the trademark \u2018PATIL FRAGRANCES\u2019.<\/p>\n

The appellant filed a suit against the respondent for infringement and passing off its trademark and trade name \u2018PATIL AND PATIL PARIMALA WORKS\u2019 by using identical and deceptively similar trade name. An application for interim injunction was also filed to restrain the respondent from using the name \u2018PATIL FRAGRANCES\u2019 during pendency of the suit, which was granted. Thereafter, the respondent too filed an IA for vacating the injunction which was allowed and thereby the injunction was vacated. The appellant filed the instant appeal impugning the order passed by the XVII Additional City Civil Judge vacating the injunction granted initially against the respondent.<\/p>\n

The High Court, in order to decide the appeal, weighed the matter to find out in whose favour lies the balance of probabilities. The Court found that the appellant and the respondent belonged to the same family; they used the same surname; the respondent was a former employee and the brother of the appellant; various members of the family use the surname \u2018PATIL\u2019 for conduct of their business. The credential of the respondent having the same name was verified by various government documentary proofs. Relying on Section 35 of the Trade Marks Act, the Court held that even a registered user or a registered trademark proprietor cannot interfere with the bona fide use by a person of his own name. Accordingly, the Court held that it was not a case of infringement of trade mark, but it was a clear case of bona fide use of his name by the respondent. In such circumstances, the Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the impugned judgment vacating the injunction passed against the respondent. [Somashekar P. Patil v. D.V.G. Patil,2018 SCC OnLine Kar 637<\/b><\/a>, dated 08-05-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Karnataka High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of L. Narayana Swamy, J. dismissed a miscellaneous first appeal while vacating the injunction <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[30145,3215,30144,3221],"class_list":["post-196021","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-bona-fide-use","tag-infringement","tag-surname","tag-Trademark"],"yoast_head":"\nInjunction against the use of trademark vacated in light of bona fide use of surname | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/15\/injunction-against-the-use-of-trademark-vacated-in-light-of-bona-fide-use-of-surname\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Injunction against the use of trademark vacated in light of bona fide use of surname\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Karnataka High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of L. Narayana Swamy, J. dismissed a miscellaneous first appeal while vacating the injunction\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/15\/injunction-against-the-use-of-trademark-vacated-in-light-of-bona-fide-use-of-surname\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-05-15T10:17:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-06-29T07:40:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/15\/injunction-against-the-use-of-trademark-vacated-in-light-of-bona-fide-use-of-surname\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/15\/injunction-against-the-use-of-trademark-vacated-in-light-of-bona-fide-use-of-surname\/\",\"name\":\"Injunction against the use of trademark vacated in light of bona fide use of surname | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-05-15T10:17:13+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-29T07:40:04+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/15\/injunction-against-the-use-of-trademark-vacated-in-light-of-bona-fide-use-of-surname\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/15\/injunction-against-the-use-of-trademark-vacated-in-light-of-bona-fide-use-of-surname\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/15\/injunction-against-the-use-of-trademark-vacated-in-light-of-bona-fide-use-of-surname\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Injunction against the use of trademark vacated in light of bona fide use of surname\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Injunction against the use of trademark vacated in light of bona fide use of surname | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/15\/injunction-against-the-use-of-trademark-vacated-in-light-of-bona-fide-use-of-surname\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Injunction against the use of trademark vacated in light of bona fide use of surname","og_description":"Karnataka High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of L. Narayana Swamy, J. dismissed a miscellaneous first appeal while vacating the injunction","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/15\/injunction-against-the-use-of-trademark-vacated-in-light-of-bona-fide-use-of-surname\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-05-15T10:17:13+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-06-29T07:40:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/15\/injunction-against-the-use-of-trademark-vacated-in-light-of-bona-fide-use-of-surname\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/15\/injunction-against-the-use-of-trademark-vacated-in-light-of-bona-fide-use-of-surname\/","name":"Injunction against the use of trademark vacated in light of bona fide use of surname | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-05-15T10:17:13+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-29T07:40:04+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/15\/injunction-against-the-use-of-trademark-vacated-in-light-of-bona-fide-use-of-surname\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/15\/injunction-against-the-use-of-trademark-vacated-in-light-of-bona-fide-use-of-surname\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/15\/injunction-against-the-use-of-trademark-vacated-in-light-of-bona-fide-use-of-surname\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Injunction against the use of trademark vacated in light of bona fide use of surname"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":274141,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/21\/delhi-high-court-grants-injunction-against-a-website-using-tata-mark-targeting-indian-public\/","url_meta":{"origin":196021,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court grants injunction against a website using TATA mark “targeting” Indian public","author":"Editor","date":"September 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The considerations, while deciding an application for grant of ad-interim injunction could be less stringent than the one for final relief in a suit. Interim decisions are required to be made based on probable rather than a definitive view.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"competitive exam","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":267320,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/24\/whether-merely-writing-letters-or-making-representations-would-give-a-sufficient-cause-or-ground-to-a-party-to-seek-condonation-of-delay-delhi-high-court-law-legal-news-legal-update\/","url_meta":{"origin":196021,"position":1},"title":"Whether merely writing letters or making representations would give a sufficient cause or ground to a party to seek condonation of delay? Del HC answers","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 24, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Stating that mere writing of a letter of representation cannot furnish an adequate explanation for the delay, Jyoti Singh, J., expressed that, it is a settled principle of law that in writ jurisdiction, the Court would not ordinarily assist those who are lethargic and indolent. In the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-144-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-144-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-144-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-144-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-144-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":223779,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/03\/cal-hc-acquiescence-only-arises-out-of-positive-acts-to-be-differentiated-from-mere-silence-or-inaction-or-from-inordinate-delay\/","url_meta":{"origin":196021,"position":2},"title":"Cal HC | “Acquiescence” only arises out of positive acts; to be differentiated from mere silence or inaction or from inordinate delay","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 3, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of I.P. Mukerji and Md. Nizamuddin, JJ., allowed an appeal filed against the order of the Single Judge whereby he had rejected the appellant-plaintiff's application for grant of interim injunction restraining the respondent-defendant from using the subject trademark. The appellant and the respondent were in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":343665,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/15\/delhi-high-court-no-deceptive-similarity-upholds-surname-jangid-trademark-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":196021,"position":3},"title":"\u2018No deceptive similarity to each other\u2019; Delhi High Court upholds bona fide use of surname \u2018JANGID\u2019 as trademark","author":"Arunima","date":"March 15, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The plaintiff uses the mark 'JANGEER', whereas the mark of the defendant includes an 'I' in place of \u2018EE\u2019 and \u2018D\u2019 in place of \u2018R\u2019 i.e., 'JANGID'. Apart from the difference in the spellings of the marks of the plaintiff and the defendant, the manner and style of writing is\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":293404,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/30\/karnataka-high-court-blinkit-vs-blinkhit-trademark-dispute-rules-in-favour-set-aside-injunction-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":196021,"position":4},"title":"[Blinkit v. Blinkhit Trademark Infringement] | Karnataka HC sets aside temporary restraining injunction against Blinkit","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 30, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court noted that the Trial Court made an error in allowing Blinkhit's application for temporary injunction, without properly appreciating the available materials on record vis-\u00e0-vis the trademark's usage and nature of the business carried out by the parties.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"karnataka high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":253042,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/20\/interim-injunction-in-favour-of-dps-society-against-infringement-of-trademark\/","url_meta":{"origin":196021,"position":5},"title":"Del HC grants interim injunction in favour of DPS Society against Infringement of trademark and crest logo by Delhi Public International School","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 20, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Sanjeev Narula, J. while addressing the matter of trademark infringement, opined that, \u201cBesides, considering that parties are in the field of education, deliberate adoption by the Defendants of impugned trade marks and logo that are deceptively similar and\/or identical to the Plaintiff\u2019s registered trade marks\/names and logos\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/Screenshot-2021-08-20-at-6.04.50-PM.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196021","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=196021"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196021\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=196021"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=196021"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=196021"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}