{"id":196020,"date":"2018-05-15T13:43:25","date_gmt":"2018-05-15T08:13:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=196020"},"modified":"2018-06-19T12:50:38","modified_gmt":"2018-06-19T07:20:38","slug":"recognition-of-madrassa-has-nothing-to-do-with-provincialisation-of-services-of-its-employees","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/15\/recognition-of-madrassa-has-nothing-to-do-with-provincialisation-of-services-of-its-employees\/","title":{"rendered":"Recognition of Madrassa has nothing to do with provincialisation of services of its employees"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Gauhati High Court<\/strong>: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Ajit Singh, C.J., addressed an intra court appeal in regard to the provincialisation of services.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The appellant joined Madrassa for the purpose of teaching 4 years after Respondent 1. The Assam Venture Educational Institutions (Provincialisation of Services) Act, 2011 was enacted to provincialise the services of the employees of the Venture Educational Institutions, and under this Act the only criteria for the provincialisation was based on the seniority of the employee. When the list was published for the same, the appellant was put in the category of \u201cexcess teacher\u201d whereas \u00a0Respondent 1 was placed in the category of \u201cAssistant Teacher\u201d. The appellant filed a writ petition challenging the said list, and the learned Single Judge directed the Director of Secondary Education to reconsider the his categorization, and thereafter, the appellant was categorised as an Assistant Teacher. Thereafter, aggrieved Respondent 1 challenged the said order in a writ petition which was allowed by the Single Judge. Appellant has impugned the order of the Single Judge.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court, observed that the appeal has no merit as the contention of the appellant that the Assistant Teacher with such combination of subjects as are held by the appellant was necessary for recognition of a Madrassa, was untenable. The question of madrassa being recognised on the basis of having an assistant teacher and services being provincialised is nowhere a criteria mentioned in the regulations of 1988. Therefore, the Court stated that the holdings of the learned Single Judge have been rightly stated and provincialisation of services has nothing to do with the recognition of Madrassa. The appeal was dismissed. [Syed Mohammad Ali v. Syed Saidul Islam, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/i79T4Em1\">2018 SCC OnLine Gau 358<\/a>, order dated 08-05-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gauhati High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Ajit Singh, C.J., addressed an intra court appeal in regard to the provincialisation <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3921,30143,2844],"class_list":["post-196020","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-madrassa","tag-provincialisation-of-services","tag-recognition"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Recognition of Madrassa has nothing to do with provincialisation of services of its employees | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/15\/recognition-of-madrassa-has-nothing-to-do-with-provincialisation-of-services-of-its-employees\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Recognition of Madrassa has nothing to do with provincialisation of services of its employees\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Gauhati High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Ajit Singh, C.J., addressed an intra court appeal in regard to the provincialisation\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/15\/recognition-of-madrassa-has-nothing-to-do-with-provincialisation-of-services-of-its-employees\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-05-15T08:13:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-06-19T07:20:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Gauhati-HC.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/15\/recognition-of-madrassa-has-nothing-to-do-with-provincialisation-of-services-of-its-employees\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/15\/recognition-of-madrassa-has-nothing-to-do-with-provincialisation-of-services-of-its-employees\/\",\"name\":\"Recognition of Madrassa has nothing to do with provincialisation of services of its employees | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-05-15T08:13:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-19T07:20:38+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/15\/recognition-of-madrassa-has-nothing-to-do-with-provincialisation-of-services-of-its-employees\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/15\/recognition-of-madrassa-has-nothing-to-do-with-provincialisation-of-services-of-its-employees\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/15\/recognition-of-madrassa-has-nothing-to-do-with-provincialisation-of-services-of-its-employees\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Recognition of Madrassa has nothing to do with provincialisation of services of its employees\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Recognition of Madrassa has nothing to do with provincialisation of services of its employees | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/15\/recognition-of-madrassa-has-nothing-to-do-with-provincialisation-of-services-of-its-employees\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Recognition of Madrassa has nothing to do with provincialisation of services of its employees","og_description":"Gauhati High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Ajit Singh, C.J., addressed an intra court appeal in regard to the provincialisation","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/15\/recognition-of-madrassa-has-nothing-to-do-with-provincialisation-of-services-of-its-employees\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-05-15T08:13:25+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-06-19T07:20:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Gauhati-HC.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/15\/recognition-of-madrassa-has-nothing-to-do-with-provincialisation-of-services-of-its-employees\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/15\/recognition-of-madrassa-has-nothing-to-do-with-provincialisation-of-services-of-its-employees\/","name":"Recognition of Madrassa has nothing to do with provincialisation of services of its employees | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-05-15T08:13:25+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-19T07:20:38+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/15\/recognition-of-madrassa-has-nothing-to-do-with-provincialisation-of-services-of-its-employees\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/15\/recognition-of-madrassa-has-nothing-to-do-with-provincialisation-of-services-of-its-employees\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/15\/recognition-of-madrassa-has-nothing-to-do-with-provincialisation-of-services-of-its-employees\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Recognition of Madrassa has nothing to do with provincialisation of services of its employees"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":24381,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/10\/30\/madrassa-can-function-as-a-polling-booth-as-it-does-not-have-any-religious-significance\/","url_meta":{"origin":196020,"position":0},"title":"Madrassa can function as a polling booth, as it does not have any religious significance","author":"Sucheta","date":"October 30, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: While dismissing a Writ Petition, V. Chitambaresh J. held that \u2018Madrassa\u2019 is not a place of worship and therefore such a building can function as a polling booth for the conduct of election. In the instant case, Sri. Boby John Pulikkaparambil on behalf of the respondent pleaded\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":281593,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/13\/employees-of-a-private-educational-institution-cannot-invoke-the-powers-of-the-high-court-conferred-by-article-226-in-respect-of-matters-1\/","url_meta":{"origin":196020,"position":1},"title":"Section 16 G (3) of U.P. Intermediate Education Act not applicable to the teachers employed in private minority institutions; Allahabad High Court reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"January 13, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"U.P. Intermediate Education Act is not applicable to the teachers employed in private minority institutions. Thus, the teachers do not have the right to invoke the powers of the High Court, under Article 226.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image31.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":237924,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/23\/ker-hc-derecognizing-an-educational-institution-is-a-drastic-measure-dislocating-a-vast-number-students-as-well-as-staff-and-cannot-be-done-in-haste-or-without-adhering-to-statutory-guidelines-peti\/","url_meta":{"origin":196020,"position":2},"title":"Ker HC | Derecognizing an educational institution is a drastic measure dislocating a vast number students as well as staff and cannot be done in haste or without adhering to statutory guidelines; Petition allowed","author":"Editor","date":"October 23, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: Anil K Narendran, J., allowing the present writ petition, issued necessary directions to the respondent authorities and further made noticeable observations with respect to the issuance of show cause notice and adequate opportunity of being heard. Brief Facts The facts of the case are summarized hereunder; That\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":44241,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/18\/delhi-high-courtss-order-striking-down-the-s-82-of-the-delhi-school-education-act-1973-held-bad-in-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":196020,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Courts\u2019s order striking down the S. 8(2) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 held bad in law","author":"Sucheta","date":"April 18, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Upholding the validity of Section 8(2) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 the Court held the said provision is a procedural safeguard in favor of an employee to ensure that an order of termination or dismissal is not passed without the prior approval of the Director of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":240065,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/03\/is-a-company-providing-expert-services-an-employer-under-epf-act-if-the-wages-are-paid-from-contractual-money-received-from-clients-sc-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":196020,"position":4},"title":"Is a company providing expert services an employer under EPF Act if the wages are paid from contractual money received from clients? SC answers","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"December 3, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a case where a company provided\u00a0trained\u00a0and efficient\u00a0security\u00a0guards\u00a0to clients, claimed that security guards were the employees of the client, the was bench of Navin Sinha* and Surya Kant, JJ has held that merely because the client pays money under a contract to the appellant and in turn the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-07-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-07-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-07-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-07-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-07-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":250937,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/08\/sexual-harassment-of-women-at-workplace\/","url_meta":{"origin":196020,"position":5},"title":"Sikk HC | Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace| Open for Executive Authority to decide the scope of the term &#8216;workplace&#8217;","author":"Editor","date":"July 8, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Sikkim High Court: The Division Bench of Jitendra Kumar Maheshwari, CJ. and Meenakshi Madan Rai, J., partly allowed an appeal which was filed challenging the Judgment dated 08-12-2020 passed in Silajit Guha vs. Sikkim University, WP(C) No.30 of 2019 by Single Bench, partly dismissing the petition deciding the issue of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196020","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=196020"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196020\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=196020"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=196020"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=196020"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}