{"id":196005,"date":"2018-05-14T14:43:49","date_gmt":"2018-05-14T09:13:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=196005"},"modified":"2018-05-23T15:00:05","modified_gmt":"2018-05-23T09:30:05","slug":"judges-of-fast-track-courts-cant-be-denied-pensionary-other-retiral-benefits-sc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/14\/judges-of-fast-track-courts-cant-be-denied-pensionary-other-retiral-benefits-sc\/","title":{"rendered":"Judges of Fast Track courts can\u2019t be denied pensionary &#038; other retiral benefits: SC"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Supreme Court<\/strong>: In the case where the question as to whether the services rendered by some Judicial Officers as Fast Track court Judges is liable to be counted for their pensionary and other benefits, the bench of J. Chelameswar and SK Kaul, JJ answered the question in affirmative and said:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cThe appellants were not appointed to the Fast Track courts just at the whim and fancy of any person but were the next in line on the merit list of a judicial recruitment process. They were either part of the select list, who could not find a place given the cadre strength, or those next in line in the select list. Had there been adequate cadre strength, the recruitment process would have resulted in their appointment.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Noticing that the judges have rendered services over a period of nine years and have performed their role as Judges to the satisfaction, otherwise there would have been no occasion for their appointment to the regular cadre strength, the bench said:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cit is a matter of great regret that these appellants who have performed the functions of a Judge to the satisfaction of the competent authorities should be deprived of their pension and retiral benefits for this period of service.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court took note of the fact that the Fast Track Court Scheme was brought in to deal with the exigency and the appellants were appointed to the Fast Track courts and continued to work for almost a decade. It was also noted that the appellants were part of the initial select list\/merit list for recruitment to the regular cadre strength but were not high enough to be recruited in the existing strength. Even at the stage of absorption in the regular cadre strength, they had to go through a defined process in pursuance of the judgment of this court and have continued to work thereafter<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It was, hence, held:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cthe methodology of non-creation of adequate regular cadre posts and the consequent establishment of Fast Track courts manned by the appellants cannot be used as a ruse to deny the dues of the appellants.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">[Mahesh Chandra Verma v. State of Jharkhand, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/i1i1F04C\">2018 SCC OnLine SC 520<\/a>, decided on 11.05.2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court: In the case where the question as to whether the services rendered by some Judicial Officers as Fast Track court <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121,"featured_media":154914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[30136,30133,3658,30134,30135,6031],"class_list":["post-196005","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-creation-of-posts","tag-fast-track-courts","tag-Judges","tag-pensions","tag-regular-cadre-posts","tag-retiral-benefits"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Judges of Fast Track courts can\u2019t be denied pensionary &amp; other retiral benefits: SC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/14\/judges-of-fast-track-courts-cant-be-denied-pensionary-other-retiral-benefits-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Judges of Fast Track courts can\u2019t be denied pensionary &amp; other retiral benefits: SC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: In the case where the question as to whether the services rendered by some Judicial Officers as Fast Track court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/14\/judges-of-fast-track-courts-cant-be-denied-pensionary-other-retiral-benefits-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-05-14T09:13:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-05-23T09:30:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/14\/judges-of-fast-track-courts-cant-be-denied-pensionary-other-retiral-benefits-sc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/14\/judges-of-fast-track-courts-cant-be-denied-pensionary-other-retiral-benefits-sc\/\",\"name\":\"Judges of Fast Track courts can\u2019t be denied pensionary & other retiral benefits: SC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/14\/judges-of-fast-track-courts-cant-be-denied-pensionary-other-retiral-benefits-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/14\/judges-of-fast-track-courts-cant-be-denied-pensionary-other-retiral-benefits-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-05-14T09:13:49+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-05-23T09:30:05+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/14\/judges-of-fast-track-courts-cant-be-denied-pensionary-other-retiral-benefits-sc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/14\/judges-of-fast-track-courts-cant-be-denied-pensionary-other-retiral-benefits-sc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/14\/judges-of-fast-track-courts-cant-be-denied-pensionary-other-retiral-benefits-sc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/14\/judges-of-fast-track-courts-cant-be-denied-pensionary-other-retiral-benefits-sc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Judges of Fast Track courts can\u2019t be denied pensionary &#038; other retiral benefits: SC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\",\"name\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"caption\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\"},\"description\":\"Senior Associate Editor\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Judges of Fast Track courts can\u2019t be denied pensionary & other retiral benefits: SC | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/14\/judges-of-fast-track-courts-cant-be-denied-pensionary-other-retiral-benefits-sc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Judges of Fast Track courts can\u2019t be denied pensionary & other retiral benefits: SC","og_description":"Supreme Court: In the case where the question as to whether the services rendered by some Judicial Officers as Fast Track court","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/14\/judges-of-fast-track-courts-cant-be-denied-pensionary-other-retiral-benefits-sc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-05-14T09:13:49+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-05-23T09:30:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Prachi Bhardwaj","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/14\/judges-of-fast-track-courts-cant-be-denied-pensionary-other-retiral-benefits-sc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/14\/judges-of-fast-track-courts-cant-be-denied-pensionary-other-retiral-benefits-sc\/","name":"Judges of Fast Track courts can\u2019t be denied pensionary & other retiral benefits: SC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/14\/judges-of-fast-track-courts-cant-be-denied-pensionary-other-retiral-benefits-sc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/14\/judges-of-fast-track-courts-cant-be-denied-pensionary-other-retiral-benefits-sc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","datePublished":"2018-05-14T09:13:49+00:00","dateModified":"2018-05-23T09:30:05+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/14\/judges-of-fast-track-courts-cant-be-denied-pensionary-other-retiral-benefits-sc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/14\/judges-of-fast-track-courts-cant-be-denied-pensionary-other-retiral-benefits-sc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/14\/judges-of-fast-track-courts-cant-be-denied-pensionary-other-retiral-benefits-sc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/14\/judges-of-fast-track-courts-cant-be-denied-pensionary-other-retiral-benefits-sc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Judges of Fast Track courts can\u2019t be denied pensionary &#038; other retiral benefits: SC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942","name":"Prachi Bhardwaj","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","caption":"Prachi Bhardwaj"},"description":"Senior Associate Editor","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":285034,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/24\/ad-hoc-service-judicial-service-seniority-elevation-high-court-judge-article-217-supreme-court-andhra-pradesh-high-court-legal-updates-knowledge-research-law-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":196005,"position":0},"title":"Ad-hoc judicial service does not count as \u2018judicial service\u2019 for elevation as a High Court judge: Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"February 24, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Some members of the Andhra Pradesh State Judicial Service had claimed that the service rendered by them as District & Sessions Fast Track judges on Ad-hoc basis was not considered for elevation to the Bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-527.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-527.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-527.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-527.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":339416,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/20\/bombay-hc-dismisses-plea-challenging-nomination-in-recruitment-process-of-district-judges\/","url_meta":{"origin":196005,"position":1},"title":"\u2018Not in excess of permissible 25% quota\u2019; Bombay HC dismisses plea challenging Nomination in recruitment process of District Judges","author":"Simranjeet","date":"January 20, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"By Resolution dated 12-04-2017, Permanent Selection and Appointment Committee of the High Court had resolved that for determining quota prescribed under Rule 5 of Maharashtra Judicial Service Rules, 2008, actual working strength of Judges in that cadre as on 31st March of every year had to be taken into consideration.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":291978,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/12\/supreme-court-stays-promotion-of-judicial-officers-as-district-judge-in-gujarat\/","url_meta":{"origin":196005,"position":2},"title":"Supreme Court stays Gujarat Govt&#8217;s \u2018rushed\u2019 decision to promote judicial officers as District Judges; says \u2018State could\u2019ve waited till next hearing\u2019","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"May 12, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Gujarat Government had issued the impugned Notification dated 18.04.2023 during the pendency of the present writ petition and after receiving the notice issued by the Court. The Supreme Court observed that the State Government could have waited till the next date of hearing which was on 28.04.2023.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"promotion of judicial officers","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/promotion-of-judicial-officers.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/promotion-of-judicial-officers.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/promotion-of-judicial-officers.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/promotion-of-judicial-officers.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":302664,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/29\/vacancy-from-selected-candidates-resignation-must-be-filled-by-fresh-selection-process-sc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":196005,"position":3},"title":"\u2018No indefeasible right to appointment in case of fresh vacancy if candidate secured merit position previously\u2019: SC","author":"Editor","date":"September 29, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"A candidate who had secured the merit rank in 2007 in higher judicial service recruitment examination was seeking appointment to the post, alleging that the post cannot be kept vacant in arbitrary manner once a selected candidate resigns from post.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"vacancy from selected candidate's resignation","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/vacancy-from-selected-candidates-resignation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/vacancy-from-selected-candidates-resignation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/vacancy-from-selected-candidates-resignation.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/vacancy-from-selected-candidates-resignation.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":374247,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/30\/fast-track-courts-india-purpose-status-conviction-rates-recruitment\/","url_meta":{"origin":196005,"position":4},"title":"India Has 879 Fast Track Courts Operational, 1800 Recommended: Law Ministry","author":"Kriti","date":"January 30, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal updates Parliament on Fast Track Courts: 879 functional across 22 States\/UTs, handling pending cases from 2015\u20142020.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Fast Track Courts","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Fast-Track-Courts.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Fast-Track-Courts.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Fast-Track-Courts.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Fast-Track-Courts.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":367197,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/19\/supreme-court-directions-determining-seniority-in-higher-judicial-services\/","url_meta":{"origin":196005,"position":5},"title":"Annual 4-point roster to determine seniority in HJS; This &#038; other Supreme Court Directions impacting statewide HJS cadres","author":"Sucheta","date":"November 19, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe statutory rules governing the HJS in the respective States, in consultation with the High Courts, shall prescribe the exact modalities of the Annual Roster and how the directions of this judgement shall be implemented\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"seniority in Higher Judicial Services","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/seniority-in-Higher-Judicial-Services.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/seniority-in-Higher-Judicial-Services.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/seniority-in-Higher-Judicial-Services.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/seniority-in-Higher-Judicial-Services.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196005","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/121"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=196005"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196005\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/154914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=196005"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=196005"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=196005"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}