{"id":195328,"date":"2018-04-20T11:05:37","date_gmt":"2018-04-20T05:35:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=195328"},"modified":"2018-06-29T15:51:11","modified_gmt":"2018-06-29T10:21:11","slug":"cci-imposes-penalty-on-leading-zinc-carbon-dry-cell-battery-manufacturers-for-catelisation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/20\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-leading-zinc-carbon-dry-cell-battery-manufacturers-for-catelisation\/","title":{"rendered":"CCI imposes penalty on leading zinc-carbon dry cell battery manufacturers for cartelisation"},"content":{"rendered":"

Competition Commission of India:<\/strong> CCI imposed penalty on three leading Indian Zinc-Carbon Dry Cell Battery manufacturers – Eveready Industries India Ltd. (\u2018Eveready\u2019), Indo National Ltd. (\u2018Nippo\u2019), Panasonic Energy India Co. Ltd. (\u2018Panasonic\u2019) and their association AIDCM (Association of Indian Dry Cell Manufacturers) for colluding to fix prices of zinc-carbon dry cell battery in India. CCI invoked the provisions of Section 46 of the Competition Act, 2002 (\u2018the Act\u2019) read with the Competition Commission of India (Lesser Penalty) Regulations, 2009 (\u2018Lesser Penalty Regulations\u2019) to reduce the penalty imposed upon Panasonic, Eveready and Nippo by 100 percent, 30 percent and 20 percent respectively .<\/p>\n

The case against these battery manufacturers was taken up by CCI suo motu under Section 19 of the Act based on the disclosure by Panasonic under Section 46 of the Act read with the Lesser Penalty Regulations. During investigation, DG (Investigation), CCI in exercise of the powers vested with it under Section 41(3) of the Act carried out simultaneous search and seizure operations at the premises of Eveready, Nippo and Panasonic on 23.8.2016 and seized incriminating material and documents there from. Subsequently, while the investigation was in progress and report from the DG was pending, Eveready and Nippo, approached CCI as lesser penalty applicants.<\/p>\n

From the evidence collected, CCI found that the three battery manufacturers, facilitated by AIDCM, had indulged in anti-competitive conduct of price coordination, limiting production\/ supply as well as market allocation in contravention of the provisions of Section 3(3)(a), 3(3)(b) and 3(3)(c) read with Section 3(1) of the Act. It was observed that the conduct was continuing from 2008, which is prior to 20.5.2009, the date on which Section 3 of the Act became enforceable, and up till 23.8.2016 i.e. the date of search and seizure operations by the DG.<\/p>\n

Considering contravention of provisions of the Act, an amount of Rs. 245.07 crore, Rs. 52.82 crore and Rs. 74.68 crore was computed as leviable penalty on three battery manufacturers i.e. Eveready, Nippo and Panasonic, respectively, in terms of the proviso to Section 27(b) of the Act. While computing leviable penalty, CCI took into consideration all relevant factors including duration of cartel, industry conditions, etc. and decided to levy penalty on the three battery manufacturers at the rate of 1.25 times of their profit for each year from 2009-10 to 2016-17. Also, penalty of Rs. 1.85 Lakh was levied on AIDCM at the rate of 10 percent of average of its receipts for preceding three years. Additionally, considering totality of facts and circumstances of the case, penalty leviable on individual officials\/office bearers of the three battery manufacturers and AIDCM was computed at the rate of 10 percent of the average of their income for preceding three years.<\/p>\n

Considering the stage at which the lesser penalty application was filed and the co-operation extended in conjunction with the value addition provided in establishing the existence of cartel, CCI granted Panasonic and its individuals 100 percent reduction in the penalty than was otherwise leviable. Eveready and Nippo, along with their individuals, were granted 30 and 20 percent reduction in penalty, reducing it to Rs. 171.55 crore and Rs. 42.26 crore respectively. No penalty was imposed on Panasonic. [In re, Cartelisation in respect of zinc carbon dry cell batteries market in India, 2018 SCC OnLine CCI 5<\/b><\/a>, order decided on 19-04-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Competition Commission of India: CCI imposed penalty on three leading Indian Zinc-Carbon Dry Cell Battery manufacturers – Eveready Industries India Ltd. (\u2018Eveready\u2019), <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":76441,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[27914,5461,29917,29918],"class_list":["post-195328","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-cartelisation","tag-cci","tag-indian-dry-cell-manufacturers","tag-lesser-penalty-regulations"],"yoast_head":"\nCCI imposes penalty on leading zinc-carbon dry cell battery manufacturers for cartelisation | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/20\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-leading-zinc-carbon-dry-cell-battery-manufacturers-for-catelisation\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"CCI imposes penalty on leading zinc-carbon dry cell battery manufacturers for cartelisation\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Competition Commission of India: CCI imposed penalty on three leading Indian Zinc-Carbon Dry Cell Battery manufacturers – Eveready Industries India Ltd. (\u2018Eveready\u2019),\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/20\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-leading-zinc-carbon-dry-cell-battery-manufacturers-for-catelisation\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-04-20T05:35:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-06-29T10:21:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/20\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-leading-zinc-carbon-dry-cell-battery-manufacturers-for-catelisation\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/20\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-leading-zinc-carbon-dry-cell-battery-manufacturers-for-catelisation\/\",\"name\":\"CCI imposes penalty on leading zinc-carbon dry cell battery manufacturers for cartelisation | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/20\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-leading-zinc-carbon-dry-cell-battery-manufacturers-for-catelisation\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/20\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-leading-zinc-carbon-dry-cell-battery-manufacturers-for-catelisation\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-04-20T05:35:37+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-29T10:21:11+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/20\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-leading-zinc-carbon-dry-cell-battery-manufacturers-for-catelisation\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/20\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-leading-zinc-carbon-dry-cell-battery-manufacturers-for-catelisation\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/20\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-leading-zinc-carbon-dry-cell-battery-manufacturers-for-catelisation\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg\",\"width\":1329,\"height\":888},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/20\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-leading-zinc-carbon-dry-cell-battery-manufacturers-for-catelisation\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"CCI imposes penalty on leading zinc-carbon dry cell battery manufacturers for cartelisation\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"CCI imposes penalty on leading zinc-carbon dry cell battery manufacturers for cartelisation | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/20\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-leading-zinc-carbon-dry-cell-battery-manufacturers-for-catelisation\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"CCI imposes penalty on leading zinc-carbon dry cell battery manufacturers for cartelisation","og_description":"Competition Commission of India: CCI imposed penalty on three leading Indian Zinc-Carbon Dry Cell Battery manufacturers – Eveready Industries India Ltd. (\u2018Eveready\u2019),","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/20\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-leading-zinc-carbon-dry-cell-battery-manufacturers-for-catelisation\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-04-20T05:35:37+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-06-29T10:21:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/20\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-leading-zinc-carbon-dry-cell-battery-manufacturers-for-catelisation\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/20\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-leading-zinc-carbon-dry-cell-battery-manufacturers-for-catelisation\/","name":"CCI imposes penalty on leading zinc-carbon dry cell battery manufacturers for cartelisation | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/20\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-leading-zinc-carbon-dry-cell-battery-manufacturers-for-catelisation\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/20\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-leading-zinc-carbon-dry-cell-battery-manufacturers-for-catelisation\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg","datePublished":"2018-04-20T05:35:37+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-29T10:21:11+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/20\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-leading-zinc-carbon-dry-cell-battery-manufacturers-for-catelisation\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/20\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-leading-zinc-carbon-dry-cell-battery-manufacturers-for-catelisation\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/20\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-leading-zinc-carbon-dry-cell-battery-manufacturers-for-catelisation\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg","width":1329,"height":888},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/20\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-leading-zinc-carbon-dry-cell-battery-manufacturers-for-catelisation\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"CCI imposes penalty on leading zinc-carbon dry cell battery manufacturers for cartelisation"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":198352,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/18\/leniency-regime-takes-a-step-forward-reduction-in-penalty-for-battery-manufacturers\/","url_meta":{"origin":195328,"position":0},"title":"Leniency Regime Takes a Step Forward \u2014 Reduction in Penalty for Battery Manufacturers","author":"SM","date":"August 18, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Anshuman Sakle*, Partner and Soham Banerjee**, Associate, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas. Cite as: (2018) PL (Comp. L) June 85","rel":"","context":"In "Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas"","block_context":{"text":"Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/law-firm\/cam\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":290137,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/20\/cci-imposed-penalty-anti-competitive-behaviour-appal-nclat-reduce-penalty-mitigating-factors-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":195328,"position":1},"title":"Mitigating factors should be considered while imposing penalty for anti-competitive behavior: NCLAT imposes 1% penalty of the turnover on Geep Industries","author":"Ritu","date":"April 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201c\u2026penalty @1% of the turnover for each year of continuance of the cartel would be appropriate penalty in keeping with the extent and seriousness proportionality of the anti-competitive behavior of Geep Industries.\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":280727,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/31\/legal-updates-legal-news-leniency-application-is-like-admission-of-guilt-in-cartel\/","url_meta":{"origin":195328,"position":2},"title":"Leniency application is like admission of guilt in a cartel; NCLAT upholds penalty imposed on United Breweries, Carlsberg and All India Breweries Association","author":"Editor","date":"December 31, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"NCLAT while deciding the issue of cartelisation by breweries observed that lesser penalty application indicates admission of guilt and held United Breweries, Carlsberg India Pvt. Ltd. and All India Breweries Association liable for cartelisation.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":254750,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/27\/cci-breweries-brewing-bilious-buzz-busted-united-breweries-carlsberg-sabmiller-involved-in-cartelisation-suffers-a-750-crore-penalty\/","url_meta":{"origin":195328,"position":3},"title":"CCI | Breweries brewing bilious buzz busted-United Breweries, Carlsberg, SABMiller involved in Cartelisation suffers a 750 Crore penalty","author":"Editor","date":"September 27, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Commission of India (CCI): In its recent press release, Competition Commission of India, while giving benefit of reduction in penalty under the provisions of Section 46 of the Competition Act, 2002\u00a0 of 100%, 40% and 20%\u00a0\u00a0 to AB InBev, United Breweries Ltd. (UBL) and\u00a0 Carlsberg India Private Limited (CIPL),\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Hot Off The Press"","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":283093,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/11\/leniency-applicants-beware-nclat-rules-in-the-beer-cartelisation-case-pawan-jagetia-v-cci-a-case-comment\/","url_meta":{"origin":195328,"position":4},"title":"Leniency Applicants Beware: NCLAT Rules in the Beer Cartelisation Case Pawan Jagetia v. CCI: A case comment","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"by Priyam Indurkhya\u2020 and Rituraj Singh Parmar\u2020\u2020","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-368.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":101231,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/01\/22\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-bidders-for-cartelisation-in-tenders-of-indian-railways\/","url_meta":{"origin":195328,"position":5},"title":"CCI imposes penalty on bidders for cartelisation in tenders of Indian Railways\u00a0","author":"Saba","date":"January 22, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Commission of India (CCI): The Competition Commission of India \u00a0has imposed penalties on three firms for bid rigging of tenders floated by Indian Railways for procurement of Brushless DC fans in the year 2013.\u00a0A final order has been passed by CCI in a case taken up\u00a0suo moto\u00a0under Section 19\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/195328","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=195328"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/195328\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/76441"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=195328"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=195328"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=195328"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}