{"id":195274,"date":"2018-04-16T17:22:48","date_gmt":"2018-04-16T11:52:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=195274"},"modified":"2018-04-16T17:22:48","modified_gmt":"2018-04-16T11:52:48","slug":"relief-under-writ-petition-declined-in-light-of-an-alternate-remedy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/16\/relief-under-writ-petition-declined-in-light-of-an-alternate-remedy\/","title":{"rendered":"Relief under writ petition declined in light of an alternate remedy"},"content":{"rendered":"

Gauhati High Court:<\/strong> A Single Judge Bench comprising of Michael Zothankhuma, J. declined to grant relief to the petitioner under the writ petition, in light of the facts that he had an alternate remedy to approach the Educational Tribunal for settling the dispute.<\/p>\n

The petitioner was aggrieved by non-provincialisation of his services as an Assistant Teacher in the Raisen ME School. Petitioner\u2019s grievance was that his services were not provincialised in spite of vacant post of science teacher; whereas, Respondent 7 who was not eligible for the post, was provincialised as an Assistant Teacher. The petitioner challenged such provincialisation of the respondent as well as his non-provincialisation. Learned counsel for the respondents, on the other hand, submitted that the Government of Assam had established Educational Tribunals to adjudicate disputes between teaching and non-teaching staff of provincialised schools; therefore, the present matter should be referred to the said Tribunal.<\/p>\n

The High Court considered the submissions made on behalf of the parties and held that the present case relates to a claim for provincialisation of the service of the petitioner vis-a-vis Respondent 7 and it was liable to be sent to the Educational Tribunal concerned. Since there was an alternative remedy present to the petitioner for resolution of the dispute, the High Court held that no relief could be granted to the petitioner under the instant writ proceedings. [Sushil Namasudra v. State of Assam, 2018 SCC OnLine Gau 308<\/a>, order dated 10-04-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Gauhati High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Michael Zothankhuma, J. declined to grant relief to the petitioner under the writ <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[22204,2769],"class_list":["post-195274","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-alternate-remedy","tag-relief"],"yoast_head":"\nRelief under writ petition declined in light of an alternate remedy | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/16\/relief-under-writ-petition-declined-in-light-of-an-alternate-remedy\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Relief under writ petition declined in light of an alternate remedy\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Gauhati High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Michael Zothankhuma, J. declined to grant relief to the petitioner under the writ\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/16\/relief-under-writ-petition-declined-in-light-of-an-alternate-remedy\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-04-16T11:52:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Gauhati-HC.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/16\/relief-under-writ-petition-declined-in-light-of-an-alternate-remedy\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/16\/relief-under-writ-petition-declined-in-light-of-an-alternate-remedy\/\",\"name\":\"Relief under writ petition declined in light of an alternate remedy | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-04-16T11:52:48+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/16\/relief-under-writ-petition-declined-in-light-of-an-alternate-remedy\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/16\/relief-under-writ-petition-declined-in-light-of-an-alternate-remedy\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/16\/relief-under-writ-petition-declined-in-light-of-an-alternate-remedy\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Relief under writ petition declined in light of an alternate remedy\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Relief under writ petition declined in light of an alternate remedy | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/16\/relief-under-writ-petition-declined-in-light-of-an-alternate-remedy\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Relief under writ petition declined in light of an alternate remedy","og_description":"Gauhati High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Michael Zothankhuma, J. declined to grant relief to the petitioner under the writ","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/16\/relief-under-writ-petition-declined-in-light-of-an-alternate-remedy\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-04-16T11:52:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Gauhati-HC.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/16\/relief-under-writ-petition-declined-in-light-of-an-alternate-remedy\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/16\/relief-under-writ-petition-declined-in-light-of-an-alternate-remedy\/","name":"Relief under writ petition declined in light of an alternate remedy | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-04-16T11:52:48+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/16\/relief-under-writ-petition-declined-in-light-of-an-alternate-remedy\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/16\/relief-under-writ-petition-declined-in-light-of-an-alternate-remedy\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/16\/relief-under-writ-petition-declined-in-light-of-an-alternate-remedy\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Relief under writ petition declined in light of an alternate remedy"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":234135,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/18\/ph-hc-court-declines-to-entertain-writ-petition-directs-petitioner-to-seek-alternate-remedy-available-under-the-agreement\/","url_meta":{"origin":195274,"position":0},"title":"P&H HC | Court declines to entertain writ petition, directs petitioner to seek alternate remedy available under the Agreement","author":"Editor","date":"August 18, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: The Division Bench of Dr S. Muralidhar and Avneesh Jhingan, JJ., dismissed the instant petition upon discovery of availability of alternate remedies to the petitioner. In the present case, the petitioner has questioned the demand for concession fees to the tune of Rs 2,19,10,897 sought\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":268478,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/16\/mp-hc-%e2%94%82-not-obligatory-for-the-court-to-entertain-writ-petition-when-efficacious-alternative-remedy-is-available\/","url_meta":{"origin":195274,"position":1},"title":"MP HC \u2502 Not obligatory for the Court to entertain writ petition when efficacious alternative remedy is available","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"June 16, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: The Division Bench of Sujoy Paul and Prakash Chandra Gupta, JJ., disposed of a petition reserving liberty to the petitioner to avail alternative remedy of appeal. Petitioner had\u00a0 filed Writ Petition challenging impugned order which was an interlocutory order passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jabalpur,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":154074,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/04\/karnataka-hc-declines-relief-article-226-light-alternate-remedy-available-s-115-cpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":195274,"position":2},"title":"Karnataka HC declines relief under Article 226 in light of alternate remedy available under S. 115 CPC","author":"Saba","date":"December 4, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: While passing the order in a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution praying to quash the order passed by the III Additional Senior Civil Judge, rejecting the application filed by the petitioner, a Single Judge Bench of BV Nagarathna, J. held that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":220862,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/15\/raj-hc%e2%94%82petition-under-art-226-cannot-be-entertained-where-an-alternate-statutory-remedy-is-available\/","url_meta":{"origin":195274,"position":3},"title":"Raj HC | Petition under Art. 226 cannot be entertained where an alternate statutory remedy is available","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 15, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Ashok Kumar Gaur, J. dismissed the writ petition filed against the order passed by the Registrar, Cooperative Societies-cum Registrar Institution exercising the powers inferred upon him under Section 24 of the Rajasthan Sports (Registration, Recognition and Regulation of Association) Act, 2005. The respondent had issued a notice\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":208882,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/28\/mp-hc-court-refuses-to-exercise-writ-jurisdiction-in-light-of-alternate-remedy-of-appeal-before-stat\/","url_meta":{"origin":195274,"position":4},"title":"MP HC | Court refuses to exercise writ jurisdiction in light of alternate remedy of appeal before STAT","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 28, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: An application filed before a Bench of Sheel Nagu, J., by petitioner for grant of permit for the corridor route, i.e. Narsinghgarh to Barai via specified places was dismissed by respondent, i.e. Secretary, State Transport Authority. Hence, petitioner filed this petition under Article 227 of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":269929,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/12\/karnataka-high-court-writ-petition-by-xiaomi-india-premature-when-alternate-remedy-available-under-s-37-fema-1999-left-unattended\/","url_meta":{"origin":195274,"position":5},"title":"Karnataka High Court | Writ petition by XIAOMI India premature when alternate remedy available under S. 37 FEMA, 1999 left unattended","author":"Editor","date":"July 12, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Karnataka High Court: S G Pandit, J. declared the present writ petition filed by XIAOMI India under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as premature as Section 37 of Foreign Exchange Management Act (\u2018FEMA'), 1999 provides complete mechanism to decide the alleged contravention of Section 4 of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Karnataka High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/karnataka_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/karnataka_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/karnataka_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/karnataka_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/karnataka_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/195274","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=195274"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/195274\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=195274"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=195274"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=195274"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}