{"id":194790,"date":"2018-04-03T10:49:52","date_gmt":"2018-04-03T05:19:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=194790"},"modified":"2018-04-05T16:19:07","modified_gmt":"2018-04-05T10:49:07","slug":"case-filed-under-prevention-of-corruption-act-quashed-holding-it-to-be-mere-counterblast-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/03\/case-filed-under-prevention-of-corruption-act-quashed-holding-it-to-be-mere-counterblast-case\/","title":{"rendered":"Case filed under Prevention of Corruption Act quashed holding it to be mere counterblast case"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Himachal Pradesh High Court:<\/strong> A Single Judge Bench comprising of Dharam Chand Chaudhary, J., decided a petition wherein it was held that the cases filed under the Prevention of Corruption Act against the respondents was a mere counterblast case and therefore, it was liable to be quashed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The petitioner was a daily wage worker in the State Department of Agriculture. A case was registered against him under the Prevention of Corruption Act alleging that he forged medical certificates and submitted them to the Department. The petitioner filed a complainant in the court below against his co-workers and superiors alleging that they also forged and accepted such certificates. The said case was dismissed by the court below. The grouse of the petitioner was that the case registered against the respondents was not investigated thoroughly, and the evidence given against them was misconstrued and misread.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The High Court perused the record and was of the opinion that the act and conduct of the petitioner amply demonstrate that he went upon to harass and humiliate his fellow labourers and superiors. Therefore, the possibility of the case registered against them at his instance being a counterblast to the case registered against him could not be ruled out. The record further revealed that the petitioner had instituted several cases including contempt proceedings against his Department and the superiors and the same stood dismissed one by one being devoid of any merits even with costs. The present, as such, in the considered opinion of the Court was a case where the petitioner was pursuing the proceedings just to humiliate and harass his superiors and also his fellow labourers, may be, on account of the above referred FIR registered against him at the instance of the Department. In such facts and circumstances, allowing the criminal proceedings to continue against the respondents would be an abuse of process of law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Accordingly, the order of the learned Special Judge was upheld. [Rajinder Bindra v. State of H.P.,\u00a0 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/K4vxXT7k\">2018 SCC OnLine HP 314<\/a>, order dated 8.3.2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Himachal Pradesh High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Dharam Chand Chaudhary, J., decided a petition wherein it was held that <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":222107,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-194790","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Case filed under Prevention of Corruption Act quashed holding it to be mere counterblast case | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/03\/case-filed-under-prevention-of-corruption-act-quashed-holding-it-to-be-mere-counterblast-case\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Case filed under Prevention of Corruption Act quashed holding it to be mere counterblast case\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Himachal Pradesh High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Dharam Chand Chaudhary, J., decided a petition wherein it was held that\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/03\/case-filed-under-prevention-of-corruption-act-quashed-holding-it-to-be-mere-counterblast-case\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-04-03T05:19:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-04-05T10:49:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/03\/case-filed-under-prevention-of-corruption-act-quashed-holding-it-to-be-mere-counterblast-case\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/03\/case-filed-under-prevention-of-corruption-act-quashed-holding-it-to-be-mere-counterblast-case\/\",\"name\":\"Case filed under Prevention of Corruption Act quashed holding it to be mere counterblast case | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/03\/case-filed-under-prevention-of-corruption-act-quashed-holding-it-to-be-mere-counterblast-case\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/03\/case-filed-under-prevention-of-corruption-act-quashed-holding-it-to-be-mere-counterblast-case\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-04-03T05:19:52+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-05T10:49:07+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/03\/case-filed-under-prevention-of-corruption-act-quashed-holding-it-to-be-mere-counterblast-case\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/03\/case-filed-under-prevention-of-corruption-act-quashed-holding-it-to-be-mere-counterblast-case\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/03\/case-filed-under-prevention-of-corruption-act-quashed-holding-it-to-be-mere-counterblast-case\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/03\/case-filed-under-prevention-of-corruption-act-quashed-holding-it-to-be-mere-counterblast-case\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Case filed under Prevention of Corruption Act quashed holding it to be mere counterblast case\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Case filed under Prevention of Corruption Act quashed holding it to be mere counterblast case | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/03\/case-filed-under-prevention-of-corruption-act-quashed-holding-it-to-be-mere-counterblast-case\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Case filed under Prevention of Corruption Act quashed holding it to be mere counterblast case","og_description":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Dharam Chand Chaudhary, J., decided a petition wherein it was held that","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/03\/case-filed-under-prevention-of-corruption-act-quashed-holding-it-to-be-mere-counterblast-case\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-04-03T05:19:52+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-04-05T10:49:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/03\/case-filed-under-prevention-of-corruption-act-quashed-holding-it-to-be-mere-counterblast-case\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/03\/case-filed-under-prevention-of-corruption-act-quashed-holding-it-to-be-mere-counterblast-case\/","name":"Case filed under Prevention of Corruption Act quashed holding it to be mere counterblast case | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/03\/case-filed-under-prevention-of-corruption-act-quashed-holding-it-to-be-mere-counterblast-case\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/03\/case-filed-under-prevention-of-corruption-act-quashed-holding-it-to-be-mere-counterblast-case\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","datePublished":"2018-04-03T05:19:52+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-05T10:49:07+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/03\/case-filed-under-prevention-of-corruption-act-quashed-holding-it-to-be-mere-counterblast-case\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/03\/case-filed-under-prevention-of-corruption-act-quashed-holding-it-to-be-mere-counterblast-case\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/03\/case-filed-under-prevention-of-corruption-act-quashed-holding-it-to-be-mere-counterblast-case\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/03\/case-filed-under-prevention-of-corruption-act-quashed-holding-it-to-be-mere-counterblast-case\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Case filed under Prevention of Corruption Act quashed holding it to be mere counterblast case"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":238146,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/29\/malafide-litigation-madras-hc-proceedings-under-s-420-ipc-quashed-for-being-counterblast-to-complaint-instituted-under-s-138-ni-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":194790,"position":0},"title":"[Malafide Litigation] Madras HC | Proceedings under S. 420 IPC quashed for being counterblast to complaint instituted under S. 138 NI Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 29, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: G.K. Ilanthiraiyan, J., allowed a criminal original petition and quashed the proceedings in a criminal case filed against the petitioner. Instant petition was filed to quash the proceedings pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate having been taken cognizance for the offences under Section 420 of Penal\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":201979,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/19\/compulsory-retirement-on-mere-ground-of-fir-registered-against-petitioner-not-to-be-sustained\/","url_meta":{"origin":194790,"position":1},"title":"Compulsory retirement on mere ground of FIR registered against petitioner not to be sustained","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 19, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of M. K. Hanjura, J., dealt with a petition where the question before Court was whether government order given by Government of Jammu and Kashmir under Article 226(2) of the Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services Regulations where petitioner was given\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":213487,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/10\/pat-hc-prevention-of-corruption-act-complaint-against-public-servant-requires-prior-sanction-of-the-competent-authority\/","url_meta":{"origin":194790,"position":2},"title":"Pat HC | Prevention of Corruption Act: Complaint against public servant requires prior sanction of the Competent Authority","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 10, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: The Bench of Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. quashed criminal proceedings filed under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 against a Panchayat Secretary, on the ground that the same lacked proper sanction of the competent authority. Petitioner moved the Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":258516,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/15\/madam-yadi-aap-chutti-chahti-hain-toh-mujhse-akele-mein-aakar-milein-chh-hc-held-it-not-to-be-a-sexually-coloured-remark-offence-under-ipc-and-sc-st-act-not-made-out\/","url_meta":{"origin":194790,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Madam if you want leave, come and meet me alone&#8217;; Chh HC held it not to be a sexually coloured remark; Offence under IPC and SC ST Act not made out","author":"Editor","date":"December 15, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: Narendra Kumar Vyas, J., quashed the FIR registered against the petitioner by Respondent 4 at Women Police Station, Bilaspur (C.G.) for commission of offence punishable under Section 354(A) IPC and Section 3 (1)(xii) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The facts\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":299074,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/11\/madras-hc-requests-cb-investigate-against-pondicherry-university-professor-misappropriation-funds\/","url_meta":{"origin":194790,"position":4},"title":"Madras HC requests CBI to investigate against Pondicherry University professor and others for misappropriation of funds","author":"Apoorva","date":"August 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Finance Section of Pondichery University had found that from 2008 to 2016 a Professor had misappropriated the funds financed by the Government of India using fake and forged bills causing a wrongful loss to the Government of India to the tune of Rs.2.25 Crores.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"madras high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":265552,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/18\/corruption-employee-reinstatement-termination\/","url_meta":{"origin":194790,"position":5},"title":"Guj HC | Court directs reinstatement of employee alleged of corruption charges; termination order quashed","author":"Editor","date":"April 18, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Gujarat High Court: Biren Vaishnav, J. allowed a petition which was filed challenging the order of termination passed by the respondent \u2013 authority, by which, the services as Assistant Motor Vehicle Inspector, Class-III of the petitioner has been terminated on the ground of lodging of an FIR under Sections 7,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/194790","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=194790"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/194790\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/222107"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=194790"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=194790"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=194790"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}