{"id":193991,"date":"2018-03-14T17:23:04","date_gmt":"2018-03-14T11:53:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=193991"},"modified":"2018-03-23T11:43:58","modified_gmt":"2018-03-23T06:13:58","slug":"ayodhya-matter-all-intervention-applications-dismissed-registry-directed-not-to-entertain-any-intervention-application","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/14\/ayodhya-matter-all-intervention-applications-dismissed-registry-directed-not-to-entertain-any-intervention-application\/","title":{"rendered":"Ayodhya Matter: All intervention applications dismissed; Registry directed not to entertain any intervention application"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Supreme Court<\/strong>: The 3-judge bench of Dipak Misra, CJ and Ashok Bhushan and SA Nazeer, JJ dismissed all the intervention applications filed in the Ram Janamabhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute, famously known as the Ayodhya matter, and directed the Registry not to entertain any interlocutory applications for intervention\/ impleadment\/ for filing any book or additional documents\/ for seeking permission to give assistance in these appeals from any third party.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Applications of\u00a0Shyam Benegal,\u00a0Aparna Sen\u00a0and\u00a0Teesta Setalvad\u00a0were part of the 32 intervention applications that were rejected by the Court. The Court also rejected the application filed by Subramanian Swamy, however, it ordered the revival of Swamy\u2019s disposed plea that had sought enforcement of his fundamental right to worship at Ram Temple in Ayodhya. He had told the Court:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit;\">\u201cmy fundamental rights are higher than my property rights.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Senior Advocate Rajeev Dhavan appeared before the Court in today\u2019s hearing after his client asked him to reconsider his decision to give up court practice.\u00a0<a style=\"font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit;\" href=\"http:\/\/blog.scconline.com\/post\/2017\/12\/11\/humiliated-senior-advocate-rajeev-dhavan-gives-court-practice\/\">Rajeev Dhavan\u00a0had given up court practice after the humiliating end to the Delhi case<\/a>,\u00a0 in which,\u00a0a heated exchange had taken place between him and CJI.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Rajeev Dhavan had submitted before the Court that the matter should be referred to a larger bench in view of the decision rendered by the Constitution Bench in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx\/?q=JTXT-0000019759\">M. Ismail Faruqui (Dr) v. Union of India, (1994) 6 SCC 360<\/a>. The Court hence said:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cwe should hear Dr. Dhawan, learned senior counsel appearing in one of the appeals on behalf of the appellants, whether the judgment in Dr. M. Ismail Faruqui (supra) requires reconsideration.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Bench, however, made it clear that clear that it\u2019s addressing the said issue shall singularly relate to whether the Bench should think of that the dictum in Dr. M. Ismail Faruqui (supra) requires reconsideration and in that event, it may pass appropriate orders for placing the matter before a five-Judge Bench for consideration of the said judgment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">On 05.12.2017,\u00a0<a style=\"font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit;\" href=\"http:\/\/blog.scconline.com\/post\/2017\/12\/05\/ayodhya-matter-3-judge-bench-fixes-8th-february-2018-next-date-hearing\/\">the Court had refused to defer the matter till 2019<\/a>\u00a0and had asked all the counsels to work in harmony in order to achieve speedy disposal of the matter. On the same day, the Courtroom witnessed another exchange between Rajeev Dhavan and CJI when Rajeev Dhavan told the Court that he would require four months to read prepare and argue the matter. On this, the Court said:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit;\">\u201cDr. Dhavan, learned senior counsel almost thought of writing a Shavian preface, which can more than be main drama or a play, by stating that he would require four months to read, prepare and argue. We have noted this, as the said submission was advanced with medieval passion and sans reason.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court will now hear the matter on March 23. [M. Siddiq v. Mahant Suresh Das, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/aSyKQP9g\">2018 SCC OnLine SC 222<\/a>, order dated 14.03.2018]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of Dipak Misra, CJ and Ashok Bhushan and SA Nazeer, JJ dismissed all the intervention applications filed <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121,"featured_media":154914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[16201,3033,29506],"class_list":["post-193991","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-ayodhya","tag-Babri_Masjid","tag-ram-janamabhoomi"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Ayodhya Matter: All intervention applications dismissed; Registry directed not to entertain any intervention application | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/14\/ayodhya-matter-all-intervention-applications-dismissed-registry-directed-not-to-entertain-any-intervention-application\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ayodhya Matter: All intervention applications dismissed; Registry directed not to entertain any intervention application\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of Dipak Misra, CJ and Ashok Bhushan and SA Nazeer, JJ dismissed all the intervention applications filed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/14\/ayodhya-matter-all-intervention-applications-dismissed-registry-directed-not-to-entertain-any-intervention-application\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-03-14T11:53:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-03-23T06:13:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/14\/ayodhya-matter-all-intervention-applications-dismissed-registry-directed-not-to-entertain-any-intervention-application\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/14\/ayodhya-matter-all-intervention-applications-dismissed-registry-directed-not-to-entertain-any-intervention-application\/\",\"name\":\"Ayodhya Matter: All intervention applications dismissed; Registry directed not to entertain any intervention application | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/14\/ayodhya-matter-all-intervention-applications-dismissed-registry-directed-not-to-entertain-any-intervention-application\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/14\/ayodhya-matter-all-intervention-applications-dismissed-registry-directed-not-to-entertain-any-intervention-application\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-03-14T11:53:04+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-03-23T06:13:58+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/14\/ayodhya-matter-all-intervention-applications-dismissed-registry-directed-not-to-entertain-any-intervention-application\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/14\/ayodhya-matter-all-intervention-applications-dismissed-registry-directed-not-to-entertain-any-intervention-application\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/14\/ayodhya-matter-all-intervention-applications-dismissed-registry-directed-not-to-entertain-any-intervention-application\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/14\/ayodhya-matter-all-intervention-applications-dismissed-registry-directed-not-to-entertain-any-intervention-application\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ayodhya Matter: All intervention applications dismissed; Registry directed not to entertain any intervention application\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\",\"name\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"caption\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\"},\"description\":\"Senior Associate Editor\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ayodhya Matter: All intervention applications dismissed; Registry directed not to entertain any intervention application | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/14\/ayodhya-matter-all-intervention-applications-dismissed-registry-directed-not-to-entertain-any-intervention-application\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ayodhya Matter: All intervention applications dismissed; Registry directed not to entertain any intervention application","og_description":"Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of Dipak Misra, CJ and Ashok Bhushan and SA Nazeer, JJ dismissed all the intervention applications filed","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/14\/ayodhya-matter-all-intervention-applications-dismissed-registry-directed-not-to-entertain-any-intervention-application\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-03-14T11:53:04+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-03-23T06:13:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Prachi Bhardwaj","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/14\/ayodhya-matter-all-intervention-applications-dismissed-registry-directed-not-to-entertain-any-intervention-application\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/14\/ayodhya-matter-all-intervention-applications-dismissed-registry-directed-not-to-entertain-any-intervention-application\/","name":"Ayodhya Matter: All intervention applications dismissed; Registry directed not to entertain any intervention application | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/14\/ayodhya-matter-all-intervention-applications-dismissed-registry-directed-not-to-entertain-any-intervention-application\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/14\/ayodhya-matter-all-intervention-applications-dismissed-registry-directed-not-to-entertain-any-intervention-application\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","datePublished":"2018-03-14T11:53:04+00:00","dateModified":"2018-03-23T06:13:58+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/14\/ayodhya-matter-all-intervention-applications-dismissed-registry-directed-not-to-entertain-any-intervention-application\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/14\/ayodhya-matter-all-intervention-applications-dismissed-registry-directed-not-to-entertain-any-intervention-application\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/14\/ayodhya-matter-all-intervention-applications-dismissed-registry-directed-not-to-entertain-any-intervention-application\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/14\/ayodhya-matter-all-intervention-applications-dismissed-registry-directed-not-to-entertain-any-intervention-application\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ayodhya Matter: All intervention applications dismissed; Registry directed not to entertain any intervention application"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942","name":"Prachi Bhardwaj","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","caption":"Prachi Bhardwaj"},"description":"Senior Associate Editor","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":195678,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/27\/ayodhya-matter-we-are-beyond-1992-93-all-that-remains-is-a-title-dispute-over-property-harish-salve\/","url_meta":{"origin":193991,"position":0},"title":"Ayodhya Matter: We are beyond 1992-93. All that remains is a title dispute over property: Harish Salve","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"April 27, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court:\u00a0In the Ram Janamabhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute, famously known as the Ayodhya matter, Senior Advocate Raju Ramchandran, appearing for Sunni Waqf Board asked\u00a0the 3-judge bench of Dipak Misra, CJ and AK Bhushan and SA Nazeer, JJ\u00a0to refer the matter to a Constitutional bench. He said that \"the issue needs larger\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":198788,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/20\/ram-mandir-babri-masjid-sc-reserves-order-on-whether-the-ayodhya-matter-be-referred-to-constitution-bench\/","url_meta":{"origin":193991,"position":1},"title":"Ram Mandir Babri Masjid | SC reserves order on whether the \u2018Ayodhya matter\u2019 be referred to Constitution Bench","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 20, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court:\u00a0The 3-Judge Bench comprising of CJ Dipak Misra and Ashok Bhushan and S. Abdul Nazeer JJ., continued with the proceedings on the Ayodhya dispute. The hearing held last on 13-07-2018 brought the sparks in today\u2019s proceedings as well, as C.S Vaidynathan representing the Ram temple objected on Rajeev Dhavan\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":220900,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/16\/ayodhya-hearing-this-matter-will-be-over-by-5pm-today-enough-is-enough-cji\/","url_meta":{"origin":193991,"position":2},"title":"Ayodhya Hearing| This matter will be over by 5pm today; enough is enough: CJI","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 16, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: On the 40th day of the Ayodhya Title dispute hearing, Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi said that the daily hearing on the Ram Mandir-Babri Masjid land dispute will end by 5 pm today. \"By 5 pm this matter is going to be over. Enough is enough,\" Justice\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":149504,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/11\/ayodhya-matter-sc-gives-3-months-time-for-translation-of-historic-documents-matter-to-be-heard-on-dec-5\/","url_meta":{"origin":193991,"position":3},"title":"Ayodhya Matter: SC gives 3 months time for translation of Historic documents; Matter to be heard on Dec 5","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"August 11, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of Dipak Misra, Ashok Bhushan and SA Nazeer, JJ allowed 3-months time for the translation of the historic documents after the Sunni Waqf Board said that the translation was incomplete as all the original historic documents were in Sanskrit, Parsi, Urdu, Arabic and other languages.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":213451,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/09\/ayodhya-dispute-nirmohi-akhara-moves-sc-against-centres-plea-to-release-excess-land-to-original-owners\/","url_meta":{"origin":193991,"position":4},"title":"Ayodhya Dispute: Nirmohi Akhara moves SC against Centre&#8217;s plea to release excess land to original owners","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"April 9, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Nirmohi Akhara, one of the parties in the Ayodhya\u00a0 title dispute case, has filed an application in the Supreme Court, opposing the Centre\u2019s plea to return to the original owners excess land acquired around the disputed Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid site. \"The government cannot get back the land to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":148531,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/08\/shia-waqf-board-to-sc-masjid-can-be-located-at-a-reasonable-distance-from-ram-janmabhoomi\/","url_meta":{"origin":193991,"position":5},"title":"Shia Waqf Board to SC: Masjid can be located at a reasonable distance from Ram Janmabhoomi","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"August 8, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"On 08.08.2017, the Shia Waqf Board filed an affidavit before the Supreme Court in the Ayodhya matter and said that it was fine if the Masjid was located in a Muslim dominated area at a reasonable distance from Lord Ram's birth place i.e. Ram Janmabhoomi. In the affidavit, the Board\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/193991","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/121"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=193991"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/193991\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/154914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=193991"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=193991"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=193991"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}