{"id":193534,"date":"2018-03-02T12:45:04","date_gmt":"2018-03-02T07:15:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=193534"},"modified":"2018-03-16T12:23:06","modified_gmt":"2018-03-16T06:53:06","slug":"fir-quashed-light-compromise-effected-berween-parties","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/02\/fir-quashed-light-compromise-effected-berween-parties\/","title":{"rendered":"FIR quashed in light of compromise effected between parties"},"content":{"rendered":"

Punjab and Haryana High Court:<\/strong> FIR in cross cases filed between the contesting parties was quashed by a Single Judge Bench comprising of Mahabir Singh Sindhu, J., on the basis of compromise entered into between the parties.<\/p>\n

The petitioner and the respondent, both, filed an FIR and cross cases against each other under Section 323 read with Section 34 of IPC in relation to an occurrence of a cross fight between them. In an earlier order passed by the High Court, the parties were directed to appear before the trial Court and get their statements recorded. After recording of such statements, learned Judicial Magistrate submitted his report, the perusal of which revealed that the parties had entered into a compromise in relation to the said incident.<\/p>\n

The High Court found that the contents of the report submitted by the learned Judicial Magistrate showed that the said compromise was genuine, voluntary and without coercion or undue influence. The Court also gave due regard to the contention of the parties that since they have reached an amicable compromise between themselves, they should be given an opportunity to live peacefully. The Court observed that the injuries caused in the incident were not on vital parts of the body. None of the parties raised any objection regarding the quashing of FIR\/cross-case in question. Hence, the High Court was of the view that it would be in the interest of justice that the parties were allowed to compromise the matter as the continuance of prosecution would be an exercise in futility.<\/p>\n

In view of the above, the FIR, its cross version and all other consequential proceedings arising therefrom were quashed. [Dalvinder Singh alias Bindri v. State of Punjab, 2018 SCC OnLine P&H 140<\/a>, order dated 30-1-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Punjab and Haryana High Court: FIR in cross cases filed between the contesting parties was quashed by a Single Judge Bench comprising <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2711,3067,13441],"class_list":["post-193534","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-compromise","tag-FIR","tag-quashing-of"],"yoast_head":"\nFIR quashed in light of compromise effected between parties | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/02\/fir-quashed-light-compromise-effected-berween-parties\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"FIR quashed in light of compromise effected between parties\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Punjab and Haryana High Court: FIR in cross cases filed between the contesting parties was quashed by a Single Judge Bench comprising\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/02\/fir-quashed-light-compromise-effected-berween-parties\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-03-02T07:15:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-03-16T06:53:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/panjab_and_hariyana_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/02\/fir-quashed-light-compromise-effected-berween-parties\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/02\/fir-quashed-light-compromise-effected-berween-parties\/\",\"name\":\"FIR quashed in light of compromise effected between parties | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-03-02T07:15:04+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-03-16T06:53:06+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/02\/fir-quashed-light-compromise-effected-berween-parties\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/02\/fir-quashed-light-compromise-effected-berween-parties\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/02\/fir-quashed-light-compromise-effected-berween-parties\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"FIR quashed in light of compromise effected between parties\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"FIR quashed in light of compromise effected between parties | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/02\/fir-quashed-light-compromise-effected-berween-parties\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"FIR quashed in light of compromise effected between parties","og_description":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: FIR in cross cases filed between the contesting parties was quashed by a Single Judge Bench comprising","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/02\/fir-quashed-light-compromise-effected-berween-parties\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-03-02T07:15:04+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-03-16T06:53:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/panjab_and_hariyana_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/02\/fir-quashed-light-compromise-effected-berween-parties\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/02\/fir-quashed-light-compromise-effected-berween-parties\/","name":"FIR quashed in light of compromise effected between parties | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-03-02T07:15:04+00:00","dateModified":"2018-03-16T06:53:06+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/02\/fir-quashed-light-compromise-effected-berween-parties\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/02\/fir-quashed-light-compromise-effected-berween-parties\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/02\/fir-quashed-light-compromise-effected-berween-parties\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"FIR quashed in light of compromise effected between parties"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":214769,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/17\/hp-hc-fir-in-non-compoundable-offences-pertaining-to-matrimonial-disputes-can-be-quashed-if-the-parties-have-settled-dispute-amicably\/","url_meta":{"origin":193534,"position":0},"title":"HP HC | FIR in non-compoundable offences pertaining to matrimonial disputes can be quashed if the parties have settled dispute amicably","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 17, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Chander Bhusan Barowalia, J. allowed a petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of FIR registered for offences under Sections 498-A and 506 of the Penal Code, 1860, on the ground that parties had entered into a compromise. In\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":212022,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/14\/ph-hc-compromise-between-parties-renders-continuation-of-prosecution-futile-fir-quashed\/","url_meta":{"origin":193534,"position":1},"title":"P&H HC | Compromise between parties renders continuation of prosecution futile, FIR quashed","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 14, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: This petition was filed before the Bench of Jaishree Thakur, J., under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code invoking the inherent power of High Court seeking quashing of FIR registered under Sections 498-A, 406, 323, 506 and 34 of Penal Code and all subsequent proceedings\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":214554,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/10\/ph-hc-high-court-well-within-its-jurisdiction-if-fir-quashed-on-the-ground-of-compromise-between-the-parties\/","url_meta":{"origin":193534,"position":2},"title":"P&H HC |\u00a0High Court well within its jurisdiction if FIR quashed on the ground of compromise between the parties","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 10, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: A Bench of Arvind Singh Sangwan, J., quashed the FIR on the basis of the compromise entered into by the parties. A petition was filed by the petitioner for quashing the FIR for the offences punishable under Sections 377, 34 of Penal Code, 1908 and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":209003,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/utt-hc-fir-for-offences-under-sections-467-468-and-471-ipc-can-be-quashed-if-parties-enter-into-a-compromise-willingly-and-amicably\/","url_meta":{"origin":193534,"position":3},"title":"Utt HC | FIR for offences under Sections 467, 468 and 471 IPC can be quashed if parties enter into a compromise willingly and amicably","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 30, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: The Bench of Narayan Singh Dhanik J. disposed a compounding application along with a criminal writ petition and quashed the First Information Report filed against the accused applicant on the ground of amicable settlement of the dispute between the parties. The instant application had been filed for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":207266,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/27\/fir-under-section-307-ipc-quashed-on-account-of-clarity-on-misunderstanding-between-parties-that-led-to-registration-thereof\/","url_meta":{"origin":193534,"position":4},"title":"FIR under Section 307 IPC quashed on account of clarity on misunderstanding between parties that led to registration thereof","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 27, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Single Judge Bench comprising of Sunil Gaur, J. quashed an FIR registered against the petitioners for an offence punishable under Section 307 IPC in light of the amicable resolution of dispute between the parties. One of the petitioners was alleged to have given a knife blow on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":268073,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/08\/in-matrimonial-offences-quashing-is-welcome-as-it-shows-that-parties-have-decided-to-put-an-end-to-the-lis-as-well-as-to-the-misery\/","url_meta":{"origin":193534,"position":5},"title":"In matrimonial offences, quashing is welcome as it shows that parties have decided to put an end to the lis as well as to the misery they undergo: Del HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 8, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Stating that, cases under Section 376 of Penal Code, 1860 should not be quashed and should not be taken as a crime against the society at large, Swarana Kanta Sharma, J., expressed that, in peculiar circumstances, where the complainant states that her future depends on quashing of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/193534","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=193534"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/193534\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=193534"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=193534"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=193534"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}