{"id":185584,"date":"2018-02-02T15:52:38","date_gmt":"2018-02-02T10:22:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=185584"},"modified":"2018-02-02T15:52:38","modified_gmt":"2018-02-02T10:22:38","slug":"fir-quashed-basis-applicants-not-concerned-dispute","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/02\/02\/fir-quashed-basis-applicants-not-concerned-dispute\/","title":{"rendered":"FIR quashed on the basis of applicants not being concerned with dispute"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Gujarat High Court:<\/strong>\u00a0\u00a0The Single Judge Bench of Hon\u2019ble Justice J.B Pardiawala, while hearing an application seeking to invoke the inherent powers of the Court, passed an order for quashing an FIR for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 323, 504 along with Section 114 of the Penal Code and under Sections 3 and 5 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The first informant got married to the\u00a0original accused 1 in whose respect the whole complaint has been filed but he is not before the court, on 08-02-2015, after contacting each other on Facebook a social media platform, which according to the Hon\u2019ble Judge is bound to fail due to the medium of contact between the two parties. The two parties started to have issues among themselves within a period of 2 months of their marriage.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The learned counsel for the first informant submitted that the FIR may be quashed as far as the applicants are concerned. The Hon\u2019ble Court while concluding the judgment stated that the FIR needs to be quashed so far the applicants were concerned, but the investigation in that regard shall proceed in respect of the original accused 1 i.e. the husband. The parties did try to settle the matter earlier so they should once again try to explore that possibility.\u00a0[Anitaben v. State of Gujarat,<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/2f726ZfR\">\u00a02018 SCC OnLine Guj 94<\/a>, order dated 24-01-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gujarat High Court:\u00a0\u00a0The Single Judge Bench of Hon\u2019ble Justice J.B Pardiawala, while hearing an application seeking to invoke the inherent powers of <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":42052,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[27784,3067],"class_list":["post-185584","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-dowry-prohibition-act","tag-FIR"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>FIR quashed on the basis of applicants not being concerned with dispute | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/02\/02\/fir-quashed-basis-applicants-not-concerned-dispute\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"FIR quashed on the basis of applicants not being concerned with dispute\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Gujarat High Court:\u00a0\u00a0The Single Judge Bench of Hon\u2019ble Justice J.B Pardiawala, while hearing an application seeking to invoke the inherent powers of\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/02\/02\/fir-quashed-basis-applicants-not-concerned-dispute\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-02-02T10:22:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/02\\\/02\\\/fir-quashed-basis-applicants-not-concerned-dispute\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/02\\\/02\\\/fir-quashed-basis-applicants-not-concerned-dispute\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Saba\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"headline\":\"FIR quashed on the basis of applicants not being concerned with dispute\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-02-02T10:22:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/02\\\/02\\\/fir-quashed-basis-applicants-not-concerned-dispute\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":237,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/02\\\/02\\\/fir-quashed-basis-applicants-not-concerned-dispute\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/04\\\/GujHC.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Dowry Prohibition Act\",\"FIR\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/02\\\/02\\\/fir-quashed-basis-applicants-not-concerned-dispute\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/02\\\/02\\\/fir-quashed-basis-applicants-not-concerned-dispute\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/02\\\/02\\\/fir-quashed-basis-applicants-not-concerned-dispute\\\/\",\"name\":\"FIR quashed on the basis of applicants not being concerned with dispute | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/02\\\/02\\\/fir-quashed-basis-applicants-not-concerned-dispute\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/02\\\/02\\\/fir-quashed-basis-applicants-not-concerned-dispute\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/04\\\/GujHC.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-02-02T10:22:38+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/02\\\/02\\\/fir-quashed-basis-applicants-not-concerned-dispute\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/02\\\/02\\\/fir-quashed-basis-applicants-not-concerned-dispute\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/02\\\/02\\\/fir-quashed-basis-applicants-not-concerned-dispute\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/04\\\/GujHC.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/04\\\/GujHC.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/02\\\/02\\\/fir-quashed-basis-applicants-not-concerned-dispute\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"FIR quashed on the basis of applicants not being concerned with dispute\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_2\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"FIR quashed on the basis of applicants not being concerned with dispute | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/02\/02\/fir-quashed-basis-applicants-not-concerned-dispute\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"FIR quashed on the basis of applicants not being concerned with dispute","og_description":"Gujarat High Court:\u00a0\u00a0The Single Judge Bench of Hon\u2019ble Justice J.B Pardiawala, while hearing an application seeking to invoke the inherent powers of","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/02\/02\/fir-quashed-basis-applicants-not-concerned-dispute\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-02-02T10:22:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/02\/02\/fir-quashed-basis-applicants-not-concerned-dispute\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/02\/02\/fir-quashed-basis-applicants-not-concerned-dispute\/"},"author":{"name":"Saba","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"headline":"FIR quashed on the basis of applicants not being concerned with dispute","datePublished":"2018-02-02T10:22:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/02\/02\/fir-quashed-basis-applicants-not-concerned-dispute\/"},"wordCount":237,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/02\/02\/fir-quashed-basis-applicants-not-concerned-dispute\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg","keywords":["Dowry Prohibition Act","FIR"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/02\/02\/fir-quashed-basis-applicants-not-concerned-dispute\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/02\/02\/fir-quashed-basis-applicants-not-concerned-dispute\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/02\/02\/fir-quashed-basis-applicants-not-concerned-dispute\/","name":"FIR quashed on the basis of applicants not being concerned with dispute | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/02\/02\/fir-quashed-basis-applicants-not-concerned-dispute\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/02\/02\/fir-quashed-basis-applicants-not-concerned-dispute\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg","datePublished":"2018-02-02T10:22:38+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/02\/02\/fir-quashed-basis-applicants-not-concerned-dispute\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/02\/02\/fir-quashed-basis-applicants-not-concerned-dispute\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/02\/02\/fir-quashed-basis-applicants-not-concerned-dispute\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/02\/02\/fir-quashed-basis-applicants-not-concerned-dispute\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"FIR quashed on the basis of applicants not being concerned with dispute"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185584","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=185584"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185584\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/42052"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=185584"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=185584"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=185584"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}