{"id":183384,"date":"2018-01-22T17:28:45","date_gmt":"2018-01-22T11:58:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=183384"},"modified":"2018-01-22T17:28:45","modified_gmt":"2018-01-22T11:58:45","slug":"bombay-hc-holds-issuance-due-notice-proprietor-renewal-registration-trademark-mandatory-requirement","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/22\/bombay-hc-holds-issuance-due-notice-proprietor-renewal-registration-trademark-mandatory-requirement\/","title":{"rendered":"Bombay HC holds issuance of due notice to proprietor for renewal of registration of trademark a mandatory requirement"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Bombay High Court:<\/strong> A Division Bench comprising of RM Borde and RG Ketkar, JJ heard a petition praying for issuance of a Writ of Prohibition, thereby prohibiting the respondent from removing the petitioner\u2019s trademark \u201cKLITOLIN\u201d from the records in their registers and a quashment of the respondent\u2019s order to remove the trademark from the said registers.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The petitioner, the owner of the trademark \u201cKLITOLIN\u201d, had registered the mark and had continued to renew the same till 2009. However, failing to do so in 2009, it was revealed that the trademark might be removed from the register. The petitioner contended that issuing a notice to the trademark proprietor under Section 25(3) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 was a mandatory requirement, in the absence of which, the respondent should allow renewal of the trademark.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court accepted the contentions of the petitioner who had relied on the case of <em>Cipla Ltd.<\/em> v. <em>Registrar of Trademarks<\/em> [Writ Petition No. 1669 of 2012] wherein it was held that removal of the mark from the trademark register without giving prior notice in Form O-3 is laconic and illegal. The respondents were therefore, directed to consider the petitioner\u2019s application for renewal of the trademark subject to payment of the required fees. [Kleenage Products (India) Private Limited v. Registrar of Trademarks, Writ Petition No. 850 of 2015, order dated 17-1-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bombay High Court: A Division Bench comprising of RM Borde and RG Ketkar, JJ heard a petition praying for issuance of a <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":74381,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-183384","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Bombay HC holds issuance of due notice to proprietor for renewal of registration of trademark a mandatory requirement | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/22\/bombay-hc-holds-issuance-due-notice-proprietor-renewal-registration-trademark-mandatory-requirement\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bombay HC holds issuance of due notice to proprietor for renewal of registration of trademark a mandatory requirement\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court: A Division Bench comprising of RM Borde and RG Ketkar, JJ heard a petition praying for issuance of a\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/22\/bombay-hc-holds-issuance-due-notice-proprietor-renewal-registration-trademark-mandatory-requirement\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-01-22T11:58:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/22\/bombay-hc-holds-issuance-due-notice-proprietor-renewal-registration-trademark-mandatory-requirement\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/22\/bombay-hc-holds-issuance-due-notice-proprietor-renewal-registration-trademark-mandatory-requirement\/\",\"name\":\"Bombay HC holds issuance of due notice to proprietor for renewal of registration of trademark a mandatory requirement | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/22\/bombay-hc-holds-issuance-due-notice-proprietor-renewal-registration-trademark-mandatory-requirement\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/22\/bombay-hc-holds-issuance-due-notice-proprietor-renewal-registration-trademark-mandatory-requirement\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-01-22T11:58:45+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/22\/bombay-hc-holds-issuance-due-notice-proprietor-renewal-registration-trademark-mandatory-requirement\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/22\/bombay-hc-holds-issuance-due-notice-proprietor-renewal-registration-trademark-mandatory-requirement\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/22\/bombay-hc-holds-issuance-due-notice-proprietor-renewal-registration-trademark-mandatory-requirement\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/22\/bombay-hc-holds-issuance-due-notice-proprietor-renewal-registration-trademark-mandatory-requirement\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bombay HC holds issuance of due notice to proprietor for renewal of registration of trademark a mandatory requirement\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bombay HC holds issuance of due notice to proprietor for renewal of registration of trademark a mandatory requirement | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/22\/bombay-hc-holds-issuance-due-notice-proprietor-renewal-registration-trademark-mandatory-requirement\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bombay HC holds issuance of due notice to proprietor for renewal of registration of trademark a mandatory requirement","og_description":"Bombay High Court: A Division Bench comprising of RM Borde and RG Ketkar, JJ heard a petition praying for issuance of a","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/22\/bombay-hc-holds-issuance-due-notice-proprietor-renewal-registration-trademark-mandatory-requirement\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-01-22T11:58:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/22\/bombay-hc-holds-issuance-due-notice-proprietor-renewal-registration-trademark-mandatory-requirement\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/22\/bombay-hc-holds-issuance-due-notice-proprietor-renewal-registration-trademark-mandatory-requirement\/","name":"Bombay HC holds issuance of due notice to proprietor for renewal of registration of trademark a mandatory requirement | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/22\/bombay-hc-holds-issuance-due-notice-proprietor-renewal-registration-trademark-mandatory-requirement\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/22\/bombay-hc-holds-issuance-due-notice-proprietor-renewal-registration-trademark-mandatory-requirement\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","datePublished":"2018-01-22T11:58:45+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/22\/bombay-hc-holds-issuance-due-notice-proprietor-renewal-registration-trademark-mandatory-requirement\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/22\/bombay-hc-holds-issuance-due-notice-proprietor-renewal-registration-trademark-mandatory-requirement\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/22\/bombay-hc-holds-issuance-due-notice-proprietor-renewal-registration-trademark-mandatory-requirement\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","width":1331,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/22\/bombay-hc-holds-issuance-due-notice-proprietor-renewal-registration-trademark-mandatory-requirement\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bombay HC holds issuance of due notice to proprietor for renewal of registration of trademark a mandatory requirement"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":353546,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/16\/rajasthan-hc-notice-under-section-253-of-trade-marks-act-mandatory-before-trade-mark-removal-scc-times-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":183384,"position":0},"title":"Trade Mark cannot be removed from official records without Notice under Section 25(3) of the Trade Marks Act: Rajasthan High Court","author":"Editor","date":"July 16, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA bare perusal of the provision provides that it was mandatory for the respondents to comply with the same before removing the Trade Mark from their register.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Notice under Section 25(3) of Trade marks Act mandatory","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Notice-under-Section-253-of-Trade-marks-Act-mandatory.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Notice-under-Section-253-of-Trade-marks-Act-mandatory.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Notice-under-Section-253-of-Trade-marks-Act-mandatory.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Notice-under-Section-253-of-Trade-marks-Act-mandatory.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":317033,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/14\/delhi-high-court-upholds-dolma-aunty-momos-trademark-cancels-infringing-mark-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":183384,"position":1},"title":"Delhi High Court upholds Dolma Aunty Momos trademark; Cancels infringing trademark registration","author":"Arunima","date":"March 14, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The ruling sets a precedent for protecting established brands and upholding the integrity of trademark registration processes. The cancellation of the infringing trademark serves as a deterrent to potential trademark violators, emphasizing the importance of respecting intellectual property rights in commercial activities.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":375421,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/del-hc-on-kerly-impasse-prior-user-v-registered-trademark-rights\/","url_meta":{"origin":183384,"position":2},"title":"Delhi HC resolves &#8220;Kerly Impasse&#8221; in &#8216;FIELDMARSHAL&#8217; Trademark Dispute; holds prior user prevails over dormant registration","author":"Prarthana Gupta","date":"February 11, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA textbook case of the \u2018Kerly impasse\u2019 where infringement and passing off coexist as concurrent causes of action\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"passing off action against registered proprietor","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/passing-off-action-against-registered-proprietor.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/passing-off-action-against-registered-proprietor.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/passing-off-action-against-registered-proprietor.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/passing-off-action-against-registered-proprietor.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":336360,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/30\/delhi-high-court-upholds-injunction-novakind-bio-sciences-mankind-pharma-kind-trademark-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":183384,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court upholds injunction against Novakind Bio Sciences for infringing Mankind Pharma&#8217;s &#8216;KIND&#8217; trademark","author":"Arunima","date":"November 30, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Mankind Pharma used the mark \"MANKIND\" since 1986 and holds 78 separate trademark registrations covering a variety of pharmaceutical products. The concern arose when Novakind adopted the name \"NOVAKIND\" for its pharmaceutical products.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":357293,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/21\/rajasthan-high-court-speedy-disposal-of-trademark-application-fundamental-right\/","url_meta":{"origin":183384,"position":4},"title":"Rajasthan High Court: Speedy disposal of Trademark application a Fundamental Right under Article 21","author":"Editor","date":"August 21, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court issued a general direction to the Registrar of Trademarks to decide all pending trademark registration applications as early as possible.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Speedy disposal of Trademark application a fundamental right","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Speedy-disposal-of-Trademark-application-a-fundamental-right.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Speedy-disposal-of-Trademark-application-a-fundamental-right.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Speedy-disposal-of-Trademark-application-a-fundamental-right.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Speedy-disposal-of-Trademark-application-a-fundamental-right.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":309697,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/19\/bombay-high-court-declared-atomberg-well-known-trademark-in-india-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":183384,"position":5},"title":"Bombay High Court declares \u2018ATOMBERG\u2019 as a well known trademark in India","author":"Arunima","date":"December 19, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Plaintiff is a company engaged in manufacturing marketing and selling a wide variety of home appliances, such as ceiling fans, pedestal fans, wall fans, exhaust fans, mixer grinders, smart door locks, and accessories thereof, such as fan remote, fan motor, fan canopy, fan blades, etc. under the trade mark\/trade\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"bombay high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/183384","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=183384"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/183384\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/74381"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=183384"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=183384"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=183384"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}