{"id":180294,"date":"2018-01-09T11:08:46","date_gmt":"2018-01-09T05:38:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=180294"},"modified":"2018-01-12T15:06:01","modified_gmt":"2018-01-12T09:36:01","slug":"equity-aids-vigilant-delhi-hc-applications-seeking-condonation-delay-devoid-sufficient-reasons-grounds","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/09\/equity-aids-vigilant-delhi-hc-applications-seeking-condonation-delay-devoid-sufficient-reasons-grounds\/","title":{"rendered":"Equity aids the vigilant: Delhi HC on applications seeking condonation of delay devoid of sufficient reasons or grounds"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Delhi High Court:<\/strong> A Bench of the Delhi High Court dismissed a Letters Patent Appeal which was preferred to assail the dismissal of applications filed for restoration of a writ petition (\u2018subject petition\u2019). The subject petition itself had been dismissed in default.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The subject petition was listed for hearing before a single Judge on 08.10.2013 wherein it was noted that the petition was stated to be suffering from Dengue and as requested, the hearing was adjourned till 28.11.2013. On 28.11.2013 however, the petition was dismissed as the petitioner had not appeared. Thereafter, applications seeking restoration of the subject petition and Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 seeking condonation of 387 days delay in filing the application were filed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The said applications were dismissed along with the observation that the petitioner was not present on 08.10.2013 and was represented through a counsel, thus, he could not plead to restore the subject petition based on the submission that the petitioner himself had misheard the date of the hearing. The observation also relied on the verdict of the Delhi High Court in Virender Kumar v. Maya Devi, 94 (2001) DLT 848 to assert that no sufficient ground had been put forth on behalf of the appellant to explain his absence before the Court on 28.11.2013 and so it would be a travesty of justice to entertain a condonation of 387 days on such a belated restoration application. Aggrieved by the impugned order, the appellant preferred the appeal. The Court analyzed the merits of the application and came to the conclusion that equity aids the vigilant and not those who slumber over their rights.\u00a0The application seeking condonation as well as the appeal itself was dismissed for being devoid of any merit. [Raj Kumaar v. Shiv Steel,<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/06dxs6O7\"> 2017 SCC OnLine Del 12598<\/a>, decided on 06.12.2017]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court: A Bench of the Delhi High Court dismissed a Letters Patent Appeal which was preferred to assail the dismissal <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-180294","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Equity aids the vigilant: Delhi HC on applications seeking condonation of delay devoid of sufficient reasons or grounds | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/09\/equity-aids-vigilant-delhi-hc-applications-seeking-condonation-delay-devoid-sufficient-reasons-grounds\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Equity aids the vigilant: Delhi HC on applications seeking condonation of delay devoid of sufficient reasons or grounds\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: A Bench of the Delhi High Court dismissed a Letters Patent Appeal which was preferred to assail the dismissal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/09\/equity-aids-vigilant-delhi-hc-applications-seeking-condonation-delay-devoid-sufficient-reasons-grounds\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-01-09T05:38:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-01-12T09:36:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/09\/equity-aids-vigilant-delhi-hc-applications-seeking-condonation-delay-devoid-sufficient-reasons-grounds\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/09\/equity-aids-vigilant-delhi-hc-applications-seeking-condonation-delay-devoid-sufficient-reasons-grounds\/\",\"name\":\"Equity aids the vigilant: Delhi HC on applications seeking condonation of delay devoid of sufficient reasons or grounds | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-01-09T05:38:46+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-12T09:36:01+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/09\/equity-aids-vigilant-delhi-hc-applications-seeking-condonation-delay-devoid-sufficient-reasons-grounds\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/09\/equity-aids-vigilant-delhi-hc-applications-seeking-condonation-delay-devoid-sufficient-reasons-grounds\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/09\/equity-aids-vigilant-delhi-hc-applications-seeking-condonation-delay-devoid-sufficient-reasons-grounds\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Equity aids the vigilant: Delhi HC on applications seeking condonation of delay devoid of sufficient reasons or grounds\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Equity aids the vigilant: Delhi HC on applications seeking condonation of delay devoid of sufficient reasons or grounds | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/09\/equity-aids-vigilant-delhi-hc-applications-seeking-condonation-delay-devoid-sufficient-reasons-grounds\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Equity aids the vigilant: Delhi HC on applications seeking condonation of delay devoid of sufficient reasons or grounds","og_description":"Delhi High Court: A Bench of the Delhi High Court dismissed a Letters Patent Appeal which was preferred to assail the dismissal","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/09\/equity-aids-vigilant-delhi-hc-applications-seeking-condonation-delay-devoid-sufficient-reasons-grounds\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-01-09T05:38:46+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-01-12T09:36:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/09\/equity-aids-vigilant-delhi-hc-applications-seeking-condonation-delay-devoid-sufficient-reasons-grounds\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/09\/equity-aids-vigilant-delhi-hc-applications-seeking-condonation-delay-devoid-sufficient-reasons-grounds\/","name":"Equity aids the vigilant: Delhi HC on applications seeking condonation of delay devoid of sufficient reasons or grounds | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-01-09T05:38:46+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-12T09:36:01+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/09\/equity-aids-vigilant-delhi-hc-applications-seeking-condonation-delay-devoid-sufficient-reasons-grounds\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/09\/equity-aids-vigilant-delhi-hc-applications-seeking-condonation-delay-devoid-sufficient-reasons-grounds\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/09\/equity-aids-vigilant-delhi-hc-applications-seeking-condonation-delay-devoid-sufficient-reasons-grounds\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Equity aids the vigilant: Delhi HC on applications seeking condonation of delay devoid of sufficient reasons or grounds"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":298817,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/07\/delhi-hc-courts-must-prioritise-purpose-statute-technicalities-condonation-of-delay-applications\/","url_meta":{"origin":180294,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court | Courts must prioritise purpose of a statute over technicalities while deciding condonation of delay applications","author":"Arunima","date":"August 7, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The primary intent of the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques Act, 1994 Act is to safeguard the rights of the unborn girl child and promote gender equality by curbing the misuse of diagnostic techniques for sex determination. Therefore, while deciding applications seeking condonation of delay, Courts should prioritize the Act's\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":210562,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/22\/del-hc-court-is-not-storage-of-petitions-filed-by-negligent-litigants-not-permitted-to-blame-previous-counsel-after-21-years-for-not-providing-case-record\/","url_meta":{"origin":180294,"position":1},"title":"Del HC | Court is not storage of petitions filed by negligent litigants: Not permitted to blame previous counsel after 21 years for not providing case record","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 22, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"'Vigilantibus, non-dermientibus, jura subveniunt' (the law helps those who are watchful and not those who are asleep) Delhi High Court:\u00a0Vinod Goel, J., dismissed\u00a0Delhi Waqf Board's applications for condoning the delay of 21 years and restoring a revision petition. Hashmat Nabi and Swathi, Advocates for the Waqf Board submitted that on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":202920,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/01\/application-seeking-condonation-of-delay-must-meet-the-test-of-section-5-of-the-jammu-kashmir-limitation-samvat-1995-and-satisfy-the-court-with-sufficient-cause-for-delay\/","url_meta":{"origin":180294,"position":2},"title":"Application seeking condonation of delay must meet the test of Section 5 of the Jammu &#038; Kashmir Limitation Samvat, 1995 and satisfy the court with sufficient cause for delay","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 1, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge bench comprising of M.K. Hanjura, J. while dealing with an application for condonation of delay in filing a review petition, dismissed both the application as well as the petition on grounds of inordinate delay in filing the same. Brief facts of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":321597,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/07\/party-not-contacting-counsel-for-6-years-cannot-seek-condonation-of-delay-alleging-that-counsel-did-not-inform-about-disposal-of-case-allahabad-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":180294,"position":3},"title":"Party not contacting counsel for 6 years, cannot seek condonation of delay alleging that counsel did not inform about disposal of case: Allahabad HC","author":"Editor","date":"May 7, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court noted that while the appellants alleged their counsel failed to inform them about the case's dismissal, there's no evidence they actively sought updates from the counsel during the six-year period.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":319759,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/09\/mockery-justice-delay-12-years-condoned-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":180294,"position":4},"title":"SC dismisses Centre\u2019s plea to condone delay of 12 years and 158 days for filing restoration of suit; calls it a \u2018mockery of justice\u2019","author":"Editor","date":"April 9, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe length of the delay is a relevant matter which the court must take into consideration while considering whether the delay should be condoned or not.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"condonation of delay of 12 years","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/condonation-of-delay-of-12-years.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/condonation-of-delay-of-12-years.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/condonation-of-delay-of-12-years.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/condonation-of-delay-of-12-years.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":325787,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/05\/punjab-haryana-hc-determined-govening-law-for-time-barred-petition-filed-under-code-of-criminal-procedure\/","url_meta":{"origin":180294,"position":5},"title":"[BNSS] Punjab and Haryana HC determines governing law for time barred petition filed under CrPC before 30-06-2024 and pending as of 01-07-2024","author":"Editor","date":"July 5, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court was of the view that the petition and the accompanying application seeking an extension of time were filed and registered in the registry of this Court when CrPC, 1973 was in force, hence, the matter would fall under the scope of Section 531(2)(a) and this petition should be\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Condonation of Delay under BNSS","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Condonation-of-Delay-under-BNSS.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Condonation-of-Delay-under-BNSS.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Condonation-of-Delay-under-BNSS.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Condonation-of-Delay-under-BNSS.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180294","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=180294"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180294\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=180294"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=180294"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=180294"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}