{"id":179644,"date":"2018-01-02T14:00:47","date_gmt":"2018-01-02T08:30:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=179644"},"modified":"2018-01-02T10:49:48","modified_gmt":"2018-01-02T05:19:48","slug":"appeal-acquittal-bailable-non-cognizable-offences-not-maintainable-sessions-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/02\/appeal-acquittal-bailable-non-cognizable-offences-not-maintainable-sessions-court\/","title":{"rendered":"Appeal against an acquittal in bailable and non-cognizable offences is not maintainable in Sessions Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>High Court of Himachal Pradesh:<\/strong> A Single Judge Bench comprising of Ajay Mohan Goel, J., allowed a criminal revision petition holding that an appeal against an acquittal, where offences are bailable and non-cognizable, lies in the High Court and not in the Court of Sessions Judge.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The petitioner was acquitted by the Trial Court in a criminal case registered under Sections 41 and 42 of the Forest Act. In an appeal filed by the State, the learned Sessions Judge set aside the judgment of acquittal. Petitioner filed the instant petition contending that the impugned judgment passed by the Court of learned Sessions Judge was perverse and void abinitio, because the learned Appellate Court while entertaining and deciding the said appeal failed to appreciate that as the offences for which the petitioner was tried by the learned Trial Court were bailable offences, no appeal was maintainable before the learned Sessions Judge as per the provisions of Section 378 of the CrPC and the forum for the State to have had challenged the said decision was the High Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The High Court before adverting to the facts of the case discussed the scope of its revisional jurisdiction and observed that the High Court in exercise of its revisional power can interfere only if the findings of the Court whose decision is sought to be revised is shown to be perverse or untenable in law or is grossly erroneous or glaringly unreasonable. It also referred to the Supreme Court judgment in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/e6heudJT\">(2015) 3 SCC 123<\/a> wherein it was held that unmerited and undeserved prosecution is an infringement of guarantee under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. In that case, the Supreme Court has further held that the purpose of revision jurisdiction is to preserve the power in the Court to do justice in cases of criminal jurisprudence.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Coming to the facts of the instant case, the Court found that the offences for which the petitioner was tried were bailable and non-cognizable offences. And on a perusal of Section 378 of CrPC, the Court held that in case of acquittal, where the offences alleged against the accused are bailable and non-cognizabele, then appeal against the judgment of such acquittal is not maintainable before the Court of learned Sessions Judge, but the same has to be filed before the High Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court held that since the appeal was not maintainable in the Court of Sessions, therefore, the order of reversal of acquittal passed by the Trial Court could not be maintained. Accordingly, the revision petition was allowed. [Pushap Raj v. State of H.P., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Il2V5s0z\">2017 SCC OnLine HP 282<\/a>, order dated March 16, 2017]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>High Court of Himachal Pradesh: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Ajay Mohan Goel, J., allowed a criminal revision petition holding that <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":222107,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-179644","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Appeal against an acquittal in bailable and non-cognizable offences is not maintainable in Sessions Court | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/02\/appeal-acquittal-bailable-non-cognizable-offences-not-maintainable-sessions-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Appeal against an acquittal in bailable and non-cognizable offences is not maintainable in Sessions Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"High Court of Himachal Pradesh: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Ajay Mohan Goel, J., allowed a criminal revision petition holding that\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/02\/appeal-acquittal-bailable-non-cognizable-offences-not-maintainable-sessions-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-01-02T08:30:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/02\/appeal-acquittal-bailable-non-cognizable-offences-not-maintainable-sessions-court\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/02\/appeal-acquittal-bailable-non-cognizable-offences-not-maintainable-sessions-court\/\",\"name\":\"Appeal against an acquittal in bailable and non-cognizable offences is not maintainable in Sessions Court | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/02\/appeal-acquittal-bailable-non-cognizable-offences-not-maintainable-sessions-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/02\/appeal-acquittal-bailable-non-cognizable-offences-not-maintainable-sessions-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-01-02T08:30:47+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/02\/appeal-acquittal-bailable-non-cognizable-offences-not-maintainable-sessions-court\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/02\/appeal-acquittal-bailable-non-cognizable-offences-not-maintainable-sessions-court\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/02\/appeal-acquittal-bailable-non-cognizable-offences-not-maintainable-sessions-court\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/02\/appeal-acquittal-bailable-non-cognizable-offences-not-maintainable-sessions-court\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Appeal against an acquittal in bailable and non-cognizable offences is not maintainable in Sessions Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Appeal against an acquittal in bailable and non-cognizable offences is not maintainable in Sessions Court | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/02\/appeal-acquittal-bailable-non-cognizable-offences-not-maintainable-sessions-court\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Appeal against an acquittal in bailable and non-cognizable offences is not maintainable in Sessions Court","og_description":"High Court of Himachal Pradesh: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Ajay Mohan Goel, J., allowed a criminal revision petition holding that","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/02\/appeal-acquittal-bailable-non-cognizable-offences-not-maintainable-sessions-court\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-01-02T08:30:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/02\/appeal-acquittal-bailable-non-cognizable-offences-not-maintainable-sessions-court\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/02\/appeal-acquittal-bailable-non-cognizable-offences-not-maintainable-sessions-court\/","name":"Appeal against an acquittal in bailable and non-cognizable offences is not maintainable in Sessions Court | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/02\/appeal-acquittal-bailable-non-cognizable-offences-not-maintainable-sessions-court\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/02\/appeal-acquittal-bailable-non-cognizable-offences-not-maintainable-sessions-court\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","datePublished":"2018-01-02T08:30:47+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/02\/appeal-acquittal-bailable-non-cognizable-offences-not-maintainable-sessions-court\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/02\/appeal-acquittal-bailable-non-cognizable-offences-not-maintainable-sessions-court\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/02\/appeal-acquittal-bailable-non-cognizable-offences-not-maintainable-sessions-court\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/02\/appeal-acquittal-bailable-non-cognizable-offences-not-maintainable-sessions-court\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Appeal against an acquittal in bailable and non-cognizable offences is not maintainable in Sessions Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":220393,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/01\/chh-hc-s-3781b-crpc-bars-appeal-in-hc-against-acquittal-order-passed-by-magistrate-in-a-cognizable-and-non-bailable-offence-reiterated\/","url_meta":{"origin":179644,"position":0},"title":"Chh HC | S.378(1)(b) CrPC bars appeal in HC against acquittal order passed by Magistrate in a cognizable and non-bailable offence, reiterated","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 1, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of Prashant Kumar Mishra and Goutam Chourdiya, JJ. dismissed an application filed by the State seeking leave to appeal against the order of acquittal rendered by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, as not maintainable. The application by the State sought leave to appeal against the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":214931,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/22\/gau-hc-s-372-crpc-appeal-against-order-of-assistant-sessions-judge-lies-in-the-court-of-sessions-judge-whether-the-impugned-order-pertains-to-conviction-or-not\/","url_meta":{"origin":179644,"position":1},"title":"Gau HC | S. 372 CrPC: Appeal against order of Assistant Sessions Judge lies in the Court of Sessions Judge, whether the impugned order pertains to conviction or not","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 22, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Gauhati High Court: Rumi Kumari Phukan, J. dismissed an application seeking leave to appeal against an Assistant Sessions Judge\u2019s order of acquittal, holding that the forum for preferring such an appeal would be the Court of Sessions Judge and not the High Court.\u00a0 The petitioner (herein) in the instant case\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":243271,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/02\/high-court-being-first-appellate-court-cannot-acquit-an-accused-without-re-appreciation-of-evidence-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":179644,"position":2},"title":"High Court, being First Appellate Court, cannot acquit an accused without re-appreciation of evidence: Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"February 2, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cNon-re-appreciation of the evidence on record may affect the case of either the prosecution or even the accused.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":151004,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/22\/sessions-court-does-not-have-any-jurisdiction-to-entertain-a-victims-appeal-under-s-372-crpc-when-acquittal-is-recorded-in-a-complaint-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":179644,"position":3},"title":"Sessions Court does not have any jurisdiction to entertain a victim\u2019s appeal under S. 372 CrPC when acquittal is recorded in a complaint case","author":"Saba","date":"August 22, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan: The appellate court had allowed the appeal of the respondent-complainant under Sections 372 and 378 CrPC and set aside the acquittal of the appellant recorded by the trial court and convicted the appellant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. This decision of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":297030,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/18\/gujarat-hc-upholds-acquittal-of-rape-accused-for-discrepancies-in-victim-deposition\/","url_meta":{"origin":179644,"position":4},"title":"Major Discrepancies in Deposition of Victim; Gujarat HC upholds Acquittal of Rape Accused","author":"Editor","date":"July 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court stated that if at all an offence is committed at a particular time, there cannot be inconsistency in the time of offence in the deposition and the FIR registered by the informant herself.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"gujarat high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gujarat-high-court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gujarat-high-court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gujarat-high-court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gujarat-high-court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":264448,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/25\/transfer-petition-for-trial-of-salman-khans-deer-hunting-case-allowed\/","url_meta":{"origin":179644,"position":5},"title":"Raj HC | Transfer petition for trial of Salman Khan&#8217;s deer hunting case allowed; High Court to take charge","author":"Editor","date":"March 25, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J., allowed a transfer petition in the infamous deer hunting case of actor Salman Khan. An FIR was lodged with the Forest Department against Salman Khan alongwith Saif Ali Khan, Neelam, Tabbsum @ Tabu, Sonali and Dushyant Singh, who, in pursuance of a complaint,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/179644","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=179644"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/179644\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/222107"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=179644"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=179644"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=179644"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}