{"id":177984,"date":"2018-01-12T13:10:42","date_gmt":"2018-01-12T07:40:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=177984"},"modified":"2018-01-12T13:10:42","modified_gmt":"2018-01-12T07:40:42","slug":"transfer-capital-asset-way-compulsory-acquisition-may-case-exemption-s-1037-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/12\/transfer-capital-asset-way-compulsory-acquisition-may-case-exemption-s-1037-act\/","title":{"rendered":"If transfer of capital asset is by way of compulsory acquisition then there may be a case of exemption under S. 10(37) of IT Act"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore:<\/strong> In a recent order passed by Arun Kumar Garodia, Accountant Member and Lalit Kumar, Judicial Member restored a case under ITA No. 162 \/ CIT (A)-1 \/ BR \/ 16-17, 163 \/ CIT (A)-1 \/ BR \/15-16 and 164 \/ CIT (A)-1 \/ BR \/ 16-17 back to Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT (A)) for a fresh decision.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The brief facts being that the appellant has challenged the order dated 20-12-2011 passed by the Income Tax Officer, Ward \u2013 8 (4) which clearly declines to condone the delay in filing the appeal petition by the appellant in CIT(A), and has further contested that the &#8216;Capital Gain Tax&#8217; that is being levied on the appellant is highly illegal and improper and hence needs to be quashed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It was observed by this Bench that the appellant&#8217;s plea was in order and the delay in filing the appeal was fully justified and the fact that the appellant&#8217;s &#8216;Capital Gain&#8217; was because of a compulsory acquisition by the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) does not qualify for &#8216;Capital Gain Tax&#8217; provided all conditions are satisfied under Section 10 sub-section 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as per which if the transfer of capital asset is by way of compulsory acquisition under any law, or a transfer the consideration for which is determined or approved by the Central Government or the RBI then there may be the case of exemption under the said section. In lieu of quashing the order passed by the Income Tax Officer, Ward \u2013 8 (4), the Tribunal ordered the case to be referred back to CIT(A) to be decided afresh after providing adequate opportunity of being heard to both the parties. [Rama Keshavadaspai v. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, ITA Nos. 756 to 758\/Bang\/2017, decided on 15-12-2017]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore: In a recent order passed by Arun Kumar Garodia, Accountant Member and Lalit Kumar, Judicial Member restored <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":170804,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-177984","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>If transfer of capital asset is by way of compulsory acquisition then there may be a case of exemption under S. 10(37) of IT Act | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/12\/transfer-capital-asset-way-compulsory-acquisition-may-case-exemption-s-1037-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"If transfer of capital asset is by way of compulsory acquisition then there may be a case of exemption under S. 10(37) of IT Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore: In a recent order passed by Arun Kumar Garodia, Accountant Member and Lalit Kumar, Judicial Member restored\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/12\/transfer-capital-asset-way-compulsory-acquisition-may-case-exemption-s-1037-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-01-12T07:40:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/12\/transfer-capital-asset-way-compulsory-acquisition-may-case-exemption-s-1037-act\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/12\/transfer-capital-asset-way-compulsory-acquisition-may-case-exemption-s-1037-act\/\",\"name\":\"If transfer of capital asset is by way of compulsory acquisition then there may be a case of exemption under S. 10(37) of IT Act | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/12\/transfer-capital-asset-way-compulsory-acquisition-may-case-exemption-s-1037-act\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/12\/transfer-capital-asset-way-compulsory-acquisition-may-case-exemption-s-1037-act\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-01-12T07:40:42+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/12\/transfer-capital-asset-way-compulsory-acquisition-may-case-exemption-s-1037-act\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/12\/transfer-capital-asset-way-compulsory-acquisition-may-case-exemption-s-1037-act\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/12\/transfer-capital-asset-way-compulsory-acquisition-may-case-exemption-s-1037-act\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887,\"caption\":\"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/12\/transfer-capital-asset-way-compulsory-acquisition-may-case-exemption-s-1037-act\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"If transfer of capital asset is by way of compulsory acquisition then there may be a case of exemption under S. 10(37) of IT Act\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"If transfer of capital asset is by way of compulsory acquisition then there may be a case of exemption under S. 10(37) of IT Act | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/12\/transfer-capital-asset-way-compulsory-acquisition-may-case-exemption-s-1037-act\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"If transfer of capital asset is by way of compulsory acquisition then there may be a case of exemption under S. 10(37) of IT Act","og_description":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore: In a recent order passed by Arun Kumar Garodia, Accountant Member and Lalit Kumar, Judicial Member restored","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/12\/transfer-capital-asset-way-compulsory-acquisition-may-case-exemption-s-1037-act\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-01-12T07:40:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/12\/transfer-capital-asset-way-compulsory-acquisition-may-case-exemption-s-1037-act\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/12\/transfer-capital-asset-way-compulsory-acquisition-may-case-exemption-s-1037-act\/","name":"If transfer of capital asset is by way of compulsory acquisition then there may be a case of exemption under S. 10(37) of IT Act | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/12\/transfer-capital-asset-way-compulsory-acquisition-may-case-exemption-s-1037-act\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/12\/transfer-capital-asset-way-compulsory-acquisition-may-case-exemption-s-1037-act\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg","datePublished":"2018-01-12T07:40:42+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/12\/transfer-capital-asset-way-compulsory-acquisition-may-case-exemption-s-1037-act\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/12\/transfer-capital-asset-way-compulsory-acquisition-may-case-exemption-s-1037-act\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/12\/transfer-capital-asset-way-compulsory-acquisition-may-case-exemption-s-1037-act\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg","width":1330,"height":887,"caption":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/12\/transfer-capital-asset-way-compulsory-acquisition-may-case-exemption-s-1037-act\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"If transfer of capital asset is by way of compulsory acquisition then there may be a case of exemption under S. 10(37) of IT Act"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":231882,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/07\/itat-bar-council-of-delhis-dominant-purpose-is-advancement-of-general-public-utility-held-entitled-for-registration-under-s-12-aa-and-consequent-exemption-under-s-80-g-income-tax-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":177984,"position":0},"title":"ITAT | Bar Council of Delhi&#8217;s dominant purpose is advancement of general public utility: Held entitled for registration under S. 12-AA and consequent exemption under S. 80-G, Income Tax Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 7, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT):\u00a0A Division Bench of R.K. Panda (Accountant Member) and Kuldip Singh (Judicial Member), while addressing a matter held, \"Bar Council of Delhi being engaged in safeguarding the rights, privileges and interest of the advocates, its dominating purpose is the advancement of general public utility within the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":270293,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/18\/itat-can-incorrect-entries-hybrid-system-of-account-lead-to-rejection-of-books-of-accounts-labor-charges\/","url_meta":{"origin":177984,"position":1},"title":"ITAT| Can incorrect entries; hybrid system of account lead to rejection of books of Accounts &#038; Labor Charges?","author":"Editor","date":"July 18, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai: Dealing with the issue pertaining to rejection of books of accounts, sustainability of disallowance of labour charges, and disallowance of outstanding labour charges, the Gagan Goyal, Accountant Member has held that CIT(A) was correct and justified in rejecting the books of account by\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":320892,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/27\/tata-steel-contribution-212-52-cr-to-compensatory-afforestation-fund-treated-as-revenue-expenditure-bombay-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":177984,"position":2},"title":"Tata Steel\u2019s contribution of Rs. 212.52 cr made to Compensatory Afforestation Fund to be treated as Revenue expenditure:Bombay High Court reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"April 27, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court held that contribution to Compensatory Afforestation Fund will be considered as revenue expenditure and not capital in nature","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":320130,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/16\/assessing-officer-to-record-dissatisfaction-cogent-reasons-for-correctness-claim-assessee-bombay-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":177984,"position":3},"title":"Assessing Officer to record dissatisfaction with correctness of claim of Assessee in respect of expenditure with cogent reasons: Bombay HC","author":"Editor","date":"April 16, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court dismissed an appeal of Income Tax Commissioner to disallow expenditure amounting to 94 Crore u\/s 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":294050,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/07\/cit-right-in-deleting-addition-made-because-of-low-gp-rate-itat\/","url_meta":{"origin":177984,"position":4},"title":"CIT was right in deleting addition made on account of low Gross Profit rate by AO without any justified reasoning: ITAT","author":"Apoorva","date":"June 7, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"It is a well-accepted principal of tax jurisprudence that the Assessing Officer cannot sit on the armchair of a businessman assessee to replace his business strategy by his own whims and fancies","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-494.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-494.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-494.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-494.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":358323,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/29\/latest-cases-on-income-tax-laws-itr\/","url_meta":{"origin":177984,"position":5},"title":"Cases Reported in ITR | Latest Cases on Income Tax Laws","author":"Shikha","date":"August 29, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Explore the latest cases reported in SCC\u2019s Income Tax Reports (ITR) Volume on Exemptions, Revision, Deductions, Limitation, Appeal, Reassessment, Legacy Dispute Resolution, Faceless assessment and much more.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cases Reported&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Latest Cases on Income Tax Laws","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Latest-Cases-on-Income-Tax-Laws.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Latest-Cases-on-Income-Tax-Laws.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Latest-Cases-on-Income-Tax-Laws.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Latest-Cases-on-Income-Tax-Laws.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/177984","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=177984"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/177984\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/170804"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=177984"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=177984"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=177984"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}