{"id":177214,"date":"2017-12-21T13:39:39","date_gmt":"2017-12-21T08:09:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=177214"},"modified":"2017-12-29T12:35:43","modified_gmt":"2017-12-29T07:05:43","slug":"bail-granted-not-parity-provisions-looking-various-factors-including-gravity-offences","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/21\/bail-granted-not-parity-provisions-looking-various-factors-including-gravity-offences\/","title":{"rendered":"Bail is granted not because of parity in provisions, but by looking at various other factors including gravity of offences"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>High Court of Judicature at Madras:<\/strong> A Division Bench comprising of Rajiv Shakdher, J. and N. Sathish Kumar, J. addressed a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner seeked the setting aside of the detention order which confined him to the Central Prison and following the quashment, seeked the court to free the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The counsel for the respondent had pointed out that no charge-sheet had been filed with regards to the crime that was allegedly committed by the petitioner. Thus the court decided to take up the main petition for hearing. The court perused the detention order of the petitioner and noticed that the petitioner had 2 cases registered against him. The Court also observed that the detenu had not filed any bail application in the second case till the date of passing of the impugned detention order. Although, the detaining officer took into account the fact that bail was granted to the petitioner for the other case, and hence, concluded that there stood a great possibility for the petitioner to be granted bail for the present case as well.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court held that the order couldn\u2019t be sustained since despite the detenu having been arrested on 14\/2\/2017 and the order having been given on 2\/5\/2017 followed by a notice on 23\/6\/2017, no counter affidavit had been filed. No explanation had been provided for the enormous delay. Along with that, despite the order having been passed on the said date, the detenu had not applied for bail. The Court thought that the detaining officer\u2019s reasoning was flawed as he thought that bail should be granted since the detenu was granted bail for the previous crime. [Kuppan @ Sathishkumar v. Secretary to Government, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/obOEfHmz\">2017 SCC OnLine Mad 11530<\/a>, dated 15.12.2017]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>High Court of Judicature at Madras: A Division Bench comprising of Rajiv Shakdher, J. and N. Sathish Kumar, J. addressed a petition <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2664,3365,26764],"class_list":["post-177214","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Bail","tag-detention","tag-previous-order"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Bail is granted not because of parity in provisions, but by looking at various other factors including gravity of offences | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/21\/bail-granted-not-parity-provisions-looking-various-factors-including-gravity-offences\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bail is granted not because of parity in provisions, but by looking at various other factors including gravity of offences\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"High Court of Judicature at Madras: A Division Bench comprising of Rajiv Shakdher, J. and N. Sathish Kumar, J. addressed a petition\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/21\/bail-granted-not-parity-provisions-looking-various-factors-including-gravity-offences\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-12-21T08:09:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-12-29T07:05:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/madras-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/21\/bail-granted-not-parity-provisions-looking-various-factors-including-gravity-offences\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/21\/bail-granted-not-parity-provisions-looking-various-factors-including-gravity-offences\/\",\"name\":\"Bail is granted not because of parity in provisions, but by looking at various other factors including gravity of offences | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-12-21T08:09:39+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-12-29T07:05:43+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/21\/bail-granted-not-parity-provisions-looking-various-factors-including-gravity-offences\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/21\/bail-granted-not-parity-provisions-looking-various-factors-including-gravity-offences\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/21\/bail-granted-not-parity-provisions-looking-various-factors-including-gravity-offences\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bail is granted not because of parity in provisions, but by looking at various other factors including gravity of offences\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bail is granted not because of parity in provisions, but by looking at various other factors including gravity of offences | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/21\/bail-granted-not-parity-provisions-looking-various-factors-including-gravity-offences\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bail is granted not because of parity in provisions, but by looking at various other factors including gravity of offences","og_description":"High Court of Judicature at Madras: A Division Bench comprising of Rajiv Shakdher, J. and N. Sathish Kumar, J. addressed a petition","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/21\/bail-granted-not-parity-provisions-looking-various-factors-including-gravity-offences\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-12-21T08:09:39+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-12-29T07:05:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/madras-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/21\/bail-granted-not-parity-provisions-looking-various-factors-including-gravity-offences\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/21\/bail-granted-not-parity-provisions-looking-various-factors-including-gravity-offences\/","name":"Bail is granted not because of parity in provisions, but by looking at various other factors including gravity of offences | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-12-21T08:09:39+00:00","dateModified":"2017-12-29T07:05:43+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/21\/bail-granted-not-parity-provisions-looking-various-factors-including-gravity-offences\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/21\/bail-granted-not-parity-provisions-looking-various-factors-including-gravity-offences\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/21\/bail-granted-not-parity-provisions-looking-various-factors-including-gravity-offences\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bail is granted not because of parity in provisions, but by looking at various other factors including gravity of offences"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":204488,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/29\/an-order-of-preventive-detention-passed-without-supplying-the-relevant-materials-to-the-detenue-is-illegal\/","url_meta":{"origin":177214,"position":0},"title":"An order of preventive detention passed, without supplying the relevant materials to the detenue, is illegal","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 29, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Rashid Ali Dar, J., allowed a petition filed against the order of District Magistrate, Anantnag, under Section 8 of the J&K Public Safety Act, whereby the petitioner was placed under preventive detention. The main issue that arose before the Court\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":202965,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/03\/law-of-preventive-detention-a-tool-to-be-used-sparingly\/","url_meta":{"origin":177214,"position":1},"title":"Law of preventive detention: A tool to be used sparingly","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 3, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench of H.K. Hanjura, J., allowed a Writ Petition filed against the order of detention passed by the respondent authorities. The petitioner was already in custody in connection with a criminal case and this formed the basis for passing of a detention\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":211742,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/11\/mp-hc-prolonged-pre-trial-detention-is-an-anathema-to-the-concept-of-liberty-bail-granted\/","url_meta":{"origin":177214,"position":2},"title":"MP HC | Prolonged pre-trial detention is an anathema to the concept of liberty; bail granted","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 11, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: This petition was filed before the Bench of Sheel Nagu, J., fourth time under Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code for grant of bail where the prior bail application were rejected on merit and petitioner was given liberty to come again after the main prosecution witness\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":221843,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/07\/jk-hc-order-of-detention-under-j-k-public-safety-act-cannot-ordinarily-be-passed-merely-on-ground-that-an-accused-under-trial-was-out-on-bail\/","url_meta":{"origin":177214,"position":3},"title":"J&#038;K HC | Order of detention under J&#038;K Public Safety Act cannot ordinarily be passed, merely on ground that an accused under trial was out on bail","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 7, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: Ali Mohammad Magrey, J. allowed the application filed by the petitioner to free him from detention. The petitioner filed a Habeas Corpus petition against the order of detention, passed by the Respondent 2 who is the District Magistrate Baramulla, in exercise of powers conferred in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":216475,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/04\/mp-hc-early-conclusion-of-trial-a-bleak-possibility-and-prolonged-pre-trial-detention-an-anathema-to-the-concept-of-liberty-bail-granted-to-externed-accused\/","url_meta":{"origin":177214,"position":4},"title":"MP HC | \u2018Early conclusion of trial a bleak possibility and prolonged pre-trial detention an anathema to the concept of liberty\u2019; bail granted to externed accused","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 4, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: Vivek Rusia, J. dealt with a bail application where the petitioner sought bail for the offence under Section 14 of the State Security Act and thereby granted the said bail to the externed petitioner. The first bail application was filed under Section 439 CrPC by the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":256992,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/12\/jurisdiction-of-suspicion-regarding-order-of-preventive-detention\/","url_meta":{"origin":177214,"position":5},"title":"Cal HC | \u201dJurisdiction of suspicion\u201d regarding order of preventive detention, Court sets aside order, suggesting it to be construed strictly","author":"Editor","date":"November 12, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court: The Division Bench of Rabindranath Samanta and Soumen Sen, JJ., allowed a writ petition which was filed invoking the \u201cjurisdiction of suspicion\u201d in view of the order of detention passed by the Joint Secretary to the Government of India on 1st April, 2021 under Section 3(1) of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/177214","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=177214"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/177214\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=177214"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=177214"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=177214"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}