{"id":177024,"date":"2017-12-20T14:00:42","date_gmt":"2017-12-20T08:30:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=177024"},"modified":"2017-12-20T12:27:20","modified_gmt":"2017-12-20T06:57:20","slug":"ncdrc-no-medical-negligence-diagonosed-per-standard-medical-practice","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/20\/ncdrc-no-medical-negligence-diagonosed-per-standard-medical-practice\/","title":{"rendered":"NCDRC: No \u2018medical negligence\u2019 if diagonosed as per standard of medical practice"},"content":{"rendered":"

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi:<\/strong> In the order passed by Ajit Bharioke, S.M. Kantikar,J., for the complaint filed by plaintiff (patient\/minor) in order to seek compensation on the ground of alleged medical negligence on the part of treating doctor. The allegations being that the plaintiff was suffering from a serious disease and in the process of diagnosis his treatment was changed due to which his health had further deteriorated. The complaint was filed with further allegations of huge financial loss and mental agony.<\/p>\n

Reliance was placed on Supreme Court\u2019s decision in but after crucially examining the foregoing discussions and relying upon the medical literature and the legal precedence in the case of Dr. Laxman Baaalakrishna Joshi<\/em> v. Dr. Trimbak Bapu Godbole<\/em>, AIR 1969 SC128, A.S. Mittal<\/em> v. State of U.P.,\u00a0<\/em>AIR 1989 SC 1570 where it was laid down that \u201cwhen a doctor is consulted by a patient, the doctor owes certain duties :<\/p>\n

(a) duty of care in deciding whether to undertake the case;<\/p>\n

(b) duty of care in deciding what treatment to give; and<\/p>\n

(c) duty of care in the administration of that treatment.<\/p>\n

And a breach of any of the above may give a cause of action for negligence and the patient may on that basis recover damages from his doctor\u201d.<\/p>\n

Further reliance was placed on the Apex Court\u2019s judgment in Jacob Mathew<\/em> v. State of Punjab,<\/em>\u00a0AIR 2005 SCC 3180, where it was held that, \u201cthe complainant is required to prove that the doctor did something or failed to do something which in the given facts and circumstances, no medical professional in his ordinary senses and prudence would have done or failed to do\u201d.<\/p>\n

The Commission further observed that there was no medical negligence on the part of opposite party while treating the patient and the patient was properly taken care of by proper diagnosis, treatment and without any lapse, as per the reasonable and standard of medical practice. Hence, the complaint was not allowed. [Vaibhav Arora v. Sunil J. Parikh, Consumer Case No. 58 of 2003, decided on 12-12-2017]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi: In the order passed by Ajit Bharioke, S.M. Kantikar,J., for the complaint filed by plaintiff <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":199533,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-177024","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies"],"yoast_head":"\nNCDRC: No \u2018medical negligence\u2019 if diagonosed as per standard of medical practice | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/20\/ncdrc-no-medical-negligence-diagonosed-per-standard-medical-practice\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"NCDRC: No \u2018medical negligence\u2019 if diagonosed as per standard of medical practice\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi: In the order passed by Ajit Bharioke, S.M. Kantikar,J., for the complaint filed by plaintiff\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/20\/ncdrc-no-medical-negligence-diagonosed-per-standard-medical-practice\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-12-20T08:30:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/20\/ncdrc-no-medical-negligence-diagonosed-per-standard-medical-practice\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/20\/ncdrc-no-medical-negligence-diagonosed-per-standard-medical-practice\/\",\"name\":\"NCDRC: No \u2018medical negligence\u2019 if diagonosed as per standard of medical practice | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/20\/ncdrc-no-medical-negligence-diagonosed-per-standard-medical-practice\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/20\/ncdrc-no-medical-negligence-diagonosed-per-standard-medical-practice\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-12-20T08:30:42+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/20\/ncdrc-no-medical-negligence-diagonosed-per-standard-medical-practice\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/20\/ncdrc-no-medical-negligence-diagonosed-per-standard-medical-practice\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/20\/ncdrc-no-medical-negligence-diagonosed-per-standard-medical-practice\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887,\"caption\":\"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/20\/ncdrc-no-medical-negligence-diagonosed-per-standard-medical-practice\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"NCDRC: No \u2018medical negligence\u2019 if diagonosed as per standard of medical practice\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"NCDRC: No \u2018medical negligence\u2019 if diagonosed as per standard of medical practice | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/20\/ncdrc-no-medical-negligence-diagonosed-per-standard-medical-practice\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"NCDRC: No \u2018medical negligence\u2019 if diagonosed as per standard of medical practice","og_description":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi: In the order passed by Ajit Bharioke, S.M. Kantikar,J., for the complaint filed by plaintiff","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/20\/ncdrc-no-medical-negligence-diagonosed-per-standard-medical-practice\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-12-20T08:30:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/20\/ncdrc-no-medical-negligence-diagonosed-per-standard-medical-practice\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/20\/ncdrc-no-medical-negligence-diagonosed-per-standard-medical-practice\/","name":"NCDRC: No \u2018medical negligence\u2019 if diagonosed as per standard of medical practice | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/20\/ncdrc-no-medical-negligence-diagonosed-per-standard-medical-practice\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/20\/ncdrc-no-medical-negligence-diagonosed-per-standard-medical-practice\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","datePublished":"2017-12-20T08:30:42+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/20\/ncdrc-no-medical-negligence-diagonosed-per-standard-medical-practice\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/20\/ncdrc-no-medical-negligence-diagonosed-per-standard-medical-practice\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/20\/ncdrc-no-medical-negligence-diagonosed-per-standard-medical-practice\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","width":1330,"height":887,"caption":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/20\/ncdrc-no-medical-negligence-diagonosed-per-standard-medical-practice\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"NCDRC: No \u2018medical negligence\u2019 if diagonosed as per standard of medical practice"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":203359,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/09\/matters-of-medical-negligence-in-the-absence-of-allegations-of-fraud-or-forgery-are-amenable-to-the-jurisdiction-of-consumer-fora\/","url_meta":{"origin":177024,"position":0},"title":"Matters of medical negligence, in the absence of allegations of fraud or forgery, are amenable to the jurisdiction of consumer fora","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 9, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): A Division Bench of S.M. Kantikar and Dinesh Singh, Members, allowed an appeal filed against the order of Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission whereby the appellant\u2019s petition was dismissed at the stage of maintainability itself. The appellant had filed a complaint against the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":199904,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/08\/medical-negligence-not-proved-on-the-sole-ground-of-an-unsuccessful-sterilization-operation\/","url_meta":{"origin":177024,"position":1},"title":"Medical Negligence not proved on the sole ground of an unsuccessful sterilization operation","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 8, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Valmiki Mehta, J., allowed an appeal filed against the judgment of the trial court whereby the appellant Hospital was held liable for medical negligence. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent-plaintiff underwent a sterilization operation in Lok Nayak Hospital.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":283924,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/15\/fir-cannot-be-registered-on-complaint-guided-by-unsubstantiated-assumptions-only-to-satisfy-discontentment-with-treatment-of-child-tis-hazari-court-sets-aside-direction-to-register-fir-against-doctor\/","url_meta":{"origin":177024,"position":2},"title":"[Medical Negligence] FIR cannot be registered on complaint guided by unsubstantiated assumptions only to satisfy discontentment with the treatment of child; Tis Hazari Court sets aside Trial Court’s direction","author":"Editor","date":"February 15, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In a medical negligence case, the Tis Hazari Court held that since there was no justifiable reason to assume that the doctor committed any offence into the allegations made by the complainant, no FIR could be registered on the whims and fancies of the complainant guided by unfounded and unsubstantiated\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Tis Hazari Court, Delhi","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-375.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":294799,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/16\/no-medical-negligence-in-justice-verma-death-ncdrc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":177024,"position":3},"title":"Know why NCDRC rejected claim of medical negligence in Justice Verma’s death","author":"Ridhi","date":"June 16, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"NCDRC conveyed that \u201cWe have deep sympathies with the death of Justice Verma, but it cannot be ground for liability.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national consumer disputes redressal commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/national-consumer-disputes-redressal-commission.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/national-consumer-disputes-redressal-commission.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/national-consumer-disputes-redressal-commission.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/national-consumer-disputes-redressal-commission.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":216454,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/04\/kar-hc-cognizance-of-complaint-about-negligence-against-a-medical-practitioner-cannot-be-taken-without-obtaining-an-opinion-from-an-expert-doctor\/","url_meta":{"origin":177024,"position":4},"title":"Kar HC | Cognizance of complaint about negligence against a medical practitioner cannot be taken without obtaining an opinion from an expert doctor","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 4, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: Alok Aradhe, J. allowed a petition praying for quashing an order whereby the Principal Civil Judge took cognizance of an alleged negligent act against a doctor; on the grounds of violation of the due process of law and action being barred by limitation. The petitioner, a medical\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":273664,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/14\/karnataka-high-court-allegations-forcible-sex-change-operation-matter-considered-in-trial-not-by-high-courts-legal-news-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":177024,"position":5},"title":"Karnataka HC dismisses quashment petition concerning allegations of forcible sex change operation; says matter should be strictly left open for trial","author":"Editor","date":"September 14, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: While deciding the instant petition for quashment of complaint, the Bench of Suraj Govindaraj, J., held that in the instant case where it has been alleged that the petitioner (a doctor) had conducted the sex change operation upon a minor without their consent, such allegations are not\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Karnataka High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Karnataka-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Karnataka-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Karnataka-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Karnataka-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Karnataka-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/177024","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=177024"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/177024\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/199533"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=177024"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=177024"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=177024"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}