{"id":169364,"date":"2017-11-17T13:17:07","date_gmt":"2017-11-17T07:47:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=169364"},"modified":"2017-11-17T13:22:38","modified_gmt":"2017-11-17T07:52:38","slug":"government-cannot-allowed-take-advantage-its-own-failure-making-appointments-deny-statutorily-recognized-right","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/17\/government-cannot-allowed-take-advantage-its-own-failure-making-appointments-deny-statutorily-recognized-right\/","title":{"rendered":"Government cannot be allowed to take advantage of its own failure in making appointments and deny statutorily recognized right"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Punjab and Haryana High Court:<\/strong> The petitioner appeared before the High Court praying she was being denied child care leave on the ground that there are insufficient number of Medical Specialists available in the ESI Hospital at Jagadhari, with only one other Medical Specialist available other than the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court noted down the fact that Rule 46 of the Haryana Civil Services (Leaves), 2016, stipulates in sub-rule 2 thereof that child care leave shall not be demanded as a matter of right and also, sub-rule 11 stipulates that child care leave would not be granted if it disrupts the functioning of offices\/institutions\/schools etc. The main reason to deny the leave was that there were no replacements available for the post of petitioner and to this, the Bench of Amol Rattan Singh, J. opined that the government cannot be allowed to take advantage of its own fault by denying a statutorily recognized right of anyone.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the instant case, petitioners\u2019 daughter was studying in Class 12 which the Court said is undoubtedly a very crucial year in the life of a school going child and therefore, the stand taken by respondents was termed wholly irrational and unacceptable. Finally, the Court allowed the petition and ordered the grant of child care leave within next 15 days and advised the respondents to engage a doctor on contract basis if required. [Dr. Kanchan Bala v. State of Haryana, CWP No. 21506 of 2017, decided on 10.10.2017]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab and Haryana High Court: The petitioner appeared before the High Court praying she was being denied child care leave on the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[5713,25004],"class_list":["post-169364","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-child-care-leave","tag-statutorily-recognized-right"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Government cannot be allowed to take advantage of its own failure in making appointments and deny statutorily recognized right | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/17\/government-cannot-allowed-take-advantage-its-own-failure-making-appointments-deny-statutorily-recognized-right\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Government cannot be allowed to take advantage of its own failure in making appointments and deny statutorily recognized right\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Punjab and Haryana High Court: The petitioner appeared before the High Court praying she was being denied child care leave on the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/17\/government-cannot-allowed-take-advantage-its-own-failure-making-appointments-deny-statutorily-recognized-right\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-11-17T07:47:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-11-17T07:52:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/panjab_and_hariyana_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/17\/government-cannot-allowed-take-advantage-its-own-failure-making-appointments-deny-statutorily-recognized-right\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/17\/government-cannot-allowed-take-advantage-its-own-failure-making-appointments-deny-statutorily-recognized-right\/\",\"name\":\"Government cannot be allowed to take advantage of its own failure in making appointments and deny statutorily recognized right | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-11-17T07:47:07+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-17T07:52:38+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/17\/government-cannot-allowed-take-advantage-its-own-failure-making-appointments-deny-statutorily-recognized-right\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/17\/government-cannot-allowed-take-advantage-its-own-failure-making-appointments-deny-statutorily-recognized-right\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/17\/government-cannot-allowed-take-advantage-its-own-failure-making-appointments-deny-statutorily-recognized-right\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Government cannot be allowed to take advantage of its own failure in making appointments and deny statutorily recognized right\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Government cannot be allowed to take advantage of its own failure in making appointments and deny statutorily recognized right | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/17\/government-cannot-allowed-take-advantage-its-own-failure-making-appointments-deny-statutorily-recognized-right\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Government cannot be allowed to take advantage of its own failure in making appointments and deny statutorily recognized right","og_description":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: The petitioner appeared before the High Court praying she was being denied child care leave on the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/17\/government-cannot-allowed-take-advantage-its-own-failure-making-appointments-deny-statutorily-recognized-right\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-11-17T07:47:07+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-11-17T07:52:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/panjab_and_hariyana_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/17\/government-cannot-allowed-take-advantage-its-own-failure-making-appointments-deny-statutorily-recognized-right\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/17\/government-cannot-allowed-take-advantage-its-own-failure-making-appointments-deny-statutorily-recognized-right\/","name":"Government cannot be allowed to take advantage of its own failure in making appointments and deny statutorily recognized right | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-11-17T07:47:07+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-17T07:52:38+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/17\/government-cannot-allowed-take-advantage-its-own-failure-making-appointments-deny-statutorily-recognized-right\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/17\/government-cannot-allowed-take-advantage-its-own-failure-making-appointments-deny-statutorily-recognized-right\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/17\/government-cannot-allowed-take-advantage-its-own-failure-making-appointments-deny-statutorily-recognized-right\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Government cannot be allowed to take advantage of its own failure in making appointments and deny statutorily recognized right"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":341832,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/19\/child-care-leave-is-akin-to-privileged-leave-not-unfettered-right-and-subject-to-administrative-discretion-raj-hc-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":169364,"position":0},"title":"Child Care Leave is akin to privileged leave subject to administrative discretion, not unfettered right: Rajasthan High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"February 19, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cDiscretion is reserved with the authority empowered to grant leave to refuse or revoke leave at any time according to the exigencies of the public service.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":320798,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/25\/supreme-court-directs-himachal-pradesh-govt-reconsider-grant-child-care-leaves-mothers-special-provisions-rpwd-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":169364,"position":1},"title":"Supreme Court directs Himachal Pradesh Govt. to reconsider grant of Child Care leaves to mothers, including making special provisions consistent with RPwD Act","author":"Apoorva","date":"April 25, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Participation of women in the work force is not a matter of privilege, but a constitutional entitlement protected by Articles 14, 15 and 21 of the Constitution; besides Article 19(1)(g).","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Child Care leave","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Child-Care-leave.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Child-Care-leave.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Child-Care-leave.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Child-Care-leave.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":47681,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/19\/state-government-ordered-to-set-up-state-coordination-committee-in-order-to-decide-granting-benefit-of-child-care-leave\/","url_meta":{"origin":169364,"position":2},"title":"State Government directed to set up State Coordination Committee in order to decide granting benefit of child care leave","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 19, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: While deciding a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":355872,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/06\/maternity-leave-to-female-government-employee-for-third-child-hp-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":169364,"position":3},"title":"Himachal Pradesh HC allows maternity leave to female government employee for her third child; reiterates stand taken by SC in K. Umadevi [2025]","author":"Editor","date":"August 6, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe petitioner had given birth to her two children prior to her induction in service but her prayer\u00a0for maternity leave, though for her third child, came to be made for the first time during the service.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"third child maternity leave","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/third-child-maternity-leave.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/third-child-maternity-leave.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/third-child-maternity-leave.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/third-child-maternity-leave.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":325818,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/05\/commissioning-mother-begotten-child-through-surrogacy-entitled-to-maternity-leave-orissa-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":169364,"position":4},"title":"A commissioning mother, who begotten child through surrogacy is entitled to maternity leave and other benefits: Orissa High Court","author":"Editor","date":"July 5, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA child born out of surrogacy to be treated in the similar manner as a child born out of the natural process and provide the commissioning mother with all the benefits provided thereto.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Orissa High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":199557,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/03\/rule-turning-down-maternity-leave-for-third-child-held-unconstitutional-uttaranchal-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":169364,"position":5},"title":"Rule turning down \u2018Maternity leave\u2019 for third child held unconstitutional: Uttaranchal HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 3, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Rajiv Sharma J., decided that the proviso second of the Fundamental Rule 153 of the U.P. Fundamental Rules be struck down as it declines to grant maternity leave to a woman for her third child. In accordance to the facts of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/169364","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=169364"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/169364\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=169364"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=169364"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=169364"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}