{"id":169274,"date":"2017-11-16T15:34:30","date_gmt":"2017-11-16T10:04:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=169274"},"modified":"2017-11-16T15:34:30","modified_gmt":"2017-11-16T10:04:30","slug":"injunction-granted-suit-passing-off-grounds-phonetic-similarity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/16\/injunction-granted-suit-passing-off-grounds-phonetic-similarity\/","title":{"rendered":"Injunction granted in a suit for passing off on grounds of phonetic similarity"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Karnataka High Court:<\/strong> A Single Judge Bench comprising of Raghvendra S. Chauhan, J., while deciding a regular first appeal, upheld the decision of the learned Trial Judge whereby he granted a permanent injunction in favor of the respondent, restraining the appellant from using the trade name which was already used by the respondent.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The appellant contended that the food joints of the respondent were prefixed by the name \u2018Vasudeva\u2019 and as such they have earned recognition as \u2018Vasudev Adiga\u2019 and the appellant was using the name \u2018Adiga\u2019s\u2019 and as such there was no similarity in the two names. The appellant, therefore, contended that the Trial Court was unjustified in concluding that there was phonetic similarity between the two names. They also contended that both the appellants and the respondents are selling different goods altogether, the appellant being the seller of sweets and the respondents being the seller of fast foods.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The High Court discussed the law dealing with infringement and passing off of trademarks. It was observed that consumer protection is essential for smooth functioning of commercial world and therefore the consumers should not be confused between the products of different sellers. While dealing with the issue of \u2018deceptive similarity\u2019, the Court held that it is not only the image that matters, but phonetic similarity between two names is also a factor to be considered. It was discussed that the factors to be considered in such a matter include nature of marks, degree of resemblance, phonetic similarity, nature of goods, class of consumers, etc. It was also observed that while purchasing a good, a consumer keeps a brand name in his mind and takes an unconscious decision within split seconds and a likelihood of confusion is most possible.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court perused the record and found that both parties were dealing in similar kind of goods- food items. The phonetic similarity between the common names ADIGA was a major factor to be considered while dealing with a case of passing off. The respondent earned a long standing goodwill in the market for its food items and the appellant entered the market much after the respondents. Given the phonetic similarity between the two names, there was a high probability of confusion in the minds of consumers.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Therefore, based on the fact finding and the law discussed as above, the High Court held that the appellant was passing off his goods as that of the respondent\u2019s. Accordingly the impugned order was upheld and the appeal was dismissed. [Adiga Sweets v. Vasudeva Adigas Fast Food (P) Ltd., RFA No. 17 of 2014, order dated 9.11.2017]<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Raghvendra S. Chauhan, J., while deciding a regular first appeal, upheld the decision <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[24984,24974],"class_list":["post-169274","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-phonetic-similarity","tag-trade-name"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Injunction granted in a suit for passing off on grounds of phonetic similarity | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/16\/injunction-granted-suit-passing-off-grounds-phonetic-similarity\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Injunction granted in a suit for passing off on grounds of phonetic similarity\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Karnataka High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Raghvendra S. Chauhan, J., while deciding a regular first appeal, upheld the decision\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/16\/injunction-granted-suit-passing-off-grounds-phonetic-similarity\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-11-16T10:04:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/16\/injunction-granted-suit-passing-off-grounds-phonetic-similarity\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/16\/injunction-granted-suit-passing-off-grounds-phonetic-similarity\/\",\"name\":\"Injunction granted in a suit for passing off on grounds of phonetic similarity | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-11-16T10:04:30+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/16\/injunction-granted-suit-passing-off-grounds-phonetic-similarity\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/16\/injunction-granted-suit-passing-off-grounds-phonetic-similarity\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/16\/injunction-granted-suit-passing-off-grounds-phonetic-similarity\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Injunction granted in a suit for passing off on grounds of phonetic similarity\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Injunction granted in a suit for passing off on grounds of phonetic similarity | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/16\/injunction-granted-suit-passing-off-grounds-phonetic-similarity\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Injunction granted in a suit for passing off on grounds of phonetic similarity","og_description":"Karnataka High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Raghvendra S. Chauhan, J., while deciding a regular first appeal, upheld the decision","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/16\/injunction-granted-suit-passing-off-grounds-phonetic-similarity\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-11-16T10:04:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/16\/injunction-granted-suit-passing-off-grounds-phonetic-similarity\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/16\/injunction-granted-suit-passing-off-grounds-phonetic-similarity\/","name":"Injunction granted in a suit for passing off on grounds of phonetic similarity | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-11-16T10:04:30+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/16\/injunction-granted-suit-passing-off-grounds-phonetic-similarity\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/16\/injunction-granted-suit-passing-off-grounds-phonetic-similarity\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/16\/injunction-granted-suit-passing-off-grounds-phonetic-similarity\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Injunction granted in a suit for passing off on grounds of phonetic similarity"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":339537,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/22\/bharat-gate-deceptively-similar-to-india-gate-delhi-high-court-restores-injunction-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":169274,"position":0},"title":"BHARAT GATE mark is deceptively similar to INDIA GATE; Delhi High Court restores injunction","author":"Arunima","date":"January 22, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The marks INDIA GATE and BHARAT GATE convey the same meaning and the difference in trade dress between the marks as visually depicted on the packages of the appellant\u2019s and respondent\u2019s products would not mitigate the confusion created by the infringement.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":366158,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/10\/bom-hc-sets-aside-injunction-in-popcorn-trade-mark-dispute\/","url_meta":{"origin":169274,"position":1},"title":"Bombay High Court sets aside injunction in trade mark dispute between SNN and UP-based popcorn maize seller","author":"Editor","date":"November 10, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe distinctive features should be discussed in order to decide as to whether the two packets\/trade dresses, viewed as a whole, would cause confusion in the mind of end consumers or not.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"popcorn trade mark dispute","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/popcorn-trade-mark-dispute.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/popcorn-trade-mark-dispute.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/popcorn-trade-mark-dispute.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/popcorn-trade-mark-dispute.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":307439,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/18\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-refuses-to-pass-temporary-injunction-in-trademark-infringement-suit-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":169274,"position":2},"title":"Blenders Pride v. London Pride | \u201cNo prima facie case\u201d; Madhya Pradesh High Court refuses to pass temporary injunction in trademark infringement suit","author":"Ritu","date":"November 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA consumer going into the market to purchase premium\/ultra-premium whisky will not be confused by the word \u2018Pride\u2019 in the name of any brand. The mark has to be compared as a whole.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":292982,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/24\/conduct-phonetic-search-of-a-mark-even-at-the-preliminary-stage-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":169274,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court directs Trade Mark Registry to conduct phonetic search of a mark even at the preliminary stage","author":"Simranjeet","date":"May 24, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"When an application is submitted for registration of a mark which involves a word, then, even at the preliminary stage, a word mark search as well as a phonetic search shall be conducted, so that the possible marks which are phonetically similar to the mark applied for, are thrown up\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":274022,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/20\/delhi-high-court-grants-ad-interim-injunction-against-tensberg-having-phonetic-similarity-with-carlsberg\/","url_meta":{"origin":169274,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court grants ad-interim injunction against Tensberg having phonetic similarity with Carlsberg","author":"Editor","date":"September 20, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The advertisements on the Facebook page and YouTube channel alone, in my prima facie opinion, cannot be sufficient to deny the plaintiff its statutory rights as a registered proprietor of the mark.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Delhi-High-Court-grants-ad-interim-injunction-against-Tensberg-having-phonetic-similarity-with-Carlsberg-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Delhi-High-Court-grants-ad-interim-injunction-against-Tensberg-having-phonetic-similarity-with-Carlsberg-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Delhi-High-Court-grants-ad-interim-injunction-against-Tensberg-having-phonetic-similarity-with-Carlsberg-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Delhi-High-Court-grants-ad-interim-injunction-against-Tensberg-having-phonetic-similarity-with-Carlsberg-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Delhi-High-Court-grants-ad-interim-injunction-against-Tensberg-having-phonetic-similarity-with-Carlsberg-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":371012,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/26\/bom-hc-vacates-injunction-raciraft-esiraft-not-deceptively-similar\/","url_meta":{"origin":169274,"position":5},"title":"Bombay HC finds no deceptive similarity between &#8220;RACIRAFT&#8221; and &#8220;EsiRaft&#8221;; Vacates interim injunction","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"December 26, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWell settled principles for assessing the deceptive similarity lays emphasis on visual appearance as well as the phonetic similarity i.e. that the marks have to be judged by the eye as well as the ear.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"not deceptively similar","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/not-deceptively-similar.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/not-deceptively-similar.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/not-deceptively-similar.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/not-deceptively-similar.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/169274","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=169274"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/169274\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=169274"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=169274"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=169274"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}