{"id":168434,"date":"2017-11-15T11:04:38","date_gmt":"2017-11-15T05:34:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=168434"},"modified":"2017-11-15T11:10:11","modified_gmt":"2017-11-15T05:40:11","slug":"judgment-passed-without-discussion-issues-rationale-not-judgment-understood-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/15\/judgment-passed-without-discussion-issues-rationale-not-judgment-understood-law\/","title":{"rendered":"A \u2018judgment\u2019 passed without discussion of issues and rationale is not a judgment as is understood in law"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:<\/strong> A Single Judge Bench dismissed objections filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against an award in an appeal before it.<\/p>\n

Upon analysis the Court found that the impugned judgment did not resemble a judgment as it did not include discussion upon issues and the rationale for the decision the court took. The impugned order had only referred to the law under Section 34 with the observation that the court is satisfied that the objections filed did not come within the scope of Section 34 of the Act.<\/p>\n

The Court referred to Harbhajan Kaur Bhatia<\/em> v. M\/s Aadya Trading & Investment Pvt. Ltd<\/em>.,\u00a0 2017 SCC OnLine Del 9176<\/a>, and held that the impugned judgment was not a judgment as can be said in law, setting it aside. The Court remanded the matter before the District and Sessions Judge, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi for proper disposal. Appeal allowed. [India Infoline Ltd. v. Santosh Kumar Saxena,\u00a0 2017 SCC OnLine Del 11254<\/a>, decided on 30.10.2017]<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench dismissed objections filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against an <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[24864,12981,24874],"class_list":["post-168434","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-issues","tag-judgment","tag-rationale"],"yoast_head":"\nA \u2018judgment\u2019 passed without discussion of issues and rationale is not a judgment as is understood in law | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/15\/judgment-passed-without-discussion-issues-rationale-not-judgment-understood-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"A \u2018judgment\u2019 passed without discussion of issues and rationale is not a judgment as is understood in law\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench dismissed objections filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against an\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/15\/judgment-passed-without-discussion-issues-rationale-not-judgment-understood-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-11-15T05:34:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-11-15T05:40:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/11\\\/15\\\/judgment-passed-without-discussion-issues-rationale-not-judgment-understood-law\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/11\\\/15\\\/judgment-passed-without-discussion-issues-rationale-not-judgment-understood-law\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Saba\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"headline\":\"A \u2018judgment\u2019 passed without discussion of issues and rationale is not a judgment as is understood in law\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-11-15T05:34:38+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-15T05:40:11+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/11\\\/15\\\/judgment-passed-without-discussion-issues-rationale-not-judgment-understood-law\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":181,\"commentCount\":0,\"keywords\":[\"Issues\",\"judgment\",\"rationale\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/11\\\/15\\\/judgment-passed-without-discussion-issues-rationale-not-judgment-understood-law\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/11\\\/15\\\/judgment-passed-without-discussion-issues-rationale-not-judgment-understood-law\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/11\\\/15\\\/judgment-passed-without-discussion-issues-rationale-not-judgment-understood-law\\\/\",\"name\":\"A \u2018judgment\u2019 passed without discussion of issues and rationale is not a judgment as is understood in law | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-11-15T05:34:38+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-15T05:40:11+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/11\\\/15\\\/judgment-passed-without-discussion-issues-rationale-not-judgment-understood-law\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/11\\\/15\\\/judgment-passed-without-discussion-issues-rationale-not-judgment-understood-law\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/11\\\/15\\\/judgment-passed-without-discussion-issues-rationale-not-judgment-understood-law\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"A \u2018judgment\u2019 passed without discussion of issues and rationale is not a judgment as is understood in law\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_2\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"A \u2018judgment\u2019 passed without discussion of issues and rationale is not a judgment as is understood in law | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/15\/judgment-passed-without-discussion-issues-rationale-not-judgment-understood-law\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"A \u2018judgment\u2019 passed without discussion of issues and rationale is not a judgment as is understood in law","og_description":"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench dismissed objections filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against an","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/15\/judgment-passed-without-discussion-issues-rationale-not-judgment-understood-law\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-11-15T05:34:38+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-11-15T05:40:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/15\/judgment-passed-without-discussion-issues-rationale-not-judgment-understood-law\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/15\/judgment-passed-without-discussion-issues-rationale-not-judgment-understood-law\/"},"author":{"name":"Saba","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"headline":"A \u2018judgment\u2019 passed without discussion of issues and rationale is not a judgment as is understood in law","datePublished":"2017-11-15T05:34:38+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-15T05:40:11+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/15\/judgment-passed-without-discussion-issues-rationale-not-judgment-understood-law\/"},"wordCount":181,"commentCount":0,"keywords":["Issues","judgment","rationale"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/15\/judgment-passed-without-discussion-issues-rationale-not-judgment-understood-law\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/15\/judgment-passed-without-discussion-issues-rationale-not-judgment-understood-law\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/15\/judgment-passed-without-discussion-issues-rationale-not-judgment-understood-law\/","name":"A \u2018judgment\u2019 passed without discussion of issues and rationale is not a judgment as is understood in law | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-11-15T05:34:38+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-15T05:40:11+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/15\/judgment-passed-without-discussion-issues-rationale-not-judgment-understood-law\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/15\/judgment-passed-without-discussion-issues-rationale-not-judgment-understood-law\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/15\/judgment-passed-without-discussion-issues-rationale-not-judgment-understood-law\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"A \u2018judgment\u2019 passed without discussion of issues and rationale is not a judgment as is understood in law"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":207210,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/25\/court-has-minimal-scope-of-interference-under-section-34-of-ac-act-where-tribunals-award-based-on-findings-of-fact\/","url_meta":{"origin":168434,"position":0},"title":"Court has minimal scope of interference under Section 34 of A&C Act where tribunal’s award based on findings of fact","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 25, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench comprising of A.K. Chawla and S. Ravindra Bhat, JJ. ruled that Single Judge of the High Court could not have justly interfered with the arbitral award passed by the tribunal which was primarily based on findings of fact. The appellant was aggrieved by the judgment\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":256081,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/26\/law-on-duty-of-appellate-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":168434,"position":1},"title":"Law on Duty of Appellate Court | Reasons, an essential feature of a judgment? Is there a link covered under reasons in Judgment? Read on","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 26, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: While stating the well-settled law that even when an appellate Court affirms the order of the Court below, it has to adjudicate on the issues which arise in the appeal, Subramonium Prasad, J., emphasized why reasons laid down in a judgment are essential and in view of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":239106,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/14\/interlocutory-orders-stay-of-trial-proceedings-and-inherent-powers-a-discussion-on-asian-resurfacing-of-road-agency-p-ltd-v-cbi\/","url_meta":{"origin":168434,"position":2},"title":"Interlocutory Orders, Stay of Trial Proceedings and Inherent Powers: A discussion on \u2018Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency (P) \u00a0Ltd. v. CBI\u2019","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 14, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"by Abhinav Sharma & Prajwal Shukla*","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-qoute-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-qoute-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-qoute-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-qoute-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-qoute-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":290178,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/20\/delhi-high-court-states-that-conclusive-foreign-judgment-would-be-enforceable-in-india-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":168434,"position":3},"title":"Conclusive foreign judgment would be enforceable in India: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"April 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court held that the judgement passed by the High Court of England was conclusive and would not fall within the exceptions carved out in Section 13 of CPC and was thus, found to be duly executable in India","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":248353,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/18\/shared-household\/","url_meta":{"origin":168434,"position":4},"title":"Del HC | \u2018Permanency\u2019 as an element of \u2018Shared Household\u2019 concept under Domestic Violence Act: Can old-aged parents-in-law be restrained from selling their house in light of shared household consequences? Read Court\u2019s proposition","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 18, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Suresh Kumar Kait, J., dealt with the provisions in regard to the concept of the shared household while referring to a very pertinent decision of the Supreme Court. In the instant case, the petitioner is stated to be the daughter-in-law and respondents her parents-in-law. It has been\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":245659,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/16\/rti-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":168434,"position":5},"title":"Utt HC | Delay in providing information under RTI Act does not amount to penalty, if valid reasons for the delay are proved; Court sets aside the penalty","author":"Editor","date":"March 16, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J., partly allowed an appeal which was filed challenging an order passed by the State Information Commissioner by which a penalty of 25,000 had been imposed upon the petitioner for not providing timely information to respondent 2. The application, under Section 6 (1) of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/168434","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=168434"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/168434\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=168434"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=168434"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=168434"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}