{"id":166643,"date":"2017-11-01T14:42:40","date_gmt":"2017-11-01T09:12:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=166643"},"modified":"2017-11-01T14:42:40","modified_gmt":"2017-11-01T09:12:40","slug":"special-police-officer-mandated-s-132-immoral-traffic-prevention-act-1956-cannot-rank-inspector-police","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/01\/special-police-officer-mandated-s-132-immoral-traffic-prevention-act-1956-cannot-rank-inspector-police\/","title":{"rendered":"Special Police Officer as mandated by S. 13(2) of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 cannot be below the rank of Inspector of Police"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Karnataka High Court:<\/strong> While deciding a criminal petition filed under Section 482 of CrPC, a Single Judge Bench comprising of Aravind Kumar, J. allowed the petition and quashed the proceedings pending against the petitioner on the file of Civil Judge.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A case was registered against the petitioner for the offences punishable under Sections 3(2B), 5(1), 5(D) 4 and 7 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the filing of charge-sheet and conducting of investigation was by a person who was not competent to do so under the ITP Act, and such the proceedings against the petitioner may be quashed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The High Court perused the record and submissions made by the parties and found that the charge-sheet was filed by a Sub-Inspector of Police. However, as per the mandate of<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/6cKfpQg5\"> Section 13(2)<\/a> of the said Act, a \u2018Special Police Officer\u2019 cannot be below the rank of Inspector of Police. The Court was of the view that where the investigation had been conducted, completed and concluded by an officer who was not competent to do so, such proceedings were liable to be quashed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Accordingly, the petition was allowed, the proceedings pending against the petitioner were quashed, and he was acquitted of the offences punishable under the abovesaid sections. [Rajeev K. v. State of Karnataka, Criminal Petition No. 6124 of 2017, order dated 16.10.2017]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court: While deciding a criminal petition filed under Section 482 of CrPC, a Single Judge Bench comprising of Aravind Kumar, <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[24514,2583,24524,24534],"class_list":["post-166643","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-immoral-traffic-prevention-act","tag-Investigation","tag-s-132","tag-special-officer"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Special Police Officer as mandated by S. 13(2) of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 cannot be below the rank of Inspector of Police | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/01\/special-police-officer-mandated-s-132-immoral-traffic-prevention-act-1956-cannot-rank-inspector-police\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Special Police Officer as mandated by S. 13(2) of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 cannot be below the rank of Inspector of Police\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Karnataka High Court: While deciding a criminal petition filed under Section 482 of CrPC, a Single Judge Bench comprising of Aravind Kumar,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/01\/special-police-officer-mandated-s-132-immoral-traffic-prevention-act-1956-cannot-rank-inspector-police\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-11-01T09:12:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/01\/special-police-officer-mandated-s-132-immoral-traffic-prevention-act-1956-cannot-rank-inspector-police\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/01\/special-police-officer-mandated-s-132-immoral-traffic-prevention-act-1956-cannot-rank-inspector-police\/\",\"name\":\"Special Police Officer as mandated by S. 13(2) of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 cannot be below the rank of Inspector of Police | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-11-01T09:12:40+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/01\/special-police-officer-mandated-s-132-immoral-traffic-prevention-act-1956-cannot-rank-inspector-police\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/01\/special-police-officer-mandated-s-132-immoral-traffic-prevention-act-1956-cannot-rank-inspector-police\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/01\/special-police-officer-mandated-s-132-immoral-traffic-prevention-act-1956-cannot-rank-inspector-police\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Special Police Officer as mandated by S. 13(2) of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 cannot be below the rank of Inspector of Police\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Special Police Officer as mandated by S. 13(2) of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 cannot be below the rank of Inspector of Police | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/01\/special-police-officer-mandated-s-132-immoral-traffic-prevention-act-1956-cannot-rank-inspector-police\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Special Police Officer as mandated by S. 13(2) of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 cannot be below the rank of Inspector of Police","og_description":"Karnataka High Court: While deciding a criminal petition filed under Section 482 of CrPC, a Single Judge Bench comprising of Aravind Kumar,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/01\/special-police-officer-mandated-s-132-immoral-traffic-prevention-act-1956-cannot-rank-inspector-police\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-11-01T09:12:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/01\/special-police-officer-mandated-s-132-immoral-traffic-prevention-act-1956-cannot-rank-inspector-police\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/01\/special-police-officer-mandated-s-132-immoral-traffic-prevention-act-1956-cannot-rank-inspector-police\/","name":"Special Police Officer as mandated by S. 13(2) of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 cannot be below the rank of Inspector of Police | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-11-01T09:12:40+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/01\/special-police-officer-mandated-s-132-immoral-traffic-prevention-act-1956-cannot-rank-inspector-police\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/01\/special-police-officer-mandated-s-132-immoral-traffic-prevention-act-1956-cannot-rank-inspector-police\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/01\/special-police-officer-mandated-s-132-immoral-traffic-prevention-act-1956-cannot-rank-inspector-police\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Special Police Officer as mandated by S. 13(2) of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 cannot be below the rank of Inspector of Police"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":376972,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/27\/proceedings-against-brothel-customer-quashed-finding-no-inducement-of-prostitution-ker-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":166643,"position":0},"title":"Kerala HC quashes criminal proceedings against brothel customer after finding no inducement of prostitution","author":"Sunaina","date":"February 27, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cSection 3, Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 deals with the punishment for keeping a brothel or allowing premises to be used as a brothel, and the said provision has no application to the petitioner who is alleged to be merely a customer.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"no inducement of prostitution","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/no-inducement-of-prostitution.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/no-inducement-of-prostitution.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/no-inducement-of-prostitution.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/no-inducement-of-prostitution.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":176934,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/19\/customers-brothel-house-not-offenders-immoral-traffic-prevention-act-1956\/","url_meta":{"origin":166643,"position":1},"title":"Customers in a brothel house are not offenders under the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956","author":"Saba","date":"December 19, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: A criminal petition was filed under Section 482 CrPC to quash the proceedings in a criminal case filed under the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956, where a Single Judge Bench comprising of K.N. Phaneendra, J. held that the offences under ITP Act or under Section 370\u00a0 IPC\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":265419,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/15\/customers-caught-in-brothel-cannot-be-prosecuted-for-immoral-trafficking\/","url_meta":{"origin":166643,"position":2},"title":"Kar HC | Customers caught in brothel cannot be prosecuted for immoral trafficking under Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, 1956","author":"Editor","date":"April 15, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: M Nagaprasanna J. allowed the criminal petition and quashed the proceedings in Crime No.347\/2021 pending before the 32nd Additional CMM Court, Bangalore The facts of the case are such that the petitioner was a customer in the brothel when the search was conducted by the respondent police.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Karnataka High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":207715,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/07\/madras-hc-grants-relief-to-indonesian-spa-therapist-booked-under-immoral-traffic-prevention-act-rebukes-police-for-colourable-exercise-of-power\/","url_meta":{"origin":166643,"position":3},"title":"Madras HC | Relief to Indonesian spa therapist booked under Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act; Police rebuked for colourable exercise of power","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 7, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cUrgent need to get out of the preconditioned mind of the majority who unfortunately see Spas and Massage Centres as brothel houses.\u201d Madras High Court: The Bench of N. Anand Venkatesh, J. allowed a petition filed by a spa therapist against her illegal confinement and quashed cases filed against owners\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":279678,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/15\/can-a-customer-in-a-brothel-be-proceeded-against-criminally-under-the-immoral-traffic-prevention-act-1956-kerala-high-court-answers-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":166643,"position":4},"title":"Can a \u2018customer\u2019 in a brothel be proceeded against criminally under the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956; Kerala High Court answers","author":"Editor","date":"December 15, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court held that the words \u2018person with whom such prostitution is carried on\u2019 as appearing in section 7(1) of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 will include a \u2018customer\u2019. Thus, a customer in a brothel can be proceeded against criminally.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-310.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":201920,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/18\/taking-the-services-of-a-prostitute-cannot-be-penalized-under-ipc-and-immoral-traffic-prevention-act-karnataka-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":166643,"position":5},"title":"Taking the services of a prostitute cannot be penalized under IPC and Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act: Karnataka High Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 18, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of K.N. Phaneendra, J. allowed a petition wherein the bench stated that a customer encouraging the services of a prostitute cannot be held liable for any prosecution. The petition was filed under Section 482 of CrPC in order to quash the entire\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/166643","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=166643"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/166643\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=166643"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=166643"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=166643"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}