{"id":166104,"date":"2017-10-31T12:40:32","date_gmt":"2017-10-31T07:10:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=166104"},"modified":"2017-10-31T12:44:16","modified_gmt":"2017-10-31T07:14:16","slug":"margin-error-age-ascertained-radiological-examination-can-3-years-either-side","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/31\/margin-error-age-ascertained-radiological-examination-can-3-years-either-side\/","title":{"rendered":"Margin of error in age ascertained by radiological examination can be 3 years on either side"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>High Court of Himachal Pradesh:<\/strong> A Single Judge Bench of Chander Bhusan Barowalia, J. allowed a criminal appeal and acquitted the appellant-accused of the charges under Sections 363, 366A, and 376 of IPC, giving him the benefit of doubt as to the age of the prosecutrix.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It was alleged that the prosecutrix was a minor and the appellant took her away on the pretext of marrying her and had sexual intercourse with her. The appellant was charged and convicted by the trial court under the above-mentioned sections. Learned counsel for the appellant, inter alia, contended that the court below failed to take into consideration the fact that as per the prosecutrix, her age was more than 17 years. And even as per the radiological examination the bony age of the prosecutrix was 15-and-half years, so there was a possibility of three years plus-minus and there was a possibility that her age was over 18 years.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The High Court perused the material on record and decisions of the Supreme Court as cited by the parties, and relying on <em>Modi\u2019s Medical Jurisprudence and Toxicology<\/em>, held that plus three can be given in normal circumstances, considering extreme climatic conditions, viz. place of living and other circumstances. In the instant case the prosecutrix grew up in extreme climatic conditions and the available record showed that she was more than 15 years of age at the time of incidence; thus applying the above-mentioned method, there was a possibility that her age was more than 18 years. Accordingly, benefit of doubt was given to the appellant and the appeal was allowed. The appellant-accused was acquitted of all the charges.\u00a0 [Aneep Kumar v. State of H.P.,<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/7Q2s5rgL\"> 2017 SCC OnLine HP 1528<\/a>, order dated 11.09.2017]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>High Court of Himachal Pradesh: A Single Judge Bench of Chander Bhusan Barowalia, J. allowed a criminal appeal and acquitted the appellant-accused <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":222107,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[24374,24404,24384,24394],"class_list":["post-166104","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-determination-of-age","tag-modis-medical-jurisprudence-and-toxicology","tag-prosecutrix","tag-radiological-examination"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Margin of error in age ascertained by radiological examination can be 3 years on either side | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/31\/margin-error-age-ascertained-radiological-examination-can-3-years-either-side\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Margin of error in age ascertained by radiological examination can be 3 years on either side\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"High Court of Himachal Pradesh: A Single Judge Bench of Chander Bhusan Barowalia, J. allowed a criminal appeal and acquitted the appellant-accused\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/31\/margin-error-age-ascertained-radiological-examination-can-3-years-either-side\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-10-31T07:10:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-10-31T07:14:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/10\\\/31\\\/margin-error-age-ascertained-radiological-examination-can-3-years-either-side\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/10\\\/31\\\/margin-error-age-ascertained-radiological-examination-can-3-years-either-side\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Saba\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"headline\":\"Margin of error in age ascertained by radiological examination can be 3 years on either side\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-10-31T07:10:32+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-31T07:14:16+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/10\\\/31\\\/margin-error-age-ascertained-radiological-examination-can-3-years-either-side\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":295,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/10\\\/31\\\/margin-error-age-ascertained-radiological-examination-can-3-years-either-side\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/11\\\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Determination of age\",\"Modi\u2019s Medical Jurisprudence and Toxicology\",\"prosecutrix\",\"radiological examination\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/10\\\/31\\\/margin-error-age-ascertained-radiological-examination-can-3-years-either-side\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/10\\\/31\\\/margin-error-age-ascertained-radiological-examination-can-3-years-either-side\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/10\\\/31\\\/margin-error-age-ascertained-radiological-examination-can-3-years-either-side\\\/\",\"name\":\"Margin of error in age ascertained by radiological examination can be 3 years on either side | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/10\\\/31\\\/margin-error-age-ascertained-radiological-examination-can-3-years-either-side\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/10\\\/31\\\/margin-error-age-ascertained-radiological-examination-can-3-years-either-side\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/11\\\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-10-31T07:10:32+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-31T07:14:16+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/10\\\/31\\\/margin-error-age-ascertained-radiological-examination-can-3-years-either-side\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/10\\\/31\\\/margin-error-age-ascertained-radiological-examination-can-3-years-either-side\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/10\\\/31\\\/margin-error-age-ascertained-radiological-examination-can-3-years-either-side\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/11\\\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/11\\\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/10\\\/31\\\/margin-error-age-ascertained-radiological-examination-can-3-years-either-side\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Margin of error in age ascertained by radiological examination can be 3 years on either side\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_2\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Margin of error in age ascertained by radiological examination can be 3 years on either side | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/31\/margin-error-age-ascertained-radiological-examination-can-3-years-either-side\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Margin of error in age ascertained by radiological examination can be 3 years on either side","og_description":"High Court of Himachal Pradesh: A Single Judge Bench of Chander Bhusan Barowalia, J. allowed a criminal appeal and acquitted the appellant-accused","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/31\/margin-error-age-ascertained-radiological-examination-can-3-years-either-side\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-10-31T07:10:32+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-10-31T07:14:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/31\/margin-error-age-ascertained-radiological-examination-can-3-years-either-side\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/31\/margin-error-age-ascertained-radiological-examination-can-3-years-either-side\/"},"author":{"name":"Saba","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"headline":"Margin of error in age ascertained by radiological examination can be 3 years on either side","datePublished":"2017-10-31T07:10:32+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-31T07:14:16+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/31\/margin-error-age-ascertained-radiological-examination-can-3-years-either-side\/"},"wordCount":295,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/31\/margin-error-age-ascertained-radiological-examination-can-3-years-either-side\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","keywords":["Determination of age","Modi\u2019s Medical Jurisprudence and Toxicology","prosecutrix","radiological examination"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/31\/margin-error-age-ascertained-radiological-examination-can-3-years-either-side\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/31\/margin-error-age-ascertained-radiological-examination-can-3-years-either-side\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/31\/margin-error-age-ascertained-radiological-examination-can-3-years-either-side\/","name":"Margin of error in age ascertained by radiological examination can be 3 years on either side | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/31\/margin-error-age-ascertained-radiological-examination-can-3-years-either-side\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/31\/margin-error-age-ascertained-radiological-examination-can-3-years-either-side\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","datePublished":"2017-10-31T07:10:32+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-31T07:14:16+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/31\/margin-error-age-ascertained-radiological-examination-can-3-years-either-side\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/31\/margin-error-age-ascertained-radiological-examination-can-3-years-either-side\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/31\/margin-error-age-ascertained-radiological-examination-can-3-years-either-side\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/31\/margin-error-age-ascertained-radiological-examination-can-3-years-either-side\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Margin of error in age ascertained by radiological examination can be 3 years on either side"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":197103,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/18\/delay-in-lodging-complaint-in-sexual-offence-cases-is-to-be-considered-in-favour-of-the-victim-if-her-testimony-inspires-confidence\/","url_meta":{"origin":166104,"position":0},"title":"Delay in lodging complaint in sexual offence cases is to be considered in favour of the victim if her testimony inspires confidence","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 18, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Swapna Joshi, J. dismissed a criminal appeal filed against the decision of the trial court convicting and sentencing the appellant (accused) for offences punishable under Sections 323 and 354 IPC along with Section 8 of Prevention of Children from Sexual Offences\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":199145,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/27\/rape-accused-acquitted-in-light-of-failure-to-conduct-dna-test-that-could-be-a-clinching-evidence-to-prove-the-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":166104,"position":1},"title":"Rape accused acquitted in light of failure to conduct DNA test that could be a clinching evidence to prove the case","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 27, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Manish Pitale, J., reversed the judgment of the trial court where the appellant was convicted for an offence punishable under Section 376 IPC and sentenced to 5 years of rigorous imprisonment. The appellant was accused of committing forcible sexual intercourse on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":191384,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/02\/21\/separate-sentences-ss-354-354-451-ipc-not-called-accused-also-convicted-s-10-pocso\/","url_meta":{"origin":166104,"position":2},"title":"Separate sentences under Ss. 354\/354-A and 451 IPC are not called for, where accused is also convicted under S. 10 POCSO","author":"Saba","date":"February 21, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench of the Delhi High Court comprising of S.P. Garg, J., disposed of a criminal appeal which challenged a judgment by which, the appellant was held guilty for committing the offences punishable under Sections 354\/354A\/451 IPC and Section 10 POCSO Act. The appellant, under\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":195113,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/09\/delay-in-lodging-of-fir-creates-doubt-about-the-incident-per-se\/","url_meta":{"origin":166104,"position":3},"title":"Delay in lodging of FIR creates doubt about the incident per se","author":"Saba","date":"April 9, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: The accused-appellant who was in custody in relation to offences punishable under various sections of IPC and POCSO Act, was enlarged on bail by a Single Judge Bench comprising of P.K. Lohra, J. The accused was charged under Sections 363, 366-A, 342 and 376 of IPC along\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":321545,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/07\/jharkhand-hc-set-aside-conviction-and-sentence-of-a-man-convicted-u-s-366a-376-of-ipc-scctimes\/","url_meta":{"origin":166104,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Victim did not raise an alarm despite having opportunity to do so\u2019; Jharkhand High Court set aside conviction and sentence of a man convicted u\/s 366A, 376 of IPC","author":"Arushi","date":"May 7, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court opined that radiological age of the victim has been assessed to be eighteen years and from the tenor of her cross-examination, it is apparent that she has wilfully left the house of her father and accompanied appellant to various places.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jharkhand High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":373630,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/23\/del-hc-pocso-father-who-impregnated-minor-daughter\/","url_meta":{"origin":166104,"position":5},"title":"DNA doesn&#8217;t lie! Delhi HC upholds POCSO Conviction of father who impregnated minor daughter","author":"Ritu","date":"January 23, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe social circumstances and the economic status of the family may have compelled the Prosecutrix and her mother to give contradictory statements or to turn hostile. However, in such cases the Court cannot completely ignore the scientific evidence which has come on record.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"father who impregnated minor daughter","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/father-who-impregnated-minor-daughter.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/father-who-impregnated-minor-daughter.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/father-who-impregnated-minor-daughter.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/father-who-impregnated-minor-daughter.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/166104","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=166104"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/166104\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/222107"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=166104"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=166104"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=166104"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}