{"id":166064,"date":"2017-11-01T10:57:32","date_gmt":"2017-11-01T05:27:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=166064"},"modified":"2017-11-01T10:57:32","modified_gmt":"2017-11-01T05:27:32","slug":"2017-scc-vol-9-october-28-2017-part-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/01\/2017-scc-vol-9-october-28-2017-part-2\/","title":{"rendered":"2017 SCC Vol. 9 October 28, 2017 Part 2"},"content":{"rendered":"

Advocates \u2014 Government Law Officers\/Counsel\/Pleader \u2014 Cancellation of tenure-based appointment \u2014 Tenure expiring during pendency of appeal \u2014 Relief:<\/strong> In this case there was cancellation of appointments of respondents who were working as Additional GP\/AGP\/APP under Rule 30(5), Maharashtra Law Officers (Appointments, Conditions of Service and Remuneration) Rules, 1984 vide order dt. 28-8-2015, which was quashed by High Court. However, in appeal filed thereagainst, Supreme Court staying operation of impugned order consequent to which cancellation order dt. 28-8-2015 continuing to remain in operation and during pendency of appeal, term of respondents on their respective posts expiring on different dates. The Supreme Court while considering nature of controversy, subsequent events and resulting consequences, modified the cancellation order dt. 28-8-2015 and directed the same to be treated as having been passed under R. 30(6) and one month\u2019s retainer in lieu of notice period paid to each respondent. [State of Maharashtra v. Kishor M. Gadhave Patil, (2017) 9 SCC 312<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Central Excise Act, 1944 \u2014 S. 9(1)(b) r\/w R. 56 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 \u2014 Omission of R. 56 w.e.f. 20-5-1994 \u2014 Effect of, on pending proceedings for evasion of duty:<\/strong> In this case, a complaint was filed on 4-8-1987, by the Revenue against the respondent-accused for evasion on account of the respondent having taken credit without following the procedure under R. 56-A but the said Rule was, on 20-5-1994, was omitted by a notification. The trial Magistrate, despite the omission, vide order dt. 22-3-2013, framed charge against the accused for the offence punishable under S. 9. The Supreme Court held that the charge against the respondent was of evasion of duty, the ingredient of the offence being evasion. Thus, the omission of a procedural rule for availing the credit could not in any manner affect the said charge. Further, the prosecution could not be deprived of opportunity to prove evasion which by itself was an offence. [Chandpaklal Ramanlal Shah v. Reliance Industries Ltd., (2017) 9 SCC 309<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Kerala Education Rules, 1959 \u2014 Rr. 2, 2-A, Ch. V and R. 3, Ch. I \u2014 Power of Government to relax Rules:<\/strong> If right to education up to age of 14 yrs, which is a fundamental right, is to be made meaningful, efforts must be made to open upper primary schools in such manner so that no child has to walk 3 km or more only to attend school. Government had authority and jurisdiction to grant such relaxation in terms of R. 3. Besides, no other school was at a distance of less than 3 km from appellant School. Hence, upgradation of appellant School from junior primary school to upper primary school without giving notice to schools in vicinity to raise objection with regard to upgradation, permissible. [Palathingal M.L.P. School v. Sethumadhavan P.K., (2017) 9 SCC 306<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Kerala Forest Act, 1961 (4 of 1962) \u2014 S. 61-A \u2014 Seizure of sandalwood from jeep \u2014 Confiscation of both under S. 61-A \u2014 Validity of:<\/strong> High Court, in revision, quashed confiscation order, relying upon its decision in Bhargavan, 1993 SCC OnLine Ker 461. The Supreme Court held that findings of fact recorded by courts below were, firstly, that seized goods were being brought from another State by owner of jeep, and secondly, that it could not be proved that goods belonged to the State where it was confiscated. In such view of matter, High Court was justified in deciding the issue in light of law laid down in Bhargavan case, rightly quashing confiscation order made under S. 61-A. [State of Kerala v. Jossy Sequeria, (2017) 9 SCC 316<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 \u2014 S. 68-C \u2014 Permit\/Permission\/Licence \u2014 Permit to private operators to ply vehicles on the notified route:<\/strong> In this case, following the ruling in Kanchan, (2006) 2 SCC 413, wherein it was held that the permits granted for the notified route were bad in law and that the State Transport Authority while granting permits on the route in question had mala fide exercised its jurisdiction, it was held that the route had become a notified route pursuant to the Nationalisation Scheme dt. 5-11-1997, and since no private operators could be permitted to operate\/ply vehicles on the notified route except as permitted by the Scheme, the respondents could not be permitted to ply the vehicles on the notified route. Further, the respondents who were existing operators could not be shown leniency as the route over which they were plying earlier did not include Dewal to Bijnor. [UP SRTC v. Sandeep Kumar Jain, (2017) 9 SCC 299<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Wealth Tax Act, 1957 \u2014 S. 27-A \u2014 Appeal to High Court under \u2014 Framing of a substantial question of law \u2014 Mandatory requirement of:<\/strong> In this case, High Court proceeded to decide the appeals under S. 27-A, without formulating the substantial question(s) of law. The Supreme Court noted that on a comparison of S. 27-A of 1957 Act with S. 100 CPC, it was held, that (i) both sections provide a remedy of appeal to the High Court; (ii) both sections are identically worded and in pari materia; (iii) S. 27-A was enacted by following the principle of \u201clegislation by incorporation\u201d and S. 100 CPC was bodily lifted from CPC and incorporated as S. 27-A in the Act; and (iv) both sections are akin to each other in all respects. Thus, following the ruling in Santosh Hazari, (2001) 3 SCC 179 in respect of S. 100 CPC, wherein it was held that the High Court cannot proceed to hear a second appeal without formulating the substantial question of law involved in the appeal and if it does so it acts illegally and in abnegation or abdication of the duty cast on Court, the matter was remanded to the High Court for deciding the appeals afresh on merits after formulating the substantial questions of law, if any. [Amrinder Singh v. CWT, (2017) 9 SCC 318<\/a>]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Advocates \u2014 Government Law Officers\/Counsel\/Pleader \u2014 Cancellation of tenure-based appointment \u2014 Tenure expiring during pendency of appeal \u2014 Relief: In this case <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":102451,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-166064","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casesreported","category-supremecourtcases"],"yoast_head":"\n2017 SCC Vol. 9 October 28, 2017 Part 2 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/01\/2017-scc-vol-9-october-28-2017-part-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"2017 SCC Vol. 9 October 28, 2017 Part 2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Advocates \u2014 Government Law Officers\/Counsel\/Pleader \u2014 Cancellation of tenure-based appointment \u2014 Tenure expiring during pendency of appeal \u2014 Relief: In this case\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/01\/2017-scc-vol-9-october-28-2017-part-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-11-01T05:27:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/01\/2017-scc-vol-9-october-28-2017-part-2\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/01\/2017-scc-vol-9-october-28-2017-part-2\/\",\"name\":\"2017 SCC Vol. 9 October 28, 2017 Part 2 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/01\/2017-scc-vol-9-october-28-2017-part-2\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/01\/2017-scc-vol-9-october-28-2017-part-2\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-11-01T05:27:32+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/01\/2017-scc-vol-9-october-28-2017-part-2\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/01\/2017-scc-vol-9-october-28-2017-part-2\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/01\/2017-scc-vol-9-october-28-2017-part-2\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/01\/2017-scc-vol-9-october-28-2017-part-2\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"2017 SCC Vol. 9 October 28, 2017 Part 2\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"2017 SCC Vol. 9 October 28, 2017 Part 2 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/01\/2017-scc-vol-9-october-28-2017-part-2\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"2017 SCC Vol. 9 October 28, 2017 Part 2","og_description":"Advocates \u2014 Government Law Officers\/Counsel\/Pleader \u2014 Cancellation of tenure-based appointment \u2014 Tenure expiring during pendency of appeal \u2014 Relief: In this case","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/01\/2017-scc-vol-9-october-28-2017-part-2\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-11-01T05:27:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/01\/2017-scc-vol-9-october-28-2017-part-2\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/01\/2017-scc-vol-9-october-28-2017-part-2\/","name":"2017 SCC Vol. 9 October 28, 2017 Part 2 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/01\/2017-scc-vol-9-october-28-2017-part-2\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/01\/2017-scc-vol-9-october-28-2017-part-2\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","datePublished":"2017-11-01T05:27:32+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/01\/2017-scc-vol-9-october-28-2017-part-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/01\/2017-scc-vol-9-october-28-2017-part-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/01\/2017-scc-vol-9-october-28-2017-part-2\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/01\/2017-scc-vol-9-october-28-2017-part-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"2017 SCC Vol. 9 October 28, 2017 Part 2"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":212360,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/25\/pak-sc-considerations-for-grant-of-bail-entirely-different-from-considerations-for-cancellation-of-bail\/","url_meta":{"origin":166064,"position":0},"title":"Pak SC | Considerations for grant of bail entirely different from considerations for cancellation of bail","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 25, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of Pakistan: The Five-Judge Bench of Mian Saqib Nisar, Asif Saeed Khan Khosa, Gulzar Ahmed, Mushir Alam and Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel, JJ., \u00a0refused to interfere with the Judgment of Division Bench of Islamabad High Court granting bail to former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, his daughter Maryam Nawaz\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":318586,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/28\/orders-passed-by-tribunals-under-senior-citizens-act-2007-also-amenable-to-challenge-under-article-227-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":166064,"position":1},"title":"Orders passed by tribunals under Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 also amenable to challenge under Article 227: Delhi High Court","author":"Simranjeet","date":"March 28, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The orders passed by the tribunals and the judicial acts by administrative bodies or authorities or persons exercising quasi-judicial functions are all amenable to challenge under Article 226 of the Constitution.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":59071,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/30\/appeal-against-cancellation-of-tender-was-dismissed-as-decision-constituted-executive-function-and-not-administrative-function\/","url_meta":{"origin":166064,"position":2},"title":"Appeal against cancellation of tender was dismissed as decision constituted executive function and not administrative function","author":"Sucheta","date":"July 30, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa: In an appeal against the cancellation of the tender by the South African Police Services (SAPS) and legality and rationality of the decision, the Court held that the decision was in regard to the executive function and not in the administrative function and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Supreme-Court-of-Appeals.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Supreme-Court-of-Appeals.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Supreme-Court-of-Appeals.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Supreme-Court-of-Appeals.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Supreme-Court-of-Appeals.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":142931,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/17\/mere-recovery-of-bribe-would-not-prove-charges-against-the-accused\/","url_meta":{"origin":166064,"position":3},"title":"Mere recovery of bribe would not prove charges against the accused","author":"Saba","date":"July 17, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court:\u00a0While deciding a criminal appeal preferred against the judgment of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, a Bench comprising of Amitava, J., set aside the judgment and order of the High Court which had convicted a police officer of taking bribes. The appellant (now deceased and represented by\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":309081,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/12\/reservation-not-required-to-be-provided-while-appointing-law-officers-by-government-madras-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":166064,"position":4},"title":"Reservation is not required to be provided while appointing Law Officers by Government: Madras High Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"December 12, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The relationship between the government and the Law Officer is purely a professional relationship and not that of a master and servant","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"madras high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":257872,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/29\/2021-scc-vol-8-part-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":166064,"position":5},"title":"2021 SCC Vol. 8 Part 2","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 29, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"2021 SCC Vol. 8 Part 2 In this part read some very interesting decisions delivered by the Supreme Court expertly analysed by our editors.\u00a0 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 11(6) and 11(9) r\/w S. 2(1)(f)(i) and S. 2(1)(f)(iii) \u2014 International commercial arbitration \u2014 Scope of: Disputes between parties,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Cases Reported"","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/166064","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=166064"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/166064\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/102451"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=166064"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=166064"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=166064"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}