{"id":165824,"date":"2017-10-27T16:48:31","date_gmt":"2017-10-27T11:18:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=165824"},"modified":"2017-11-02T18:10:40","modified_gmt":"2017-11-02T12:40:40","slug":"employers-decision-matters-relating-service-employees-not-immune-judicial-review","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/27\/employers-decision-matters-relating-service-employees-not-immune-judicial-review\/","title":{"rendered":"Employer’s decision in matters relating to service of employees is not immune from judicial review"},"content":{"rendered":"

Calcutta High Court:<\/strong> A Division Bench comprising of Nishita Mhatre, Acting CJ and Tapabrata Chakraborty, J. dismissed the appeal filed by the National Institution for Orthopedically Handicapped, holding that the respondent-employees deserved to be absorbed and regularized in the service of the Institute.<\/p>\n

In the instant appeal, the question raised was whether the employees who have been working satisfactorily for more than 30 years in a canteen which provides food for the patients and staff of an Institution run by the Union of India were entitled to absorption and regularization in service?<\/p>\n

Learned Single Judge of the High Court previously held that the employees were entitled to be regularized in service with the Institute\u00a0concerned.\u00a0 Aggrieved by that decision of the learned Single Judge, the Institute preferred the instant appeal through its Director and other Officers.<\/p>\n

The Institute was established, maintained and managed by the Government of India. There were in-patients who were admitted to the hospital run by the Institute and who were being treated there for years together. Food services for such patients were provided from the canteen in which the employees were working. The number of employees inducted into the canteen was regulated by the Institute. The Institute payed 70% of the salary of the canteen staff and 30% was paid through the income of the canteen.<\/p>\n

The High Court after perusing all the material on record and the submissions made by the parties was of the opinion that the decision of the employer to create or abolish posts or to prescribe the source or mode of recruitment and lay down the qualification etc. is not immune from judicial review. In the instant case, the only obstacle in the way of absorption of the employees into regular service was lack of sanctioned posts. The High Court held that, to suggest that employees who have been working for 30 years without a break in the canteen which undoubtedly formed an integral part of the Institute would not be considered as permanent or regular employees, was utter callousness and neglect on the part of the Government in fulfilling its Constitutional mandate besides being contrary to the provisions of law as well as several judgments cited at the Bar.<\/p>\n

Accordingly, the appeal filed by the Institute was dismissed and directions were given for the absorption and regularization of the canteen employees in service within 12 weeks. [National Institution for Orthopedically Handicapped v. Goutam Banerjee, 2017 SCC OnLine Cal 14927<\/a>, order dated 18.09.2017]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Calcutta High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Nishita Mhatre, Acting CJ and Tapabrata Chakraborty, J. dismissed the appeal filed by the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":48761,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[24324,3042,24314],"class_list":["post-165824","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-employers-decision","tag-Judicial_Review","tag-regularization-in-service"],"yoast_head":"\nEmployer's decision in matters relating to service of employees is not immune from judicial review | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/27\/employers-decision-matters-relating-service-employees-not-immune-judicial-review\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Employer's decision in matters relating to service of employees is not immune from judicial review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Nishita Mhatre, Acting CJ and Tapabrata Chakraborty, J. dismissed the appeal filed by the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/27\/employers-decision-matters-relating-service-employees-not-immune-judicial-review\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-10-27T11:18:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-11-02T12:40:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/27\/employers-decision-matters-relating-service-employees-not-immune-judicial-review\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/27\/employers-decision-matters-relating-service-employees-not-immune-judicial-review\/\",\"name\":\"Employer's decision in matters relating to service of employees is not immune from judicial review | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/27\/employers-decision-matters-relating-service-employees-not-immune-judicial-review\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/27\/employers-decision-matters-relating-service-employees-not-immune-judicial-review\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-10-27T11:18:31+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-02T12:40:40+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/27\/employers-decision-matters-relating-service-employees-not-immune-judicial-review\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/27\/employers-decision-matters-relating-service-employees-not-immune-judicial-review\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/27\/employers-decision-matters-relating-service-employees-not-immune-judicial-review\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/27\/employers-decision-matters-relating-service-employees-not-immune-judicial-review\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Employer’s decision in matters relating to service of employees is not immune from judicial review\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Employer's decision in matters relating to service of employees is not immune from judicial review | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/27\/employers-decision-matters-relating-service-employees-not-immune-judicial-review\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Employer's decision in matters relating to service of employees is not immune from judicial review","og_description":"Calcutta High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Nishita Mhatre, Acting CJ and Tapabrata Chakraborty, J. dismissed the appeal filed by the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/27\/employers-decision-matters-relating-service-employees-not-immune-judicial-review\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-10-27T11:18:31+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-11-02T12:40:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/27\/employers-decision-matters-relating-service-employees-not-immune-judicial-review\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/27\/employers-decision-matters-relating-service-employees-not-immune-judicial-review\/","name":"Employer's decision in matters relating to service of employees is not immune from judicial review | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/27\/employers-decision-matters-relating-service-employees-not-immune-judicial-review\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/27\/employers-decision-matters-relating-service-employees-not-immune-judicial-review\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg","datePublished":"2017-10-27T11:18:31+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-02T12:40:40+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/27\/employers-decision-matters-relating-service-employees-not-immune-judicial-review\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/27\/employers-decision-matters-relating-service-employees-not-immune-judicial-review\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/27\/employers-decision-matters-relating-service-employees-not-immune-judicial-review\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/27\/employers-decision-matters-relating-service-employees-not-immune-judicial-review\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Employer’s decision in matters relating to service of employees is not immune from judicial review"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/calcutta-court.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":296833,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/14\/punjab-haryana-high-court-directs-regularization-clerk-30-years-service\/","url_meta":{"origin":165824,"position":0},"title":"Punjab and Haryana High Court directs regularization of clerk after 30 years of service","author":"Ridhi","date":"July 14, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is the duty of the State Government and its department to provide opportunity to its employees especially a female employee to be given benefit of higher education by sending her for further training.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"punjab and haryana high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":255864,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/21\/creation-and-or-sanction-of-the-posts-is-the-sole-prerogative-of-government-courts-cannot-interfere-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":165824,"position":1},"title":"Creation and\/or sanction of the posts is the sole prerogative of Government; Courts cannot interfere: Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 21, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Framing of any scheme is no function of the Court and is the sole prerogative of the Government.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":324800,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/20\/meghalaya-hc-teacher-resignation-voluntary-retirement-pensionary-benefits\/","url_meta":{"origin":165824,"position":2},"title":"Meghalaya HC treats teacher’s resignation as voluntary retirement, grants pensionary benefits after 33 years of service","author":"Editor","date":"June 20, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"On being informed that her services were yet to be regularized, in view of the urgency to contest the elections, aspiring for a career in politics, she submitted the resignation letter.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Meghalaya High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":214000,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/26\/pat-hc-order-rejecting-regularization-of-service-not-sustainable-where-employees-representation-disposed-of-on-half-baked-facts\/","url_meta":{"origin":165824,"position":3},"title":"Pat HC | Order rejecting regularization of service not sustainable where employee\u2019s representation disposed of on half-baked facts","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 26, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: The Bench of Ashutosh Kumar, J. allowed a civil writ petition filed by a work-charged employee and directed the concerned authority to consider his representation for regularization of service afresh after consideration of all facts. Petitioner who was appointed against a vacant post as a work-charged employee\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":360144,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/15\/ph-hc-lays-down-parameters-for-timely-implementation-of-court-order-service-matters\/","url_meta":{"origin":165824,"position":4},"title":"Punjab and Haryana HC flags non-regularisation of ad-hoc workers, administrative delays; Lays down parameters for timely implementation of court decisions","author":"Editor","date":"September 15, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe delivery of judgments alone does not guarantee the credibility of the justice system. True justice is realized only when the administration acts promptly and effectively to enforce the decisions of the courts.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"timely implementation of court orders in service matters","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/timely-implementation-of-court-orders-in-service-matters.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/timely-implementation-of-court-orders-in-service-matters.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/timely-implementation-of-court-orders-in-service-matters.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/timely-implementation-of-court-orders-in-service-matters.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":202969,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/03\/regularization-to-a-post-ought-to-be-done-keeping-in-mind-the-expertise-and-experience-of-the-employees\/","url_meta":{"origin":165824,"position":5},"title":"Regularization to a post ought to be done keeping in mind the expertise and experience of the employee(s)","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 3, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Ali Mohammad Magrey, J., allowed a Writ Petition filed by the petitioners seeking consideration of their respective cases for change of designation from Helper (Civil) to Electrician, Carpenter and Motor Mechanic respectively. The petitioners were initially appointed to the post\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/165824","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=165824"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/165824\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/48761"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=165824"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=165824"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=165824"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}