{"id":165254,"date":"2017-10-26T10:33:09","date_gmt":"2017-10-26T05:03:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=165254"},"modified":"2017-11-02T18:01:38","modified_gmt":"2017-11-02T12:31:38","slug":"inconvenience-caused-person-certain-individual-eventuality-cannot-reason-declare-provision-illegal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/26\/inconvenience-caused-person-certain-individual-eventuality-cannot-reason-declare-provision-illegal\/","title":{"rendered":"Any inconvenience caused to a person for certain individual eventuality cannot be a reason to declare a provision illegal"},"content":{"rendered":"

Rajasthan High Court: <\/strong>A writ petition was filed to examine constitutional validity of Rule 63(4) of the Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2017 (the Rules of 2017). The sub-rule aforesaid provides that an appeal shall be filed within three months of the date of communication of the order appealed against, provided that an appeal may be admitted after the said period if the appellate authority is satisfied that the appellant has sufficient cause for not filing the appeal within the said period but the appeal shall not be admitted after expiry of six months from the date of order appealed against.
\nThe learned counsel for the petitioner argued that under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957<\/a> and its corresponding Rules, there is no restriction for not entertaining an appeal after expiry of the extended three months. He also contended that the proviso to sub-rule (4) of Rule 63 of the Rules of 2017 was discriminatory as well as arbitrary to the extent it restrained from admitting an appeal after expiry of six months from the date of the order appealed against.<\/p>\n

The High Court finding the argument of the learned counsel devoid of any merit and thus dismissing the writ petition, laid down that<\/p>\n

\u201cIt is well settled that validity of a subordinate legislation can be challenged only if that lacks legislative competence, violates fundamental rights or any of the provisions of the Constitution of India, inconsistent with the provisions of the parent statute i.e. the statute under which subordinate legislation is made, or exists the limits of the authority conferred upon it by the parent statute and if such law is manifestly arbitrary or unreasonable to conclude that the legislature never intended to extend authority to make such rules\/regulations. Rule 63 of the Rules of 2017 provides a remedy of appeal to the aggrieved person and as per its proviso the appellate authority is empowered to condone the delay up to the extent of three months beyond the limitation prescribed. The check for filing appeals subsequent thereto, in our considered opinion, is not at all unjust or arbitrary or is in conflict with any of the eventualities in which validity of a subordinate legislation can be challenged.\u201d<\/p>\n

[Suraj Mal v. State of Rajathan,\u00a0 2017 SCC OnLine Raj 2598<\/a>, decided on 14.10.2017]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Rajasthan High Court: A writ petition was filed to examine constitutional validity of Rule 63(4) of the Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules, <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[8991,3655,24234,24224,24214],"class_list":["post-165254","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-appeal","tag-limitation","tag-mines-and-minerals-development-and-regulation-act","tag-rajasthan-minor-mineral-concession-rules","tag-rule-634"],"yoast_head":"\nAny inconvenience caused to a person for certain individual eventuality cannot be a reason to declare a provision illegal | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/26\/inconvenience-caused-person-certain-individual-eventuality-cannot-reason-declare-provision-illegal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Any inconvenience caused to a person for certain individual eventuality cannot be a reason to declare a provision illegal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court: A writ petition was filed to examine constitutional validity of Rule 63(4) of the Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/26\/inconvenience-caused-person-certain-individual-eventuality-cannot-reason-declare-provision-illegal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-10-26T05:03:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-11-02T12:31:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/10\\\/26\\\/inconvenience-caused-person-certain-individual-eventuality-cannot-reason-declare-provision-illegal\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/10\\\/26\\\/inconvenience-caused-person-certain-individual-eventuality-cannot-reason-declare-provision-illegal\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Saba\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"headline\":\"Any inconvenience caused to a person for certain individual eventuality cannot be a reason to declare a provision illegal\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-10-26T05:03:09+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-02T12:31:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/10\\\/26\\\/inconvenience-caused-person-certain-individual-eventuality-cannot-reason-declare-provision-illegal\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":394,\"commentCount\":0,\"keywords\":[\"Appeal\",\"limitation\",\"Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act\",\"Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules\",\"Rule 63(4)\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/10\\\/26\\\/inconvenience-caused-person-certain-individual-eventuality-cannot-reason-declare-provision-illegal\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/10\\\/26\\\/inconvenience-caused-person-certain-individual-eventuality-cannot-reason-declare-provision-illegal\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/10\\\/26\\\/inconvenience-caused-person-certain-individual-eventuality-cannot-reason-declare-provision-illegal\\\/\",\"name\":\"Any inconvenience caused to a person for certain individual eventuality cannot be a reason to declare a provision illegal | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-10-26T05:03:09+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-02T12:31:38+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/10\\\/26\\\/inconvenience-caused-person-certain-individual-eventuality-cannot-reason-declare-provision-illegal\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/10\\\/26\\\/inconvenience-caused-person-certain-individual-eventuality-cannot-reason-declare-provision-illegal\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2017\\\/10\\\/26\\\/inconvenience-caused-person-certain-individual-eventuality-cannot-reason-declare-provision-illegal\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Any inconvenience caused to a person for certain individual eventuality cannot be a reason to declare a provision illegal\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_2\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Any inconvenience caused to a person for certain individual eventuality cannot be a reason to declare a provision illegal | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/26\/inconvenience-caused-person-certain-individual-eventuality-cannot-reason-declare-provision-illegal\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Any inconvenience caused to a person for certain individual eventuality cannot be a reason to declare a provision illegal","og_description":"Rajasthan High Court: A writ petition was filed to examine constitutional validity of Rule 63(4) of the Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/26\/inconvenience-caused-person-certain-individual-eventuality-cannot-reason-declare-provision-illegal\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-10-26T05:03:09+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-11-02T12:31:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/26\/inconvenience-caused-person-certain-individual-eventuality-cannot-reason-declare-provision-illegal\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/26\/inconvenience-caused-person-certain-individual-eventuality-cannot-reason-declare-provision-illegal\/"},"author":{"name":"Saba","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"headline":"Any inconvenience caused to a person for certain individual eventuality cannot be a reason to declare a provision illegal","datePublished":"2017-10-26T05:03:09+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-02T12:31:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/26\/inconvenience-caused-person-certain-individual-eventuality-cannot-reason-declare-provision-illegal\/"},"wordCount":394,"commentCount":0,"keywords":["Appeal","limitation","Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act","Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules","Rule 63(4)"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/26\/inconvenience-caused-person-certain-individual-eventuality-cannot-reason-declare-provision-illegal\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/26\/inconvenience-caused-person-certain-individual-eventuality-cannot-reason-declare-provision-illegal\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/26\/inconvenience-caused-person-certain-individual-eventuality-cannot-reason-declare-provision-illegal\/","name":"Any inconvenience caused to a person for certain individual eventuality cannot be a reason to declare a provision illegal | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-10-26T05:03:09+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-02T12:31:38+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/26\/inconvenience-caused-person-certain-individual-eventuality-cannot-reason-declare-provision-illegal\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/26\/inconvenience-caused-person-certain-individual-eventuality-cannot-reason-declare-provision-illegal\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/26\/inconvenience-caused-person-certain-individual-eventuality-cannot-reason-declare-provision-illegal\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Any inconvenience caused to a person for certain individual eventuality cannot be a reason to declare a provision illegal"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":298512,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/04\/supreme-court-upholds-constitutionality-r-410-and-r-73-rajasthan-minor-mineral-concession-rules\/","url_meta":{"origin":165254,"position":0},"title":"Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of R. 4(10) and R.7(3) of Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules","author":"Apoorva","date":"August 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court reiterated that there is no right vested over an application made which is pending seeking lease of a Government land or over the minerals beneath the soil in any type of land over which the Government has a vested right and regulatory control.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"rajasthan minor mineral concession rules","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/rajasthan-minor-mineral-concession-rules.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/rajasthan-minor-mineral-concession-rules.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/rajasthan-minor-mineral-concession-rules.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/rajasthan-minor-mineral-concession-rules.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":252439,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/07\/regulations-regarding-mining-leases-granted-to-government-companies-notified-vide-mineral-concession-amendment-rules-2021\/","url_meta":{"origin":165254,"position":1},"title":"Regulations regarding mining leases granted to government companies notified vide Mineral Concession (Amendment) Rules, 2021","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"August 7, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"The Ministry of Coal has notified Mineral Concession (Amendment) Rules, 2021 on August 6, 2021. It amends the Mineral Concession Rules, 1960. \u00a0 Key amendments made by the Mineral Concession (Amendment) Rules, 2021, are: Definition: \u201crun-of-mine\u201d means the raw, unprocessed or uncrushed material in its natural state obtained after blasting\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":249910,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/17\/minerals-other-than-atomic-and-hydro-carbons-energy-minerals-concession-third-amendment-rules-2021\/","url_meta":{"origin":165254,"position":2},"title":"Minerals (Other than Atomic and Hydro Carbons Energy Minerals) Concession (Third Amendment) Rules, 2021","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"June 17, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"The Ministry of Law and Justice has notified Minerals (Other than Atomic and Hydro Carbons Energy Minerals) Concession (Third Amendment) Rules, 2021. The Rules shall come into force on July 1, 2021. The Rules, 2021 amends Minerals (Other than Atomic and Hydro Carbons Energy Minerals) Concession Rules, 2016 in the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":248336,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/17\/aircraft-second-amendment-rules-2021-comes-into-force\/","url_meta":{"origin":165254,"position":3},"title":"Aircraft (Second) Amendment Rules, 2021 comes into force","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"May 17, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"The Ministry of Civil Aviation has notified Aircraft(second) Amendment Rules, 2021 on May 13, 2021 to amend the Aircraft Rules, 1937. Key amendments notified by the ministry are as follows: Rule 3B has been substituted - Any person aggrieved by an order passed by an officer may prefer an appeal\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":261723,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/14\/new-provisions-related-to-allotment-of-new-name-to-existing-llp-introduced-vide-llp-amendment-rules-2022\/","url_meta":{"origin":165254,"position":4},"title":"New provisions related to Allotment of New Name to Existing LLP, introduced vide LLP (Amendment) Rules, 2022","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 14, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The Central Government notifies Limited Liability Partnership (Amendment) Rules, 2022 to amend the Limited Liability Partnership Rules, 2009. Key Amendments: In the said rules, the following rule shall be inserted, namely: - 19A. Allotment of new name to existing LLP under sub-section (3) of section 17: In case a Limited\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-161.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-161.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-161.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-161.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-161.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":308190,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/01\/family-pension-assam-services-rules-1969-entitlement-determination-criminal-appeal-gauhati-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":165254,"position":5},"title":"Pensioner entitled for provisional family pension till determination of criminal appeal with respect to Rule 22(1) of Assam Services (Pension) Rules, 1969: Gauhati HC","author":"Sucheta","date":"December 1, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The High Court opined that pension being a very valuable right, the legislature in its wisdom, had incorporated Rule 22 of the 1969 Rules, so that a pensioner survives till the allegations attain finality.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"gauhati high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gauhati-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gauhati-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gauhati-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gauhati-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/165254","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=165254"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/165254\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=165254"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=165254"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=165254"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}