{"id":164604,"date":"2017-10-21T12:20:15","date_gmt":"2017-10-21T06:50:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=164604"},"modified":"2017-10-27T15:22:55","modified_gmt":"2017-10-27T09:52:55","slug":"trial-court-didnt-take-sufficient-care-branding-petitioner-stigma-living-adultery-order-set-aside","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/21\/trial-court-didnt-take-sufficient-care-branding-petitioner-stigma-living-adultery-order-set-aside\/","title":{"rendered":"Trial court didn\u2019t take sufficient care before branding petitioner with \u201cstigma of living in adultery\u201d, order set aside"},"content":{"rendered":"

Bombay High Court:<\/strong> A Single Judge Bench comprising of Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi, J. quashed and set aside an order of the trial Court that had cancelled the maintenance awarded to the petitioner, stating that the trial court had not taken \u201csufficient care before branding the petitioner with the stigma living in adultery\u201d.<\/p>\n

Accepting the contentions of the petitioner, that the trial court had not perused the evidence on record, the High Court held that the lower court had not even perused the judgment granting divorce to the respondent and the petitioner. It had been established in the aforesaid judgment that the divorce was being granted on grounds of desertion and not adultery since the respondent had failed to adduce sufficient evidence to prove his allegations. However, since Gautam Pawar, the one with whom the petitioner had been alleged to be living in adultery did not present himself for cross-examination, the trial court held that since this evidence had remained unchallenged, it should be relied upon and that the petitioner did have illicit relations with Gautam Pawar.<\/p>\n

The High Court held that the trial court \u201chas not at all appreciated the evidence on record properly and drawn the conclusions which were not borne out from the material.\u201d Along with this, the petitioner\u2019s claim for enhancement of maintenance was also accepted and the amount increased for her and her son till the time he attained majority. [Laxmi Dnyanadeo Netke v. Dnyanadeo Vithal Netke, 2017 SCC OnLine Bom 8643<\/a>, order dated 6.10.2017]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Bombay High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi, J. quashed and set aside an order of the trial <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":74381,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-164604","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts"],"yoast_head":"\nTrial court didn\u2019t take sufficient care before branding petitioner with \u201cstigma of living in adultery\u201d, order set aside | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/21\/trial-court-didnt-take-sufficient-care-branding-petitioner-stigma-living-adultery-order-set-aside\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Trial court didn\u2019t take sufficient care before branding petitioner with \u201cstigma of living in adultery\u201d, order set aside\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi, J. quashed and set aside an order of the trial\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/21\/trial-court-didnt-take-sufficient-care-branding-petitioner-stigma-living-adultery-order-set-aside\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-10-21T06:50:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-10-27T09:52:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/21\/trial-court-didnt-take-sufficient-care-branding-petitioner-stigma-living-adultery-order-set-aside\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/21\/trial-court-didnt-take-sufficient-care-branding-petitioner-stigma-living-adultery-order-set-aside\/\",\"name\":\"Trial court didn\u2019t take sufficient care before branding petitioner with \u201cstigma of living in adultery\u201d, order set aside | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/21\/trial-court-didnt-take-sufficient-care-branding-petitioner-stigma-living-adultery-order-set-aside\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/21\/trial-court-didnt-take-sufficient-care-branding-petitioner-stigma-living-adultery-order-set-aside\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-10-21T06:50:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-27T09:52:55+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/21\/trial-court-didnt-take-sufficient-care-branding-petitioner-stigma-living-adultery-order-set-aside\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/21\/trial-court-didnt-take-sufficient-care-branding-petitioner-stigma-living-adultery-order-set-aside\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/21\/trial-court-didnt-take-sufficient-care-branding-petitioner-stigma-living-adultery-order-set-aside\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/21\/trial-court-didnt-take-sufficient-care-branding-petitioner-stigma-living-adultery-order-set-aside\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Trial court didn\u2019t take sufficient care before branding petitioner with \u201cstigma of living in adultery\u201d, order set aside\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Trial court didn\u2019t take sufficient care before branding petitioner with \u201cstigma of living in adultery\u201d, order set aside | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/21\/trial-court-didnt-take-sufficient-care-branding-petitioner-stigma-living-adultery-order-set-aside\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Trial court didn\u2019t take sufficient care before branding petitioner with \u201cstigma of living in adultery\u201d, order set aside","og_description":"Bombay High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi, J. quashed and set aside an order of the trial","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/21\/trial-court-didnt-take-sufficient-care-branding-petitioner-stigma-living-adultery-order-set-aside\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-10-21T06:50:15+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-10-27T09:52:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/21\/trial-court-didnt-take-sufficient-care-branding-petitioner-stigma-living-adultery-order-set-aside\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/21\/trial-court-didnt-take-sufficient-care-branding-petitioner-stigma-living-adultery-order-set-aside\/","name":"Trial court didn\u2019t take sufficient care before branding petitioner with \u201cstigma of living in adultery\u201d, order set aside | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/21\/trial-court-didnt-take-sufficient-care-branding-petitioner-stigma-living-adultery-order-set-aside\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/21\/trial-court-didnt-take-sufficient-care-branding-petitioner-stigma-living-adultery-order-set-aside\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","datePublished":"2017-10-21T06:50:15+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-27T09:52:55+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/21\/trial-court-didnt-take-sufficient-care-branding-petitioner-stigma-living-adultery-order-set-aside\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/21\/trial-court-didnt-take-sufficient-care-branding-petitioner-stigma-living-adultery-order-set-aside\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/21\/trial-court-didnt-take-sufficient-care-branding-petitioner-stigma-living-adultery-order-set-aside\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","width":1331,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/21\/trial-court-didnt-take-sufficient-care-branding-petitioner-stigma-living-adultery-order-set-aside\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Trial court didn\u2019t take sufficient care before branding petitioner with \u201cstigma of living in adultery\u201d, order set aside"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":320680,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/24\/to-trigger-section-1254-crpc-continuous-and-repeated-acts-of-adultery-required-mp-hc-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":164604,"position":0},"title":"“To trigger Section 125(4) CrPC, continuous and repeated acts of adultery required”; MP High Court upheld maintenance order","author":"Ritu","date":"April 24, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court found that the quantum of maintenance awarded by the trial court was reasonable, considering the circumstances and prevailing cost of living.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":146441,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/01\/divorce-petition-allowed-on-the-grounds-of-cruelty-and-adultery\/","url_meta":{"origin":164604,"position":1},"title":"Divorce petition allowed on the grounds of cruelty and adultery","author":"Saba","date":"August 1, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Kenya:\u00a0 The petition was filed pertaining to the issue of dissolution of marriage on the grounds of cruelty and adultery. Petitioner had submitted the marriage certificate as an evidence to prove her marriage with the respondent. It has also been stated by the petitioner that, following their\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":311176,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/joinder-of-paramour-as-necessary-party-not-mandatory-in-all-divorce-cases-orissa-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":164604,"position":2},"title":"[Hindu Marriage and Divorce (Orissa High Court) Rules, 1956] Joinder of ‘Paramour’ as necessary party not mandatory in all divorce cases: Orissa HC","author":"Editor","date":"January 11, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Rule 5 of the Hindu Marriage and Divorce (Orissa High Court) Rules, 1956 provides for Necessary parties- (a) In every petition for divorce or judicial separation on the ground that the respondent is living in adultery or has committed adultery with any person, the petitioner shall make such person a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"orissa high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":304022,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/07\/wife-not-entitiled-maintenance-living-in-adultery-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":164604,"position":3},"title":"\u201cQuestion of claiming maintenance does not arise when wife is staying in adultery\u201d: Karnataka High Court","author":"Sucheta","date":"October 7, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In view of the wife\u2019s \u201cconduct and dishonesty\u201d, the Court dismissed revision petition filed by the wife seeking to set aside the order of the Sessions Judge setting aside her monetary maintenance and compensation.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"karnataka high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":374651,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/04\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-dna-test-adultery-divorce-upheld\/","url_meta":{"origin":164604,"position":4},"title":"DNA test of a child permissible in divorce proceeding on ground of adultery: Madhya Pradesh High Court","author":"Editor","date":"February 4, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIn case where necessary pleadings are there and no declaration is sought regarding illegitimacy of the child and the issue only relates to adultery of the wife, then in appropriate cases, a DNA test can be ordered, if there are sufficient pleadings of non-access\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"DNA test permissible to prove adultery","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/DNA-test-permissible-to-prove-adultery.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/DNA-test-permissible-to-prove-adultery.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/DNA-test-permissible-to-prove-adultery.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/DNA-test-permissible-to-prove-adultery.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":348591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/22\/divorced-wife-living-in-adultery-disqualified-from-claiming-maintenance-under-s-125-crpc-chhattisgarh-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":164604,"position":5},"title":"Divorced wife living in adultery is disqualified from claiming maintenance under S. 125 CrPC: Chhattisgarh HC","author":"Editor","date":"May 22, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe decree obtained by the husband for divorce on proving the adulterous life of the wife cannot give a license to her to continue to live in an illicit relationship and to get her right to claim maintenance revived.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Chhattisgarh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/164604","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=164604"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/164604\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/74381"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=164604"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=164604"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=164604"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}