{"id":164404,"date":"2017-10-19T13:12:12","date_gmt":"2017-10-19T07:42:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=164404"},"modified":"2017-11-09T16:04:07","modified_gmt":"2017-11-09T10:34:07","slug":"lower-authorities-take-view-different-constitutional-courts-record-reasons-detail","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/19\/lower-authorities-take-view-different-constitutional-courts-record-reasons-detail\/","title":{"rendered":"If lower authorities have to take a view different from that of Constitutional Courts, they  should record their reasons in detail"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Karnataka High Court:<\/strong> While deciding a set of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, a Single Judge Bench of Vineet Kothari, J. allowed the petitions holding that judgments of the Constitutional Courts can be altered, modified or reversed only by the superior courts of larger strength or hierarchy, but they could not be allowed to be casually referred and not followed for good reasons to be recorded by the Authorities below the Constitutional Courts.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The petitioner challenged the re-assessment order passed against the petitioner, by the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Tax. Learned counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, submitted that the Assessing Authority made a cursory reference to the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court in the impugned order but failed to apply the binding judgment and proceeded to pass the impugned orders which deserve to be quashed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The High Court considered the submissions made on behalf of the parties and was of the opinion that the Authority did not understand and failed to apply the ratio of the concerned judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court. It was held that if the lower Authorities choose to take a view different from that of a Constitutional Bench, they should record their detailed reasons in writing, so that the Appellate Authorities or the Constitutional Courts when dealing with their orders have an opportunity to peruse their appropriate application of mind to the judgment delivered by the Constitutional Courts. And if that is not done, then it would be taken as a disregard to the judgments of the Constitutional Courts and might drag such Authorities in the realm of judicial indiscipline or even contempt. Accordingly, applying the ratio of the judgment concerned, the petitions were allowed and the impugned order was set aside. [Federal Mogul Goetze (India) Ltd. v. CCT,<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/SMFM5c9P\">\u00a02017 SCC OnLine Kar 2892<\/a>, dated 9.10.2017]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court: While deciding a set of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, a Single Judge <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-164404","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>If lower authorities have to take a view different from that of Constitutional Courts, they should record their reasons in detail | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/19\/lower-authorities-take-view-different-constitutional-courts-record-reasons-detail\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"If lower authorities have to take a view different from that of Constitutional Courts, they should record their reasons in detail\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Karnataka High Court: While deciding a set of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, a Single Judge\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/19\/lower-authorities-take-view-different-constitutional-courts-record-reasons-detail\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-10-19T07:42:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-11-09T10:34:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/19\/lower-authorities-take-view-different-constitutional-courts-record-reasons-detail\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/19\/lower-authorities-take-view-different-constitutional-courts-record-reasons-detail\/\",\"name\":\"If lower authorities have to take a view different from that of Constitutional Courts, they should record their reasons in detail | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-10-19T07:42:12+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-09T10:34:07+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/19\/lower-authorities-take-view-different-constitutional-courts-record-reasons-detail\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/19\/lower-authorities-take-view-different-constitutional-courts-record-reasons-detail\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/19\/lower-authorities-take-view-different-constitutional-courts-record-reasons-detail\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"If lower authorities have to take a view different from that of Constitutional Courts, they should record their reasons in detail\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"If lower authorities have to take a view different from that of Constitutional Courts, they should record their reasons in detail | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/19\/lower-authorities-take-view-different-constitutional-courts-record-reasons-detail\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"If lower authorities have to take a view different from that of Constitutional Courts, they should record their reasons in detail","og_description":"Karnataka High Court: While deciding a set of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, a Single Judge","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/19\/lower-authorities-take-view-different-constitutional-courts-record-reasons-detail\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-10-19T07:42:12+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-11-09T10:34:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/19\/lower-authorities-take-view-different-constitutional-courts-record-reasons-detail\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/19\/lower-authorities-take-view-different-constitutional-courts-record-reasons-detail\/","name":"If lower authorities have to take a view different from that of Constitutional Courts, they should record their reasons in detail | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-10-19T07:42:12+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-09T10:34:07+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/19\/lower-authorities-take-view-different-constitutional-courts-record-reasons-detail\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/19\/lower-authorities-take-view-different-constitutional-courts-record-reasons-detail\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/19\/lower-authorities-take-view-different-constitutional-courts-record-reasons-detail\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"If lower authorities have to take a view different from that of Constitutional Courts, they should record their reasons in detail"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":270447,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/21\/bombay-high-court-courts-cannot-be-hyper-technical-in-their-approach-when-it-comes-to-petitions-under-s-125-crpc-son-liable-to-maintain-father\/","url_meta":{"origin":164404,"position":0},"title":"Bombay High Court | Courts cannot be hyper technical in their approach when it comes to petitions under S. 125, CrPC ; son liable to maintain father","author":"Editor","date":"July 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: Vibha Kankanwadi, J. partly allowed a writ petition setting aside the judgment and order of Additional Sessions Judge and confirming the findings of Judicial Magistrate First Class further modifying the maintenance amount to Rs 3000\/- per month. The present petition was filed by a father intending to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":209162,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/01\/bom-hc-issues-of-constitutionality-of-a-statute-not-be-decided-for-mere-academic-purpose\/","url_meta":{"origin":164404,"position":1},"title":"Bom HC | Issues of constitutionality of a statute not to be decided for mere academic purpose","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 1, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court at Goa:\u00a0The Division Bench of M.S. Sonak & Prithviraj K. Chavan, JJ. dismissed a set of petitions holding that the present was not an appropriate case to entertain a constitutional challenge to Section 33(3) of Goa Land Revenue Code, 1968. Vires of Section 33(3) were challenged in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":6458,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/06\/court-came-down-heavily-on-petitions-with-divisive-agenda-and-endeavour\/","url_meta":{"origin":164404,"position":2},"title":"Court came down heavily on petitions with divisive agenda and endeavour","author":"Sucheta","date":"January 6, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: While condemning the motive of the petitioner for filing the present petition which seeks to raise divisive issues of mythological nature to create a jurisdiction of P.I.L, the Court dismissed the petition with exemplary cost of Rs.20,000. In the present writ petition, the petitioner herein, a social\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;High Courts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"High Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/highcourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":280229,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/22\/delhi-high-court-not-duty-of-constitutional-courts-but-civic-bodies-to-regulate-public-movement-and-their-choice-of-urinating-spitting-and-littering-on-walls-having-sacred-images\/","url_meta":{"origin":164404,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court| Not duty of constitutional courts but civic bodies to regulate public movement and their choice of urinating, spitting and littering on walls having sacred images","author":"Editor","date":"December 22, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a PIL filed seeking a prohibition of affixing photographs of gods\/goddesses on walls to prevent public urination, spitting on and littering around such sacred images, a Division Bench of Satish Chandra Sharma and Subramonium Prasad, JJ., held that the present case is not a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":238951,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/10\/same-sex-couples-live-in-relationship-all-hc-highlights-nexus-between-constitutional-courts-and-constitutional-morality-did-society-take-a-u-turn-after-scs-decision-in-navtej-singh-johar-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":164404,"position":4},"title":"[Same-Sex Couples &#038; Live-in-relationship] All HC highlights nexus between Constitutional Courts and Constitutional Morality || Did Society take a U-Turn after SC&#8217;s decision in Navtej Singh Johar case? Read","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 10, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of Shashi Kant Gupta and Pankaj Bhatia, JJ., addressed the issue of harassment to citizens on their sexual orientation and highlighted the significance of 'Constitutional Morality'. The present petition highlighted the stark reality of the society where the citizens were facing discrimination at the hands\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":224304,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/18\/hp-hc-vesting-of-discretion-with-executive-authority-does-not-clothe-it-with-the-power-to-violate-constitutional-provisions\/","url_meta":{"origin":164404,"position":5},"title":"HP HC | Vesting of discretion with executive authority does not clothe it with the power to violate Constitutional provisions","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 18, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J. allowed a petition pertaining to exercise of discretionary power of the Governor in the appointment of the household staff in the secretariat. The petition was filed by one, Dharam Prakash, challenging the government order which promoted the respondent, the junior-most Beldar, to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/164404","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=164404"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/164404\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=164404"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=164404"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=164404"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}