{"id":163384,"date":"2017-10-13T13:36:05","date_gmt":"2017-10-13T08:06:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=163384"},"modified":"2017-10-27T13:39:13","modified_gmt":"2017-10-27T08:09:13","slug":"inherent-powers-conferred-upon-revenue-authority-not-include-power-review-final-order-assistant-commissioner","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/13\/inherent-powers-conferred-upon-revenue-authority-not-include-power-review-final-order-assistant-commissioner\/","title":{"rendered":"Inherent powers conferred upon Revenue Authority does not include the power to review final order of Assistant Commissioner"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Karnataka High Court:<\/strong> While deciding a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, a Single Judge Bench of B.S. Patil, J. held that the inherent powers conferred upon the Revenue Authority does not include the power of review, so as to review the final order passed by the Assistant Commissioner, on merits.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The petitioner challenged the order passed by the Assistant Commissioner whereby he revoked his earlier order passed in an appeal by the petitioner and directed for fresh consideration of the said appeal by exercising his powers under Sections 24 and 25 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The petitioner contended that having passed the said earlier order allowing the appeal filed by the petitioner, the Assistant Commissioner has become functus-officio, and had no power to review the same under Section 25 of the Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">While considering the contentions of the petitioner, the High Court found favor with the decision relied upon by the petitioner in\u00a0N. Chandra Reddy v. State of Karnataka, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/27e69Arc\">2016 SCC OnLine Kar 8039<\/a>, whereby the High Court held that the Assistant Commissioner had no power to review his own final orders under Section 25 of the Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Accordingly, it was held that the impugned order could not be sustained and the petition was allowed setting aside the said impugned order. [Sri Munithirumalappa v. Assistant Commissioner, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/cI0DJ8mU\">2017 SCC OnLine Kar 2498<\/a>, ordr dated 3.10.2017]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court: While deciding a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, a Single Judge Bench of <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-163384","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Inherent powers conferred upon Revenue Authority does not include the power to review final order of Assistant Commissioner | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/13\/inherent-powers-conferred-upon-revenue-authority-not-include-power-review-final-order-assistant-commissioner\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Inherent powers conferred upon Revenue Authority does not include the power to review final order of Assistant Commissioner\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Karnataka High Court: While deciding a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, a Single Judge Bench of\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/13\/inherent-powers-conferred-upon-revenue-authority-not-include-power-review-final-order-assistant-commissioner\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-10-13T08:06:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-10-27T08:09:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/13\/inherent-powers-conferred-upon-revenue-authority-not-include-power-review-final-order-assistant-commissioner\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/13\/inherent-powers-conferred-upon-revenue-authority-not-include-power-review-final-order-assistant-commissioner\/\",\"name\":\"Inherent powers conferred upon Revenue Authority does not include the power to review final order of Assistant Commissioner | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-10-13T08:06:05+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-27T08:09:13+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/13\/inherent-powers-conferred-upon-revenue-authority-not-include-power-review-final-order-assistant-commissioner\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/13\/inherent-powers-conferred-upon-revenue-authority-not-include-power-review-final-order-assistant-commissioner\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/13\/inherent-powers-conferred-upon-revenue-authority-not-include-power-review-final-order-assistant-commissioner\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Inherent powers conferred upon Revenue Authority does not include the power to review final order of Assistant Commissioner\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Inherent powers conferred upon Revenue Authority does not include the power to review final order of Assistant Commissioner | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/13\/inherent-powers-conferred-upon-revenue-authority-not-include-power-review-final-order-assistant-commissioner\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Inherent powers conferred upon Revenue Authority does not include the power to review final order of Assistant Commissioner","og_description":"Karnataka High Court: While deciding a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, a Single Judge Bench of","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/13\/inherent-powers-conferred-upon-revenue-authority-not-include-power-review-final-order-assistant-commissioner\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-10-13T08:06:05+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-10-27T08:09:13+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/13\/inherent-powers-conferred-upon-revenue-authority-not-include-power-review-final-order-assistant-commissioner\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/13\/inherent-powers-conferred-upon-revenue-authority-not-include-power-review-final-order-assistant-commissioner\/","name":"Inherent powers conferred upon Revenue Authority does not include the power to review final order of Assistant Commissioner | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-10-13T08:06:05+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-27T08:09:13+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/13\/inherent-powers-conferred-upon-revenue-authority-not-include-power-review-final-order-assistant-commissioner\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/13\/inherent-powers-conferred-upon-revenue-authority-not-include-power-review-final-order-assistant-commissioner\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/13\/inherent-powers-conferred-upon-revenue-authority-not-include-power-review-final-order-assistant-commissioner\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Inherent powers conferred upon Revenue Authority does not include the power to review final order of Assistant Commissioner"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":245920,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/22\/possession-of-properties\/","url_meta":{"origin":163384,"position":0},"title":"Kar HC | Assistant Commissioner and Tahsildar made a consorted effort to abuse their office to take possession of the properties, demolish them and dispossess the rightful owners","author":"Editor","date":"March 22, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: R. Devdas, J. allowed the petitions and quashed the impugned orders and directed not to act upon the recommendation of the National Commission of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. Background The facts of the case are such that one Sri Kaveriga was granted the land in question\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":206979,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/18\/discretionary-order-for-condonation-of-delay-passed-by-quasi-judicial-powers-cannot-be-interfered-with-in-writ-jurisdiction\/","url_meta":{"origin":163384,"position":1},"title":"Discretionary order for condonation of delay passed by quasi-judicial powers cannot be interfered with in writ jurisdiction","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 18, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Sanjeev Kumar, J., dismissed the current writ petition invoked for quashing the order of the district judge whereby the appeal of the petitioner was held as non maintainable and the order passed by the Assistant Labour Commissioner regarding the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":244051,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/19\/will\/","url_meta":{"origin":163384,"position":2},"title":"MP HC | Do the revenue authorities have jurisdiction to decide the correctness and genuineness of a \u201cWill\u201d? Court explains","author":"Editor","date":"February 19, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: G.S. Ahluwalia, J., disposed of a writ petition setting aside the orders passed by the Board of Revenue and Additional Commissioner in relation to a matter of Will. The petition contained that the husband of the petitioner had one-half share in the agricultural land bearing survey\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":300599,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/final-order-first-appeal-challenged-in-revision-under-s-210-up-revenue-code-allahabad-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":163384,"position":3},"title":"Revisional Court has power to rectify order of subordinate Revenue Court at any stage of the suit or proceedings: Allahabad High Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"September 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"To interpret 'proceeding decided' as entire proceedings and not a part of a proceeding would amount to restricting the exercise of revisional jurisdiction which is not as contemplated under Section 210 of UP Revenue Code.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allahabad high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":203819,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/16\/interim-relief-in-nature-of-final-order-cannot-be-granted-madhya-pradesh-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":163384,"position":4},"title":"Interim relief in nature of final order cannot be granted: Madhya Pradesh High Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 16, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: This petition was filed before a Single Judge Bench comprising of Anand Pathak, J., filed against an order where appointment of petitioner was put on hold. Facts of the case are that petitioner and respondent applied for a post of Anganwadi worker at Gram Panchayat where\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":210192,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/18\/pat-hc-restraint-on-operations-at-sand-ghaat-without-hearing-the-concerned-party-causes-loss-to-state-exchequer-and-is-unsustainable-in-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":163384,"position":5},"title":"Pat HC | Restraint on operations at sand ghaat without hearing the concerned party \u2013causes loss to State exchequer and is unsustainable in law","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 18, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: The Bench of Sanjay Priya, J. allowed a petition filed challenging an order vide which petitioner was restrained from taking sand from a ghaat settled in his favour. The instant petition had been filed being aggrieved by an order issued by the Assistant Director, Department of Mines\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/163384","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=163384"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/163384\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=163384"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=163384"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=163384"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}