{"id":161284,"date":"2017-10-03T16:58:54","date_gmt":"2017-10-03T11:28:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=161284"},"modified":"2017-10-03T16:58:54","modified_gmt":"2017-10-03T11:28:54","slug":"cbec-instructions-on-time-limit-for-review-of-orders","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/03\/cbec-instructions-on-time-limit-for-review-of-orders\/","title":{"rendered":"CBEC instructions on time limit for review of orders"},"content":{"rendered":"

Subject:<\/strong> Extension of time for review by Review Committees of Chief Commissioners or Commissioners of Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax under Section 129D(3) of the Customs Act, 1962 and Section 35E(3) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and Section 86(3) of the Finance Act, 1994<\/strong><\/p>\n

1. (a) Attention is invited to Section 1290(3) of the Customs Act, 1932 and Section 35E(3) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, wherein the time prescribed for review of the orders is three months from the date of the communication of the orders in original. This period is further extendable by another 30 days by the Board on sufficient cause being shown in the Customs and Central Excise Acts, However, as per Section 86(3) of the Finance Act, 1994, the period for Review is already prescribed as 4 months without any provisions for extension by the Board.<\/p>\n

(b) Further, in terms of Section 129A(1B) of the Customs Act, 1962 and Section 35B(1B) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and Section 86(1A) of the Finance Act, 1994, the review committees of the Commissioners for reviewing the orders in Appeal of the Commissioner (Appeals) is also appointed by the Board. The period of review is prescribed as 3 months without any extension provision.<\/p>\n

2. Despite the sufficient time limits provided in the said acts, instances have been noticed where the proposals for the constitution\/ re-constitution of the Review Committees of the Chief Commissioners, with or without the request to extend the time period by another 30 days are sent extremely close to the last. As a result, the time left for the Board to issue the Office Orders for the same, is too short, and it becomes very difficult to have the necessary action completed within the stipulated time.<\/p>\n

3. To obviate this situation, the following actions may be taken:<\/p>\n

a) It may kindly be ensured that, the self contained proposals for reconstitution of the review committees and\/or requests for extension of time period of review, must be sent to the Board at least 21 days prior to the last date of the review along with the reasons for the delay.<\/p>\n

b) The last date for review should be prominently indicated in the proposal.<\/p>\n

c) Suggestions for the reconstitution of the Review Committees of the Chief Commissioners or the Commissioners, as the case may be, are to be given.<\/p>\n

4. The above Instruction may kindly be noted for strict compliance.<\/p>\n

[F. No. 390\/Review\/49\/2017-JC]<\/p>\n

Central Board of Excise & Customs<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Subject: Extension of time for review by Review Committees of Chief Commissioners or Commissioners of Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax under <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":47661,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1188,2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-161284","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hot_off_the_press","category-news"],"yoast_head":"\nCBEC instructions on time limit for review of orders | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/03\/cbec-instructions-on-time-limit-for-review-of-orders\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"CBEC instructions on time limit for review of orders\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Subject: Extension of time for review by Review Committees of Chief Commissioners or Commissioners of Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax under\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/03\/cbec-instructions-on-time-limit-for-review-of-orders\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-10-03T11:28:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/centralboardofexcise.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/03\/cbec-instructions-on-time-limit-for-review-of-orders\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/03\/cbec-instructions-on-time-limit-for-review-of-orders\/\",\"name\":\"CBEC instructions on time limit for review of orders | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/03\/cbec-instructions-on-time-limit-for-review-of-orders\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/03\/cbec-instructions-on-time-limit-for-review-of-orders\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/centralboardofexcise.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-10-03T11:28:54+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/03\/cbec-instructions-on-time-limit-for-review-of-orders\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/03\/cbec-instructions-on-time-limit-for-review-of-orders\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/03\/cbec-instructions-on-time-limit-for-review-of-orders\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/centralboardofexcise.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/centralboardofexcise.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/03\/cbec-instructions-on-time-limit-for-review-of-orders\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"CBEC instructions on time limit for review of orders\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"CBEC instructions on time limit for review of orders | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/03\/cbec-instructions-on-time-limit-for-review-of-orders\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"CBEC instructions on time limit for review of orders","og_description":"Subject: Extension of time for review by Review Committees of Chief Commissioners or Commissioners of Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax under","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/03\/cbec-instructions-on-time-limit-for-review-of-orders\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-10-03T11:28:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/centralboardofexcise.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/03\/cbec-instructions-on-time-limit-for-review-of-orders\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/03\/cbec-instructions-on-time-limit-for-review-of-orders\/","name":"CBEC instructions on time limit for review of orders | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/03\/cbec-instructions-on-time-limit-for-review-of-orders\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/03\/cbec-instructions-on-time-limit-for-review-of-orders\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/centralboardofexcise.jpg","datePublished":"2017-10-03T11:28:54+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/03\/cbec-instructions-on-time-limit-for-review-of-orders\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/03\/cbec-instructions-on-time-limit-for-review-of-orders\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/03\/cbec-instructions-on-time-limit-for-review-of-orders\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/centralboardofexcise.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/centralboardofexcise.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/03\/cbec-instructions-on-time-limit-for-review-of-orders\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"CBEC instructions on time limit for review of orders"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/centralboardofexcise.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":284893,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/23\/madras-high-court-examines-the-scope-and-ambit-of-s-174-of-cgst-act-in-context-of-notifications-issued-under-the-repealed-tax-regime-dismisses-petition-filed-by-ar-rahman\/","url_meta":{"origin":161284,"position":0},"title":"Madras High Court examines the scope and ambit of S. 174 of CGST Act in context of Notifications issued under the repealed tax regime","author":"Editor","date":"February 23, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The practice and procedure, both pre and post GST are consistent and involve participation of the officer of the DGGI in issuance of show cause notices.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-455.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-455.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-455.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-455.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":313182,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/05\/high-court-jurisdiction-specifically-excluded-under-sec-35g-central-excise-act-jharkhand-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":161284,"position":1},"title":"High Court\u2019s jurisdiction specifically excluded under Section 35G of Central Excise Act: Jharkhand HC","author":"Ridhi","date":"February 5, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court said that one of the issues involved relates to determination of valuation of excisable goods and\/or rate of duty of excisable goods, amongst other things, for the purpose of assessment.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"jharkhand high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/jharkhand-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/jharkhand-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/jharkhand-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/jharkhand-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":264906,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/02\/whether-confiscation-by-custom-excise-authority-forfeits-the-claim-of-secured-creditor-over-such-property-whether-the-dues-of-excise-department-create-a-first-charge-sc-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":161284,"position":2},"title":"Whether confiscation by Custom & Excise Authority forfeits the claim of Secured Creditor over such property? Whether the dues of Excise department create a First Charge? SC answers","author":"Editor","date":"April 2, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Division Bench of L. Nageswara Rao and Vineet Saran*, JJ., quashed the confiscation order of Customs and Central Excise Commission confiscating land, building, plant and machinery of Rathi Ispat Ltd. for lacking statutory backing. The Bench observed that the existing law only permit confiscation of goods and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/photo_2022-04-01_23-36-58.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/photo_2022-04-01_23-36-58.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/photo_2022-04-01_23-36-58.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/photo_2022-04-01_23-36-58.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/photo_2022-04-01_23-36-58.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":257188,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/17\/cbdt-clarifies-pre-show-cause-notice-to-be-not-mandatory-for-cases-under-central-excise-act-1944-or-finance-act-1994-except-in-certain-cases\/","url_meta":{"origin":161284,"position":3},"title":"CBDT clarifies pre-show cause notice to be not mandatory for cases under Central Excise Act, 1944 or Finance Act 1994 except in certain cases","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"November 17, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs has issued clarification regarding pre-show cause notice consultation for cases vide circular dated November 11, 2021. It is clarified that pre-show cause notice consultation shall not be mandatory for cases under Central Excise Act, 1944 or Finance Act 1994 for recovery of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":196294,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/23\/cbic-monetary-limit-of-rs-2-5-lakh-fixed-for-filing-appeal-with-commissioner-a\/","url_meta":{"origin":161284,"position":4},"title":"CBIC: Monetary limit of Rs 2.5 Lakh fixed for filing appeal with Commissioner (A)","author":"Saba","date":"May 23, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"With a view to reduce government litigations,\u00a0 the Central Board of Indirect Taxes has introduced monetary limits at the level of Commissioner (Appeals), in legacy Central Excise and Service Tax matters only. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 35R of the Central Excise Act, 1944 made applicable to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Hot Off The Press"","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/centralboardofexcise.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/centralboardofexcise.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/centralboardofexcise.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/centralboardofexcise.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/centralboardofexcise.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":234243,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/19\/has-the-amendment-to-section-4-of-the-central-excise-act-1944-affected-the-method-of-determination-of-value-of-excisable-goods-sc-explains\/","url_meta":{"origin":161284,"position":5},"title":"Has the amendment to Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 affected the method of determination of value of excisable goods? SC explains","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"August 19, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Explaining the scheme of provisions under the Central Excise Act, 1944, the 3-judge bench of SA Bobde, CJ and AS Bopanna and V. Ramasubramanian, JJ has laid down elaborate principles that the Adjudicating Authorities has to keep in mind while determining the value of excisable goods. The said\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/161284","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=161284"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/161284\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/47661"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=161284"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=161284"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=161284"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}