{"id":159144,"date":"2017-09-25T14:47:27","date_gmt":"2017-09-25T09:17:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=159144"},"modified":"2017-10-06T18:03:15","modified_gmt":"2017-10-06T12:33:15","slug":"nclat-moratorium-will-not-affect-any-suit-or-case-pending-before-supreme-court-uart-32-or-any-high-court-uart-226","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/25\/nclat-moratorium-will-not-affect-any-suit-or-case-pending-before-supreme-court-uart-32-or-any-high-court-uart-226\/","title":{"rendered":"NCLAT: \u2018Moratorium\u2019 will not affect any suit or case pending before Supreme Court u\/Art. 32 or any High Court u\/Art. 226\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal:\u00a0<\/strong>Canara Bank, the appellant-financial creditor, challenged the impugned order passed by National Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench whereby while admitting the application preferred by Appellant under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 passed an order of moratorium thereby prohibiting the institution of suits or continuation of pending suits or proceedings except before the High Courts and Supreme Court of India, against the Corporate Debtor including execution of any judgment, decree or order in any court of law, Tribunal, arbitration panel or other authority.<\/p>\n

The counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant contended that the Adjudicating Authority cannot exclude any court from the purview of moratorium for the purpose of recovery of amount or execution of any judgment or decree, including the proceeding, if any, pending before the High Courts and Supreme Court of India against a \u2018corporate debtor\u2019. NCLAT while adjudicating the matter opined that Section 14 relates to \u2018Moratorium\u2019 which the Adjudicating Authority is required to declare at the time of admission of the application for \u2018corporate insolvency resolution The NCLAT stated that,<\/p>\n

“from Section 14(1) (a), it was clear that institution of suits or continuation of pending suits or proceedings against the corporate debtor including execution of any judgment, decree or order by any court of law, tribunal, arbitration panel or other authority come within the purview of \u2018moratorium\u2019 and that the said provision specifically did not exclude any Court, including the Hon\u2019ble High Courts or Hon\u2019ble Supreme Court of India.\u201d<\/p>\n

The NCLAT, dismissing the appeal, and further clarifying the impugned order passed by Tribunal relating to \u2018moratorium\u2019 held in clear terms that,<\/p>\n

\u201cThe Hon\u2019ble Supreme Court has power under Article 32 of the Constitution of India and Hon\u2019ble High Court under Article 226 of Constitution of India which power cannot be curtailed by any provision of an Act or a Court. In view of the aforesaid provision of law, we make it clear that \u2018moratorium\u2019 will not affect any suit or case pending before the Hon\u2019ble Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution of India or where an order is passed under Article 136 of Constitution of India. \u2018Moratorium\u2019 will also not affect the power of the High Court under Article 226 of Constitution of India. However, so far as suit, if filed before any High Court under original jurisdiction which is a money suit or suit for recovery, against the \u2018corporate debtor\u2019 such suit cannot proceed after declaration of \u2018moratorium\u2019, under Section 14 of the I&B Code.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u00a0[Canara Bank v. Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited, 2017 SCC OnLine NCLAT 255<\/a>, decided on 14.9.2017]<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal:\u00a0Canara Bank, the appellant-financial creditor, challenged the impugned order passed by National Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench whereby <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":153604,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[22064,22074,22804],"class_list":["post-159144","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code","tag-moratorium","tag-section-7"],"yoast_head":"\nNCLAT: \u2018Moratorium\u2019 will not affect any suit or case pending before Supreme Court u\/Art. 32 or any High Court u\/Art. 226\u00a0 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/25\/nclat-moratorium-will-not-affect-any-suit-or-case-pending-before-supreme-court-uart-32-or-any-high-court-uart-226\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"NCLAT: \u2018Moratorium\u2019 will not affect any suit or case pending before Supreme Court u\/Art. 32 or any High Court u\/Art. 226\u00a0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal:\u00a0Canara Bank, the appellant-financial creditor, challenged the impugned order passed by National Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench whereby\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/25\/nclat-moratorium-will-not-affect-any-suit-or-case-pending-before-supreme-court-uart-32-or-any-high-court-uart-226\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-09-25T09:17:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-10-06T12:33:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"844\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/25\/nclat-moratorium-will-not-affect-any-suit-or-case-pending-before-supreme-court-uart-32-or-any-high-court-uart-226\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/25\/nclat-moratorium-will-not-affect-any-suit-or-case-pending-before-supreme-court-uart-32-or-any-high-court-uart-226\/\",\"name\":\"NCLAT: \u2018Moratorium\u2019 will not affect any suit or case pending before Supreme Court u\/Art. 32 or any High Court u\/Art. 226\u00a0 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/25\/nclat-moratorium-will-not-affect-any-suit-or-case-pending-before-supreme-court-uart-32-or-any-high-court-uart-226\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/25\/nclat-moratorium-will-not-affect-any-suit-or-case-pending-before-supreme-court-uart-32-or-any-high-court-uart-226\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-09-25T09:17:27+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-06T12:33:15+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/25\/nclat-moratorium-will-not-affect-any-suit-or-case-pending-before-supreme-court-uart-32-or-any-high-court-uart-226\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/25\/nclat-moratorium-will-not-affect-any-suit-or-case-pending-before-supreme-court-uart-32-or-any-high-court-uart-226\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/25\/nclat-moratorium-will-not-affect-any-suit-or-case-pending-before-supreme-court-uart-32-or-any-high-court-uart-226\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":844},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/25\/nclat-moratorium-will-not-affect-any-suit-or-case-pending-before-supreme-court-uart-32-or-any-high-court-uart-226\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"NCLAT: \u2018Moratorium\u2019 will not affect any suit or case pending before Supreme Court u\/Art. 32 or any High Court u\/Art. 226\u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"NCLAT: \u2018Moratorium\u2019 will not affect any suit or case pending before Supreme Court u\/Art. 32 or any High Court u\/Art. 226\u00a0 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/25\/nclat-moratorium-will-not-affect-any-suit-or-case-pending-before-supreme-court-uart-32-or-any-high-court-uart-226\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"NCLAT: \u2018Moratorium\u2019 will not affect any suit or case pending before Supreme Court u\/Art. 32 or any High Court u\/Art. 226\u00a0","og_description":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal:\u00a0Canara Bank, the appellant-financial creditor, challenged the impugned order passed by National Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench whereby","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/25\/nclat-moratorium-will-not-affect-any-suit-or-case-pending-before-supreme-court-uart-32-or-any-high-court-uart-226\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-09-25T09:17:27+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-10-06T12:33:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":844,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/25\/nclat-moratorium-will-not-affect-any-suit-or-case-pending-before-supreme-court-uart-32-or-any-high-court-uart-226\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/25\/nclat-moratorium-will-not-affect-any-suit-or-case-pending-before-supreme-court-uart-32-or-any-high-court-uart-226\/","name":"NCLAT: \u2018Moratorium\u2019 will not affect any suit or case pending before Supreme Court u\/Art. 32 or any High Court u\/Art. 226\u00a0 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/25\/nclat-moratorium-will-not-affect-any-suit-or-case-pending-before-supreme-court-uart-32-or-any-high-court-uart-226\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/25\/nclat-moratorium-will-not-affect-any-suit-or-case-pending-before-supreme-court-uart-32-or-any-high-court-uart-226\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","datePublished":"2017-09-25T09:17:27+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-06T12:33:15+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/25\/nclat-moratorium-will-not-affect-any-suit-or-case-pending-before-supreme-court-uart-32-or-any-high-court-uart-226\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/25\/nclat-moratorium-will-not-affect-any-suit-or-case-pending-before-supreme-court-uart-32-or-any-high-court-uart-226\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/25\/nclat-moratorium-will-not-affect-any-suit-or-case-pending-before-supreme-court-uart-32-or-any-high-court-uart-226\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","width":1330,"height":844},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/25\/nclat-moratorium-will-not-affect-any-suit-or-case-pending-before-supreme-court-uart-32-or-any-high-court-uart-226\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"NCLAT: \u2018Moratorium\u2019 will not affect any suit or case pending before Supreme Court u\/Art. 32 or any High Court u\/Art. 226\u00a0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":280511,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/01\/the-intersection-between-arbitration-and-insolvency-proceedings-an-indian-perspective\/","url_meta":{"origin":159144,"position":0},"title":"The Intersection between Arbitration and Insolvency Proceedings: An Indian Perspective","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 1, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Devna Arora* and Didon Misri**","rel":"","context":"In "OP. ED."","block_context":{"text":"OP. ED.","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Indian Perspective","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-51.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":174734,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/12\/arbitration-clause-cannot-invoked-moratorium\/","url_meta":{"origin":159144,"position":1},"title":"Arbitration clause cannot be invoked during moratorium","author":"Saba","date":"December 12, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal: In the judgment delivered by S.J. Mukhopadhaya (Chairperson), A.I.S. Cheema (Judicial Member) and Balvinder Singh (Technical Member) dismissed all the appeals arising out of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process initiated against the appellants (corporate debtors). National Company Law Tribunal had admitted the application against the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":270901,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/30\/entertainment-city-ltd-an-affiliate-of-united-group-nclat-grants-moratorium-benefits\/","url_meta":{"origin":159144,"position":2},"title":"Entertainment City Ltd an ‘affiliate’ of United Group; NCLAT grants Moratorium Benefits","author":"Editor","date":"July 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi: The Bench of Ashok Kumar Bhushan, J., Chairperson, M. Satyanarayana Murthy, J., Judicial Member, and Barun Mitra, Technical Member set aside an order given by the National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi (NCLT, New Delhi) and held that the Appellant, Entertainment\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":236343,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/27\/cheque-proceedings-against-a-company-during-insolvency-proceedings-a-legal-complication-scc-archives\/","url_meta":{"origin":159144,"position":3},"title":"Cheque Proceedings Against a Company During Insolvency Proceedings – A Legal Complication [SCC Archives]","author":"Editor","date":"September 27, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"by Akaant Kumar Mittal\u2020","rel":"","context":"In "OP. ED."","block_context":{"text":"OP. ED.","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":203934,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/18\/nclt-not-to-entertain-application-under-section-9-ib-code-before-expiry-of-10-days-from-date-of-giving-notice-under-section-81-nclat\/","url_meta":{"origin":159144,"position":4},"title":"NCLT not to entertain application under Section 9 I&B Code before expiry of 10 days from date of giving notice under Section 8(1): NCLAT","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 18, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A two-member bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial) allowed an appeal filed against an order of National Company Law Tribunal (Mumbai). The respondent preferred an application under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":264487,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/26\/national-company-law-tribunal-orders-insolvency-proceedings-against-supertech\/","url_meta":{"origin":159144,"position":5},"title":"National Company Law Tribunal orders insolvency proceedings against Supertech: Indebted and defaulted repayment of loan","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi: The Coram of P.N. Prasad, Judicial Member and Rahul Bhatnagar, Technical Member, declared insolvency proceedings against the builder Supertech Limited. An application was filed to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against Supertech Limited under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/NCLT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/NCLT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/NCLT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/NCLT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/NCLT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/159144","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=159144"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/159144\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/153604"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=159144"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=159144"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=159144"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}