{"id":158584,"date":"2017-09-23T16:00:31","date_gmt":"2017-09-23T10:30:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=158584"},"modified":"2017-09-23T14:29:19","modified_gmt":"2017-09-23T08:59:19","slug":"2017-scc-vol-8-september-21-2017-part-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/23\/2017-scc-vol-8-september-21-2017-part-2\/","title":{"rendered":"2017 SCC Vol. 8 September 21, 2017 Part 2"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sale of Goods Act, 1930 \u2014 Ss. 4 and 19 to 22 \u2014 When and where title passes to purchaser:<\/strong> When and where title passes can be ascertained from intention of parties. Intention of parties can be ascertained from terms of contract. If intention is not clear in contract, that is, if it is an unconditional contract, rules in Ss. 20 to 24, Sale of Goods Act, 1930 have to be applied. [Arihant Udyog v. State of Rajasthan, (2017) 8 SCC 220<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Contract and Specific Relief \u2014 Remedies\/Relief \u2014 Remedies for Breach of Contract \u2014 Damages:<\/strong> Party claiming compensation must establish that breach was cause for loss of anticipated profit. Causal connection between breach and loss is essential. Breach should be sufficiently substantial cause of loss. Remoteness of damage has also to be determined on basis whether loss was within reasonable contemplation of parties. No compensation is payable for making bad bargain. [Kanchan Udyog Ltd. v. United Spirits Ltd., (2017) 8 SCC 237<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Service Law \u2014 Seniority \u2014 Determination of seniority \u2014 Conditional absorption:<\/strong> Benefit of service rendered in previous cadre in equivalent post to deputationists who were subsequently absorbed in transferee department on specific terms and conditions in terms of which past service in previous department as well as period of service rendered on deputation was denied, cannot be granted. [Mrigank Johri v. Union of India, (2017) 8 SCC 256<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Transfer of Property Act, 1882 \u2014 Ss. 60 proviso and 91:<\/strong> Mortgagor\u2019s right of redemption under S. 60 can stand extinguished under proviso thereto by act of parties or decree of court. Right of purchaser of right of redemption under S. 91 would also be subject to same limitation under proviso to S. 60 and he cannot claim to have better right than his predecessor-in-interest. [Allokam Peddabbayya v. Allahabad Bank, (2017) 8 SCC 272<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Government Contracts and Tenders \u2014 Auction\/Bidding\/Tender Process\/Rejection of Bid\/Tender:<\/strong> A single entity can bid for itself and it can consist of its constituents which are wholly owned subsidiaries and they may have experience in relation to the project. Where the singular or unified entity claims that as a consequence of merger, all the subsidiaries form a homogenous pool under its immediate control in respect of rights, liabilities, assets and obligations, the integrity of the singular entity as owning such rights, assets and liabilities cannot be ignored and must be given effect. The identity of the entities as belonging to the Government when established can be treated as a Government-owned entity and the experience claimed by the parent of the subsidiaries can be taken into consideration. [CRRC Corpn. Ltd. v. Metro Link Express For Gandhinagar & Ahmedabad (Mega) Co. Ltd., (2017) 8 SCC 282<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Customs Tariff Act, 1975 \u2014 Ss. 9-A(1) and (5) \u2014 Anti-dumping duty, during the pendency of review exercise:<\/strong> Anti-dumping duty is not automatically imposable. Issuance of a notification is necessary for extending the period of antidumping duty as no duty or tax can be imposed without the authority of \u201claw\u201d. Therefore, the duty would not automatically continue after the expiry of five years simply because review exercise was initiated before the expiry of the said period. Hence, order of continuation of anti-dumping duty made after expiry of duty period is invalid. [Union of India v. Kumho Petrochemicals Co. Ltd., (2017) 8 SCC 307<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Service Law \u2014 Promotion \u2014 Norms\/Principles\/Rules applicable \u2014 Determinative date for \u2014 CGO No. 02\/2005 or CGO No. 02\/2009 dt. 19-6-2009 \u2014 Posts of IG (Coast Guards) sanctioned on 22-5-2009 and 23-6-2009 \u2014 DPC convened on 23-7-2009:<\/strong> Determinative date for applicability of procedure would be date of convening of DPC and procedure prevalent on that date would be applicable. [Union of India v. K.P.S. Raghuvanshi, (2017) 8 SCC 334<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Electricity Duty Act, 1958 (40 of 1958) \u2014 S. 3(2)(vii)(a)(i) \u2014 Exemption from payment of duty on electricity generated for captive use \u2014 Non-grant of:<\/strong> In this case Appellant 2 had been constituted as a special purpose vehicle for supply of power to Appellant 1 Company in which Appellant 1 had 42% shareholding but out of the 515 MW capacity, 300 MW capacity had also been allocated to the Gujarat Electricity Board. It was held that the statutory scheme for grant of exemption had to be strictly construed. Since, Appellant 2 was not jointly generating energy with Gujarat Electricity Board and was selling the energy to the extent of 300 MW to Gujarat Electricity Board, the conditions of the statutory provisions of S. 3(2)(vii)(a) were not fulfilled, namely, generation of energy for own use. Therefore, Appellant 1 was not entitled to exemption. [Essar Steel India Ltd. v. State of Gujarat, (2017) 8 SCC 357<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 11(6) and 12(5) \u2014 Appointment of arbitrator by parties \u2014 When can be adjudicated upon by Court:<\/strong> The courts, in proceeding under S. 11 of the Act, can exercise the jurisdiction to nullify the appointments made by the authorities when there has been failure of procedure or ex facie contravention of the inherent facets of the arbitration clause. [TRF Ltd. v. Energo Engineering Projects Ltd., (2017) 8 SCC 377<\/a>]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sale of Goods Act, 1930 \u2014 Ss. 4 and 19 to 22 \u2014 When and where title passes to purchaser: When and <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":102451,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-158584","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casesreported","category-supremecourtcases"],"yoast_head":"\n2017 SCC Vol. 8 September 21, 2017 Part 2 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/23\/2017-scc-vol-8-september-21-2017-part-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"2017 SCC Vol. 8 September 21, 2017 Part 2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Sale of Goods Act, 1930 \u2014 Ss. 4 and 19 to 22 \u2014 When and where title passes to purchaser: When and\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/23\/2017-scc-vol-8-september-21-2017-part-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-09-23T10:30:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/23\/2017-scc-vol-8-september-21-2017-part-2\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/23\/2017-scc-vol-8-september-21-2017-part-2\/\",\"name\":\"2017 SCC Vol. 8 September 21, 2017 Part 2 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/23\/2017-scc-vol-8-september-21-2017-part-2\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/23\/2017-scc-vol-8-september-21-2017-part-2\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-09-23T10:30:31+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/23\/2017-scc-vol-8-september-21-2017-part-2\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/23\/2017-scc-vol-8-september-21-2017-part-2\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/23\/2017-scc-vol-8-september-21-2017-part-2\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/23\/2017-scc-vol-8-september-21-2017-part-2\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"2017 SCC Vol. 8 September 21, 2017 Part 2\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"2017 SCC Vol. 8 September 21, 2017 Part 2 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/23\/2017-scc-vol-8-september-21-2017-part-2\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"2017 SCC Vol. 8 September 21, 2017 Part 2","og_description":"Sale of Goods Act, 1930 \u2014 Ss. 4 and 19 to 22 \u2014 When and where title passes to purchaser: When and","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/23\/2017-scc-vol-8-september-21-2017-part-2\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-09-23T10:30:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/23\/2017-scc-vol-8-september-21-2017-part-2\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/23\/2017-scc-vol-8-september-21-2017-part-2\/","name":"2017 SCC Vol. 8 September 21, 2017 Part 2 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/23\/2017-scc-vol-8-september-21-2017-part-2\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/23\/2017-scc-vol-8-september-21-2017-part-2\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","datePublished":"2017-09-23T10:30:31+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/23\/2017-scc-vol-8-september-21-2017-part-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/23\/2017-scc-vol-8-september-21-2017-part-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/23\/2017-scc-vol-8-september-21-2017-part-2\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/23\/2017-scc-vol-8-september-21-2017-part-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"2017 SCC Vol. 8 September 21, 2017 Part 2"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":213972,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/26\/unliquidated-damages-concept-genesis-and-calculation\/","url_meta":{"origin":158584,"position":0},"title":"Unliquidated Damages \u2013 Concept, Genesis and\u00a0Calculation","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 26, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Bhumesh Verma, Managing Partner and Aditi Duggal, Student Researcher, Corp Comm Legal Cite as: (2019) PL (CL) February 89","rel":"","context":"In "OP. ED."","block_context":{"text":"OP. ED.","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/UNLIQUIDATED-DAMAGES.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/UNLIQUIDATED-DAMAGES.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/UNLIQUIDATED-DAMAGES.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/UNLIQUIDATED-DAMAGES.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/UNLIQUIDATED-DAMAGES.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":263340,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/09\/compensation-payable-under-ss-73-74-and-75-are-only-for-loss-or-damage-caused-by-breach-or-inclusive-of-mere-act-of-breach-as-well\/","url_meta":{"origin":158584,"position":1},"title":"Compensation payable under Ss. 73, 74 and 75 are only for loss or damage caused by breach or inclusive of mere act of breach as well? Ker HC explains","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 9, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: The Division Bench of P.B. Suresh Kumar and C.S. Sudha, JJ., expressed that, \"...compensation payable under Sections 73, 74 as also under Section 75 is only for loss or damage caused by the breach and not account of the mere act of breach. If in any case\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":244975,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/04\/lost-profit-damages-a-paradise-not-yet-lost\/","url_meta":{"origin":158584,"position":2},"title":"Lost Profit Damages: A Paradise (Not Yet) Lost","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 4, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by Hasit B. Seth\u2020 Cite as: 2021 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 12","rel":"","context":"In "'Lex Mercatoria' by Hasit Seth"","block_context":{"text":"'Lex Mercatoria' by Hasit Seth","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/individual\/lex-mercatoria-by-hasit-seth\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/hasith-12.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/hasith-12.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/hasith-12.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/hasith-12.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/hasith-12.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298039,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/30\/supplier-cannot-treat-non-payment-of-goods-as-ground-for-non-delivery-of-balance-goods-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":158584,"position":3},"title":"Never Reported Judgment | When contract is not for delivery of goods in installments, supplier cannot treat non-payment of goods as ground for non-delivery of balance goods [1951 SCC 267]","author":"Simranjeet","date":"July 30, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"This report covers the Supreme Court's Never Reported Judgment dating back to the year 1951 on breach of contract.","rel":"","context":"In "Cases Reported"","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"breach of contract","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/breach-of-contract.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/breach-of-contract.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/breach-of-contract.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/breach-of-contract.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":281059,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/05\/loss-of-profits-awarded-by-arbitral-tribunal-disallowed-by-commercial-court-sikkim-high-court-set-aside-order-passed-by-commercial-courts-restored-award-passed-by-tribunal-legal-news-legal-research-up\/","url_meta":{"origin":158584,"position":4},"title":"Can Courts re-appreciate evidence under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act and treat High Courts as regular first Court of Appeal? Sikkim High Court answers in Negative","author":"Editor","date":"January 5, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court observed that the Tribunal after holding that there was a fundamental breach of contract, factored in the contributory delay caused by the appellant and fairly awarded \u2018Loss of Profit\u2019 by slashing it to 50% of the original claim put forth by the appellant.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Sikkim High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image104.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":337728,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/23\/flying-in-the-face-how-consumer-forums-are-ignoring-the-fateh-chand-dicta\/","url_meta":{"origin":158584,"position":5},"title":"Flying in the Face: How Consumer Forums are Ignoring the Fateh Chand Dicta","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 23, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"by Deepak Singh\u2020","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Consumer Forums","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Consumer-Forums.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Consumer-Forums.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Consumer-Forums.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Consumer-Forums.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/158584","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=158584"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/158584\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/102451"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=158584"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=158584"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=158584"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}