{"id":158024,"date":"2017-09-18T17:23:45","date_gmt":"2017-09-18T11:53:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=158024"},"modified":"2017-09-28T16:03:15","modified_gmt":"2017-09-28T10:33:15","slug":"scrutinize-the-allegations-carefully-against-close-relatives-of-husband-when-fir-is-filed-under-s-498-a-ipc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/18\/scrutinize-the-allegations-carefully-against-close-relatives-of-husband-when-fir-is-filed-under-s-498-a-ipc\/","title":{"rendered":"Scrutinize the allegations carefully against close relatives of husband when FIR is filed under S. 498-A IPC"},"content":{"rendered":"

Punjab and Haryana High Court:<\/strong> The High Court recently addressed the case of petitioners under Section 482 CrPC for quashing the FIR filed under Sections 323, 406, 498-A, 420, 506 and 120-B IPC on the ground that they had been falsely implicated in the case. Petitioner 1\u00a0 was the mother-in-law of the complainant who lodged complaint against her as well as her husband after the matrimonial relations of complainant and her husband did not remain cordial any more.<\/p>\n

After the registration of FIR, when the DSP thoroughly investigated into the matter, he concluded that the dispute was between the husband and wife and no role could be attributed to Kamaljit Kaur- the petitioner. After this, the complainant prepared a Divorce Deed in which she had clearly testified that she was giving divorce to her husband and had received lump sum money from the petitioner as life time maintenance as well as alimony.<\/p>\n

However after this, the complainant filed a complaint against the petitioner under Section 156(3) CrPC before the Magistrate alleging the demand of dowry from her. The petitioner now before the High Court contended that she had been roped in the case without any adequate reasons and that the dispute was between her daughter-in-law and the son who does not even reside with them, but in Canada. The petitioner also highlighted the contents of the \u2018Divorce Deed\u2019 that had been signed by the complainant.<\/p>\n

The Court looked into the antecedents of the case and found that main allegations of the complainant have been against her husband that he solemnized another marriage in Canada after taking dowry from her father and did not talk to her after that and so on. The Court observed that the allegations were general in nature qua the petitioners and thus, not sustainable. Also, the Bench of Jaishree Thakur, J. said that details made out in the FIR do not satisfy the ingredients of Sections 406 and 498-A against the petitioners.<\/p>\n

The Bench cited Preeti Gupta<\/em> v. State of Jharkhand<\/em>, (2010) 7 SCC 667<\/a> in support of its observations in which it has been laid down by the Supreme Court that the allegations of harassment of husband’s close relations to the complainant filing under Section 498-A, should be scrutinized with great care and circumspection. It further considered the fact that the petitioner had already paid maintenance to the complainant and was also looking after the minor child of complainant and her husband, it decide to accept the petition and quash the FIR against petitioners. [Kamaljit Kaur @ Kamla Devi v. State of Haryana, 2017 SCC OnLine P&H 2344<\/a>, decided on 15.09.2017]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Punjab and Haryana High Court: The High Court recently addressed the case of petitioners under Section 482 CrPC for quashing the FIR <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[23034,3000,23024],"class_list":["post-158024","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-allegations","tag-harassment","tag-s-498-a-ipc"],"yoast_head":"\nScrutinize the allegations carefully against close relatives of husband when FIR is filed under S. 498-A IPC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/18\/scrutinize-the-allegations-carefully-against-close-relatives-of-husband-when-fir-is-filed-under-s-498-a-ipc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Scrutinize the allegations carefully against close relatives of husband when FIR is filed under S. 498-A IPC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Punjab and Haryana High Court: The High Court recently addressed the case of petitioners under Section 482 CrPC for quashing the FIR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/18\/scrutinize-the-allegations-carefully-against-close-relatives-of-husband-when-fir-is-filed-under-s-498-a-ipc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-09-18T11:53:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-09-28T10:33:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/panjab_and_hariyana_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Saba\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/18\/scrutinize-the-allegations-carefully-against-close-relatives-of-husband-when-fir-is-filed-under-s-498-a-ipc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/18\/scrutinize-the-allegations-carefully-against-close-relatives-of-husband-when-fir-is-filed-under-s-498-a-ipc\/\",\"name\":\"Scrutinize the allegations carefully against close relatives of husband when FIR is filed under S. 498-A IPC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-09-18T11:53:45+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-28T10:33:15+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/18\/scrutinize-the-allegations-carefully-against-close-relatives-of-husband-when-fir-is-filed-under-s-498-a-ipc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/18\/scrutinize-the-allegations-carefully-against-close-relatives-of-husband-when-fir-is-filed-under-s-498-a-ipc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/18\/scrutinize-the-allegations-carefully-against-close-relatives-of-husband-when-fir-is-filed-under-s-498-a-ipc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Scrutinize the allegations carefully against close relatives of husband when FIR is filed under S. 498-A IPC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785\",\"name\":\"Saba\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Saba\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Scrutinize the allegations carefully against close relatives of husband when FIR is filed under S. 498-A IPC | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/18\/scrutinize-the-allegations-carefully-against-close-relatives-of-husband-when-fir-is-filed-under-s-498-a-ipc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Scrutinize the allegations carefully against close relatives of husband when FIR is filed under S. 498-A IPC","og_description":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: The High Court recently addressed the case of petitioners under Section 482 CrPC for quashing the FIR","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/18\/scrutinize-the-allegations-carefully-against-close-relatives-of-husband-when-fir-is-filed-under-s-498-a-ipc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2017-09-18T11:53:45+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-09-28T10:33:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/panjab_and_hariyana_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Saba","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Saba","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/18\/scrutinize-the-allegations-carefully-against-close-relatives-of-husband-when-fir-is-filed-under-s-498-a-ipc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/18\/scrutinize-the-allegations-carefully-against-close-relatives-of-husband-when-fir-is-filed-under-s-498-a-ipc\/","name":"Scrutinize the allegations carefully against close relatives of husband when FIR is filed under S. 498-A IPC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-09-18T11:53:45+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-28T10:33:15+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/18\/scrutinize-the-allegations-carefully-against-close-relatives-of-husband-when-fir-is-filed-under-s-498-a-ipc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/18\/scrutinize-the-allegations-carefully-against-close-relatives-of-husband-when-fir-is-filed-under-s-498-a-ipc\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/18\/scrutinize-the-allegations-carefully-against-close-relatives-of-husband-when-fir-is-filed-under-s-498-a-ipc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Scrutinize the allegations carefully against close relatives of husband when FIR is filed under S. 498-A IPC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/e8e76b10dfc9c0d576324bfdbb2c2785","name":"Saba","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a815285315cd85d8b3246c60ed8ed99825949c1b85b370c49212daa54ededa98?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Saba"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_2\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":209547,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/06\/del-hc-in-laws-discharged-of-s-498-ipc-where-complainant-roped-in-all-family-members-without-ascribing-specific-rules\/","url_meta":{"origin":158024,"position":0},"title":"Del HC | In-laws discharged of S. 498-A IPC where complainant roped in all family members without ascribing specific roles","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 6, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. dismissed a petition filed against the judgment of Revisional Court whereby petitioner's \/ complainant's in-laws were discharged of the offences under \u00a0Sections 498-A and 34 IPC. In 2013, petitioner had filed an FIR against her husband and in-laws alleging harassment. It was alleged that her\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":269065,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/27\/karnataka-high-court-illicit-relationship-with-husband-of-the-complainant-not-necessary-ground-to-constitute-offence-under-s-498-a-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":158024,"position":1},"title":"Karnataka High Court | Illicit relationship with husband of the complainant not necessary ground to constitute offence under S. 498-A IPC","author":"Editor","date":"June 27, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Karnataka High Court: Hemant Chandangoudar J. quashed the FIR against accused 5 being the woman who had illicit relations with the husband of the complainant, for the offence punishable under Section 498-A Penal Code, 1860 (\u2018IPC'). An FIR was filed by R2, being the legally wedded wife of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Karnataka High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":251549,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/20\/cruelty-5\/","url_meta":{"origin":158024,"position":2},"title":"AP HC | Is girlfriend or concubine a “relative” of husband, liable to be prosecuted for cruelty under S. 498-A IPC? Court decides","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 20, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Andhra Pradesh High Court, Amaravati: Cheekati Manavendranath Roy, J., addresses whether a girlfriend or concubine who is not connected by blood or marriage can be prosecuted under Section 498-A of Penal Code, 1860. In the instant matter, it was stated that a case under Sections 498-A, 114 Penal Code, 1860\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":229693,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/18\/ph-hc-disgruntled-wives-use-provisions-of-s-498-a-ipc-as-a-weapon-rather-than-shield\/","url_meta":{"origin":158024,"position":3},"title":"P&H HC | Disgruntled wives use provisions of S. 498- A IPC as a weapon rather than shield","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 18, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court:\u00a0Jaishree Thakur, J., allowed a petition filed under Section 482 CrPC and held that, \"Disgruntled wives use the provisions of Section 498- A IPC as a weapon rather than shield.\" Petitioners have been summoned to face trial under Sections 498-A, 506, 120-B Penal Code, 1860 an\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":215706,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/14\/del-hc-wife-entitled-to-lodge-fir-under-s-498-a-ipc-from-parental-place-where-she-takes-refuge-even-in-absence-of-allegation-of-harassment-at-the-said-place\/","url_meta":{"origin":158024,"position":4},"title":"Del HC | Wife entitled to lodge FIR under S. 498-A IPC from parental place where she takes refuge even in absence of allegation of harassment at the said place","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 14, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Mukta Gupta, J. dismissed a writ petition wherein the petitioner husband sought quashing\u00a0of FIR registered under Section 498-A, 406 and 34 IPC at Police Station, Paschim Vihar, Delhi. The petitioner, who was represented by Hitender Kapur, Advocate, took three grounds seeking to quash FIR:\u00a0(i)\u00a0lack of territorial jurisdiction contending\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":297718,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/26\/second-wife-complaint-section-498-a-penal-code-not-maintainable-karnataka-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":158024,"position":5},"title":"Complaint under S. 498-A, IPC filed by the second wife against the husband and in-laws cannot be maintainable: Karnataka High Court","author":"Sucheta","date":"July 26, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court pointed out that \u2018woman\u2019 as per S. 498-A, IPC means and includes a legally wedded wife.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"karnataka high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/158024","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=158024"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/158024\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=158024"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=158024"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=158024"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}